|
Books by Tom Dent
Southern
Journey /
Blue Lights and River Songs /
The Free Southern Theater
* *
* * *
Books by Jerry W. Ward Jr.
Trouble the Water
(1997) /
Black Southern Voices (1992)
* * * *
*
The Art of Tom Dent: Early Evidence
By Jerry W. Ward, Jr.
Dillard University Unless one is engaged in the task of writing a
fairly comprehensive biography, the study of a writer rarely
begins with attention to her or his juvenilia. A writer’s
early attempts to overcome various anxieties of influence, to
master the intricacies of language, and to forge a distinctive
voice are either dismissed or trivialized. This habit, or
perhaps convention, serves as a disadvantage within the
scholarly community. It precludes opportunities to make serious
inquiries about the origins of the writer’s later achievement
and power. Valid inquiries, of course, can be initiated at
points other than the formative years. Nevertheless, our
insights about style and the writer’s aesthetic might be
strengthened by trying to identify the literary origins of
creative production. This procedure is especially germane in
efforts to account for Tom Dent’s importance as an African
American writer and intellectual.
The governing presupposition for these notes is a claim about
quality in writing. The art or skill that makes good writing is
a possession of value and an activity of mind that is never
exactly, as Richard Wright accurately proposed in “Blueprint
for Negro Writing,” on the page. The art is in perspective.
The page is a catalyst for the engagement of the reader’s mind
with that of the writer; they collaborate on a vision of
reality, agreeing or disagreeing as the case might be.
Thomas
Covington Dent (or as he preferred, Tom Dent), a New Orleans
writer best known for his work with Free Southern Theater and
his extraordinarily popular play Ritual Murder, his
electric mentorship of younger writers and artists, and his work
in oral history that culminated in Southern Journey
(1997), certainly had perspective in the sense that
Richard Wright intended; Dent also had subtle political and
historically analytic perspectives on African American cultures.
These perspectives are richly manifested in Dent’s fledgling
work as a journalist, specifically from writing produced during
his tenure as editor-in-chief of the MAROON TIGER, the
Morehouse College newspaper, during 1951-52. His editorials in
Volume 53, Numbers 1-6, provide early evidence of what we are
beginning to understand about his orientation toward reality,
his aesthetic preferences, his complex and historically grounded
modes of thought and expression. This evidence, crucial for a
full assessment of Dent’s later work, marks Dent as a writer
from the Black South who sought something more substantial than
the vapors of fame.
Dent’s college editorials range from his measured
pronouncements as a serious undergraduate political science
major and history minor in the role of journalist to the playful
wittiness that became a telling feature in his later writings.
In these notes, brief summaries of the editorials must
substitute for the pleasure of reading them in the context of
other articles that bespeak a collegial mindset in the 1950s.
In Vol. 53, No. 1 (November 2, 1951), the editor’s corner
is entitled “Who Is To Blame? For Fixes and Scandals.”
Drawing attention to the expulsion of 90 West Point cadets
“for cribbing on examination,” Dent found the incident to be
an illustration of “what fruits a system of overemphasis on
college athletics has brought and will bring.”
Dent was keenly aware that events and decisions are not
one-dimensional. Blame, as he discerned, was systemic. The
athletes alone should not be blamed for being immoral and
corrupt, for they were “part of an immorality which has
engulfed not one, but all phases of our society.” Their fault
was getting caught. In Dent’s view, our “whole conception of
life needs a serious revamping.” The young Dent echoed the
idealism of his generation and of the self-contradicting 1950s
in the closing paragraphs:
|
We are beginning to see what’s happening, and people
everywhere are realizing that something somewhere is mighty wrong.
Men of truth and wisdom see that we have neglected the basic
ideals of life for a mechanical panacea which is expected to
give all the answers. They realize that
the machine is only a pseudo-solution for life’s problems,
and urge a speedy return to simple and basic qualities like
decency and truth.
Indeed our teachings and emphasis must reside on these
essential qualities if our civilization is to survive (2).
|
Dent’s pronouncement is to be interpreted in the context of
concerns for freedom, democracy, and civil rights and of unrest
among “people everywhere” caught in the machinations of the
Cold War. With time, Dent’s idealism would be transformed into
pragmatism, but he would always hold fast to belief in decency
and truth.
In the next issue of MAROON TIGER (Vol. 53, No. 2,
November 30, 1951), Dent moved from social moralizing to the
humor of language in a philosophy course at Morehouse.
“Danger! For Students in Philosophy Only” (2) deconstructed
the ease of answering questions about the metaphysical first
principles of Parmenides in Sam Williams’s eight o’clock
course by pointing to the danger of asking certain questions.
“Mr. Williams, if God made the world in the beginning he
must have been here before the beginning. How can that be?”
