|
Books by
Katharine
Jefferts Schori
Gospel in the Global Village: Seeking God's Dream of
Shalom /
A Wing and a Prayer: A Message of Faith and Hope
* * * *
*
Delivering
Good News to the Oppressed
A Service of
Repentance
By The Most
Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori
Presiding
Bishop and Primate / The Episcopal Church
The great dream
of God has always been quite clear to the prophets.
Isaiah’s vision of delivering good news to the
oppressed, liberty to the captives, and comfort to the
grieving is a whole-hearted and full-bodied
expression of abundant life, in right relationship
to God and neighbor. Micah says that all that’s
really important in life is to do justice, and to
love mercy, and to walk humbly in God’s presence.
Amos has choice words for those who “sell the
righteous for silver and the needy for a pair of
sandals” [Amos 2:6], he reminds his hearers that God
will not let such transgressions go unpunished.
Human beings
have repeatedly forgotten or ignored the image of
God borne by their brothers and sisters. We have
turned away from loving our neighbors as ourselves.
We have degraded those who are like us under the
skin, so that we might use them worse than beasts of
burden. We have sought to be god, lording it over
others. In the process, we have repudiated that
divine image in ourselves and discovered that there
is little or no health in us.
Human beings
have sought to use others for their own ends since
we first came down from the trees. We can observe
the other apes building dominance hierarchies that
minimize some of the violence in their societies,
and know that some of that pattern is built into our
own DNA. But the supposedly spiritual animal has not
risen far above his origins. We are often as fallen
as our Biblical ancestors Adam and Eve, seeking to
be their own gods.
Slavery has
existed from the time one human being could
physically compel another to serve desires. It was
likely fairly limited initially, for it requires
significant superiority in numbers, power, or
firearms to enforce the will of one or a few against
an entire community. Slaves have long been the
spoils of war on every continent, and traded between
warring parties in ancient tribal conflicts.
Military economies have been built on their labor of
slaves—Rome, Athens, and the other supposed
ancestors of modern democracies relied on a
subjugated class. Even early Christianity, under
Paul’s leadership, couldn’t really imagine a society
without slaves. He reminded them to obey their
masters, and the use of proof texts long provided
ecclesiastical support to those who tried to justify
the propriety of human property.
Yet it was the
wholesale trading in slaves, begun under the
Portuguese in the 1400s, that scaled up inhumanity
to inhuman enormity. More than 10 million slaves
were shipped from Africa to the Americas in the next
five centuries. In the 18th
century alone, Britain shipped 2.5 million
slaves. Katrina Browne and Tom DeWolf tell us that
the DeWolf family was responsible for importing
10,000 slaves to these shores. And the church was
there through it all, giving supposedly sacred
support to a degradation of the image of God, in
both captive and captor. In the slave ports in
Africa, churches were built close to those prisons
and holding cells for those soon to be exiled from
their native land. The church baptized many, often
without informing or asking consent from those who
were grafted onto the Body of Christ.
Yet, in the
persistent reversal of the gospel, lifting up the
lowly and putting down the mighty, those seeds took
root in rich soil, and grew into fruit those
Anglican clergy could never have imagined. That
fruit produced eventually seeds that helped to
demolish the evil fields in which they were planted.
The prophets are often unpopular, but rarely wrong.
The
particularly American role in slavery involved
people across this land, and not just in the Deep
South.
Katrina Browne’s work, and
her cousin’s book,
are opening the eyes and minds of many northerners
to the ways in which eminent families and captains
of industry and clergy of this church, presiding
bishops included, share responsibility to the
enormities of slavery. Many in this land continued
to profit from the forced labor and deprived liberty
of sons and daughters of Africa long after the
“legal” end of the commerce in human flesh called
the slave trade. They simply exported the greatest
evidence of it to places like Cuba. I wonder if our
governmental animosity toward that nation might be
different today if we did not share guilt for the
human conditions there.
Even after the
end of the Civil War, a war supposedly fought to
free the slaves, to ensure equal human dignity and
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all
human beings in this nation, even after that human
greed soon re-established the reality of slavery.
