|
Books by
Rose Ure Mezu
Women
in Chains: Abandonment in Love Relationships in the
Fiction of Selected West African Writers (1994)
/
Songs of the Hearth
(1993) /
Homage to My People
(2004) /
A History of Africana Women's Literature (2004)
Black
Nationalists: Reconsidering Du Bois, Garvey, Booker T. &
Nkrumah (1999)
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works (2006)
*
* * * *
An Africana
Blueprint for Living
in the 3rd Millennium
Global Community1: An Essay
By Rose Ure Mezu Achebean thoughts have profound Global signification.
Pardonably, peoples of African descent tend to think of
Chinua Achebe only in terms of cultural redefinition and
authentication. But I posit that there are multiple
layers of the writer’s humanistic, poetic, philosophical
and intellectual worldview - his vision de monde – if
you will (see
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works).
Above all, with his many writings, Achebe attempts to
provide clarification about ways to tackle the problems
besieging Africa, Diasporan African peoples, and the
modern global youth, so as to promote understanding
among peoples and nations.
In Achebean fictional universe, the author is not dead
but very much alive within the human community.
Consequently, the following Achebean thoughts can serve
as blueprint and guide for negotiating the choppy,
cultural waters of modern living in a Third Millennium
Global Community:
Africa’s Precolonial Inheritance
and Colonial Rule as Africa’s own Middle Passage
The point is restated ad infinitum
that Africa is an ancient civilization with a holistic
way of life. The ancient Africans did not need the West
to teach them about God; they lived and moved, and had
their being in the Godhead; nor did they require
assistance on how to organize their society. The
ancient Africans could do so, all by themselves. For
this reason, the first part of Things Fall Apart (TFA)
avoids any mention of European colonials. This is a
conscious effort to recreate a cultural way of life
which Achebe acknowledges is his own, and African
peoples’ “Pre-colonial Inheritance.”
For continental Africans, colonial
rule became their Middle Passage. Achebe’s
tradition-based novels, TFA and Arrow of God,
were thus carefully crafted to counter the stereotype of
the African as a savage, without culture seen in books
by Joyce Carey (Mr. Johnson, The African Witch),
H. Ryder Haggard (King Solomon’s Mines, Ayesha),
and Joseph Conrad’s The Heart of Darkness
(1899).
This is similar to Edward Said’s
evaluative critique of Orientalism defined as an
ideology that depicts persons from the Orient as
eccentric, backward, sensual, passive and separate as
the non-Western Other; an individual considered
inferior, conquerable and therefore to be
rechristianized / civilized to accept the values of the
dominant society. In Said’s words, “Orientalism was
ultimately a political vision of reality whose structure
promoted the difference between the familiar (Europe,
West, "us") and the strange (the Orient, the East,
"them").” For his part, in order to remedy this
estrangement of the natives from themselves, Achebe
therefore vows through his tradition-based stories:
|
[...] to help my society regain belief in
itself and put away the complexes of the
years of denigration and self-abasement [. .
. ] [f]or no thinking African [Black] can
escape the wound on his soul [. . . ] I
would be quite satisfied if my novels
(especially the ones I set in the past) did
no more than teach my readers that their
past--with all its imperfections--was not
one long night of savagery from which the
first European acting on God's behalf
delivered us (“The Novelist as a Teacher“ in
MYOCD 45). |
However, because the West and the
colonized Others are inextricably linked for good or for
bad, there can be no complete rejection / denial of
existing differences, but rather a re-evaluation of such
differences in a more critical and objective fashion to
enable a peaceful cohabitation in a Third Millennium
global community
Tradition of Cultural Nationalism:
Colonialist Criticism as Forerunner to Post-Colonial
Critical Theories
Chinua Achebe is considered father of
modern African literature. Even though, he modestly
disclaims laying a “proprietary hand” on African art
which he regards as a “communal enterprise in
creativity, as seen in the Mbari art tradition of the
Igbos (“African Literature as Restoration of
Celebration” 1), Achebe does lay a sort of claim all the
same, as seen in this response:
|
I think what we did was literally to create
African Literature [. . . ] There may be
different opinions about the quality of
particular texts but nobody anywhere who
lays any claims to being knowledgeable can
ignore African literature now (Daily
Times. Nov. 18, 1989, 12). |
And the secret of this
self-confidence comes from his prescription as to how to
combat colonial and postcolonial exploitation, which is:
the best education possible. Armed with the best
philosophical, critical, and creative tools that the
West could offer, he embarked on a revisionist course,
and inaugurated what was called “Colonialist Criticism”
which naturally became a fore-runner to what today is
called “Post-colonialism in Criticism and Theory.”