Dent answered the question in a way that illustrated the
fundamental instability of language. “Well, God didn’t make
the world in the beginning; he was the beginning, and then made
the world. But when he saw what kind of world it turned out to
be, he decided that the biggest mistake he made was to make
anything at all; so he destroyed everything and made the world
over again which was another beginning and that’s how God got
here before the beginning.” All was well in the course until
the same student asked “Well who made God?” Dent emphasized
the slipperiness of language and the oddity of humor by
sandwiching the editorial between “poetic” opening and
closing lines:
|
Man, I got Sam at eight o’clock in the morn.
How far is it from the top of Graves Hall to the lawn?
………
You see what I mean by “dangerous.”
Man, I got Sam at eight o’clock in the morn,
Wouldn’t it be wonderful to land on that lawn.
|
We may assume that a small number of Morehouse men valued
Dent’s ability to detect funny moments in the daily grind of
higher education. In a letter-to-the-editor published a few
months later, William Borders complimented Dent with subtle
humor of his own.
|
Dear Mr. Dent:
I am writing you concerning your article on philosophy as
taught by Mr. Williams. You should be commended for your
splendid technique, your choice of words, connectives, and most
of all, your sense of humor.
The last factor, I believe, stimulated an abundance of
interest. The analysis of a typical class period definitely
wipes away all doubt in my mind as to the course and most of
all, the instructor. Suffice it to say that your article
exemplifies the qualities of good English. Keep the good work
up!
|
Borders’s tone suggests that we might seek to locate
Dent’s humor in the particular ways he situated good English.
At the beginning of 1952, the last semester of his senior
year, Dent had much good work to do. He had to deal with a
crisis endemic among college newspaper: lack of genuine support
from students. In the January 17, 1952 issue, The Editor’s
Corner was replaced by Harold A. Hamilton’s guest editorial
“Importance of Being Earnest,” a gesture designed “to
establish cooperation between the MAROON TIGER and CLARK
PANTHER.” [Hamilton was the editor of the Clark College
paper.]
For this issue, Dent wrote “A Crisis Is Near,”
lamenting that producing the newspaper “has been a one-man
affair…The MAROON TIGER should not be a one-man
production. It takes too much time away from the editor, who has
to go to school too.” Dent claimed that since he had become
editor, “never has even half of the material come in on time.
It is always necessary to hunt the person down to get his
article, and in a great many cases the Editor has to write the
article himself if he is to get his material in to the publisher
on time”(2).
He also wrote a brief reply to a suggestion that more
students would read the paper if the articles pertained less to
sports and more to the “life of the student.” Dent indicated
he would be happy to receive “any definite suggestions as to
articles that would be ‘more interesting’ to the student
body as a whole” (2). These commonplaces do cast a pinpoint of
light on Dent’s later concerns with all facets of writing as a
discipline, especially the importance of listening to audiences.
Dent’s major editorial “Younger Generation Sad
Representative of American Youth” (Vol. 52, No. 4, February
27, 1952) reflected on a conclusion reached in the November 5,
1951 issue of Time. Dent agree with Time’s editors that
“the younger generation . . . lacks drive, lacks a belief in
something, and just lacks — period.” The conclusion, Dent
wrote, was “without a doubt justified”(2). Dent echoed the
prevailing sociological view of his “complacent” generation
in bold print:
|
But even the stigma of confusion doesn’t characterize our
generation properly. Many generations have been confused, but it
seems to me that the outstanding characteristic of our
generation is an apathy and general attitude of nonchalance. We
lack zip, fire, and spirit. We aren’t for anything and we
aren’t against anything. We just let things rest if they’ll
let us rest. This, to me, seems to be very bad because it means
that we are making no attempt to get out of the confusion. We
don’t want to fight it, we’re too tired. We’ve had too
much fighting and there is no desire to do any more of it. |
Dent was writing from the perspective that belonged to the
dream world of his youth, which he later described as “a
nonracial world, where we would find solace from the exclusively
black world we were confined to, where the color of our skin,
our racial heritage, did not matter (Southern Journey 2).”
The power of unstated integrationist assumptions inhabits
Dent’s language, the positioning pronoun “we” having a
decidedly James Baldwin flavor but not the strategic force of
Baldwin’s habitual undermining of American fallacies.
Nevertheless, Dent had the foresight to suggest that it was
delayed trauma rather than complacency that stymied his
generation. “Born in a depression, raised during a war and
being drafted to fight a new one if we didn’t fight the last
one, we have experienced nothing but insecurity” (2).
In this
sense, Dent displaced the conclusion presented by one Time
correspondent that youth would not engage in “a voracious
striking out from security, wealth and stability” (“The
Younger Generation ”52). One could not strike out from a
security one had never known. Moreover, as Dent noted in the
editorial, the prospect of being drafted for military service
during the Cold War produced special anxieties for college-aged
Negro males.
Dent’s acceptance of prevailing liberal ideology
and the intuition that his generation might someday become world
leaders was fraught with conflict. His struggle for balance in a
nonracial framework is early evidence which urges us to consider
how differently he would present the dilemma of racial exclusion
and civil complicity in later essays and poems. It was perhaps
comforting to Dent that Carter Wesley, editor of the Houston Informer, suggested in response to his editorial that
both adults and youths were confused but that “one has to have
a code one lives by from day-to-day, based upon the fundamentals
of virtue. The only peace in this world for a man lies in his
own soul----- (Wesley 2).”