Douglas Blackmon has written an immensely important
book,
Slavery by Another Name, detailing the
intentional and conscious ways in which slavery was
effectively reinstituted in the southern United
States soon after the Civil War. Legally undergirded
by criminal penalties that restricted almost every
aspect of life for African Americans, those systems
forbade even the freedom to work where and for whom
one pleased. Those laws provided opportunities to
arrest human beings who appeared to be strong manual
laborers on the flimsiest of excuses, and then sell
those human beings to white farmers, mine owners,
foresters, and industrialists—supposedly to pay
off the costs of their arrest and imprisonment.
Blackmon
details facts as well as following the stories of
individuals and families caught up in those farcical
and fiendish proceedings. He reports that by the end
of the 1880s at least 10,000 black men were enslaved
in southern states, mining, farming, and making
turpentineii Miners and industrialists
grew wealthy off this ready supply of almost free
labor. So did the communities which sold the
laborers. By 1889, when its entire annual budget was
only about $1 million, Alabama was garnering more
than $120,000 a year from selling convicts, almost
all of them black. The end of the 1880s at least
10,000 black men were enslaved in southern states,
mining, farming, and making turpentinei.iii But it
wasn’t just the old Confederacy that was involved.
The investments on which the industrialists relied
came from New York and Wall Street.
In 1907, one
mining company in Birmingham was relying almost
exclusively on slave labor. Those mines and their
related enterprises sold steel to companies like
Southern Pacific and the Union Pacific railroads. It
was also the time of a major stock market crash and
dire threats to the economy, one which would sound
very familiar to us today. JP Morgan, stalwart
Episcopalian who helped to start the Clergy Pension
Fund, was involved in a buyout to ensure financial
stability. It involved US Steel buying those slave
mines in Birmingham. Three weeks later, the new
president of that mining operation signed a contract
for 400 more convict-slaves.iv
Atlanta has a
similar story, with mines, and brickworks, and
industrialized farms that operated with slave labor
around the year 1900. An operation controlled by
Fourth National Bank of Atlanta was the primary
beneficiary, a firm eventually subsumed in Wachovia
Bank Company. In 1896 that bank’s owners drove over
1200 convict laborers, representing nearly 40% of
Georgia’s available prison labor pool. Wachovia,
however, has done some investigation into its own
history and significant reparative work in recent
years.v
Through all of
this, there was almost no federal oversight,
investigation, or intervention. There was a small
foray by a federal prosecutor named Reese in
Montgomery in 1902, under Teddy Roosevelt. He had
very limited success in prosecuting what were called
peonage cases (debt-slavery), mostly because juries
didn’t have the stomach to convict their fellow
townsmen. Repeated requests to federal officials for
assistance were almost universally ignored. Ignored,
that is, until World War II began.
Nazi Germany
and imperial Japan actually helped to end this
atrocity. Propaganda from the enemy sought to
convince African Americans that their lot would be
better with nations who took their humanity
seriously. Only then did federal officials begin to
worry about the stain on this nation. Well, my
friends, that stain has spread far and wide. It was
the rare privileged person of faith who was able to
see the sin of chattel slavery, in either North or
South, before the Civil War. It was even rarer for a
church member to speak out against that inhumanity
or work to end it. Rare as well to work against Jim
Crow.
Nor have we yet truly begun to teach our
children about the sins of this nation: enslavement
of Native Americans by early colonists; northern
involvement in the African slave trade; the wretched
excesses of plantation slavery; or the
institutionalized criminalization of black life in
the south after the Civil War. We have hardly begun
to look at the realities of our heritage. All of our
clergy participate in a pension system begun by one
who benefited from slavery. Trinity Church, Wall
Street, had slaves on its farms in New York in the
1700s. There were at one time slaves at Virginia
Seminary—working, not attending classes—and that
diocese reports that in 1860, more than 80% of their
clergy owned slaves.