Achebe cites a character in Senegalese writer Cheikh
Hamidou Kane’s Ambiguous Adventure who says to a
white Frenchman,
|
We have not had the same past you and
ourselves, but we shall have strictly
the same future
(qtd. in “African Literature as Restoration
of Celebration,” 10; my emphasis). |
Interpretively,
this means that we are now in an age of Globalization
which calls for multiculturalism, not monoculturalism.
Monoculturalism is a unidimensional view of one’s
culture as being putatively superior; it carries with it
the arrogance of a unversalist perspective that not only
degrades its subject victims but blinds its
practitioners. Universalism2, Achebe opines,
should be banned because it is only life seen from an
ethno-European angle.
Molefi Asante re-emphasizes that
Eurocentrism is an “ethnocentric view posing as a
universal view” (“What is Afrocentrism?” 15). In much
the same fashion, Feminism is a narrow Euro-ethnic
bourgeois view of the woman question necessitating
Womanism to serve the needs of the women “Others.”
Equally, Feminism speaks of racial arrogance when an
ethnic view of life is made to represent a global view.
African American literary icon Ishmael Reed3 (Japanese
By Spring) as an exponent of multiculturalism
continues to harp on the theme of an expanded plurifocal,
ethnically-varied human community.
The Cultural Encodes the Political
Next, Achebe believes that Cultural
Writing is as effective as, or even more so than,
political activism. But, how do peoples of African
descent reclaim pride of self and community? The answer
is: through a tradition of Cultural Nationalism arrived
at by way of telling stories. No foreigner, Achebe
concludes, can tell “my” story for “me,” no matter how
talented, or knowledgeable. Stories, Achebe believes,
“are not innocent; they can be used to put you in the
wrong crowd, in the party of the man who has come to
dispossess you” (“African Literature as Restoration of
Celebration” 7), who with determined earnestness, lays a
claim to your territory, then carves out a space for
you, and wants you to be content with that slice of
life.
But writers who symbolically used to
belong to a sacred but lofty profession have
metamorphosed into writers as intellectuals now
testifying to their regions’ experiences, thereby giving
these experiences public exposure in the agenda of
global discourse. Thus, today’s writer has become
society’s critic—the sensitive point of the community,
guide, prophet, visionary. Consequently, Achebe’s very
sophisticated 1987 Anthills of the Savannah
(Chapter 5 of
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works)
is meant to be a panegyric to all writers / artists.
It celebrates the primacy of Writing
as the one art par excellence. The writer as
storyteller—griot—gives political leaders headache
because s/he elucidates the problem, challenges and
seeks to defeat an imposed and sometimes the quiet
”normalcy” of unseen hegemonic forces. The storyteller
does, as the Hellenic gadfly Socrates did (to his peril)
make the citizenry think and start to question how they
are governed. This has universal application.
To hammer home this ideological
paradigm, Achebe uses the Igbo metaphor of Nkolika
– “Recalling-Is-Greatest” (which also re-emphasizes
storytelling as a female artform) to establish the
primacy of storytelling, an art which like woman which
nurtures, shapes, and reshapes humankind. The story,
Achebe insists, contains the literary DNA that is passed
on to future generations:
|
The sounding of the battle-drum is
important; the fierce waging of the war
itself is important; and the telling of the
story afterwards—each is important in its
own way. I tell you, there is not one of
them we could do without. But if you ask me
which of them takes the eagle-feather
[notice this metaphor that comes from the
African rain forest], I will say boldly: the
Story. Recalling-Is-Greatest. Why?
Because it is only the story that can
continue beyond the war and the warrior. It
is the story that outlives the sound of
war-drums and the exploits of brave
fighters. It is the story, not the others,
that saves our progeny from blundering like
blind beggars into the spikes of the cactus
fence. The story is our
escort; without it, we are blind [. . .] the
story is everlasting . (Anthills
of the Savannah
123-4; my emphasis). |
Art and Functionalism
Achebe thus takes a stand against a
purely abstract / esthetic use of art (writing), arguing
instead for committed, functional art that serves a
social purpose. In “The Novelist as a Teacher,” Achebe
speaks of an earnestness “appropriate to my situation.
Why? Because I have a deep-seated need to alter things
within that situation, to find for myself a little more
room than has been allowed me in the world” (Chinua
Achebe: the Man and His Works 14). Interpretively,
he is saying that most conflicts have their genesis in
claims of superior power, space (land – metaphorical or
otherwise), or the lack thereof.
The West runs the world, and things
turned upside down must be rectified. The current tragic
conflicts in the Middle East, with suicide bombers to
boot, ready to die in order to resist “occupation” serve
as cases in point. However, the writer as an
intellectual, while not resorting to the violence of
weaponry, yet understands the issues at stake and can
change such notions of power, superiority, and
appropriation of space.
