|
Book by John Maxwell
How to Make Our Own News: A Primer for Environmentalist and Journalists
* * * * *
Building
Utopia on a Garbage Heap
By John Maxwell In the United
States the ship of state sails on. The band plays on the
promenade deck where the Emperor presides, resplendent in his
new clothes. Below decks, however, it is a different story, with
the stokers and the oilers, the spinners and the bilge-men,
slaving away to repair the growing breach in the
double-bottomed, gold-plated hull. Some think they may have hit
an iceberg.
Every day, it
seems, a new crack appears in the credibility of the White
House. Dr Condoleezza Rice is, after all, to testify under oath
to the 9/11 commission, after it appeared that the
Administration’s refusal to allow her to do so is worrying
many Americans.
Then, a few days
ago, it was discovered that thousands of pages of documents
which the Clinton Library had wanted the Commission to see, had
been blocked by the Bush White House. Of course, people are
beginning to wonder whether these documents might prove that
Richard Clarke is right when he said that President Bush had
taken his eye off the Al Quaida ball, with disastrous effects.
Then, on Friday,
the Independent in London published an interview with a
woman called Sibel Edmonds, a Turkish American translator who
worked briefly for the FBI intelligence office. She says
during her time at the FBI, documents she saw made it clear that
the US National Security adviser, Dr Rice, had told an
”outrageous lie” when she said that there was no
intelligence warning the administration that terrorists were
planning to attack buildings in the US with aircraft.
Mrs Edmonds says
she has provided information to the panel investigating the 9/11atrocity
which proved senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's plans to
attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.
She gave the Commission information that was circulating within
the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an
attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists
were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to
silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by
citing "state secrets privilege".
Normally, one would
expect that such an explosive charge would get at least as much
publicity as has been given to the transcendentally significant
Grand Jury investigation into the charge of child molestation
against Michael Jackson. Instead, TV anchors are apologising for
telling the truth when it doesn’t suit the White House; and
people alleged to be journalists, such as Wolf Blitzer
find it necessary to help the White House smear and discredit
people like whistleblower Richard Clarke. Another so called
journalist, Robert Novak, having allowed himself to be used as
an instrument of the White House in smearing an earlier
whistleblower, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, is exporting his
talents.
Candide
in Haiti
Novak has recently
been used to try to embellish the image of the gunmen now ruling
Haiti. According to Novak, the Haitian ‘Prime Minister’ La
Tortue “is correct in calling the rebels
‘freedom fighters’”.
According to Novak
“The radical president's [Aristide’s] reign left a
country without electricity, passable roads or public schools,
with a devastated economy and, according to LaTortue, a looted
treasury.” (Novak has been to Haiti before, for the same
propaganda purposes, so he should know the facts.)
La Tortue told
Novak: "The public finance is in crisis. They (the Aristide
regime) took everything they could from the reserve of the
country." His estimate: "over $1 billion stolen in
four weeks.” (Emphasis added)
Novak is either the
most credulous journalist in history or he is a willing tool of
the thugs now ruling with US protection. Maybe he is both,
because it is difficult to understand how anybody could give
credence to anyone who claims that “over $1 billion”
was stolen from Haiti. Perhaps Aristide made away with the
entire stock of Monopoly game sets in Haiti, but even that could
hardly have provided him with one billion of anything.
Novak, of course,
is meant to lend a gloss to the libels and fantasies now
creating a storm in certain news media. On Friday the regime
announced that it would seek Aristide’s extradition from
Jamaica for all manners of crimes. Which might be a good idea,
since the pathetic pettifoggers who run the country would be
forced at last either to put up or shut up.
That may be wishful
thinking, since the Haitian Opposition has been never been able
to produce the evidence of the misdeeds it has historically
charged against Aristide.
Perhaps the
Jamaican government should become interested in this ten-cent
opera. The Jamaican government, it seems to me, is doing its
level best to find a way around common sense and the law in
order to recognise the bunch of murderers and their accomplices
who now say they rule Haiti. And, of course, the demand for
extradition would be heard in a Jamaican court according to our
rules of evidence and with the press present.
As I said on a
television programme a few weeks ago, the only thing Aristide
has not yet been accused of is cannibalism. But that too,
may be in the offing.
