ChickenBones: A Journal

for Literary & Artistic African-American Themes

   

Home    Visit Our Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)

Google
 

The primary interest of White Americans is the retention of the status quo—

nationally and internationally. Let's be real, White Americans enjoy

being No. 1 and they are willing to shed blood and capital to stay No.1.

 

 

Dean Fades, Kerry Soars

Clark Waits in the Wings

Editorial by Rudolph Lewis

With their "uplifting" messages John Kerry, Senator of Massachusetts, and John Edwards, Senator of North Carolina, won Iowa. Howard Dean, the darling of the flagging left, held on for a disappointing third place with only 18% of the votes, about half of Kerry's votes.

In the voice of Iowans, middle-class White Americans have reiterated their stance: the “Left” and liberalism in the Democratic Party and the nation will not be tolerated. This political scenario does not bid well for the interests of the majority of black Americans. Their issues of social justice – in education, criminal justice, and economic parity (all of which have a high price tag) – will again be ignored in this upcoming presidential campaign and the next administration.

For the last thirty years, White Americans have steadily moved toward the right. The political spectrum has shifted so much so that most Americans consider the millionaire governor of Vermont a “leftist.”  Partially, this is the case, I suspect, because social activists like white middle-class labor unionists such as SEIU and the bureaucracy of the AFL-CIO, desperately trying to organize low-paid service workers, jumped on his internet bandwagon.

We black Americans who are poor and powerless and tend to ignore electoral politics remain keenly aware that this is a white man’s country and that the Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court act first and foremost in the interest of the White middle-class. The less than statesman-like Al Sharpton—in contradistinction to the diplomatic Carol Mosely-Braun—made it clear in the last Democratic debate that Democrats like Dean – liberal, centrist, or conservative – do not have black interests foremost because these fellows know they have to win the hearts of White Americans.

The primary interest of White Americans is the retention of the status quo—nationally and internationally. Let's be real, White Americans enjoy being No. 1 and they are willing to shed blood and capital to stay No.1. Simply, that means sustaining an imperial army that will not be withdrawing from the Mid-East within the next decade, which means the loss of hundreds of billions of dollars that will not go into solving domestic issues such as health-care access, shortage of education funding, cheap labor and underemployment, which eventually lead to high incarceration or early death..

White domestic concerns encompass fear of international threats, taxes on the middle-class, and the loss of middle-class jobs or income. These are primary individual and family-oriented issues. This great cross-section of secular White Americans also have a sensitive ear for the issues of religious conservatives—social respectability and conformity, with their hostility to abortion, gay marriages, illicit drugs, etc. and strong support of police repression, harsh sentencing, and the growth of penal institutions.

In short, White Americans have little interest in social reforms or social justice—which are the primary needs of the white and Hispanic poor and most black Americans.

The plain fact is that President Bush retains the support of nearly six in 10 Americans—many of these are Democrats. Though many White Americans believe that the president has taken the country in a “very, very radical direction" in starting the War against Iraq and depleting the federal coffers, White Americans out of prideful arrogance are committed to “helping the Iraqi people” and defending and securing the oil fields of the Mid-East. That is the reason that the campaign of Dennis Kucinich fell flat as a pancake.

Aware of the polls, Democrats know that a race with Bush will be close and that presently he would win 48 percent to 46 percent—his edge boosted and sustained by the Religious Right and by patriotic loyalty that he is a “war president.”  Yet Bush remains vulnerable because about 2.3 million jobs have been lost since he took office and a budget surplus was turned into a large $500 billion deficit.

The Democrats, much of the public believes, would better handle such domestic issues as the economy, prescription drugs for the elderly, health insurance, Medicare, the budget deficit, immigration, taxes, and education. They are not so certain, however, that the Democrats would do as well as the Republican with international threats to America's No. 1 status.

So the Democrats in looking for a candidate to beat George Bush emphasize status-quo or "centrist" qualities. These they see in candidates like Vietnam veteran John Kerry with his wealthy family connections, Southern homeboy John Edwards, and retired General Wesley Clark. Both Edwards and Clark’s Southern connections are seen as potential electoral advantages.

Of these three, with respect to the War Against Iraq, the former Republican Wesley Clark, who has received the support of documentary filmmaker Michael Moore and has leveled the charge that the Bush administration has not been "serious about going after terrorism," is the most curious.

Clark, a former NATO supreme commander now campaigning in New Hampshire, proposed giving the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) a new role in tracking down international terrorists and finding fugitives such as Osama bin Laden

He believes, “We can lift the cloud of fear that's been hanging over America. Because we've got an administration that from the beginning didn't do everything it could have done to have prevented 9/11. And after 9/11 they [the Bush Administration] took us into a war in Iraq that we didn't have to be in. They weren't serious about going after terrorism. They were serious about going after Saddam Hussein."

Clark said, "I was consistently against this [going after Saddam] from the time the guys in the Pentagon told me two weeks after 9/11 that we were attacking Iraq. It didn't make any sense to me. . . . This was a war we didn't have to fight. It was an elective war."

The awful fact remains, whether the Democrats manage or not to squeak out a win against President Bush, hard times are in the cards for an indefinite period for most black Americans, especially the poor. Of course, our comfortable black elected officials and spokespersons will continue to sustain the pretense that salvation is just around the corner.

posted 2004

*   *   *   *   *

 

 

 

 

 

 

update 2 July 2008

 

 

Home  Amin Sharif Table    Editor's Page  

Related files: Iowa Presidential Campaign