Through the earnestness of
storytelling, or writing as an art, the writer seeks to
change an unjust status quo. Jesus Christ, Frederick
Douglass, W.E.B. Du Bois, Karl Marx, Mahatma Gandhi,
MLK, Jr., Malcolm X, et cetera, effectively used the
power of ideas in words and writings to effect lasting,
radical social change.
The Dynamics of
Proper Governance
As said
earlier in this essay, it is not immediately obvious
that Achebe’s writings, above all else, are deeply
involved with the questions and dynamics of proper
governance— familial, communal, national, and
international. Things Fall Apart; No Longer at Ease
(sequel to TFA), Arrow of God, A Man of the People,
Anthills of the Savannah, and The Trouble with Nigeria,
Morning Yet On Creation Day (MYOCD).,
Hopes and Impediments deal squarely with the
problems of correct governance. Achebe admits that
his is “a new voice, coming out of Africa and
speaking of African experience in a world-wide context”
(“The African Writer and the English Language” 61).
Racial inequality, he indicts as the core factor
responsible for Africa’s malaise, and he points directly
to this:
|
Take for instance the issue of racial
inequality which—whether or not we realize
it—is at the very root of Africa’s problems
and has been for four hundred years (MYOCD,
78). |
And Achebe is also
speaking for Africans forced into the diaspora through
slavery. Obviously, while blaming African-born, greedy,
neo-colonialist stooges for bad governance, Achebe lays
the core blame for improper governance on the imposition
on Africa of an alien and very brutal governing concept
which treated with contempt the peoples’ way of life.
This ”way of life” the Igbos of Nigeria for instance
call—Omenala—which takes its meaning from
”Ala”—the earth, soil, land (represented by a female
deity) which the Rev. Ezewudo describes as a system of
consensual belief as to what constitutes virtue or vice
whereby the overall communal good conditions and limits
anyone’s actions.
This way of
governance is very well illustrated in Things Fall
Apart. For instance, before the farming season, the
community would practise peaceful coexistence so as to
get increased yield from ala / ani and
hence honor the earth goddess—the most powerful deity
after Chukwu (Chi-Ukwu – Supreme God) whom they
reverenced. Omenala also symbolizes belief in a
supernatural law in which politics, and justice are
integrally interconnected. Any contravention of moral
law such as TFA’s Okonkwo’s beating of his
wife-becomes nsoala, or aru (abomination),
a crime of dishonor against the earth goddess, the
arbiter of morality, demands that reparation be made, as
Okonkwo did make. Thus, agricultural, economic, and
moral considerations were linked together holistically.
Consquently, it can
be stated that the ideal of Western capitalist democracy
is fundamentally at variance with the familial and
communal structure of traditional governance ethos not just in Africa but in all
community-based, non-Western countries. Again, the
political upheavels tearing apart the Middle East region
illustrate the point. Western capitalism as introduced
into the erstwhile Western colonies lacks social
interaction between governors and the governed.
As a
politico-economic ideology, it was very dictatorial
because the colonizers never consulted the native
leaders and land owners on the proper mode of
governance, suitable for the peoples’ wellbeing. The
system was also exploitative because the Western
administrative officers lived like royalty,
commandeering the peoples’ mineral and other wealth, and
were accountable to nobody. This exploitaiton was
sustained through policies, discourse, and visual
imagery laced with notions of power and superiority,
formulated to facilitate Western colonizing mission.
And so presently,
caught at the crossraods of opposing cultures, and
finding nothing to identify with, today’s natives tend
to address this new ”democratic” governing model as
”they.” Consequently, they adopt a free-for-all,
”chop-I-chop” or eat-as-much-as-you-can attitude towards
this alien Western concept, with no checks and balances,
which contrary to traditional native ethos exalts the
individual over the community. Thus, various chapters
of
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works
also re-examine Niccolò
Machiavelli’s The Prince,
the Pan-Africanist / political thoughts of W.E.B. Du
Bois, and gender issues in Zora Neale Hurston’s
Their Eyes Were Watching God
as platforms for comparison with African political,
gender, and cultural attitudes and systems.
But the book also
examines Achebe’s indictment of African leaders for
post-colonial abuse and exploitation of the masses.
Beyond the era of Achebe’s writings, African nations’
political, and socio-economic malaise has worsened
because of unprecedented corruption, embezzlement of the
nations’ resources, internecine conflicts, political
thuggery, compounded by the recourse to murder as a
weapon of political intimidation. Hence, in countries
that were former West European colonies, there persistis
a lack of identification, commitment, trust, or loyalty
on the part of the disengaged African, or Asian natives.
A politico-economic
model
must
must be worked out which will reconcile this complex mix
of the African’s cultural-history and inherited alien
ideas and equally allow space for varieties of dynamic
human experience suitable for indigenous governance and
a Third Millennium global living.