The
consequences continue to this day. Most of us, white
and black, put our money in banks whose history is
in some way connected to profits made from slave
labor. Most of us benefit from steel made by
companies with some connection to those slave-driven
mines of the industrializing South. Most of us
expect to live in communities made safer by law
enforcement and prisons.
Who is in those
prisons? I would suggest to you that the grossly
inappropriate racial balance in our prisons today is
partly the result of criminalizing most parts of
black life in the South, from the 1880s well up
until the 1960s. The difficulties for the inner city
black families today also have something to do with
centuries of removing black men from their families,
to serve as slave labor in somebody else’s field, or
mine, or factory.
Through it all,
people of privilege looked the other way, and too
few found the courage to question inhuman ideas,
words, practices, or laws. We and they ignored the
image of Christ in our neighbors. We colluded with
businesses and industries that sought only the
greatest profit, made on the backs of forced labor.
That search for profit at all costs is not just
greed but idolatry, and we are being reminded of its
consequences in our own day.
Yet there is
hope. Against all rational possibility, there is
hope. The slave chaplains in Ghana began a journey
of faith that eventually resulted in prophets and
witnesses like W. E. B. Du Bois (who began life in
an Episcopal Sunday school),
Sojourner Truth,
Zora
Neale Hurston, and Dr. King, as well as our
latter-day prophets, like
Barbara Harris,
Ed Rodman,
Martini Shaw,
Thomas Logan,
C. David Williams and so
many here today. Profiteers and owners may have
intended to use the gospel to control, but God used
it to set the captives free, eventually. There is no
limiting the power and love of God to transcend the
death and evil of this life. Yet we will not
experience the full resurrection until the whole
body of Christ rises again.
We’re going to
go out from this place today, remembering that great
vision of God for a restored creation, where all
humanity lives together in dignity, with justice and
peace, whether black or white, Hispanic or Chinese,
woman, man, gay, straight, enemy or friend. We’re
going to leave this place today knowing that that
great vision of liberation, redemption, and healing
is indeed possible, if we join in. It’s going to
take the utter commitment and labor of all those who
have freely chosen the yoke of Christ, whose service
is perfect freedom—freedom for all humanity. We are
recommitting ourselves to that service. When we do,
we can once more lift our heads and rightly say,
“today this scripture has been fulfilled in your
hearing.”
Notes
i Browne, Katrina.
Traces of the Trade.
Thomas DeWolf,
Inheriting the Trade. Beacon
ii Blackmon, Douglas.
Slavery by Another Name. p. 90
iii Ibid, 95
iv Ibid, 294-5
v Ibid, 387
Service of
Repentance / St. Thomas, Philadelphia / 4 October
2008, 10:30 am
Source:
EpiscopalChurch
Katharine Jefferts Schori
(born March 26, 1954, in Pensacola, Florida) is the
26th Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church.
Previously elected as the 9th Bishop of the
Episcopal Diocese of Nevada, she is the first woman
elected as a
primate of the worldwide Anglican Communion.
Jefferts Schori was elected at the 75th General
Convention on June 18, 2006 and invested at
Washington National Cathedral on November 4, 2006.
She took part in her first General Convention of the
Episcopal Church as Presiding Bishop in July 2009. .
. .
Episcopal Church elects first woman Presiding Bishop.
. . . Katharine Jefferts Schori,
A Wing and a Prayer: A Message of Faith and Hope.
New York: Morehouse Publishing (January 2007).
Wikipedia
* * *
* *
Response
The Civil War began in Charleston—at
a convention—By Robert N.
Rosen—One hundred and fifty years ago today, at high noon on April 23, 1860,
the Democratic Party opened its national convention in Charleston. The
Democratic Party was then the majority party in American politics. The
president, James Buchanan, was a Democrat.
His predecessor, Franklin Pierce, was a
Democrat. 'There are radical and inextinguishable feuds in the Democratic
Party,' the reporter Murat Halstead wrote, 'and they must come out here and
now.'
