|
Books by Amiri
Baraka
Tales of the Out &
the Gone
/
The Essence of Reparations /
Somebody Blew Up
America & Other Poems
/
Blues People
Autobiography
of LeRoi Jones/Amiri Baraka /
Selected Poetry of
Amiri Baraka/LeRoi Jones
/
Black Music
* *
* * *
CDs by James
Brown
Live
at the Apollo /
Messing with the Blues /
20 All-time Greatest Hits /
Star Time /
50th Anniversary Collection /
Foundations of Funk
The PayBack /
Say
It Live and Loud
* *
* * *
James
Brown, Amiri Baraka, & James Forman
Climbing
Malcolm’s Ladder
Black Rhetoric in a Post-Modern Age
By Rudolph Lewis
James Brown Opens the Door
There was no vitally conscious time when
James Brown, the “Godfather of Soul,” was not moving and
suggestive of the potentialities of work, sexuality, and
creativity. I heard him first on a jukebox in the backwoods of
southern Virginia, Mr. Parham’s Place down by Sansi Swamp, we
slow dancing body sweating close sinking down in
“Bewildered” and “Try Me.” Them was days of teenage
anxiety, clumsy fingers, and mumbling lips.
When twelve, I experienced James Brown on
stage, in the flesh, at Baltimore’s Royal Theater, he ending
his show with “Please, Please, Please.” At the afternoon
matinee, in the blue red darkness and on the white spotlighted
stage, James Brown did the cape routine (my first time
experience): James ruffled
collapsing to his knees, moaning, pleading sweating screaming,—all spontaneously, it seemed. James and his retainer performed the
dynamic routine with
exact precision and spontaneity at the 8 o’clock show.
I was
astonished. It was a non-literary (performance) critique on the black
rhetorical methods found in Negro preaching and black religious ecstasy.
By 1968, being hip with Stokely and
Black Power, folk music and Coltrane, the speeches of
Malcolm and Martin, I saw James Brown a world below, yesterday’s news, as
some have said. But James was now, the Flames were still alive. The Number One Soul Brother proved, however,
that he was more adaptable than Amiri
Baraka, Eldridge Cleaver,
and Kwame Toure combined, when he released his own version of
“Black & Proud.”
In Washington, D.C. Brown held up his
hand and the riot slithered into the darkness. Like he was a
mighty man, like a Malcolm. Nixon and
Humphrey embraced and boosted Brown as a new black leader,
exemplary of hard work and black capitalism.
Politics cries out continually for
sophistication, and deception. And there ain’t nothing
sophisticated and unnatural about James Brown, the master of
showmanship and musical innovator. He remains an extraordinary
interpreter of Negro sentiment, rhythms, and moods. Forty years
later, his music is as contemporary and moving as it was in 1960. His
foibles and his run-ins with the law, for most of us, matter
little. James Brown is Man at his creative best, and his musical
creations an enduring cultural legacy, so that one may speak of
a "James Brown Era."
It is Brown’s driving relentless rhythm,
his danceable “funk,” his verbal discordance, his dancing
and screaming, sliding and pedaling across the stage, his long
processed hair flying—all a responsive rhetorical commentary
(giving back) on black life that makes him a cultural icon, second
only, probably to Martin King, who also mastered the tenor and
temperament of Negro timing. This appeal to the best embracing
passions of the Negro is what sustains my interest in the social
phenomena of James Brown and his music, whatever criticisms I
may entertain of him as a businessman and political theorist.
But the Godfather endures.
In a recent NYTimes book review “'I Feel Good': The
Godfather of Everything” Ishmael Reed brings our attention to the
Godfather’s second autobiography I Feel Good: A
Memoir of a Life of Soul. His first, The Godfather of
Soul, was published in 1986. I looked for an “as told
to” as with some slave narratives or like “Lady Day.”
James Brown might be a writer, like Louis Armstrong, whose
writings are simple and perceptively sharp. JB’s thought may
indeed be as dazzling as his feet.
For those of us who grew up in the 60s in the
lonely backwoods of the segregated South we need only the
records and CDs of JB's music to know the man and his
significance. His rhythms and moods, film clips, and our
memories only are vessels sufficient to capture the impact of
his artistry in emotionally sustaining several generations.
