Another
Quagmire For The AmeriKKKan Empire
By Junious Ricardo Stanton
|
There is no question
that the US government was ill-prepared for the
aftermath of a war well fought. Many facilities, such as
electrical transformers and oil pumping stations that
had been meticulously spared by the air campaign, were
destroyed by looters and saboteurs. Many members of the
old regime escaped and have come back to haunt the
occupying authorities. Both problems have set the
reconstruction process back. The administration
implicitly conceded that something was amiss early on
when it sacked Jay Garner, a mild-mannered former
general, and replaced him as viceroy with the
tough-talking Paul Bremer. Mr Garner complained that his
outfit - the Pentagon's Office of Reconstruction and
Humanitarian Assistance - had been hastily assembled and
given neither the time nor the resources to prepare for
running a country of 24m people. Mr Garner had only two
months to plan and no more than 200 staffers to work
with. The lack of preparation is astounding not only
because the Iraq invasion had been long foreseen but
also because America and its allies have run so many
similar nation-building exercises in recent years:
Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, East Timor, Kosovo, Afghanistan.
Yet there has been little attempt to apply the lessons
of those places in Iraq." - Financial Times
July 2, 2003 |
The Bush cabal as Laurel and Hardy used to
say, have gotten themselves into another fine mess. The invasion
and occupation of Iraq was supposed to be a smooth orderly romp
in the park. Instead it displays the omens of a protracted
bitter struggle. Just as AmeriKKKa arrogantly went into Vietnam
to uphold European imperialism foolishly underestimating the
Vietnamese' will to resist foreign domination, so too have Bush
and Co. underestimated the Afghani and Iraqi people's will and
resolve.
US soldiers are dying on a daily basis in
Iraq and now the spotlight is back on Afghanistan as hostilities
flair up. Things are getting so hot the US propaganda machine
can no longer blame escalating US casualties in both Afghanistan
and Iraq on auto accidents or friendly fire.
In an article in the July 2 2003 online
version of Financial Times an Op-Ed piece written by a
senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations called for the
US to establish a Colonial Office. I suggest you read the piece
at www.FT.com -- it addresses the real issue, imperial
occupation, what must be done to "stabilize" Iraq. The
writer Max Boot asserts the situation in Iraq should have been
foreseen given the US involvement in other actions around the
world.
Boot's perspective on Iraq is typical of a
colonizer: arrogant to the point of dismissing the natural urge
of people to defend their families and homeland against takeover
by imperialist forces. He states quite candidly the imperialist
intentions of Bush and Co , "The lack of preparation is
astounding not only because the Iraq invasion had been long
foreseen but also because America and its allies have run so
many similar nation-building exercises in recent years: Somalia,
Haiti, Bosnia, East Timor, Kosovo, Afghanistan. Yet there has
been little attempt to apply the lessons of those places in
Iraq."
What lessons is he talking about? Haiti is
still feisty thank goodness. The last I heard there is fierce
resistance in Afghanistan; warlords hastened AmeriKKKa's
withdrawal from Somalia; East Timor was no piece of cake. The
jury is still out on Bosnia and Kosovo: despite seventy-some odd
days of "shock and awe" NATO bombings, ground troops,
and mercenaries are still needed in those countries to maintain
"order" years later! So what lessons can be learned
from these actions other than the possibility of long drawn-out
animus and conflict a la Vietnam?
Bush and Co have bitten off more than they
can chew especially since the US military forces are being
overextended all over the globe. Unlike US troops in Japan and
Germany following WWII when the US government succeeded in
molding pro-US governments, the people of Afghanistan and Iraq
detest the AmeriKKKan presence.
Boot called for an office of colonial
affairs, "We need to create a colonial office – fast. Of
course, it cannot be called that. It needs an anodyne euphemism
such as Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance.
But it should take its inspiration, if not its name, from the
old British Colonial Office and India Office. Together, these
two institutions ran large swaths of the world with a handful of
bright, honest, industrious civil servants. They had an enormous
impact, given the small numbers involved; there were seldom more
than 1,000 members of the Indian civil service to administer
hundreds of millions of Indians. Like its British predecessors,
the US colonial service needs to be an elite civilian agency
that can call on forces for assistance where appropriate."
Boot fails to realize Bush and Co are a bunch
of cold-blooded thieves who are used to doing their dastardly
deeds in the dark, they have their hands full trying to deal
with open resistance to their occupation by two very stubborn
nations while also trying to secretly expropriate the rest of
the world's resources. Boot also fails to recognize another
lesson of history, Britain lost its American colonies because it
overextended itself in wars around the world. The longer the
resistance to AmeriKKKan occupation goes, the deeper Bush and Co
will sink into the quagmire.
POSITIVELY
BLACK -- 5 July 2003 |