Equiano and Achebe: A
Common Literary Ancestry for Africa and its Diaspora
Certainly, the enslaved
Africans sent to the Americas and the West Indies sought
to preserve what they could of their original language
and folklore. But dispersal, forced separation, family
fragmentation (See Morrison’s Beloved, and
Frederick Douglass’ Narrative), and their
complete immersion and socialization into an alien
culture created a cultural vacuum. Into this vacuum
stepped Olaudah Equiano with his 1789 Narrative
which I believe received corroboration and
authentication, albeit by way of the fictional
narratives, with Achebe’s Things Fall Apart and
Arrow of God.
Chapter Seven of Chinua
Achebe: the Man and His Works therefore examines
similarities in the portrayal of this African Igbo
society by both Equiano and Achebe. As the Preface
points out, “Equiano’s work has lately
become the focus of some controversies by some people
who are neither Igbos nor inhabitants of Essaka. These
people question, out of ignorance, the authenticity of
Equiano’s place of birth. And so without setting out to
do so, Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works has
presented a veritable defense of the truth about Igbo /
African culture and Equiano’s recollection” of its
traditions (viii).
As established by Cheikh Anta
Diop and other scholars, Africa was not and is not
culturally, socially and technologically a tabula
rasa.” Christian missionaries from Europe and
America—Catholics, Protestants and Evangelicals—who
scoured the length and breadth of Africa to establish
churches possessed limited knowledge of African
cultures, and, therefore, of African spirituality. They
had biased perceptions in their reports of Igbo culture,
for instance. But it must be accepted that it was not
their responsibility to promote or advance the Igbo
institutions but rather to justify their overthrow and
replacement with their own religion-system of beliefs,
just as racism was invented as justification for slavery
which was economically motivated.
Many years in
the making,
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works
is therefore designed to help adult and youthful
readers—the community and academia alike—re-examine Igbo
(African) religious thoughts, socio-cultural world, its
folklore, mythopoeia—all the features that have informed
the writings of diasporan artists as diverse as Sonia
Sanchez, Ishmael Reed, Alice Walker, Paule Marshall,
Amiri Baraka, Toni Morrison, including also African poet
/ novelist S. Okechukwu Mezu as he puts forward African
Communalism (“The Communalist Manifesto”) as a model of
economic-cultural living which is totally opposed to the
individualist Western capitalist economic structure that
is descended from a feudal totalitarian model. The
book’s discourse also covers Africa’s respect for nature
and the environment—formerly dubbed
“animism,” “paganism,”
heathenism,” and “polytheism,” which now is a model
for today’s Western concerns for the Eco-system, et
cetera.
Religious
Tolerance as Prerequisite for Harmonious Global
Co-habitation
A case is also
made for religious tolerance as a sine qua non
for harmonious global living. Presently, the
current project that gives recognition to African
cultures and African spirituality is called inculturation. Inculturation stands for the process
of letting the Christian church experience growth on
non-Western native soil; it is the process of bridging
the gap between faith and life. Inculturation aims at
stimulating a transforming dialogue of the
Christian faith with African cultures. The late Pontiff
John Paul II puts it succinctly to African theologians
during his trip to Nigeria (March 21-23, 1998):
|
Do all that you can [...] so that your
people will feel more and more at home in
the Church, and the Church more and more at
home among your people. Necessary here will
be research into traditional African
religion and culture (Qtd. by Ezewudo in
Mezu’s Religion and Society 57).
|
And thus,
the abuses, violations, inaccurate, disrespectful
treatment, and ignorant misperceptions by Christian
Churches of Africa’s artifacts, shrines, cultural /
religious beliefs became the subject of an extensive
apology by Pope John Paul II (Pope John Paul II and
Africa, 51). As a first step, the Pope encouraged
African ecclesiastics in their position as “insiders” to
encourage the assimilation of positive traditional
values that proclaim belief in One Supreme Being who is
Eternal, Creator, Provident and a Just Judge: values
which are readily harmonized with the content of the
Christian faith. He exhorted the African Christian
Church to draw up their own martyrology to honor people
we know who are saints—canonized or not.
That
Africans are now being encouraged to revisit the honor
given to their dead—the veneration of ancestors—is a
vindication of the pristine value of the spirituality
and faith of the Africans’ ancestors discredited through
Western missionary superciliousness and ignorance. These
modern developments are the fruits of the cosmo-theological
thoughts propagated by (among others), Achebe (in essays
and fictional works), and by Equiano— the earliest,
important literary and cultural ancestor of all peoples
of African descent (“Achebe’s Writings as
Authentication of the Igbo Culture of Equiano’s 1789 Narrative”).
As Africa
and its diasporan youth should take comfort, the
“African soul” is still intact since Africa’s lost
reverences are gradually being recovered owing to the
resilience and authenticity of African cultural and
spiritual heritage. The point at issue is that religious
faith is an abstract concept conditioned by culture and
environment, and these certainly dictate the many ways
of apprehending the reality of Godhead.
