|
Books by Floyd W.
Hayes, III
A Turbulent Voyage: Readings in African
American Studies /
Forty
Acres and a Mule: The Rape of Colored Americans
* *
* * *
Down with the Clintons
By
Floyd Hayes,
III,
Ph.D.
|
My husband did not wrap
up the nomination in 1992 until he won the
California primary somewhere in the middle
of June, right? We all Remember Bobby
Kennedy was assassinated in June in
California. I don't understand it.—Hillary
R. Clinton |
The Clintons once
thought they had a second presidency in the bag. Once
that delusion was shattered, they entered upon the road
of desperation. Panic now motivates their political
strategies, which have become increasingly malicious and
depraved. They will say anything, do anything, in their
despicable and decadent attempt to win the Democratic
Party presidential nomination. However, their
win-at-any-cost strategy
has backfired at
every point. To raise the specter of Obama's
assassination—and suggest that she is waiting for
something terrible to happen so that she can step into
the nomination—is the lowest form of evil. Think of how
her comments resonate with so many other whites in
America.
Bill Clinton never
was a "black" president; he wasn't even a New Deal
liberal president. Check out the extent to which his
neo-liberal ideology and social policies actually
carried out many of the policy fantasies of Ronald
Reagan, especially on the question of welfare
policy. Recall
when Bill said, "Mend it but don't end it?" He then
gave welfare recipients five years, and then it ended!
One doesn't even have to rehearse his treatment of Lani
Guinier and other blacks. NAFTA clearly was/is not in
the interest of the US working class. So, damn!
Hillary's political
strategy is an atrocity! Yes, it is unforgivable! But
so many blacks want to forgive and forget. However,
here is a circumstance in which it is morally
justifiable not to forgive or forget her vicious
behavior not only toward the Obama family, but also
actually toward black people. Indeed, it is morally
defensible to be totally angry and outraged at the
Clintons.
Now is the time for
some black writers and scholars to begin writing books,
articles, essays, and commentaries about the Clintons'
atrocious and decadent political strategies--past
policies and present politics—so that future generations
will never forget or forgive them.
Like so many of
this country's leaders and first families—perhaps more
so in the present case—the Clintons need to be subjects
of our severest criticism. What better case can be made
for a literature of indictment?
Down with the Clintons!
* *
* * *
Hello,
This is not an
over-reaction. Consider the subtext, the subliminal
psychopathic suggestions, implied by HRC's, as well as a
host of others, repeatedly spoken or inferred remarks
invoking harm to the Obamas (read by extension, Black
people in general): There's something going on that
needs to addressed and discussed: There's a storm
gaining strength of public racially aggressive/violent
speech; it's a growing pattern, bigger, more invidious
than a right wing smear:
1) The use
of a hangman's noose as a racist symbol has resurfaced
recently, most notably in the 2006 case of the Jena Six
when six black high school students in Louisiana were
charged with beating a white student after nooses had
been left in a tree under which the black students had
asked school permission to sit, and add to that the
notion of lynching a Black person.
** **Hangman's
Noose Targets Columbia Professor *(Oct. 10, 2007): New
York police are investigating a possible hate crime at
Columbia University Tuesday after a hangman's noose was
tied to the door of a black professor at Columbia's
Teachers College. (http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3711479&page=1)
** Golf Channel
anchor Kelly Tilghman* (January 08, 2008): ...joked,
young players who wanted to challenge Tiger Woods should
*``lynch him in a back alley.''* The Golf Channel was
forced to suspend her for two weeks in response to
public outrage.
(You know, I have a
lot of sympathy for Michelle Obama, for Bill Clinton,
For all of these people. Bill Clinton, I have sympathy
for him, because they're thrown into a hopper where
everybody is waiting for them to make a mistake, so that
they can just go and bludgeon them…That's wrong. And *I
don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle
Obama* *unless there's evidence, hard facts,* that say
this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she
really feels — that America is a bad country or a flawed
nation, whatever —then that's legit….[http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200001
(with video)]
According to
Alabama's Tuskegee University, 3,466 African-Americans
were lynched in the United States from 1882-1968. In
2005, The U.S. Senate officially apologized for failing
to act on more than 200 anti-lynching bills introduced
over the years.
2) The controversial front
cover of the Roswell Beacon dated May 15, 2008.