Indeed, 'no American political
convention has ever held so much meaning for a party and nation,' one
historian wrote about the convention in Charleston. The Republican Party was
in its infancy. The Old Whig Party of Henry Clay had collapsed, and
anti-slavery, 'Free Soil' men created a new party, the Republican Party, led
by John Fremont, Henry Seward, the influential senator from New York, and
Salmon Chase, the senator from Ohio.
The powerful senator from Illinois,
Stephen A. Douglas, who had defeated that upstart Abraham Lincoln for a
Senate seat from Illinois, was in line to be nominated for president in
Charleston. He would then go on to preserve the Union by accommodating
Southerners and pacifying Northerners on the burning, all-consuming issue of
slavery.
PostandCourier
* * *
* *
Lessons from Confederate History
Month—The unedited truth is that Lincoln ended slavery in the
Confederacy for the same reason it was instituted—to make capitalism more
functional. By the 1860s the Industrial Revolution was in gear. Northern
industrial businesses would outperform Southern agrarian businesses, making
it necessary to restructure labor, commerce, and capital investments. Paying
low wages to Black industrial laborers therefore made better economic sense
and great social policy for a more civilized face of government.
But since Southern states stood to lose billions in property (enslaved)
assets and wealth, the Confederates sought secession and war became an
unavoidable consequence of this industrial shift. While a Confederate
victory would have definitely prolonged slavery, this should not be
politically misconstrued into the notion that Lincoln’s fight against
secession was thereby a fight for the justice of abolition.
To believe that the principal of the Civil War was to “free” Africans from
the Confederates is as inaccurate as thinking the current war in Afghanistan
is being fought to free Afghans from the Taliban. Although Afghans may
eventually be liberated from Taliban influences as a by-product of the war,
the underlying purpose and politics of the conflict are immensely more
far-reaching. And likewise were the driving circumstances between the Civil
War and the by-product of Emancipation.—
Ezrah Aharone
* * *
* *
Henry Louis Gates pens Article
Absolving—White People For Slavery-Wants us to
Blame Africans—Wow this is a two-page story that the
New York
Times is running . . . You’d think Henry Louis Gates would’ve
learned a few things after his confrontation with Cambridge police last year
when they accused him of breaking into his house and jammed him up . . .
Apparently not. All I can do is shake my head and note that this article
appears the night after ABC Nightline ran that story about Black Women not
finding suitable men. As author Bakari Kitwana pointed out. . . So this
article basically says Africans helped white slavers capture us. Duh. We’ve
. . . known that. Hell it was Black slaves that usually ran to master and
told about slave insurrections. It was Black slave that were sometimes made
to be overseers. None of that absolves the horrific institution of slavery
which here in the US was rooted in the strong belief that our ancestors who
were forced to work those fields were less than human and forced to endure
unspeakable horrors.—Davey D
HipHopPolitics
* * *
* *
See Amiri Baraka's
Essence of
Reparations—Nehesi
House
* * *
* *
Skip continues to not understand the
differences between the primary victims (the enslaved Africans), The
collaborators (a very small minority of Africans) and primary beneficiaries
(Europeans & Arabs. Only Black people and others of color are always
expected to accept Blame for their victimhood. No one would dear even
approach Jewish people about... See More accepting blame for their
collaborators in those death camps. There were many. They know, they were
not in charge and they know who the real decision makers and beneficiaries
of their exploitations and deaths were. All oppressed and suppressed people
have collaborators. Why are we expected to elevate ours and give them more
significants in the African holocaust. Skip is basically a white apologists
in Brown face. He is a collaborator also.—Maisha
Ongoza
* * *
* *
Ending the Slavery Blame-Game—By Henry Louis Gates, Jr.—Cambridge, Mass.— But the sad
truth is that the conquest and capture of Africans and their sale to
Europeans was one of the main sources of foreign exchange for several
African kingdoms for a very long time. Slaves were the main export of the
kingdom of Kongo; the Asante Empire in Ghana exported slaves and used the
profits to import gold. Queen Njinga, the brilliant 17th-century monarch of
the Mbundu, waged wars of resistance against the Portuguese but also
conquered polities as far as 500 miles inland and sold her captives to the
Portuguese. When Njinga converted to Christianity, she sold African
traditional religious leaders into slavery, claiming they had violated her
new Christian precepts.