Women
in Achebe’s World
In the
Third Millennium global community, women’s
fate rests squarely in their hands. Enlightenment has
brought a lot of freedom from traditional patriarchal
strictures. And so, Chapter Eight of
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works discusses women in the
writer’s fictional universe. It must be acknowledged
that Achebe is not your typical misogynist writer.
Rather, I accuse him of over-idealization of
women (represented by the Igbo metaphor of Nneka—Mother
is supreme), a position that equally renders women
ineffective since they play no part in society’s
governance because they are idealized and
over-protected. Confronting him with this in a 1995
interview, Achebe defends vigorously his portraiture of
women as a mere comforter figure, picking up after men
when things go wrong, Achebe quipped back,
|
And who is to blame? You see, many people do
not read fiction the way it should be read—
as representing what is. They think it
should show what “ought to be.” Fiction is
not a political argument. The book showed
what there is. I am telling a story that
illustrates that society had a huge flaw
[. . . ] (231). |
Chinua
Achebe, in turn, asks me a question:
|
Achebe:
Tell me, how do you think I viewed women in
Things Fall Apart?
Mezu:
You viewed the concept of the mother
idealistically. Women were treated
sympathetically. In fact, Okonkwo received
indictment for being violent with his wives.
Achebe:
But Okonkwo was always violent with
everyone. Both he and his society had
weaknesses which included the female
species, and the adoration of power. They
paid terrible prices for these. Okonkwo paid
a terrible price by being banished for ever
in the evil forest, and so did the Igbo
society by suffering defeat at the hands of
an alien civilization.
His character Ikem—Anthills of the
Savannah—says to Beatrice and Achebe, by
extension, to all women “I can't tell you
what the new role for Woman will be. I don't
know. I should never presume to know. You
have to tell us.” (Anthills of the
Savannah 98. In Chinua Achebe: the
Man and His Works 28-9). |
Of course, no modern woman needs to be told that she has
to work hard to provide a platform for her own fulfilled
existence. Third. Millennium global community has an
equitanble place for everyone.
Womanist
Creativism
Achebe’s words naturally
inspired the formulation of my poetics of women’s
writing titled “Theorizing the African Feminist Novel:
the State of African Literature Today” (A History of
Africana Women’s Literature, 24-47) that calls for a
reconstructive phase of female writing—termed Womanist
Creativism—a phase that does more than protest women’s
sufferings / exploitation but urges women creative
writers to use all of the resources of literature to
create positive, energetic, and resilient female
characters as paradigmatic models of real-life women who
can participate capably in the governance of society.
“And who is to blame?” And since women have to initiate
their own freedom from all strictures, even through
ideas, I did just that in A History of Africana
Women’s Literature (2004).
Igbo Pragmatism: A model for Third Millennium Community
Living
Achebe explores
and offers up the pragmatism of the ancient Igbos in
especially TFA and Arrow of God as a
possible mode of survival in the present treacherous
world of shifting values, and from the imperialistic,
hegemonic tendencies of the powerful nations. Okonkwo
and Ezeulu—the respective heroes of his two
tradition-based novels—are inflexible, overbearing,
intolerant, and unaccommodating of differences and other
peoples’ opinions. In the end, both men end up
ignominiously. Achebe appears to recommend the
Traditional Religious concept of the pragmatic Igbos as
perhaps a viable way of living with others within a
global community. There
is no religious absolutism in the mentality of the
traditional Igbos. Therefore, chapter twenty-one of Things Fall Apart can be regarded as the theological
chapter of the book in which an influential village
elder Akunna disputes with Mr. Brown, the reasonable and
somehow liberal-minded European missionary:
|
“You [Mr. Brown]
say that there is
one supreme God who owns heaven and earth,”
said Akunna on one of Mr. Brown’s visits.
“We also believe in Him and call him Chukwu.
He made all the world and the other Gods.”
“There are no other gods,” said Mr. Brown.
Chukwu is the only god and all others are
false. You carve a piece of wood . . . and
you call it god. But it is till a piece of
wood.”
Such absolutist claims are contrary to the
Igbo world view that believes in “live and
let live.”
“Yes,’ said Akunna. It is indeed a piece of
wood; the tree from which it came was made
by Chukwu, as indeed all minor gods were [ .
. .] The head of your church is in your
country [ . . .] Your queen sends her
messenger, the District Commissioner. He
finds that he cannot do the work alone and
so he appoints kotma to help him. It
is the same with God or Chukwu. He appoints
the other gods to help him [ . . .] We make
sacrifices to the little gods, but when they
fail and there is no one else to turn to we
go to Chukwu [ . . .] We approach a great
man through his servants [ . . .] We worry
them more because we are afraid to worry
their Master. Our fathers knew that Chukwu
was the Overlord and that is why many of
them gave their children the name Chukwuka –
“Chukwu is supreme’”
“You said one interesting thing,” said Mr.
