ChickenBones: A Journal

for Literary & Artistic African-American Themes

   

Home   Visit Our Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)

Google
 

elections alone are not the end of the story. A democratic regime must act democratically in

the country and in relations with its neighbours otherwise the mandate becomes suspect

 

 

Deposing Charles Taylor

A Thursday Postcard

By  Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem

 

Former President Charles was forced by a combination of local, regional and international pressure to resign his office two weeks ago. In a surreal performance he made his valedictory national broadcast witnessed by three African Presidents: Mbeki (South Africa), Chissano (Mozambique and current chair of the AU) and Kufour (Ghana and current chair of the ECOWAS).

Affecting a patriotism and "love for my people" that was neither characteristic of his brutal war for the presidential mansion nor his ransom presidency for six years or his various regional misadventures he compared himself to Jesus Christ and felt himself  "the sacrificial lamb."

It was distasteful and I am sure very offensive to committed practising Christians that a scoundrel like "'Charlie Boy" can misappropriate such potent religious symbolism that is at the centre of their faith for his ignoble purposes. That said it does not mean that there is no iota of legitimate concern in it even if liberally embroidered on a canvass of political opportunism.

It is like the Man who was accused of being paranoid and he said: "the fact that I may be paranoid does not mean that there is nobody conspiring against me." The fact that Charles Taylor said something does not mean that there may not be element of truth in it though not for the delusionary and emotive reasons that Taylor had in mind in forcing the parallel.

He has indeed been sacrificed but unlike Christ his second coming is neither heralded nor desirable and hopefully he is gone and gone forever. He has been sacrificed as a symbol of emerging higher standards expected of African leaders and growing consensus that African leaders cannot just rule as they please, how they please, and for as long as they desire.

The Taylor experience has far wider implication in many ways.

One, it is a precedent that sets a higher threshold for other sitting dictators that they can be dealt with. African leaders now have to show why they can act on Taylor and not on others. They will be hard put to justify "softly softly" diplomacy in confronting similar situations from now on. This expands the space for public discourse on dealing with these issues. Some of the positive aspects of the Constitutive Act of the African Union and worthy aspirations of the African Peer Review Mechanism in the unpopular NEPAD may be gathering their own momentum precluding inaction by the leaders.

Two, the hand-me-down, Donor-driven, Aid-addicted limited democratic dispensations across the continent is being given its African imprint that demands more than just merely winning elections in order to legitimise yourself. Here was Charles Taylor, "elected" in elections judged by the ubiquitous international community and its allied election tourists, as "generally free and fair" being forced out of office before the expiration of his "legitimate" mandate. It means that elections alone are not the end of the story. A democratic regime must act democratically in the country and in relations with its neighbours otherwise the mandate becomes suspect and can be overrun by wider needs of the country and the region.

Three, it operationalises notions of collective sovereignty and security. Your neighbours have as much legitimate stake in your internal activities as you do in theirs which may give force to emerging regional citizenship and governance. For instance, Charles Taylor is not indicted because of what he has done in Liberia and to fellow Liberians (even though gruesome evidence abound) but for his support for banditry and predatory Rebels in a neighbouring country. The Presidents and Commanders of Uganda, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Angola and others militarily involved in the DRC must worry because maybe not now but in the future they could be indicted for their actions or inactions in the tragedy of that country.

There are also a number of problems with the Taylor experience. Who decides when a government has forfeited its electoral mandate? Is it the level of armed rebellions and other military campaigns, regardless of their motivation, support base, and political programme?

Is it a decision that is subject to the whims and caprices of the regional hegemonic power that is able to use its good and not so good offices, to ensure that its will prevails?

If this option triumphs it will only be an African version of the Bush school of diplomacy whose doctrine is: BE REASONABLE, DO IT MY WAY! If the region decides what are the institutional mechanisms that are in place to ensure that these decisions are made fairly and consistently? President Compaore of Burkina-Faso is probably as guilty as Charles Taylor in fostering senseless wars but he appears to be more sophisticated than his former buddy. If regional concern for security alone will necessitate action why are they not more robust in dealing with Laurent Gbagbo of Ivory Coast who is using Xenophobia and genocidal ideology to retain power?

The big question of all is what can the region do if it is the regional power itself that is in breach of the emerging consensus around collective security and sovereignty? If Nigeria can save the region who will save Nigerians and Nigeria? That one can raise these questions today is in itself a measure of the relative space open for Africans to engage and build consensus on resolving these issues. In the past these debates were stifled by dubious claims of 'internal affairs', 'sovereignty', or 'territorial integrity'.

There is great scope for African governments, regional and continental institutions, parliamentarians, civil Society groups, NGOs and all stake holders to engage on these issues in order to give concrete expression to our desire for 'African solutions to African problems'.

"Forward ever , backward never".....Kwame Nkrumah (1909 - 1972)

 

Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem has been General Secretary of the global Pan African Movement since 1994 and is resident in Uganda and London. Tajudeen is Nigerian by origin. He was a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford where he gained his D.Phil in political science. He was a founder member of the Africa Resource and Information Bureau, London, and has been at the centre of numerous initiatives to promote peace and democracy in Africa. Tajudeen writes and lectures on Africa for several journals and universities. He is Chairperson of the Centre for Democratic Development and the Pan African Development Education and Advocacy Programme.

Tajudeen28@yahoo.com or Tajudeen@Padeap.net. Thursday Postcard appears in Uganda's THE NEW VISION

posted 22 August 2003

Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf  (video)

*   *   *   *   *

 

 

 

 

 

 

update 4 October 2008

 

 

Home   Patricia Jabbeh Wesley    Transitional Writings on Africa      The African World

Other Liberian articles:  Liberia: The Willis Knuckles Saga  African President Addresses US Congress    I, Momolu, Liberia   After All the Flame  (poem)