Big Brother Africa: Debasing Self For
A Fee
By
Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye
Recently,
Big Brother Africa (BBA2) Reality Show ended in
South Africa amidst much din, slimy scandals and
lingering controversies, and the only coherent statement
it was able to make was that in this our very
unfortunate and bankrupt age, money has acquired an even
greater and awesome powers, and its capacity to compel
otherwise rational human beings to gleefully part ways
with every bit of their honour and dignity, be
disdainful all considerations for decency and
self-esteem, and enthusiastically indulge in several
nauseating, self-debasing acts, has exceeded what anyone
had thought was possible in decent society.
I am not a fan of
the Big Brother nonsense, and all such shows, like
beauty pageants, where people are paid and cheered on to
throw their honour and dignity as human beings to the
dogs, to satisfy the depraved taste of irredeemable
voyeurs. In fact, if there were no generous reports
about these events in the media, which one occasionally
glanced through, I may never have known that anything
like BBA2 ever took place. But I am a grateful that I
read some of those reports, because, it would never have
occurred to me that some murky-hearted fellows, with
excess cash to spend, could go all out to turn their
fellow human beings into a little less than animals,
confined in some glorified human zoo, where the most
depraved among them could go as wild and immoral as he
or she could, to dishonour and make a very big fool of
himself or herself, before millions of TV viewers in
Africa and beyond, in order to earn $100, 000.
While this lure
of lucre endures, do these fellows ever stop to think
that the footage of their disgraceful outing in South
Africa would survive tomorrow, and that they would have
children and grandchildren whose sensibilities would be
perpetually assaulted by the awful pornographic footages
they were gleefully producing in their blind rush for
$100,000?
According to
reports, the Housemates took their bathe together during
what they called “Shower
Hour,” and while the boys stripped to their
boxers, the girls bared everything, not just before the
boys whom they had never met until they were selected
and confined in the Big Brother zoo, but, also, millions
of viewers out there, which may have included kids from
their households and neighborhoods! (Forget the
age-restriction crap). Imagine the kid brothers and
sisters or tender nephews and nieces of the Housemates
seeing their big aunties they once held in high esteem
flaunting their stark nudity on the screen with every
brazenness and shamelessness. What in the name of all
that is decent and noble can we possibly call this?
Well, some of the
girls, however, occasionally bathed with their
underpants on, and only bared their chests, but that, no
doubt, did not diminish the grave obscenity the whole
thing still constituted.
Now how would
these clearly bird-brained fortune hunters rejoin and
face the same society before whom they had shamelessly
and grossly cheapened themselves, by flaunting the pride
of their womanhood before every willing eye? Should
even $1billion dollars be enough to compel anyone to do
this?
Indeed, Feminists
and Women Rights activists would never protest this
clear debasement of the woman, because this is not the
kind of advocacy that attracts grants. This should not
be surprising to anyone because it is still from the
same cabal that prosecutes these obscene shows that the
major bulk of sponsorships flow.
Although
virtually everything about BBA was horrible, revolting
and scandalous, a consensus exists that the most
horrible scandal it yielded, now popularly known as “fingergate,”
reportedly, took place on Saturday, 27 October 2007. I
first read about it on
Nigerians In America, in an
article by Ms. Bolanle Aduwo, a
screenwriter, broadcaster and producer.
Please permit me
to quote her account of the obscene incident:
|
Biggie had
provided plenty of booze (undiluted, Russian
vodka) and what resulted was an incident
that will definitely go down as one of the
most scandalous moments in Big Brother
history. The housemates became crazed,
drunken zombies and engaged in acts better
suited for a porno movie. The evening
eventually ended in what many call a
possible rape! Or how do you explain the
actions of Richard, the 24-year-old
Tanzanian film student and the only male
occupant of the House fondling and
‘fingering’ a comatose, blind-drunk Ofunneka,
a 29-year-old Medical Assistant from
Nigeria?…The whole of Africa saw this girl’s
“privates”… What happened… horrified viewers
as Richard lying between the two comatose
women, undressed them and began to fondle,
kiss and ‘finger’ both of them!” |
This incident had provoked
serious outrage across Africa. A Women Rights group in
South Africa had called for the footage of the incident,
only to announce later, after viewing it, that it agreed
with MNET, that what happened between Richard and
Ofunneka was consensual. Nigeria’s House of
Representatives, groping for some form of self-redeeming
tasks, after
Ettehgate, had also waded into the matter,
something I had thought was an entirely private
misadventure between the girl and the South African
prurient millionaires.
