Blacks As Whipping Boys
By Junious
Ricardo Stanton
|
The
corporate elite-owned and controlled media function to
create a climate of opinion, to shape social perception
by framing the reality and information which basically
shapes perception by framing the reality and information
which basically shapes the formation and expression of
opinions. They do this mainly through setting the issues
agenda, that is by controlling the "domain of
discourse" e.g. determining what is worthy of
public exposure and discussion. They choose what issues
and information are to be emphasized, to be ignored or
suppressed. Consequently they create visibility and
legitimacy for certain persons, groups and opinions and
thereby impose limits on public knowledge, interest,
discourse, understanding, behavioral orientation and
capacity.
-- Dr. Amos Wilson Blueprint For
Black Power, p. 229 |
The revelation New York Times
journalist Jayson Blair plagiarized stories, took credit for
work that was not his own, and created the impression he was
involved in incidents that in fact he was not, has taken a
bizarre twist. At a time when many AmeriKKKans realize the
corporate owned media shape reality to fit the agenda of the
ruling elites and increasingly more truth seekers are turning to
other sources such as the Internet, shortwave radio, and
satellite television for their information, Jayson Blair's
indiscretions are being used by the Times and related
media as a ruse to kill two birds with one stone.
The mostly white male editorial
boards of the mainstream and alternative media have pounced on
Blair with both feet denouncing him as a traitor to journalistic
integrity, something we all know is virtually non existent in
these times of universal deceit, disinformation and denial, to
further malign African people and take pot shots at
"Affirmative Action.". In effect Jayson Blair has
become the scapegoat and whipping boy for the multifarious sins
of the corporate owned media. Jayson Blair resigned in disgrace
amidst the hoots and jeers of his white peers -- all of whom,
truth be told, at one time or another under deadline or
editorial pressure have done some of the things they've verbally
stoned Blair for.
How can a media so embedded (as in
prostitution) with the out and out fascists who run this country
point fingers at Jayson Blair? What Blair did is both unethical
and indefensible especially from an Afrocentric point because
that misguided "brother" was doing dirty work for one
of the paragons of global white supremacy!
AmeriKKKan mythology posits freedom of the
press as one of the rights guaranteed by the "Bill of
Rights," which purportedly ensures a diversity of ideas and
an open vibrant public discussion and debate of the issues
facing the people on a daily basis. However, in reality the mass
media has always supported the ideology and agenda of the ruling
elites from slavery to their current campaign of global
imperialism and domination. Case in point, the recent Invasion
of Iraq, despite widespread opposition to a unilateral assault
on Iraq by conscious AmeriKKKans and peace-loving people all
over the world, the corporate owned media pushed the
administration's fascist agenda, parroting Bush's lies about
"weapons of mass destruction" and Saddam Hussein
posing an immediate threat to the US.
Every network talking head became a
cheerleader for US imperialism. There was absolutely no anti-war
presence on the major networks and cable news agencies. Any
dissent was met with swift retaliation, intimidation, and
attack. Anyone who dared challenge the administration party line
was denounced as unpatriotic, a supporter of terrorism, or a
coward. So much for diversity, freedom of thought and
expression. The disclosure of Blair's plagiarism comes on the
heels of mounting public derision following the Bush
administration's failure to produce the weapons of mass
destruction that prompted the pre-emptive invasion of another
weak and defenseless nation (given AmeriKKKa is the dominant
Western military superpower most nations in its cross hairs will
be much weaker and relatively easy pickings; with the exception
of North Korea).
The corporate-owned mass media served as
lapdogs and cheerleaders for the ruling elites' invasion and
occupation of both Afghanistan and Iraq now most thinking people
are beginning to suspect, we have been played big time. The New
York Times is one of the main culprits. The Times
was one of the primary targets of CIA infiltration in Operation
Mockingbird which dates back to the late '40's. The Times
has a long history of CIA/journalistic collusion. Which is
worse, plagiarizing someone else's work or promoting lies and
fascist imperialist policies that cost the lives of hundreds of
US soldiers and countless innocent civilians in Afghanistan and
Iraq? Aren't both unethical and immoral? That's what makes the
media's chastisement of Blair all the more hypocritical.
POSITIVELY BLACK
posted 19 may 2003 |