Ishmael has said “writin is fightin.” For James Brown,
meshing/clashing rhythms, making the feet, the hips move,
dazzling the imagination—a hardworking and sincere performance
was/is fightin, the good fight. I can live with that, and so
will those who love his work.
Brown’s influence on contemporary music
entertainment is only one aspect of Ishmael’s review. Ishmael
raises the perennial question of what is “success” for the
black artist—writer, musician, visual artist—and concludes:
“Attracting white paying customers to your books, theater or
music, of course, meant success. The other route was to be cited
by a white musician or critic as having influenced a white
musician.” Investors making big returns on black work and
resources ain't news.
Nevertheless, it is phenomenal indeed that
semi-literate Negro peasants terrorized under Jim Crow could
develop an infectious music form and content that foster
“international good will toward the United States.” This
cultural influence, however, could occur only in conjunction
with the sway of the global US economic and military penetration
into every dark corner on the planet with the latest information
technology. In this market-oriented world of efficiency, black
talent gains privileges and benefits even if their cultural
forms originated among the marginal. Like hip-hop.
Baraka, Malcolm, & Marx
Another curious writing appeared in Crisis,
by Amiri
Baraka, an insightful black cultural critic, titled
“From Parks to Marxism: A Political Evolution” (December
1998). Baraka’s essay exudes that rally-the-troops style. He,
passionate as James Brown, recalls past victories and sacrifices
and encourages his readers poetically to draw on their great
reservoir of energy and resentment. He is militantly convinced
“it is time for another political upsurge by the Afro-American
people, and indeed by the great masses of all the people in the
U.S. who are not home watching the stock market for their daily
swig of our blood.” His is a rhetoric that recalls the
rhetorical excesses of the 60s and 70s.
In this deceptive essay of political struggle
and cultural remembrance, nowhere is there any discussion of
Marxism. Or even the history of Marxism among U.S. blacks. The
only “political evolution” that can be described in
Baraka’s creative prose is a movement from the non-violent
resistance rhetoric of Rosa Parks to the caustic rhetoric of Malcolm
X (with his emphasis on armed struggle). There is also
the movement from the agrarian South to the urbanized North,
from the backwoods tenant farmer to ghetto thug, criminal, and
jazz aficianado.
In 1965 Harlem, with the fratricidal public
assassination of Malcolm X, the rhetoric of violence seemingly
came to its natural end and found its appropriate target. But it
did not end in the ballroom of Malcolm’s death. Malcolm’s
rhetoric was revived in that of Stokely, Cleaver, Baraka, and
Karenga and a ton of small-fry imitators who wanted their
militancy on evening news. These were the young black gods of
revolutionary struggle.
Are we to think that Baraka is as ignorant as
James Brown, in matters of black politics? Without a doubt
Baraka uses much more militant rhetoric than James Brown (a man
of and by and for the people), who would never speak of Wall
Street Journal readers as investors taking “their daily
swig of blood.” Baraka’s violent imagination registers
nowhere in the corpus of James Brown’s music. Hip-hop like its
attendant computerized war games of course has its gothic,
medieval blood images.
In some sense, Baraka makes an old-school/new
school argument in a North/South context. Malcolm the Harlemite
is his God, a harbinger of End Time, in Islamic robes. Martin
King a Georgia Baptist cut his revolutionary teeth in Montgomery
and established his fame in Birmingham against Bull Connor. For
Baraka, King’s rhetoric was infused with “classical
Afro-American Christian mythology,” with its tactical use of
Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and Gandhi’s “Non
Violent Resistance”:
|
The church, the voice of southern
Black religion and its professional class, would assert
its leadership, and Christianity now would reassert its
leadership, and Christianity now would be the clothes
democracy would need. If we were Righteous, we would
Overcome, as the Bible and Jesus promised. |
That kind of religious mythology was fine for
the illiterate Southern Negro. But the hip hard-edged black of
the North needed a different kind of rhetoric. Baraka argues
that Malcolm’s militant self-defense stance, his Pan-African
and socialist sentiments elevated the struggle and probably
would have advanced the struggle quicker if it had not been for
a cultural (folk) tradition that advanced the messianic view
that freedom came with “the Coming of the Lord.”