Did these Africans know how harsh
slavery was in the New World? Actually, many elite Africans visited Europe
in that era, and they did so on slave ships following the prevailing winds
through the New World. For example, when Antonio Manuel, Kongo’s ambassador
to the Vatican, went to Europe in 1604, he first stopped in Bahia, Brazil,
where he arranged to free a countryman who had been wrongfully enslaved.
African monarchs also sent their children along these same slave routes to
be educated in Europe. And there were thousands of former slaves who
returned to settle Liberia and Sierra Leone. The Middle Passage, in other
words, was sometimes a two-way street. Under these circumstances, it is
difficult to claim that Africans were ignorant or innocent.
NYTimes
* * *
* *
It should now be clear to everyone who
follows even remotely the reparations issue that since the rightward turn of
the US since 911 Obama, as the first Black president, is likely the least
person with the ability to address the reparations issue from any positive
angle. The second black president might have a better shot. One of the
arguments the right wing threw at Obama over the health care issue was the
claim that really it was, they said, a form of reparations for blacks. Under
these circumstances, in my opinion, the best thing Obama can do for
reparations is to say nothing at all at the present time.
Secondly Gates’ argument that Africans
who were enslaved by the US were already slaves is an old argument long
promoted by apologists for the slavocracy and Confederacy. He should resign
his position as head of the Harvard’s DuBois Institute in shame. People who
unqualifiedly equate pre-feudal African slavery with chattel slavery of the
capitalist era only promote confusion and intellectually disarm us. Ray is
absolutely correct to label this piece a “buck dance.”
Finally, to date at least, the apology
by African leaders and Africans in general for their participation in the
slave trade is their issue. To the best of my knowledge Gates is the only
public person to go to Africa and berate the Africans for their historic
involvement in the slave trade. Senegal’s president Wade denounced the
reparations movement only because his ancestors were leading slave traders
and fears personal financial accountability. And there is a church in Congo
(the name of which momentarily escapes me) that is promoting a project for
Congolese to symbolically buy back slaves from the West as a form of
national redemption.—Damu
* * *
* *
I guess Skippy
wasn't through with his career in idiocy when he did the PBS special
Wonders of the African World
. I remember
this fool standing in front of an Ethiopian priest wearing a Harvard t-shirt
and a condescending smirk on his face asking to see the ark of the covenant.
He also went to Ghana and told an Akan king that he could NEVER forgive
Africans for Slavery. Gates has had his lips epoxied to the white boy's
behind for a loooooong time.
With the exception of
The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism,
his scholarship is questionable.
I got a good laugh when he did that show on PBS that tracks the DNA of
celebrities. It turns out that the majority of his ancestors are from Sweden
or something. No surprise to me. ...
Gates should be publicly rebuked by all conscious scholars. This happened
once before when Black Scholar Journal published an issue dedicated
entirely to criticizing his PBS Special
Wonders of the African World
Duane
Deterville
* * *
* *
The Underlying Concepts
of the Black Manifesto
Reparations
as Tactic of Black Liberation
Or Loosening the Social Controls on
Blacks By
James Forman, Chairman
United Black Appeal * * *
* *
Churches: A Black Manifesto—Time Friday, May. 16, 1969—James Forman,
one-time executive director of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee, disrupted a Sunday Communion service at Manhattan's Riverside
Church to demand, among other things, that the church, located on the edge
of Harlem, turn over 60% of its investment income to the conference. Two
days later Forman posted the conference's "Black Manifesto" on the door of
the headquarters of the Lutheran Church in America; the Lutherans' share of
the reparations bill, he said, was $50 million. Finally, he appeared at the
New York Archdiocesan chancery to demand $200,000,000 from U.S. Roman
Catholics.
Ironically, this blunt demand on the
churches originated from a well-intentioned effort by a liberal interfaith
group to draw out black ideas for the economic betterment of urban ghettos.
The Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization (IFCO), which
includes 23 Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Negro and Mexican-American groups,
organized the National Black Economic Development Conference to bring black
leaders together for discussions and action on the economic aspects of Black
Power. The result was not what IFCO had expected. Forman took over a meeting
of the conference in Detroit and called for an end to the capitalistic
system in the U.S. Then he pushed through a "Black Manifesto," which passed
187 to 63, with many abstentions—Time
* * *
* *
Black Manifesto by The Black
National Economic Conference—The New York Review of Books—July 10,
1969—We the black people assembled in Detroit, Michigan for the National
Black Economic Development Conference are fully aware that we have been
forced to come together because racist white America has exploited our
resources, our minds, our bodies, our labor. For centuries we have been
forced to live as colonized people inside the United States, victimized by
the most vicious, racist system in the world. We have helped to build the
most industrial country in the world.
We are therefore demanding of the white
Christian churches and Jewish synagogues which are part and parcel of the
system of capitalism, that they begin to pay reparations to black people in
this country. We are demanding $500,000,000 from the Christian white
churches and the Jewish synagogues. This total comes to 15 dollars per
nigger. This is a low estimate for we maintain there are probably more than
30,000,000 black people in this country. $15 a nigger is not a large sum of
money and we know that the churches and synagogues have a tremendous wealth
and its membership, white America, has profited and still exploits black
people. We are also not unaware that the exploitation of colored peoples
around the world is aided and abetted by the white Christian churches and
synagogues. This demand for $500,000,000 is not an idle resolution or empty
words. Fifteen dollars for every black brother and sister in the United
States is only a beginning of the reparations due us as people who have been
exploited and degraded, brutalized, killed and persecuted. Underneath all of
this exploitation, the racism of this country has produced a psychological
effect upon us that we are beginning to shake off. We are no longer afraid
to demand our full rights as a people in this decadent society. . . .
NYBooks
* * *
* *
Henry Louis Gates gets slavery's history all wrong—By
Dr. Boyce Watkins—What occurred after we left Africa can and must be
considered independently from what happened while our forefathers were in
the mother land.
Beyond the indisputable financial damage caused by
slavery, there is also a price to be paid for pain, suffering and aggregate
trauma. Even the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which abolishes
slavery, has a clause stating that it's still OK to enslave another
American, as long as that person has been convicted of a crime. Given that
the United States incarcerates 5.8 times more black men than South Africa
did during the height of apartheid, it's easy to argue that the human rights
violations of American slavery continue to this day.
The arbitrary label of "convict" is used against black
men in a disproportionate fashion as a loophole for American corporations to
continue to profit from slave labor. I don't want to play the "blame game."
But mainstream media must not play the "irresponsibility game," by promoting
apologist African-American scholars who are willing to write off 400 years
of systemically oppressive behavior. While the Rodney King, "Can't we all
just get along?" approach makes some of us more comfortable, the truth is
that America cannot become truly post-racial until it overcomes its
past-racial influences. TheGrio
* * * *
|
Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in
America
By Melissa V.
Harris-Perry
According to the
author, this society has historically exerted
considerable pressure on black females to fit into one
of a handful of stereotypes, primarily, the Mammy, the
Matriarch or the Jezebel. The selfless
Mammy’s behavior is marked by a slavish devotion to
white folks’ domestic concerns, often at the expense of
those of her own family’s needs. By contrast, the
relatively-hedonistic Jezebel is a sexually-insatiable
temptress. And the Matriarch is generally thought of as
an emasculating figure who denigrates black men, ala the
characters Sapphire and Aunt Esther on the television
shows Amos and Andy and Sanford and Son, respectively.
Professor Perry
points out how the propagation of these harmful myths
have served the mainstream culture well. For instance,
the Mammy suggests that it is almost second nature for
black females to feel a maternal instinct towards
Caucasian babies.