3) Arkansas
Governor Mike Huckabee (May 15, 2008) ...took a hit at
Senator Barack Obama during the annual National Rifle
Association meeting with An off-color joke during his
speech in Louisville, Kentucky, when a loud Bang was
heard off-stage. *"That was Barack Obama,"* Huckabee
quipped, *"He just tripped off a chair. He was getting
ready to speak. Somebody aimed a Gun at him and he…he
dove for the floor."* (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/05/huckabee-jokes.html)
4) Clinton Kennedy
Assassination Reference: Raises Bobby's Death To Explain
Why She Stays In Race
"My husband did not
wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the
California primary somewhere in the middle of June,
right? We all Remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in
June in California. I don't understand it.' [WATCH] &
Check out commentary
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/23/clinton-kennedy-assassina_n_103319.html
It Was NOT a Gaffe. by rhetoricus
http://rhetoricus.dailykos.com/ Sat May 24, 2008 at
12:30:43 PM PDT
*However we choose
to make sense of, respond to, and move on from,
Hillary'sstatements, we need to understand a few
things.*
*A gaffe is
something said once. A gaffe comes out in opposition to
what was intended. A gaffe runs contrary to a person's
general stance and record. Thus, a gaffe is easily
apologized for, and with an apology, a gaffe warrants
forgiveness. *
*This, however, was
NOT the first time Hillary Clinton has invoked the
specter of assassination by using that word in
comparison to the current primary. That makes her
comment not a gaffe, but a strategy. And she has not
apologized for the offense to Obama, who was (intended
or not) the referent people heard. Hillary seems not
even to apprehend the horror to Obama, his family, or
his supporters in invoking "assassination" to argue for
why she continues to fight on the campaign trail.*
*These factors need to be kept in
mind.*
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/151140/851/599/522141
Hillary's Hopes
http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/05/24/hillary-s-hopes.aspx>
Posted Saturday, May 24, 2008 1:26PM
<http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/05/24/hillary-s-hopes.aspx
*Emily Yoffe*
http://www.slate.com/blogs/search/searchresults.aspx?u=2114
So this is what
it's come to:* the Lone Gunman strategy.* It's no
secret that Hillary Clinton has been hoping for a
colossal misstep by Barack Obama, or a damaging
revelation, to end his candidacy, leaving her the last
woman standing. But the satisfying irony would be that
Clinton has made the ultimate in political blunders by
voicing [Washington
Post ]the possibility of the assassination of her
opponent. It's chilling, the cool, uninflected way she
casually brings up what she calls the "historic fact"
that Bobby Kennedy was murdered in June - *before the
end of the primary season, so thank goodness Hubert
Humphrey hadn't withdrawn prematurely!* Later, woften
runs into June, as her own husband's did, and anyway
the Kennedys have been on her mind because of the brain
tumor diagnosis of Ted Kennedy (take note: voodoo dolls
really do work). *Read more: *
http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/
Keith Olbermann: Countdown: Special
Comment "Hillary You Went Too Far" 5-23-8 (a gut
wrenching commentary)
*The use of the word
"assassination" is not open to misinterpretation. It has
no place, not with our country's history. Those words,
Senator?
You actually invoked the
nightmare of political assassination.
You actually
invoked the spectre of an inspirational leader, at
The seeming moment
of triumph, for himself and a battered nation yearning
to breathe free, silenced forever.
You actually
used the word "assassination" in the middle of a
campaign with a loud undertone of racial hatred -- and
gender hatred – and political hatred.
You actually
used the word "assassination" in a time when there is a
fear, unspoken but vivid and terrible, that our
again-troubled land and fractured political landscape
might target a black man running for president.
Or a white
man.
Or a white
woman!
You actually
used those words, in this America, Senator while running
against an African-American against whom the death
threats started the moment he declared his campaign?
You actually
used those words, in this America, Senator, while
running to break your "greatest glass ceiling" and
claiming there are people who would do anything to stop
you?
You!
Senator --
never mind the implications of using the word
"assassination" in any connection to Senator Obama...
What about you? You cannot say this!
**Watch: *http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ba3x-name0
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/23/195538/275/126/521613
Hillary's RFK
remarks spark widespread rebuke: a sampling *I think
Hillary, in a very matter-of-fact manner, maybe coldly,
maybe calculatingly, pointed out once again that
something very bad might happen to Obama, and that if it
did, she could still become President. It's obvious
she's thought about it. I think it's the last real hope
she has left of being the nominee.*
*Does she wish for
it to happen? I don't know, but she sure does want to be
President, doesn't she? And the way she talked about it
today says to me that she's just thinking about herself
and what she wants. If Obama dies, she wins. She said it
today, using other words. Remember, I could still win,
and here's how.*
*I think the danger
to Obama and his family is greater than it has been for
anyone else ever. He's gotten closer than any African
American to winning, and there's still a lot of hatred
out there.*
*As a candidate,
the wife of a President and a mother, Hillary should
know this all too well and common decency, to me, says
that she doesn't touch the assassination talk ever under
any circumstances. No matter what.* *I think at the very
least, she should honor the courage he's shown as a
candidate and the very real dangers he and his family
face.