This cultural (religious) perspective of the
southern Negro (the Negro folk) contrasts greatly with that of
the urban, cosmopolitan Negro. Baraka explains:
|
We younger Blacks out of school or
the service or in the factories and warehouse docks,
knew being ‘righteous’ or ‘good’ had never
worked, except if you could fight. (that’s why we
called ourselves ‘Bad’!) You couldn’t be where we
lived and let nobody insult you. So the Christian
essence of ‘the movement’ was lost to us. |
We all can appreciate juvenile rebellion
(punks and thugs) in the city. I too watched the Bowery Boys,
they can have their cultural and political usefulness. But can a
liberation philosophy or theory rise out of the mire of such
ignorance and violence. They like their peasant forbears are
natural molds for petty bourgeois sentiments and dreams.
Observe the last several decades of hip-hop's sustainability.
But Frantz Fanon became a bible to U.S. black
militants. Though within the United States, black communities
were colonized and policed by racist police forces; these black
ghettos were colonies like Algeria or Ghana or Nigeria. James
Forman claimed proudly that his “ideological thinking” was
honed on the “writings of Frantz Fanon”: “As a people we
must try to make him [Frantz Fanon] and his ideas a popular hero
to black people in the United States and the world around.”
And the Panthers wave Chairman Mao’s Red Book. The urgent
times were a pungent political stew, very heady indeed.
For Baraka, too, it is atheistic communism,
that gets him singing, with its myth of the proletariat and the
proletariat revolution, the myth of the people redefined in
Marxist classes:
the bourgeois, the petty bourgeois, and the proletariat (the
masses). In this scheme, the poor will get to "heaven on earth,"
led by an advance political party of poets (and other misfits),
intellectuals, professionals, and other political operatives.
This is how Bolsheviks seize state
power and all wealth in the name of the proletariat, until the
proletariat becomes conscious of itself and its destiny. That was
the story in Russia. In China, this process of socialization may
take centuries, if at all. Power reluctantly shifts.
I heard Stokely Fall 1967 in Murphy
Auditorium at Morgan State College. His daring speech was
spellbinding. I had never heard a black man speak about white
people in public as Stokely mocked them. His arrogant rhetoric
thrilled an audience that felt his revolutionary resentment. The
inspiring session ended in shouts of Black Power!
Black Power!
Black Power! And the pumping of raised fists. I was an immediate
convert, on the sidelines until I joined Baltimore SNCC and set
up a SNCC office at 432 E. North Avenue. It evolved into Black
Liberation Press (BLP), led by Walter Lively, a Trotskyite, with a
black corps of volunteer students.
BLP printed James Forman and other writers.
The previous summer I read Ellison,
Baldwin,
and Wright, guided by a Pratt librarian, a Hampton graduate. It
was from this Black woman I got my first coherent view of the
black struggle and the growing black anti-war fervor. It was
Stokely, however, that personified for me unashamedly militant
black manhood. Walter Lively and his Jewish socialist friends
at Johns Hopkins taught me about the socialist struggle in
Europe and especially the Russian Revolution. They were
anti-Stalinists and their hero was Leon Trotsky, romantically
assassinated in Mexico by Soviet agents. And there was also the
New Era Bookstore at the corner of Park and Mulberry, run by an
old CPA member.
In short I was within the heartbeat and
general flow of the “ideological thinking” of the time: a
Baltimore cauldron of black nationalist ideas (The Soul School,
the Nation of Islam, SNCC, Panthers, Moorish Science Temple, and
more hybrid ideologies); and the socialists (Communists, SDSers,
Du
Bois and Pan-African Socialists, Nkrumah
and Nyerere). And
there was also Baraka's Black Mass, which was about as
rational as a Black Marxist. It was a great political, social,
and cultural bazaar.
In its transitional stage from civil rights
to a revolutionary organization, SNCC fell apart financially,
with its expulsion of Jewish and white intellectuals and its
support of the PLO. Worst, its chairman, Rap Brown, was on the
run. Everyone knew that SNCC was dead. What was next? How could
the struggle for liberation and black consciousness be moved
forward?
