ChickenBones: A Journal

for Literary & Artistic African-American Themes

   

Home   ChickenBones Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)  

Google
 

 The South has been a bastion of racism for almost 400 years . . . Southerners and their allies in other regions

are not going to admit that . . . instead, they are going to say . . . a real concern for states rights . . . opposed

to big government programs that aim to ease the terrible economic conditions

 

 

And Now the South Rules the North

 The 2004 Presidential Election

Democrats Should Move More to the Political Center?

Critique of the Liberals: Supporting the War in Iraq

By Patrick L. Cooney, Ph.D.

 

November 3, 2004 

George Bush has won the 2004 Election and I find myself disappointed and depressed. I was sure Bush was going to win the election, but it still hurt when he did. The election campaign from the Republican side was especially dirty. The Republicans pushed the fear factor of terrorism, even though it has been over three years since a terrorist attack has been committed against the United States homeland. And they pushed the fear gays marrying. In other words, they pushed their favorite issues: demagogic ones.

As if the election campaign was not bad enough, it seems to me the media political analysis by the supposed political experts is just adding insult to injury.

"Moral" Issues?

The pundits have concluded that according to their surveys, the top issue of the election was "moral" issues. I find the use of the word "moral" insulting. If the right wing is moral, then I guess the implication is that the left wing is immoral. If it is moral to be homophobic, then it is immoral to want to grant full civil rights to homosexuals. If it is moral to forbid abortion, then it is immoral to support freedom of choice. And on and on it goes.

The issues the pundits brand as "moral" ones, are really "social" issues, not "moral" ones. (Or they are civil rights issues, which the conservatives want to limit for gays, women and minorities.)  And these "social" issues are directly related to demographic divides in the United States, especially over race.

"Isn’t it about culture?" asks Chris Matthews of MSNBC’s "Hard Ball." Well, no Chris, it isn’t. That kind of statement is like saying the Civil War was not about slavery but the greater evangelical streak in the South, or to be even more ridiculous, over the Southerners’ love of grits over home fries.

In the great debate in sociology between Marx pushing the primary importance of economic forces on social life and Max Weber pushing the primary importance of ideas and values as the primary force, Weber basically lost. In other words, those people wanting to break with the Catholic Church in order to prosper economically willingly grasped at the Protestant rationale that the greed and self-advancement associated with capitalism were superior values, not inferior ones. The self-interest came first, the justifications and rationalisms came second.

It is this type of self-interest that always drives human beings. The realm of voting is no different. People vote because of their self-interests. And their self-interests are to promote themselves, their families and friends and other people who are like-minded (and all too often like-skin-colored). Now most people do not like or want to describe their politics this way. They want to say that they are motivated by the highest and purest of moral ambitions. They want to believe that it is not their own interests they are voting for in elections, but rather the interests of the entire nation.

Americans are afraid to talk seriously about race. And it is in their self-interest to say that we are primarily divided by "moral" and "cultural" issues. Yes, it is true we are divided by these issues, but this division is the result of demographic divisions within the United States and those are primarily over race and secondarily over ethnicism.

The South has been a bastion of racism for almost 400 years of American history and it still is. Since most people now admit it is not really acceptable to be racist, the Southerners and their allies in other regions are not going to admit that they are motivated by racial concerns or racial fears. No, instead, they are going to say they are motivated not by racism, but by a real concern for states rights, not motivated by hate, but opposed to big government programs that aim to ease the terrible economic conditions under which blacks and Hispanics live.

Vernon Johns once wrote that that region of the country (the South) that is most in need of forgiveness by religious values, claim itself to be the most religious. Similarly, the evangelicals claim that they are the moral majority. But there was a wonderful bumper sticker during the Nixon years when this characterization was popular: "The Moral Majority is Neither."

The claims of the South and their mid-western/western allies that they are motivated by the highest of moral values is ridiculous. The South is still motivated by what it has always been motivated by: a fear of the racial advancement of black people. No matter how moral the people of the region claim to be, and how immoral the liberals are, this kind of talk has to be taken with a grain of salt. They, like all voters, are motivated by self-interest and they see their self-interests in opposition to blacks and those liberals willing to support them.

It is even ridiculous to claim that the evangelicals are more religious than those who are not evangelical. It is an insult to religion and spirituality to say that those associated with racism, chauvinism, ethnicism and homophobia are the most moral and the most religious. On the contrary, these people are more in need of God’s forgiveness than those of us who are concerned with overcoming the negative isms that so drive the religious right.