Brown. “You are afraid of Chukwu. In my
religion Chukwu is a loving father and need
not be feared by those who do His will.”
“But we must fear Him when we are not doing
His Will,” said Akunna. “And who is to tell
His will. He is too great to be known.”
(164-5) |
Ndichie
Akunna’s is a most pertinent question and observation
that speak of another kind of theo-philosophical
viewpoint: “And who is to tell His will? He is too
great to be known.” In this, one sees elements of
resilience of the African Religious worldview such as
exists in Achebe’s narratives in which the African makes
socio-cultural choices, testing and subjecting the
learned Christian behavior to respond to the African
situation. Thus, despite the overwhelming invasion of
the West, the African soul could not be stolen. The
same element of African resilience holds in the African
American religious worship, as Christian as it is.
Frederick Douglass would in his Narrative indict
the Christian plantation overlords for their hypocrisy
and non-knowledge / practice of the Christ’s
compassionate dictates: “O, ye nominal Christians! Might
not an African ask you—Learned you this from God?” (The
Narrative 201, 209).
It can be
stated truly that until the advent of Islam and
Christianity (as practiced by some missionaries),
traditional Africans never embarked on wars of religious
conversion, being quite tolerant of other creeds.
Indigenous religions were neither universalist
(seeking to convert the whole of the human race) nor competitive (in bitter rivalry against other
creeds), being more communal in nature. As Mazrui puts
it,
|
Like Hinduism and modern Judaism—and unlike
Christianity and Islam—indigenous African
traditions have not sought to convert the
whole of the human kind. The Yoruba do not
seek to convert the Ibo to Yoruba
religion—or vice versa. Nor do either the
Yoruba or the Ibo compete with each other
for the souls of a third group like the
Hausa. By not being proselytizing religions,
indigenous African creeds have not fought
with each other. Over the centuries Africans
have waged many kinds of wars with each
other—but hardly ever religious ones before
the universalist creeds arrived.
(Mazrui, ”Africa and Other Civilizations:
Conquests and Counter-Conquest.” In Religion and Society, 71-91. ed. Rose
Ure Mezu, BAP 1999). |
As Arrow of God’s Nwaka states bluntly to the
inflexible Ezeulu, the priest of Ulu, “wisdom is like a
goatskin bag; every man carries his own, Ezeulu has told
us what his father told him about the olden days [ . . .
] My father told me a different story.” Thus, the
fictional Nwaka is restating an absence of an absolutist
view of reality that allows the Other the freedom to
think differently. At the end, while the intolerant and
aggressive Okonkwo commits suicide, Umuofia as a
pragmatic community survives. So does Umuaro after
Ezeulu’s insanity, proving the truth of the Igbo proverb
Ezeulu had said to Obika, “It is praiseworthy to be
brave and fearless, my son, but sometimes it is better
to be a coward. We often stand in the compound of a
coward to point at the ruins where a brave man used
to live” (Arrow
of God
11).
Thus, for
the traditional Igbos, it was never “My way or the
highway” nor “You are either with me or against me”—an
attitude which in the inferiorized group breeds
resentment and leads to conflicts. Rather, the Igbos’
attitude is one that accepts that “where one thing
stands, something else can stand beside it”—an attitude
that is summed up in the metaphor of the dancing
masquerade who goes to all sides of the market square in
order to see the entire crowd.
The point
made is that whenever any nation’s political authority
or religion becomes universalist and indisputable, then,
the result is sure to be tyranny over all others. Every
point of view represents an angle of vision, a different
kind of cultural conditioning. At the end, any
community’s cosmological viewpoint is a slice of the
Ultimate Truth, a search for Infinite Wisdom seen from a
specific philosophical viewpoint. And so, what the Third
Millennium global community calls for is more
accommodation of the other’s viewpoint, more respect for
the other’s land space, for the culture of the supposed
Other.
Finally, Achebe is a creative
artist who believes that writing empowers the oppressed
to reject negative cultural constructions, negative
racial and religious prejudices. Virginia Woolf speaks
about the “integrity” of writing—“a conviction” that the
novelist tells us that “this is the truth” (A Room of
One’s Own, Chapter 4).
The radical Iranian
novelist Azar Nafisi in Reading Lolita in Tehran
insists on the democratizing properties of the novel
which is not blind to other people’s problems and pains,
for “not seeing them means denying their existence”
(132). Chinua Achebe himself emphasizes over and over
the importance of novelistic art to the world, as can be
distilled in this conversation:
|
Mezu: On writing and its relevance,
what do you consider as the core message in
your works?
Achebe: To make people think. Just as
a good story keeps revealing itself in
different ways, in different connotations.
The meaning is not finished. To make you see
yourself in a different light.