James Forman, Fanon, &
Revolution
Negroes in 1969 were integrating schools,
employment, and public accommodations. Organizing unions among
black women, as did Local 1199. To attract the TV cameras,
militant fantasies grew larger and larger like a hot-air balloon.
The “revolutionary” was the cultural hero, in some quarters.
World Revolution, the musical theme. The black struggle, according
to SNCC strategist James Forman, had to be
internationalized.
|
In 1967, as International Affairs Director
of SNCC, Forman traveled extensively throughout the African
continent, representing SNCC at the UN International Seminar on
Apartheid in Lusaka, Zambia. In winter of the same year he spoke
before the Fourth committee at the UN. . . . Forman assumed the
role of Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Panthers in February,
1968. |
There was an urge among a few to find the most
militant, cutting edge of “ideological thinking.” James Forman
was the Man, the black political theorist. I recommend
highly The Political Thought of James Forman (1970), edited
by the Staff of Black Star Publishing, and printed by Walter
Lively's group, Black Liberation Press. In brief form, Forman’s
diary note titled “Ten Year Plan” summarizes the apex of
Forman’s revolutionary views. Actually, Forman looks ten years
back and ten years ahead. By 1969 he had developed a revolutionary
black political theory, combining black racialism, Leninism, and
the abolition of capitalism.
Forman was reluctant to call himself a Pan
Africanist. Forman was as alert as Richard Wright in the 50s when
he was on the continent:
|
For inside Africa today there are many
bourgeois nationalists running African governments and
exploiting the people in the name of Pan Africanism. We
have the right to at least demand that people not regress
from W.E.B. Du Bois who in his later years was pleading
for Pan-African socialism. I am for Pan African socialism
if it means taking all the wealth of Africa away from the
imperialists and using it for the disposition of all
oppressed people. |
So Forman is a long way from Marcus Garvey's
imperial African view. But Forman also distances his African
politics from that of Du Bois, whose politics rested its hopes on
the commitment and sacrifice of an educated elite. (Read Du
Bois
Speaks to Africa.)
Like the
Oakland Panthers, and other Fanon influenced revolutionaries,
Forman believed that urban thugs and gangsters (the core of the
riots) of northern and western cities were unconscious
revolutionaries (the black lumpen proletariat) and that
with the proper political training and education they would
“understand that we have both a class and a racial fight and
that it is not simply a question of race.”
After King was gunned down in Memphis, a mood
of conspiracy hovered (like LA smog) over all of black thinking, and
ghetto politics. With King removed from the scene, black militants
heightened the tone of their rhetoric. For some, Armageddon was
here! The black working poor had a revolutionary responsibility
being in the "Eye of the Beast." As the “black vanguard force”
it was their destiny to lead American workers in the seizure of
“state power . . . acquired and won by armed struggle.” Forman
boosts and applauds his own rhetoric while he knows prophetically that the
“seventies will be one of serious repression for us, black
people in the United States.”
The Romance of the Lumpen. “Freedom Comes Out the Barrel of a Gun.” And other
theories and acts played militantly well in FBI
surveillance conspiracies, as well in the homes and minds of the Silent Majority,
heavily arming itself. As Askia Touré
points out, white America came
down on the new black revolutionaries like a ton of bricks:
“FBI’s COINTELPRO on Black radical groups, coupled with the 'recession'
and Drug Plagues in the Inner Cities, during the Reagan era . . .
crushed the Movement.”
Few have considered the insanity of Forman’s
“theory of the black vanguard leading the fight for world
socialism in the United States.” He was naively confident
“based upon certain experiences that there are and will be
whites who will clearly understand” that black people are a
“colony” within the geographic boundaries of an imperial power
and that the black revolutionary workers party should rule the US
government as a natural right and as a guarantor of the rights of
the black and poor. This bastardization of Marx, Lenin, Du Bois
marks the highpoint of Pan-African revolutionary thinking in
America.
The offices of black radicals and the streets
of ghetto America were abandoned by young black middle-class
militants, scattering like roaches under the searchlights of white
repression. They escaped the criminal gun play among brothers--for
union organizing or black studies in the academy or public service
in poverty programs. “Black empowerment” was substituted for
“Black Power.” Expanding
the privileges and rights of black professionals and businessman
elevated above that of social justice for the black poor.
Defending Social Security and Medicare more responsible than idle
theories of socialist revolution.