And now the pundits are congratulating Bush and Karl Rove for the brilliance of their campaign strategy. To call demagoguery brilliance is to turn logic on its head. In the "old" South, the campaigner who was the most anti-black was the one who usually won. But would we call the more strident racist of the campaign the most brilliant? I would hope not.

George Bush is supposed to be more in touch with the people in his base. That is probably true because he shares the same narrow, parochial and racism-influenced values that pervade the South and rural areas of the United. States. Yes, he is a "good-old-boy" (never mind that this type of person is motivated by racism, homophobia, religious bigotry, etc.)

The plain simple fact is that the South would have voted Republican even if the Republicans had run a chimpanzee instead of George Bush. Bush performed miserably. He was the first president to actually lose jobs in the last 75 or so years; he lied to the American public (and to himself) about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in order to use the revenge fever in America to start a war in Iraq; he made the United States class system even more grossly unequal than even his equally negative Republican predecessors; he managed to take a budget surplus and run it down to the largest budget deficit in American history; and his spend-thrift ways has made it impossible to fund substantial social progress in health, education and welfare. But the South did not care about Bush’s record. For no matter how poorly Bush performed, at least he did not help further progress in civil rights.

 The Loss of Northern Power

 As a result of the Great Depression the Northern Democrats could count on the support of the conservative Southern Democrats because the South was interested in gaining greater economic advantages. But following the signing of the Civil Rights Legislation of 1964, the South started its switch to the more conservative Republican Party.

As a result, the Northern Democrats had to nominate Southern Democrats for the office of the president if they wanted to win. But now, in 2004, it is becoming quite clear that the majority of the Southern Democrats have virtually all become Southern Republicans and that the entire Democratic Party cannot count on any electoral help from the South. And to make matters almost unbearable, the South with their rural allies in the mid-West now have greater political power than the North and that the North will be forced to take a secondary role on political and cultural issues.

I have written about the Southernization of the United States in which the whites of the North and South have reached a somewhat shared negative view of any future progress in the civil rights field, a negative view that is primarily directed at blacks. But one think I did not see was that as the South got more powerful they would start to go too far; they became emboldened and have tried to thrust their general negative/rural culture on the North. They talk about getting rid of abortion, maintaining the right of every American to own an assault rifle and bringing prayer back to the schools.

I also did not envision that the North and South would change roles and that now the North would start to feel alienated from the larger culture and start to fight to retain their more liberal, more forward-looking culture. They are not willing to accept the racist culture of the South.

So where do liberals go from here?

 *   *   *   *   *

Democrats Should Move More to the Political Center?

 Now all the pundits are saying that the Democrats have to rethink their positions. And, more specifically, they need to come more to the political center. Of course, coming to the center these days is to become like the Republicans, anti-gay, anti-civil rights progress, pro-war as a means of handling foreign disputes, etc. And on, and on goes the crazy logic created by using the term "moral."

The division of the United States into two different camps is really nothing new. The United States was barely able to come together in the first place and had to grant so much authority to the individual states that it almost assured the Civil War that followed only four score and seven years later. The North’s pulling out its troops from the South led to racial apartheid and then a second Civil War, the American Civil Rights Movement. Ever since LBJ signed the civil rights legislation, the South had been consolidating its political position around the Republican Party, a party they see as having the right attitude towards blacks – ignore their issues and let them fall farther behind whites.

No, the fact of two nations in one is nothing new, it has just become more consolidated along racial divisions and their associated cultural justifications. No, it is nothing new. It is just that the South and their allies have now come to dominate the nation.

And we liberals don’t like it!!!!!

I grew up in the South and hated it. There was racial bigotry everywhere I looked. I thought Southerners were crazy and at times even dangerous. As a liberal in the South in the Jim Crow days, one had to be very careful of what one said to others. I chafed under the system of racism in the South and I find myself in somewhat familiar territory now as the South exerts its power politically and morally.

No, I won’t move to the political center. I won’t compromise with racism and bigotry. To hell with the South and its political allies and its supposed moral superiority. Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.

Under racism, the South was economically and culturally backward. If they are able to continue to exert their negative influences on the entire nation, the United States will find itself like the old South, left behind economically and politically and culturally impoverished.

Source: http://www.vernonjohns.org/vernjohns/southulesnorth.html

*   *   *   *   *

Critique of the Liberals: Supporting the War in Iraq

Every once in a while I need to vent my frustration with the American political process.  And one of the things that keeps irritating me is the excuse liberals give for having supported the War in Iraq – namely that they were hoodwinked by the Bush administration's evidence of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Well, I'm sorry but that just can't be true. I assume that they all viewed that ridiculous presentation before the United Nations by then Secretary of State Colin Powell.  As I watched it, I just kept saying to myself "they've got nothing" and "this is not proof of anything."  I thought if this were a court of law they would throw the case out for lack of evidence.  Frankly, I thought the whole presentation was farcical.   