As for the source
of the Jezebel, black women had no control over their
own bodies during slavery given that they were being
auctioned off and bred to maximize profits. Nonetheless,
it was in the interest of plantation owners to propagate
the lie that sisters were sluts inclined to mate
indiscriminately.
|
 |
* *
* * *
The
Essence of Reparations
By Amiri Baraka
 |
Slavery by Another Name
The Re-Enslavement of
Black Americans from the
Civil War to World War
II
By
Douglas A. Blackmun
Wall Street Journal
bureau chief Blackmon
gives a groundbreaking
and disturbing account
of a sordid chapter in
American history—the
lease (essentially the
sale) of convicts to
commercial interests
between the end of the
19th century and well
into the 20th. Usually,
the criminal offense was
loosely defined vagrancy
or even changing
employers without
permission. The initial
sentence was brutal
enough; the actual
penalty, reserved almost
exclusively for black
men, was a form of
slavery in one of
hundreds of forced labor
camps operated by state
and county governments,
large corporations,
small time entrepreneurs
and provincial farmers.
Into this history,
Blackmon weaves the
story of Green Cottenham,
who was charged with
riding a freight train
without a ticket, in
1908 and was sentenced
to three months of hard
labor for Tennessee
Coal, Iron & Railroad, a
subsidiary of U.S.
Steel. |
Cottenham's
sentence was extended an
additional three months
and six days because he
was unable to pay fines
then leveraged on
criminals. Blackmon's
book reveals in
devastating detail the
legal and commercial
forces that created this
neoslavery along with
deeply moving and
totally appalling
personal testimonies of
survivors
* * *
* *
|
Obama's America and the New Jim Crow
The Recurring Racial Nightmare, The Cyclical Rebirth
of Caste
by Michelle Alexander
Most people don’t
like it when I say this. It makes them angry. In the
“era of colorblindness” there’s a nearly fanatical
desire to cling to the myth that we as a nation have
“moved beyond” race. Here are a few facts that run
counter to that triumphant racial narrative:
*There are more
African Americans under correctional control today—in
prison or jail, on probation or parole—than were
enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
*As of 2004, more
African American men were disenfranchised (due to felon
disenfranchisement laws) than in 1870, the year the
Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that
explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.
|
 |
* A black child
born today is less likely to be raised by both parents
than a black child born during slavery. The recent
disintegration of the African American family is due in
large part to the mass imprisonment of black fathers.
*If you take into
account prisoners, a large majority of African American
men in some urban areas have been labeled felons for
life. (In the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80%.)
These men are part of a growing undercaste—not class,
caste—permanently relegated, by law, to a second-class
status. They can be denied the right to vote,
automatically excluded from juries, and legally
discriminated against in employment, housing, access to
education, and public benefits, much as their
grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim
Crow era.
* *
* * *
Michelle Alexander: US Prisons, The New Jim Crow
Where
Have All the Black Men Gone?—Michelle
Alexander—In 2005, for
example, 4 out 5 drug arrests were for possession and
only 1 out of 5 were for sales. Most people in state
prison for drug offenses have no history of violence or
significant selling activity. Nearly 80 percent of the
increase in drug arrests in the 1990s — the period of
the most dramatic expansion of the drug war — was for
marijuana possession, a drug less harmful than alcohol
or tobacco. In some states, though, African Americans
have comprised 80 to 90 percent of all drug convictions.
This is
The New Jim Crow. People of color are rounded up —
frequently at young ages — for relatively minor drug
offenses, branded felons, and then relegated to a
permanent second-class status in which they may be
denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from
juries, and subjected to legal discrimination in
employment, housing, access to education, and public
benefits. Those who are lucky enough to get a job upon
release from prison find that up to 100 percent of their
wages may be garnished to pay fees, fines, and court
costs as well as the costs of their imprisonment and
accumulated child support. What, realistically, do we
expect these folks to do? When those labeled felons fail
under this system to make it on the outside — not
surprisingly, about 70 percent fail within 3 years — we
throw up our hands and wonder where they all went. Or we
chastise them for being poor fathers and for failing to
contribute to their families. It’s a set up. This system
isn’t about crime control; it about racial control. Yes,
even in the age of Obama.
HuffingtonPost
update 23 April 2010
|