We mocked James Brown for his photo-op with
Richard Nixon. But we find it rather presidential when Kweisi
Mfume, like Booker T. with Teddy, photo-ops with George “The
Second Coming” Bush, who spurned the NAACP during his first
term. Not odd at all, Kweisi protested in the Baltimore Times.
In short, we have not “evolved” as Baraka suggests, but rather
we got more of the same, at least from the view of poor workers,
as it was after the victories of the Civil War and Reconstruction,
when the voices of Opportunism and Moderation dominated and
terrorized, and crushed the calls for Revolution, and free land.
In a U.S. society with several African American
billionaires (e.g. Oprah and Bill Cosby) and a slew of
millionaires (sports and other entertainers), the myth of the
revolutionary black poor collapsed. In such an arid clime, a
political theory that emphasizes the liberation of the poor is
impossible. Bill Cosby, stamped and approved by the respectable,
lacks any confidence in the seriousness of the black poor.
I thank the Lord we still got James Brown, who
keeps on going back to take us to the bridge, his rhythms driving
us toward our deepest and blackest hopes and desires.
*
* * * *
Malcolm X
artifacts unearthed—Police docs and more found among
belongs of 'Shorty' Jarvis—1 February
2012—Documents outlining the crime that landed
Malcolm X in prison in the 1940s are among some
1,000 recently unearthed items purchased jointly by
the civil rights leader's foundation and an
independent collector of African-American artifacts.
The documents and other artifacts belonged to late
musician Malcolm "Shorty" Jarvis, who served in
prison with Malcolm X and was one of his closest
friends. Jarvis' 1976 pardon paper also is part of
the collection, which was recently discovered by
accident. The items had been in a Connecticut
storage unit that had gone into default, and were
initially auctioned off to a buyer who had no idea
what he was bidding on. The Omaha, Nebraska-based
Malcolm X Memorial Foundation, which oversees the
Malcolm X Center located at his birthplace, will
house and display the just-arrived archives. It
split the cost with Black History 101 Mobile Museum,
based in Detroit—the birthplace of the Nation of
Islam.—Mobile Museum founder and curator Khalid
el-Hakim declined to identify the original buyer or
the price the two organizations paid for the trove.
Still, even after splitting the cost, he said it's
the largest acquisition to date for his mobile
museum, which includes Jim Crow-era artifacts, a Ku
Klux Klan hood and signed documents by Malcolm X and
Rosa Parks. . . . The collection also reveals an
enduring connection between the two Malcolms after
their incarceration, Malcolm X's conversion to Islam
and his rise to prominence. There's a 72-page
scrapbook of Malcolm X's life that was maintained by
Jarvis until after his friend's 1965 assassination.
One of the civil rights era's most controversial and
compelling figures, Malcolm X rose to fame as the
chief spokesman of the Nation of Islam, a movement
started in Detroit more than 80 years ago. He
proclaimed the black Muslim organization's message
at the time: racial separatism as a road to
self-actualization and urged blacks to claim civil
rights "by any means necessary" and referred to
whites as "devils."—TheGrio
*
* * * *
|
|
Lynchsong
By Lorraine Hansberry
I can hear Rosalee
See the eyes of Willie McGee
My mother told me about
Lynchings
My mother told me about
The dark nights
And dirt roads
And torch lights
And lynch robes
The
faces of men
Laughing white
Faces of men
Dead in the night
sorrow night
and a
sorrow night
1951
Source:
AmericanLynching |
* * *
* *
 |
Writer Lorraine Hansberry's
sober eulogy of the death of Willie McGee weighed heavy on the
hearts and minds of the American Left. On May 8, 1951, a crowd of
five hundred lingered outside the courthouse of Laurel, Mississippi,
to witness the execution of yet another black man convicted for
allegedly raping a white woman. His 1945 lightning trial resulted in
a guilty conviction delivered in less than two and a half minutes by
an all-white, male jury, setting off a heated five-year legal
struggle that drew national headlines. Despite an aggressive appeals
defense team who attempted every legal maneuver in the book, the US
Supreme Court ultimately chose not to intervene. With the legal
lynching of the Martinsville Seven in February, Ethel and Julius
Rosenberg's conviction in March, followed by the execution of McGee
in May, 1951 was a bad year for Left-leaning lawyers (Parrish 1979;
Rise 1995). Most discouraging, national news sources like the New
York Times and Life magazine red-baited the "Save Willie
McGee" campaign and—as Life reported—its "imported" lawyers (Popham
1951a; Life 1951). Few felt McGee's passing with as heavy a heart as
his chief counsel, thirty-one-year-old Bella Abzug. |
Before Abzug became a representative in
Congress and a leader in the peace and women's movements, she confronted the
Southern political and legal system at the height of the early Cold War.