But imagine my surprise when suddenly the liberals aboard the war wagon agreeing that Saddam Hussein had an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. 

Now we know that there were no weapons of mass destruction.  And so, of course, George Bush had to come up with some lame excuse, but so did the liberals.  And the liberal excuse was that Bush had fooled them with his false accusations and evidence about weapons of mass destruction. 

The political leaders of the liberals are not ignorant people, so how or why did they fall for the Powell dog and pony show?

The truth is that the liberals were afraid of losing even more political power if they did not go along with the war fever that the Republicans whipped up following the 9/11 tragedy.  The U.S. following the passage of Civil Rights legislation in the 1960s has become so conservative that they are a danger to themselves: their super nationalism led them into a long and protracted war in Iraq and their failure to spend a few bucks to hold back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain has cost the nation further billions of dollars.

The truth is that the conservatives had the political clout to roll over the liberals and the liberals did roll over.

I don't really blame the liberals for rolling over, but I do believe it does a disservice to liberalism and further blinds them to the truth to let them keep excusing their support for the war in Iraq by their having been duped by the Bush administration's evidence of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.  --Patrick L. Cooney, 9/15/2005

photo left: Vernon Johns

posted 7 January 2005

*   *   *   *   *

AALBC.com's 25 Best Selling Books


 

Fiction

#1 - Justify My Thug by Wahida Clark
#2 - Flyy Girl by Omar Tyree
#3 - Head Bangers: An APF Sexcapade by Zane
#4 - Life Is Short But Wide by J. California Cooper
#5 - Stackin' Paper 2 Genesis' Payback by Joy King
#6 - Thug Lovin' (Thug 4) by Wahida Clark
#7 - When I Get Where I'm Going by Cheryl Robinson
#8 - Casting the First Stone by Kimberla Lawson Roby
#9 - The Sex Chronicles: Shattering the Myth by Zane

#10 - Covenant: A Thriller  by Brandon Massey

#11 - Diary Of A Street Diva  by Ashley and JaQuavis

#12 - Don't Ever Tell  by Brandon Massey

#13 - For colored girls who have considered suicide  by Ntozake Shange

#14 - For the Love of Money : A Novel by Omar Tyree

#15 - Homemade Loves  by J. California Cooper

#16 - The Future Has a Past: Stories by J. California Cooper

#17 - Player Haters by Carl Weber

#18 - Purple Panties: An Eroticanoir.com Anthology by Sidney Molare

#19 - Stackin' Paper by Joy King

#20 - Children of the Street: An Inspector Darko Dawson Mystery by Kwei Quartey

#21 - The Upper Room by Mary Monroe

#22 – Thug Matrimony  by Wahida Clark

#23 - Thugs And The Women Who Love Them by Wahida Clark

#24 - Married Men by Carl Weber

#25 - I Dreamt I Was in Heaven - The Rampage of the Rufus Buck Gang by Leonce Gaiter

Non-fiction

#1 - Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention by Manning Marable
#2 - Confessions of a Video Vixen by Karrine Steffans
#3 - Dear G-Spot: Straight Talk About Sex and Love by Zane
#4 - Letters to a Young Brother: MANifest Your Destiny by Hill Harper
#5 - Peace from Broken Pieces: How to Get Through What You're Going Through by Iyanla Vanzant
#6 - Selected Writings and Speeches of Marcus Garvey by Marcus Garvey
#7 - The Ebony Cookbook: A Date with a Dish by Freda DeKnight
#8 - The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors by Frances Cress Welsing
#9 - The Mis-Education of the Negro by Carter Godwin Woodson

#10 - John Henrik Clarke and the Power of Africana History  by Ahati N. N. Toure

#11 - Fail Up: 20 Lessons on Building Success from Failure by Tavis Smiley

#12 -The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness by Michelle Alexander

#13 - The Black Male Handbook: A Blueprint for Life by Kevin Powell

#14 - The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates by Wes Moore

#15 - Why Men Fear Marriage: The Surprising Truth Behind Why So Many Men Can't Commit  by RM Johnson

#16 - Black Titan: A.G. Gaston and the Making of a Black American Millionaire by Carol Jenkins