Mezu: That is the meaning of the
word you used in the Anthills –
“Nkolika” - the Story is Greatest?
Achebe: Yes! (Chinua Achebe: The
Man and His Works, 235). |
Thus, literature has an
important function to play in imparting the values of
humane-ness, decency and fair-play without which the
world would be exactly what it is today—in chaos,
tottering on the edge of an immense precipice, awaiting
just that one tragic push of an act of injustice to
topple into the darkest nuclear abyss. In the context
of global peace among nations and peoples, Achebe
considers the writer more important than the soldier, or
the man with political power. The writer is the world’s
only hope, producing
|
Literature which alters the situation in the
world. A great and important book does that
and nothing can be done without reference
to it. It has made a statement which
changes the relationships and perceptions of
the world
(cited
in
Chinua Achebe 272). |
Achebe’s song of the story in
Anthills of the
Savannah bears repeating:
|
.
. the Story - Recalling-Is-Greatest.
Why? Because it is only the story that can
continue beyond the war and the warrior. It
is the story that outlives the sound of
war-drums and the exploits of brave
fighters. It is the story, not the others,
that saves our progeny from blundering like
blind beggars into the cactus fence. |
Writing is thus our medium of
reclaiming our personal, cultural, intellectual, and
religious freedoms. These are ours for the taking, for
Achebe urgently reiterates, “If I were God, I would
regard as the very worst our acceptance—for whatever
reason—of racial inferiority” (“The Novelist as a
Teacher” in MYOCD 44). Under-girding this
optimism, this self-confidence in a new and invigorating
life of many freedoms is the same kind of optimism that
empowered the visionary W.E.B. Du Bois to exclaim in
prophetic poetic writing:
|
I lifted my
voice and cried
I cried to heaven as I died
O turn me to the Golden Horde
Summon all western nations
Toward the Rising sun . . .
Awake, Awake, O Sleeping world
Honor the sun
Worship the stars, those vaster suns
Who rule the night
Where black is bright
And all unselfish work is right
And greed is sin
And Africa leads on
Pan Africa.
Freedomways
(Winter, 1962) |
Thus, through the
medium of writing, especially with Things Fall Apart
(1958), a classic story that transcends time and place,
Achebean thoughts, like Du Boisian thoughts, provide
paradigms for a Third Millennium harmonious global
living. These are some of the many interpretive issues
tackled by Rose Ure Mezu in
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works (Adonis & Abbey, 2006). Since cultural
writing has been established as encoding true civic
activism, these philosophical, literary paradigms
consequently can serve as our veritable guide towards
reclaiming our common humanity, towards determing the
qualities of leadership and leaders of vision, moral
strength and integrity who should be the guides in a
Third Millennium Global Community—qualities this poem
from the 2004 Homage to My People (2004) so
delineates:
|
Who should be our leaders?
Who then should be our leaders?
Those imbued with a guiding light
Who are sensitive to our problems
Whose actions suit our needs
Those willing to speak up for us
Whose actions match their words
How do we know them?
When they can walk our streets
Know our homes, call our kids by name
When they scold our kids who do wrong
When they boldly speak out our frustrations
When they work to keep guns out of their
hands so kids
Do not end up bloody on some unforgiving
urban pavement
Our Leaders are those who cry when we cry
and
Who laugh when we laugh
When speaking our pain, they do not sell us
out
Where do we see them?
In our schools replacing guns with textbooks
In churches, celebrating kids who score
life’s high goals
In the streets cuddling our kids when they
are hurt
In the prisons visiting the wasting lives of
boys and girls
In the ghettoes, pointing out areas outside
business districts
And fighting to end the human misery going
on there
In civic centers counseling to keep our
families intact
In Congress legislating to provide work for
our jobless
In Government voiding the backrolling of
just laws
Why do we call them leaders?
They are leaders who refuse to bend during a
hailstorm
Who stand firm and do not flinch when
maligned
Who can withstand the tumult of challenge
and adversity
Who know how to fight the mental darkness of
ignorance & fear
With the radiant light of knowledge, courage
and self-reliance
Who wrestle with drugs and crimes plaguing
our communities
Who know how to heal the festering sore of
racial neglect
Who know how to effectively use the tools of
democracy
Why do we call them Our Own?
When a new dance tune is played, our leaders
know which foot to put forward first
As warhorses, our leaders know when to seize
the time
and use every available leverage for our
communal good
They work to destroy false barriers of
class, gender, color
that obstruct our efforts at Renewal and
Reconstruction
Who in the past were our leaders
We hail those leaders who dead but yet live
who did not slouch
Who walked through life with tall courage
and large strides
Who recognized dishonor not in defeat but in
surrender
Who helped to restore our belief in our dark
and bronzed selves
Who helped us know we are one with the rest
of humanity
Who joined with us to discover how to make a
way out of no way
Who dared to dream, to take risks and to
defy the odds
Who labored to widen today’s narrow path for
us to tread tomorrow
Who now are our leaders?
