|
Nathaniel
of Southampton or Balaam’s Ass
God’s
Revelations in the Virginia Wilderness
By
Rudolph Lewis
For
the captured and chained Africans who crossed the Atlantic and
their descendants born in Virginia, the Christian Bible became
that instrument and guide which carved out new visions and
revelations within the context of the New World called America.
After two centuries in the American wilderness, God made these
“exiles” into a new people (African Americans) and established
with them a new covenant, and a method contrary to their masters
to interpret his holy word. For them, the Bible, including the Old
Testament, became more than just a history of the ancient Hebrew
and Israelite peoples and their relationship with Yahweh.
Over
two decades ago ten African-American Catholic bishops testified to
the role of culture and social status in determining biblical
belief and perspective. They wrote as follows: “The Bible was
not for our ancestors a mere record of the wonderful works of God
in a bygone age; it was a present record of what was soon to come.
God will lead his people from the bondage of Egypt. God will
preserve his children in the midst of the fiery furnace. God’s
power will make the dry bones scattered on the plain snap
together, and he will breathe life into them. Above all, the birth
and death, the suffering and the sorrow, the burial and the
resurrection tell how the story will end for all who are faithful,
no matter what the present tragedy is” (Pastoral Letter, 1984).
Thus, for African-American slaves (our
ancestors) the Christian Bible, including the Pentateuch, was a
book of liberation as well as one of redemption that protected and
defended the slave, the poor, and the powerless. The Pentateuch
legislation (Ex.20-23; Lev. 19, 25; Dt. 15, 24) demonstrates
definitively God’s concern for the oppressed. The narratives of
Hagar, Jacob, and Joseph in Genesis and of Moses in Numbers 12
assure us further that God favors those who are dependent upon
divine protection.
Our
masters, the Virginia slaveholders, however, used the Book for an
instrument of oppression. They made use of Noah’s curse of
Canaan and the Hebrew enslavement of their idolatrous neighbors
and their incorporation of slavery into their national life
(Gen.9, 12, 14, 20, 26, 47; Ex. 21; Lev. 25) to justify their
system of enslaving our ancestors. These traders in human flesh
cited chapter and verse in developing a racial ideology to show
God’s approval of their diabolical deeds and their repressive
relationship with their Christian servants, our fathers and
mothers.
So
when the colonies became a nation under the banner of freedom and
brotherhood, the interests and welfare of our ancestors were
dismissed. Two natives of Virginia, George Washington and Thomas
Jefferson (the first and third presidents), shuffled their feet
and scratched their heads and did nothing to bring relief to their
Christian servants. Against this new oppression (lahats),
our ancestors cried out (tsa’aq)
to God.
Our
gracious God did not forgive these American slaveholders. He would
not allow their sacrilegious acts nor their abuse of power to go
unchallenged. In the fall of 1800, in answer to our ancestors cry,
God sent his people a prophet and a preacher. He was born of a
newly arrived African woman bought on the trading block in
Suffolk, Virginia. This child was fathered by a Southampton
slave owner who raped his mother immediately after purchase. Born
of two antagonistic worlds, this child was named Nathaniel (in
Hebrew meaning the “gift of God”). He was raised in the
household of his father and master, Benjamin Turner, a Methodist
slave owner who resided in the Village of Cross Keys, near a town
named Jerusalem, the seat of government in Southampton County,
Virginia.
While
a child, Nathaniel lived a privileged life (for a slave) and given
the opportunity, he exhibited his powers of knowledge and insight.
He learned to read without being taught. He knew of events that
happened before his birth. By all accounts, black and white,
Nathaniel as an adult knew by heart the Scriptures from Genesis to
Revelation. This slave-owner community, especially the Christian
slaves, became aware of Nathaniel’s divine markings, his promise
of freedom, and his mission of liberation. The prophet Nathaniel,
our ancestors believed, was their Moses, sent to leave them out of
bondage.
Sometime
between 1816 and 1819, Nathaniel experienced both a biblical
revelation and a visitation by the Holy Spirit. Here, in his own
words is how he described these miraculous events.
By this time, having arrived to man's estate, and hearing the
Scriptures commented on at meetings, I was struck with that
particular passage which says: "Seek ye the kingdom of Heaven
and all things shall be added unto you." I reflected much on
this passage, and prayed daily for light on this subject - As I
was praying one day at my plough, the spirit spoke to me, saying
"Seek ye the kingdom of Heaven and all things shall be added
unto you." This passage on the kingdom can be found at
Matthew 6:33 and Luke 12:31.