Perhaps the
Jamaican government should seek the advice and assistance of Mr
Ira Lowenthal, the head cook and bottlewasher of the Haiti
Democracy Project, who is now stationed in Jamaica, busily
enhancing our democracy. Apparently, Mr Lowenthal, an expert on
voudou, spent years on a USAID mission "enhancing
Haitian democracy”.
He is on a similar
contract in Jamaica. Should we be alarmed?
De-criminalising
Haiti
Haiti’s basic
problem is a systemic one. Because of the hostility and the
constant threat of invasion from France, Britain, and the United
States in the nineteenth century the Haitian revolutionaries
organised every institution in Haiti along military lines, with
soldiers in charge, everywhere. The mulatto elite found it easy
to co-opt and corrupt this system with their money and it was
further co-opted and corrupted by the US occupation after 1915.
All signs of
incipient democracy among the peasants have been repeatedly and
violently aborted – the latest being four weeks ago. The
best brains have been driven out or murdered and the power has
almost always been in the hands of the elite and their servant
army.
The Nobel Peace
prize winner and former President of Costa Rica Oscar Arias has
been making impassioned pleas against the reinstatement of the
Haitian army:
|
Like so
many Third World countries, Haiti has suffered not only
from a lack of national security in the sense of borders
and territorial integrity but also an ongoing crisis of
human security, the right of each person to live in
peace and with the guarantee of basic rights such as
food, healthcare, education, and citizenship. The army,
long an instrument of suppressive authoritarian regimes,
has historically deprived Haitians of these fundamental
rights.
Isolated
and destitute, Haitians have been terrorized not only by
military violence but also by its accompanying legacy of
poverty. In the late 1980s, the army consumed
approximately 40 percent of the national budget [almost
as bad as the IMF -jm] even as hunger and AIDS
decimated the population. Haiti could count on one
soldier for every 1,000 citizens, and 1.5 doctors for
every 10,000. |
It is clear to most
observers except the Bush White House that Haiti cannot be
treated as some foreign relations triumph, as Mr Powell’s visit next
week will suggest.
The UN Special
Envoy to Haiti, Reginald Dumas, declared this week that the
UN should be committing itself to a long-term mission in Haiti
to last about twenty years, "We cannot continue with the
start-stop cycle that has characterized relations between the
international community and Haiti. You go in, you spend a couple
of years, you leave, the Haitians are not necessarily involved
and the whole thing collapses. This has to stop," Dumas
said he told the council
“There has to be
a long-term commitment, which I perceive the council is ready
and willing to give," Dumas said. "It must
be coordinated assistance. It must be sustained assistance, and
it must be assistance that involves the people of Haiti. It
cannot be a situation in which the UN or some other agency goes
in a says `I have this for you.' There has to be discussion.
There has to be cooperation, or else it will fail again."
This is what
Aristide was attempting to do, but he was sabotaged at every
step by the United States CIA and USAID, by the European Union,
by the IMF, and the World Bank.whose ideological commitment
cannot comprehend the development of grass roots democracy and
prefer to believe that select elements of 'civil society' will
be able to provide at least a democratic facade.
That facade is
intended to provide a mask for the slavery Haitians fought
so valiantly to extinguish 200 years ago. The most significant
actions of the outside world in the past month have been –
1.
A loan from the World Bank, the first since 1998, to a
private company which intends to produce free-zone manufactures
for the US market and
2.
the US Congress initiative – “The Haiti
Economic Recovery Opportunity Act Of 2004,” which will extend
concessions to clothing and other goods produced in Haiti at
starvation wages in free zones.
Aristide Speaks
“On another day,
I walked down another [slum] corridor and three young girls –
wearing second-hand dresses thrown away by nice middle-class
girls in a northern country and brought here by profiteering
middlemen – these young girls were selling themselves for
quarters and dimes and less, to any man – and that was the new
generation of my beloved country. . . .
“I say to them,
come back and make a new Haiti. Spurn comfort. Come back, live
in misery and build a new way. . . . You know how hard it is to
build Utopia on a garbage heap; indeed it is hard to build even
a decent poor man’s home there. But that’s all we ask, a
decent poor man’s home, and no more corruption, no more
inflicted misery, no more children bathing in sewage.”
“…We are all
living under a system so corrupt that to ask for a plate of rice
and beans every day for every man woman and child is to preach
revolution. That is the crime of which I stand accused!”
(Jean Bertrand Aristide: In the Parish of the
Poor)
Copyright 2004 by John Maxwell
maxinf@cwjamaica.com * *
* * *
update 16 June 2008 |