They are now our leaders
Who believe in a better Tomorrow
Who can dream and keep hope alive
Who know the ways of concrete action
Who will not backslide in the face of
aggression
Who must try and survive in order to journey
with us
Through the risky Present into that
equitable Tomorrow.
(Rose Mezu, Homage To My People. February 17, 2001) |
Notes:
1. 1. Essay is
modified from a Lecture delivered as Writer-in-Residence
to the Assembled Faculty and Students of the University
of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls on Monday, November 6, 2006. Program was organized by the UNI
African Studies Association.
2. 2. In a July
1-7, 1983 interview in Emeryville, California, a suburb
of Oakland and San Francisco by Reginald Martin,
Ishmael Reed comments on and explains the
origin of the word universal”:
|
. . . [universal is] not a
criticism of literature. Lorenzo Thomas tracked the term
"universal" to Tolstoy's essay on art, in which he says
that universal art is the art of the people. The other
art is landlord art: ballet. They got it all wrong, and
they use the term to dismiss works which they consider
too local or too ethnic. . . . Someone was telling me
that a great book would never be written in Yiddish, and
then about six months later, Isaac Singer won the Nobel
Prize for literature. I think if Faulkner had been a
black writer, he would have been considered ethnic. I
would say 60 percent of Faulkner's work is written in
black English. People just seem to be blinded to reality
when it comes to dismissing languages. I don't think
there is any standard English. I think there is such a
thing as protocol English. |
3. Some of Reed’s books are
Yellow Back Radio Broke Down (1969),
Mumbo
Jumbo (1972),
The Last Days of Louisiana Red
(1974)
Flight to Canada (1976),
The
Terrible Twos
(1982),
The Terrible
Threes (1999),
Reckless Eyeballing
(2000).
4. W.E.B. Du
Bois, The Souls of Black Folk (New American
Library edition: New York, 1969).
Works Cited:
Achebe, Chinua. Morning
Yet on Creation Day. London: Heinemann Educational
Books, 1975.
Anthills
of the Savannah. Heinemann Educational Books, 1987.
Arrow
of God. New York: Random House, 1969.
Things
Fall Apart. Heinemann Educational Books, 1958.
Interview with
the Nigerian. Daily Times. Nov. 18, 1989, 12.
Conrad, Joseph. The Heart
of Darkness, Edinburgh, GB: Blackwood’s Magazine,
1899.
Douglass, Frederick. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American
slave, Written by Himself. Ed. David W. Blight.
N.Y.: Bedford Books, 1993.
Ezewudo, Gabriel.
“Christianity, African Traditional Religion and
Colonialism: Were Africans Pawns or Players in the
Cultural Encounter?” In
Religion and Society.
Ed. Rose Ure Mezu. -- Baltimore, MD: Black Academy
Press, 1998. 43-61.
Mezu, Rose Ure. Chinua
Achebe: The Man and His Works.
London: Adonis &
Abbey Publishers Ltd., 2006.
“Theorizing the
African Feminist Novel: the State O f African Literature
Today.” In A History of Africana Women’s Literature.
Baltimore, MD: BAPress,
2004.
Mezu,
Rose Ure &
S. Okechukwu,
eds. Pope John Paul II and Africa.
Baltimore, MD: BAP, 2005.
Mezu, S.
Okechukwu. Communalist Manifesto. Washington, DC:
Nigerian Students’ Voice, 1966.
Nafisi, Azar. Reading
Lolita in Tehran. New York: Random House, 2003.
Said, Edward. “The Public
role of Writers and Intellectuals.” In The Public
Intellectual. Ed. Helen Small.Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing, 2002.
Summary Points of
Edward Said's "Orientalism"
ttp://www.english.emory.edu/Bahri/Orientalism.html
Woolf, Virginia.
A Room of One's Own. London:
Hogarth's Press, 1929.
* * * * *
As Writer-in-Residence,
Dr. Rose Ure Mezu
read the above essay as Lecture before the
assembled faculty and students of the University of
Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls on November 6, 2006. It
elicited very lively, soul-searching discussion,
questions and answers. * *
* * *
Other essays by Dr. Rose Ure Mezu:
An Africana
Blueprint for Living in the 3rd Millennium
Global Community1: An Essay
Pope
John Paul II: A Life with a Mission: A Mission of Grace and Moral
Strength
A History
of Africana Women's Literature (Introduction)
Africana
Women: Their Historic Past and Future
Activism
Black
Nationalists: Reconsidering: Du Bois, Garvey, Booker T., &
Nkrumah (Introduction)
Chinua Achebe The
Man and His Works (Introduction)
* *
* * *
posted 6 December 2006 |