The
intent of my discussion here is not to relate the full history of
the prophet Nathaniel and his relationship with the Christian
slaveholders of Cross Keys, Virginia. Nor will I provide an
exposition in detail of the devastating events of the summer and
fall of 1831 that made plain the wrath of God in which both slave
and slaveholder in great numbers were slaughtered.
This
overview of the Nathaniel Turner story is merely a preamble to a
more general argument. My intent is to point out the thematic
connection that exists between the story of the diviner Balaam
(and his ass) and that of the Prophet Nathaniel. The theme of the
above two cited gospel passages asserts man’s dependence on God.
This theme of man’s dependence on God, Balaam made explicit when
he informed King Balac that he could do nothing, “small or
great, contrary to the command of the Lord, my God” (Num.
22:18-19). Balac wanted Balaam to curse the Israelite people whose
incursions into Moab threatened Balac’s kingdom.
Like
Balaam, Nathaniel too was in the midst of a crisis situation.
During the early 1800s in Cross Keys and throughout Virginia, the
slaveholders changed from one form of economic activity to
another. Because agricultural prices plummeted, Christian
slaveholders began a trade in what they called “black gold.”
Instead of pigs and crops of the field, they developed an unsavory
commerce by the breeding and selling of men, women, and children
(our ancestors) for slave markets in the Deep South. It was by
these means that they sought to have comfort and wealth for
themselves and their children and their posterity.
Self-proclaimed
representatives of God, these Christian slaveholders did not
assure their Christian servants of just and proper treatment. They
separated husband from wife, parents from children. These New
World rulers used
young Christian slave girls to satisfy their base appetites.
Moreover, these Methodist Christians began to racialize the
Scriptures and their worship. Their Christian slaves were not
allowed to worship or take communion in their churches. The
oppression of our ancestors exceeded all bounds that could be
justified by the Pentateuch or the New Testament.
In
both these stories incredulity plays a devastating role. King
Balac did not believe Balaam’s words that it was not in his
power to bless or curse. Balac believed he could buy God’s
favor. He believed he could influence God by his earthly wealth
and power. Similarly, the slaveholders of Cross Keys thought that
their successful pursuit of wealth, their building of churches and
costly altars would cause God to favor them over those whom they
ruled and abused. These good Christians slaveholders of Cross Keys
could not fathom that God would choose his spokesman from among
their Christian slaves to speak his truth.
In
this spiritual reality of man’s dependence on God, freedom and
land are sub-themes in both the Nathaniel and Balaam narratives.
The Hebrew people in Egypt became a new people, namely, the
children of Jacob, or the Israelites. God liberated them from
Pharaoh’s rule and slavery. Yet God renewed with them the
promise of land that he had made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and
fulfilled that promise in giving them the victory over the
idolatrous and swaggering natives of Canaan.
Through
Nathaniel, God promised African Americans freedom. That freedom
came within less than forty years after the martyrdom of Prophet
Nathaniel. God’s promise to our ancestors was not as restricted
as that which he made to the Israelites. There was no physical
place that Nathaniel could lead his people. God’s prophet
Nathaniel preached a total liberation, as did the prophet Isaiah (Isa.
19:23-24. For African Americans, Canaan Land was/is a spiritual
place or reality, like the kingdom of heaven (Mt 6:33 and Lk
12:31). Their freedom and land were to be given and allotted among
those who despised and oppressed them.
In
great measure all that God promised our ancestors was
accomplished. Yet many of my brethren have not/do not give thanks
fully to what God wrought for us, nor what God revealed through
his servant Nathaniel. Some have given and give thanks more so to
Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy than they do to God and his prophet
Nathaniel. In these days and times, few appreciate the blessings
that God bestowed on Nathaniel and our ancestors. Nathaniel’s
powers of invisibility and prophecy are mocked by the sciences
and social sciences of modernism.
Coming
under the influence of modern education, too many African
Americans have lost their faith in God and of God in man. But I
tell you, if the Spirit of God can enter into Balaam’s ass and
cause him to see the Angel of our Lord and speak the words of
Yahweh, it was indeed a small miracle our Lord performed in the
Prophet Nathaniel. Because of doctrine and dogma, our detractors
would have us believe that God no longer speaks to man except
through biblical revelation. For them, revelation (God’s
self-revelation to man) ceased with the first-century Christians.