#17 - Brainwashed: Challenging the Myth of Black Inferiority by Tom Burrell

#18 - A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life's Purpose by Eckhart Tolle

#19 - John Oliver Killens: A Life of Black Literary Activism by Keith Gilyard

#20 - Alain L. Locke: The Biography of a Philosopher by Leonard Harris

#21 - Age Ain't Nothing but a Number: Black Women Explore Midlife by Carleen Brice

#22 - 2012 Guide to Literary Agents by Chuck Sambuchino
#23 - Chicken Soup for the Prisoner's Soul by Tom Lagana
#24 - 101 Things Every Boy/Young Man of Color Should Know by LaMarr Darnell Shields

#25 - Beyond the Black Lady: Sexuality and the New African American Middle Class  by Lisa B. Thompson

*   *   *   *   *

Salvage the Bones

A Novel by Jesmyn Ward

On one level, Salvage the Bones is a simple story about a poor black family that’s about to be trashed by one of the most deadly hurricanes in U.S. history. What makes the novel so powerful, though, is the way Ward winds private passions with that menace gathering force out in the Gulf of Mexico. Without a hint of pretension, in the simple lives of these poor people living among chickens and abandoned cars, she evokes the tenacious love and desperation of classical tragedy. The force that pushes back against Katrina’s inexorable winds is the voice of Ward’s narrator, a 14-year-old girl named Esch, the only daughter among four siblings. Precocious, passionate and sensitive, she speaks almost entirely in phrases soaked in her family’s raw land. Everything here is gritty, loamy and alive, as though the very soil were animated. Her brother’s “blood smells like wet hot earth after summer rain. . . . His scalp looks like fresh turned dirt.” Her father’s hands “are like gravel,” while her own hand “slides through his grip like a wet fish,” and a handsome boy’s “muscles jabbered like chickens.” Admittedly, Ward can push so hard on this simile-obsessed style that her paragraphs risk sounding like a compost heap, but this isn’t usually just metaphor for metaphor’s sake. She conveys something fundamental about Esch’s fluid state of mind: her figurative sense of the world in which all things correspond and connect. She and her brothers live in a ramshackle house steeped in grief since their mother died giving birth to her last child. . . . What remains, what’s salvaged, is something indomitable in these tough siblings, the strength of their love, the permanence of their devotion.WashingtonPost

*   *   *   *   *

Incognegro: A Memoir of Exile and Apartheid

By  Frank B. Wilderson, III

Wilderson, a professor, writer and filmmaker from the Midwest, presents a gripping account of his role in the downfall of South African apartheid as one of only two black Americans in the African National Congress (ANC). After marrying a South African law student, Wilderson reluctantly returns with her to South Africa in the early 1990s, where he teaches Johannesburg and Soweto students, and soon joins the military wing of the ANC. Wilderson's stinging portrait of Nelson Mandela as a petulant elder eager to accommodate his white countrymen will jolt readers who've accepted the reverential treatment usually accorded him. After the assassination of Mandela's rival, South African Communist Party leader Chris Hani, Mandela's regime deems Wilderson's public questions a threat to national security; soon, having lost his stomach for the cause, he returns to America. Wilderson has a distinct, powerful voice and a strong story that shuffles between the indignities of Johannesburg life and his early years in Minneapolis, the precocious child of academics who barely tolerate his emerging political consciousness. Wilderson's observations about love within and across the color line and cultural divides are as provocative as his politics; despite some distracting digressions, this is a riveting memoir of apartheid's last days.Publishers Weekly

*   *   *   *   *

The White Masters of the World

From The World and Africa, 1965

By W. E. B. Du Bois

W. E. B. Du Bois’ Arraignment and Indictment of White Civilization (Fletcher)

*   *   *   *   *

Ancient African Nations

*   *   *   *   *

If you like this page consider making a donation

online through PayPal

*   *   *   *   *

Negro Digest / Black World

Browse all issues


1950        1960        1965        1970        1975        1980        1985        1990        1995        2000 ____ 2005        

Enjoy!

*   *   *   *   *

The Death of Emmett Till by Bob Dylan  The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll  Only a Pawn in Their Game

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson Thanks America for Slavery / George Jackson  / Hurricane Carter

*   *   *   *   *

The Journal of Negro History issues at Project Gutenberg

The Haitian Declaration of Independence 1804  / January 1, 1804 -- The Founding of Haiti 

*   *   *   *   *

*   *   *   *   *

ChickenBones Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)

 

 

 

 

 

 

update 29 December 2011

 

 

 

Home  Junious Ricardo Stanton Table