But why does it seem Africa
has suddenly awakened from its moral slumber just
because fingergate happened? Well, if you ask me,
the matter is very simple: Even if there were no “fingergate,”
all the people who participated in BBA2 had irremediably
soiled their honour and dignity? What sort of girls
would gleefully strip themselves nude, to bathe, not
only in the full gaze boys, but also before more than
one million TV viewers across Africa? (If the boys wore
their shorts and the girls chose to bare everything,
what kind of statement were they making about their
gender?) Just the other day, while gathering materials
for this piece, I stumbled on a blog where a photograph
of Ofunneka was posted holding her towel apart and
proudly baring her not particularly appealing chest for
all to see! So, even without “fingergate,” was that not
self-demeaning enough?
On Monday, I visited a
website,
www.ofunneka.com, where all sorts of hate posts were
heaped on the doorsteps of “Richard the rapist,” who
“stole the crown.” All sorts of stories were dredged up
to rubbish the Tanzanian, as if he did not rubbish
himself enough while in the BBA zoo. But while countless
sympathizers were out there condemning MNET for the
indecent show and calling for Richard’s head for
“sexually abusing” Ofunneka, the “innocent,
well-behaved, but stone-drunk symbol of decent African
woman,” the girl was at the other place addressing a
press conference, apologizing for what happened and
dismissing reports that she was raped. Saturday PUNCH
of November 24, 2007, quotes her as saying: “I will
say that I let down my guards a little, but then I am
human.”
I am seriously touched by
this girl’s predicament. It is painful to imagine that
she might carry the shame of her disastrous BBA
appearance all her life. It must be clear to her now
that whoever counseled her into the BBA folly has done
her a grave harm. The most noble job she must engage
herself in now would be to always dissuade any other
person she encounters to avoid BBA like a plague despite
the money.
In this internet age, it
should not surprise her that countless blogs would
spring up tomorrow, attracting serious traffic to
themselves with footages of “fingergate” and some of her
nude pictures from
Shower Hour at the
Big Brother zoo. A costly mistake has already been made
by going to the BBA house, and a costly price must be
paid.
But, if by her own painful
predicament, other young Africans are able to learn that
it is practically impossible to safeguard one’s honour
and dignity in such a morally bankrupt enclave like BBA
house, created solely to promote obscenity and
depravity, to service the vulgar tastes of prurient men
and women, she should consider the sacrifice worthwhile.
Who is even sure that “fingergate” was not scripted
and directed by MNET, to diminish her rising profile in
the media as the symbol of true African woman, which
would have created serious problems for MNET when
eventually Richard was declared “winner”?
By Richard's “victory”,
what statement has MNET succeeded in making? That it was
alright for a man who was married to suddenly “fall in
love” with another woman he had just met on a reality TV
show; engage in open and revolting adulterous acts with
this new lover or concubine on satellite TV, knowing
full well that his wife was at home watching; and then
while in the same bed with his new lover, he engages in
wild sexual acts with yet another woman, on the same
bed! And after it all, according to a report in
Namibian of October 29, 2007, he excitedly
pronounces: “I have seen the rivers and mountains of Big
Brother…I’m going to bump all the women in BBA house.”
What a vulgar celebration of hideous conquests!
With all the
nauseating exploits of Richard’s, which earned him the
prize, what MNET is saying is that for anyone to win the
next BBA (assuming this won’t be the last), he must
simply become an animal like Richard, because it is only
animals that win its price; yes, such a person must
regard and treat women as mere playthings.
Now the point
has also been regularly made, namely, why watch BBA if
you know it would offend your mind? Indeed, amateur porn
channels and websites like BBA abound, but they do not
attract generous positive reviews from “serious”
newspapers like BBA does. MNET can afford to inflict its
violent obscenity only on interested viewers if it could
check its invasion of our newspaper pages the way it
does.
Nor should the
government show more than a passing interest in shows
like BBA, as the Nigerian House Assembly or the Federal
Government did recently. Now, I have no problems with
the Information Minister, Mr. John Odey, offering a job
to Miss Ofunneka Molokwu, as he reportedly did the other
day, if that would console her, but he has no right to
declare that by appearing on that reprehensible show,
she has “represented us well” and has, today, become
“the Heart of Africa.”
No doubt, it must be clear to the
minister that he was speaking himself, and I insist that
he makes this clear immediately. In fact, President Umar
Musa Yar’Adua must call him to order before he uses the
stain of BBA to further rubbish his ailing regime. On no
account must the Federal Government appear to endorse
such a horribly obscene show that has offended many
decent people in Africa and has even been banned by some
African governments.
Mr. Odey,
since he had excess time to squander, should have merely
consoled the girl, assuaged her pain over the BBA
misadventure, but more importantly, used that
opportunity to urge other Nigerians youths to shun such
shows no matter the huge prize money they dangle, if
they do not wish to encounter such tragedies like “fingergate.”
And I think I am right.
* *
* * *
scruples2006@yahoo.com /
www.ugochukwu.blog.com
Thursday, 06 December 2007
posted 7 December 2007 |