But
those of us who still hold to God’s covenant, we know that God
still speaks today to our hearts and minds. He speaks to those who
have faith and ears to hear and eyes to see. We still yet have
prophets (men and women) among us. The Holy Spirit too is still
among us teaching the truth of God’s words and his ways and
leading us along the true path. There are growing numbers of
African Americans who spiritually understand that Nathaniel was a
true prophet, an apostle of the Living Christ, and a martyr in his
name. In his work, he was greater than Balaam and his ass and much
more clear-sighted in his desire for a universal and just religion.
* *
* * *
Nathaniel
Turner
Christian
Martyrdom in Southampton
A
Theology of Black Liberation
By Rudolph Lewis
* *
* * *
Nathaniel Turner, the Bible,
& the Sword
A
Reconsideration of the 1831 “Confessions”
By
Rudolph Lewis
Biblical
Scholars, Theologians & Other Commentators
on Nathaniel
Turner of Southampton
Compiled by
Rudolph Lewis
*
* * * *
Zippety Doo Dah, Zippety-Ay: How Satisfactch'll Is
Education Today? Toward a New Song of the South
Dr. Joyce E. King on
Black Education and New Paradigms
*
* * * *
The State of African Education
(April 200)
Attack On Africans Writing Their Own History Part 1 of 7
Dr Asa
Hilliard III speaks on the assault of academia on Africans writing and
accounting for their own history.
Dr Hilliard is A teacher,
psychologist, and historian.
Part 2 of 7
/
Part
3 of 7 /
Part 4 of 7
/
Part 5 of 7 /
Part 6 of 7 /
Part 7 of 7
*
* * * *
Basil Davidson's "Africa Series"
Different
But Equal /
Mastering A Continent /
Caravans
of Gold /
The King and the City /
The Bible and The Gun
West Africa Before the Colonial Era: A
History to 1850
By
Basil Davidson
African Slave Trade: Precolonial History,
1450-1850
By Basil Davidson
* *
* * *
 |
1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus
Created
By Charles C. Mann
I’m
a big fan of Charles Mann’s previous
book
1491:
New Revelations of the Americas Before
Columbus, in which he
provides a sweeping and provocative
examination of North and South America
prior to the arrival of Christopher
Columbus. It’s exhaustively researched
but so wonderfully written that it’s
anything but exhausting to read. With
his follow-up,
1493, Mann has taken it to a
new, truly global level. Building on the
groundbreaking work of Alfred Crosby
(author of
The Columbian Exchange and, I’m
proud to say, a fellow Nantucketer),
Mann has written nothing less than the
story of our world: how a planet of what
were once several autonomous continents
is quickly becoming a single,
“globalized” entity.
Mann not only talked to countless
scientists and researchers; he visited
the places he writes about, and as a
consequence, the book has a marvelously
wide-ranging yet personal feel as we
follow Mann from one far-flung corner of
the world to the next. And always, the
prose is masterful. In telling the
improbable story of how Spanish and
Chinese cultures collided in the
Philippines in the sixteenth century, he
takes us to the island of Mindoro whose
“southern coast consists of a number of
small bays, one next to another like
tooth marks in an apple.” We learn how
the spread of malaria, the potato,
tobacco, guano, rubber plants, and sugar
cane have disrupted and convulsed the
planet and will continue to do so until
we are finally living on one integrated
or at least close-to-integrated Earth.
Whether or not the human instigators of
all this remarkable change will survive
the process they helped to initiate more
than five hundred years ago remains,
Mann suggests in this monumental and
revelatory book, an open question. |
* *
* * *
|
Ratification
The People Debate the Constitution,
1787-1788
By Pauline Maier
A notable historian
of the early republic, Maier devoted a
decade to studying the immense
documentation of the ratification of the
Constitution. Scholars might approach
her book’s footnotes first, but history
fans who delve into her narrative will
meet delegates to the state conventions
whom most history books, absorbed with
the Founders, have relegated to
obscurity. Yet, prominent in their local
counties and towns, they influenced a
convention’s decision to accept or
reject the Constitution. Their
biographies and democratic credentials
emerge in Maier’s accounts of their
elections to a convention, the political
attitudes they carried to the conclave,
and their declamations from the floor.
The latter expressed opponents’
objections to provisions of the
Constitution, some of which seem
anachronistic (election regulation
raised hackles) and some of which are
thoroughly contemporary (the power to
tax individuals directly). Ripostes from
proponents, the Federalists, animate the
great detail Maier provides, as does her
recounting how one state convention’s
verdict affected another’s. Displaying
the grudging grassroots blessing the
Constitution originally received, Maier
eruditely yet accessibly revives a
neglected but critical passage in
American history.—Booklist |
 |
* * * *
*
* *
* * *
update 3 October 2011
|