Dent’s April 1952 editorial “When Professors Object We
Must Always Yield” was a humorous tale of Professor N. P.
Tillman’s being outraged that lines from his 1917 poem
“Tryst” had been quoted in A. Russell Brooks’ article on
the MAROON TIGER as a human document (Brooks 5). Tillman
threatened to sue, according to Dent, for violation of
copyright. Dent reminded Tillman the poem had been published in
a 1917 issue of the MAROON TIGER and that the newspaper did not
have a copyright.
Tillman proclaimed he would have the matter
brought before the discipline committee. Such a committee, to
Dent’s knowledge, did not exist. Feigning repentance, Dent
wrote: “I’m sorry we hurt your feelings, Mr. Tillman. We
will never print another word about you in the Maroon Tiger”
(2). Dent did not print one word about Tillman. He printed
several about the professor who was too “chicken” (Dent’s
word) to appreciate free publicity. The heart of the editorial
narrates the exchange between Tillman and Dent, and Dent’s
final sentence is wonderfully ironic: “O Lord! Now I never
will find out who Aberdeen was!” Dent pretended an inability
to distinguish a place from a person.
Dent’s final editorial, “The Summing Up and Moving On,”
appeared in the May 21, 1952 issue. It was not surprising that
he should have called for more positive support among
administrators, faculty, and students for extra-curricular
activities, especially athletics. Dent was an avid sports fan.
Dent did not urge favoritism but a clearer understanding that
“education is a broad process, and that by refusing to
cooperate with other activities that students are interested in
beside their assignments they [the faculty] are failing to fully
educate the student “(2). It is surprising, however, that
Dent’s chief complaint regarded tradition at Morehouse. That
particular criticism merits full quotation:
|
There is another evil which grows out of this traditionalism
which I think is slightly evident at Morehouse. It is a sort of
provincialism or stagnation. Some of the members of the
Morehouse community have been here so long that they have become
insensitive to outside happenings. This is a criticism I have of
some of the members of the Morehouse faculty. They are well
qualified but many of them have been here so long that they have
become ignorant of new methods, discoveries, etc. I want to make
it clear that this is not true of all Morehouse teachers, but it
is true of too many of them. This is bad because it means that
students who study under these teachers and go out into the
world community or to higher institutions of learning will not
be adequately prepared. Antiquated theory will not do in an
ever-changing world. We must live with our times if we are to
survive” (2, 7). |
Dent did not aim his parting shots at the philosophical
traditions which defined the role of his alma mater in
the history of African American culture. His target was the kind
of pedagogy which served to miseducate and underprepare Negro
students. Having been trained to think critically at Morehouse
by the brilliant political scientist Robert Brisbane, Dent could
discriminate nicely between the value of honoring tradition and
the negation that resulted from blind “worship” of
traditions. The work Dent would produce during the next four
decades is marked by his penchant for reason, for surgical
analysis of affairs, for being informed about the cutting edge
of history’s progress.
In Dent’s post-Morehouse life (1953-1998) and writing, one
finds that he abandoned antiquated theory in order to participate
fully in certain political and cultural transformations of the
latter twentieth century. He abandoned tradition and the
doctoral program in political science at Syracuse University to
immerse himself (from the perspective of the black middle class
into which he was born) in alarming activities.
His
participation in founding the legendary Umbra Workshop
(1962-1965), his civil rights activity as associate director of
the Free Southern Theater, his teaching younger writers through
the Free Southern Theater workshops and the Congo Square Writers
Union, his promotion of cultural and historical awareness
through the projects of the Southern Black Cultural Alliance,
his continuing research on music, folklife, and history as
executive director of the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage
Foundation, his final contribution to civil rights
historiography in Southern Journey — all these
experiences involved writing.
The early evidence from the editorial pages of the
MAROON
TIGER suggests that Dent was consistent in holding on to
primal values, to a code, even as he adopted new modes of
expression to free himself from some ideas the bourgeois
imagination sought to imprint upon his generation. Behind
Dent’s writing was the firm belief that one must discover
critical values in a sense of history, one must discover
perspectives that are effective in an ever-changing world.
What endures most in the work of Tom Dent is perspective, the
vantage points at which a writer places words, so that readers
see the purpose of collecting experiences and data and assessing
them while recognizing enough is never known and, then, laughing
to prevent self-destruction in confusion and despair. In summing
up his education at Morehouse and his experiences as an
undergraduate journalist, Dent confessed:
|
In my four years I have learned two things.
One is that I don’t know anything and the second is to laugh.
Since you don’t know anything, about the best you can do is
laugh it off and try again. (“The Summing Up…”
7)
|
* *
* * *
updated 9 April 2008
|