Retained in 1948 by the Civil Rights Congress (CRC)—a New York-headquartered
Popular Front legal defense organization—the novice labor lawyer honed her civil
rights . . .
Source:
https://Litigation-Essentials.LexisNexis
* * *
* *
* * * * *
|
The New Jim Crow
Mass Incarceration in the Age of
Colorblindness
By Michele Alexander
Contrary to the
rosy picture of race embodied in Barack
Obama's political success and Oprah
Winfrey's financial success, legal
scholar Alexander argues vigorously and
persuasively that [w]e have not ended
racial caste in America; we have merely
redesigned it. Jim Crow and legal racial
segregation has been replaced by mass
incarceration as a system of social
control (More African Americans are
under correctional control today... than
were enslaved in 1850). Alexander
reviews American racial history from the
colonies to the Clinton administration,
delineating its transformation into the
war on drugs. She offers an acute
analysis of the effect of this mass
incarceration upon former inmates who
will be discriminated against, legally,
for the rest of their lives, denied
employment, housing, education, and
public benefits. Most provocatively, she
reveals how both the move toward
colorblindness and affirmative action
may blur our vision of injustice: most
Americans know and don't know the truth
about mass incarceration—but her
carefully researched, deeply engaging,
and thoroughly readable book should
change that.—Publishers
Weekly |
 |
* * *
* *
 |
Debt: The First 5,000 Years
By David Graeber
Before there was money, there was debt. Every economics textbook says the same thing: Money was invented to replace onerous and complicated barter systems—to relieve ancient people from having to haul their goods to market. The problem with this version of history? There’s not a shred of evidence to support it. Here anthropologist David Graeber presents a stunning reversal of conventional wisdom. He shows that for more than 5,000 years, since the beginnings of the first agrarian empires, humans have used elaborate credit systems to buy and sell goods—that is, long before the invention of coins or cash. It is in this era, Graeber argues, that we also first encounter a society divided into debtors and creditors. Graeber shows that arguments about debt and debt forgiveness have been at the center of political debates from Italy to China, as well as sparking innumerable insurrections. He also brilliantly demonstrates that the language of the ancient works of law and religion (words like “guilt,” “sin,” and “redemption”) derive in large part from ancient debates about debt, and shape even our most basic ideas of right and wrong. We are still fighting these battles today without knowing it. Debt: The First 5,000 Years is a fascinating chronicle of this little known history—as well as how it has defined human history, and what it means for the credit crisis of the present day and the future of our economy. Economist Glenn Loury /Criminalizing a Race
|
* *
* * *
|
Say it Loud: Poems about James Brown
Edited by Michael Oatman and Mary Weems
Preface by Lamont
B. Steptoe
This anthology is a
tribute in poems to James Brown and includes work by
over 30 poets including Amiri Baraka, Emotion Brown,
Katie Daley, Thomas Sayers Ellis, Kelly A. Harris, Tony
Medina, Ayodele Nzinga, Michael Oatman, Michelle Rankins,
Patricia Smith, Lamont B. Steptoe, George Wallace and
Mary Weems.
"On May 3, 1933,
James Joseph Brown was born in Barnwell, South Carolina
in the heart of Jim Crow America. On December 25, 2006,
JB, the hardest working man in show business passed on.
These poems celebrate, memorialize and speak to the
legacy of the Godfather of Soul. They share
their memories from childhood to adulthood of the man
who was influenced by such musical giants as Little
Richard, but who laid the physical and musical steps for
artists such as Michael Jackson and many current Rap and
Hip Hop musicians today."—Adah Ward-Randolph
|
 |
*
* * * *
posted 26 February 2005
|