teresa hill's diary:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/23/224630/771/5/521718
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/65451/0542/860/521896
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/62635/9590
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/clinton-calls-vp-chatter-completely-untrue/
http://www.blogsofwar.com/2008/05/23/hillary-clinton-on-hope-obama-could-still-be-assassinated?referer=sphere_related_content
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/73250/5819
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/23/155636/6
Assassination Discussions May 23,
2008 5:44 PM
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/assassination-d.html
*Hillary invokes RFK assassination
*
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/23/1058940.aspx
HRC is unfit for any elected
office.
www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/stop-yelling-at-hillary-t_b_103135.html
Contact: Superdelegate Donna
Brazile or Brazile and Associates at
info@brazileassociates.com
—Hunter Adams
* * *
* *
Floyd W. Hayes,
III, coordinator of programs and undergraduate studies—A
senior lecturer in the
Department of Political Science, Hayes is
coordinator of programs and undergraduate studies in the
Center for Africana Studies. His teaching and research
interests include black politics and political
philosophy, urban politics and public policy,
educational policymaking and politics, leadership
studies, and the politics of jazz. He is the author of
numerous articles and the editor of
A Turbulent Voyage: Readings in African
American Studies.
He is currently
working on a book examining the social and political
thought of Richard Wright, “Domination and Ressentiment:
The Desperate Vision of Richard Wright.” Hayes earned a
BA in French and political science from North Carolina
Central University, an MA in African Area Studies from
the University of California, Los Angeles, and a Ph.D. in
government and politics from the University of Maryland.
* * *
* *
Other Responses
Dear All,
In addition to Bill Clinton's gutless dumping of Lonnie
Guinier (I knew her father) in the early days of his
administration, he did not come to his presidential
candidacy with racially clean hands.
For example, only when he became a presidential
candidate did he resign from a racially segregated
Little Rock golf club. And I cannot forget the summary
firing WITHOUT EXPLANATION of Clifton Wharton
(ex-Chairman of TIAA/CREF) as his first black Deputy
Secretary of State within months of Wharton's
appointment.
As for Lonnie Guinier, she was a friend and Yale Law
School classmate of Bill Clinton who had even
entertained Bill and Hillary at her home on Martha's
vineyard prior to Bill's race for the presidency! So
much for friendship and personal loyalty from the
Clintons . . . the untrustworthy pair of racist,
self-seeking, power mad, unscrupulous opportunists!
The Clintons come to the current race for the
presidential nomination with hands sullied by racism . .
.notwithstanding Bill Clinton's showcase office in
Harlem! Best,
—Rick
* * *
* *
Dear Miriam,
Well, given the detail about Bill Clinton in your
friend's comment, perhaps we need to ask seriously how
it was that Clinton became the "first black president."
What was it that seemed to have attracted so many blacks
to him? What specifically motivated Toni Morrison to
apply that moniker to him? I am not calling for any
criticism of her; what I do want to know is how he
could "capture" black consciousness in the manner he
did.
Of course, many of us were severely critical of the
Clinton regime, but still, many blacks and others gave
the Clintons considerable status. It could be argued
that the Clintons began the present Democratic Party
nomination campaign as political royalty. Why? Again,
how did they capture this authority? In my view, the
Clintons were duplicitous "back in the day," and they
remain so now.
—Floyd
* * *
* *
Floyd, I really
don't know the answer to your very important question,
and I think it's one that bears analysis by a political
scientist like you, Ron Walter, or others in your field.
In fact, it would make a provocative subject for a book.
Personally, I think that two things factored in: (1) the
appointment of prominent, well respected Blacks (and
other ethnics) such as Hazel O'Leary, Ron Brown, Delano
Lewis, Veronica Coleman (to a federal judgeship here in
Tenn.), and others to important positions in his
administration, and (2) his ability to "walk and talk"
Black Southern culture, which he'd picked up from
growing up in small-town Arkansas. His personal charisma
and his talent on the saxophone were icing on the cake.—Miriam
* * *
* *
All Hillary said was that
during the month of June somebody did get killed. She
didn't mean to suggest that anybody could get killed.
Good thing for her she said it just before the Memorial
Day weekend news moratorium.—Wilson
* * *
* *
It was never so
much what Hillary said. It was the climate she created
for what could be said, and worse doneCheck this out:
FOX Pundit Wishes for Obama Assassination, Laughs—Huffington
Post
* * *
* *
It was both: what she said and the
possibility that she created.—Miriam
* *
* * *
Well, Miriam was
the first to point out to me the decadence of the old
civil rights establishment (OCRE) and the need for a
"new breed" of black politicians. Well, such as
Obama. Some say the new head of the NAACP is such a
person, as well. I don't know about that. She knew many
of the OCRE, the old guard in Memphis. I respect her
moderation.
At first I was blind to her insight but she has proven
right. Adjacent to the OCRE was the old black
nationalist-socialist groups and persons, of which I was
a part, they too have lacked self-criticism. They too
have reacted abrasively toward Obama. Well, some of them
have prospered in labor unions and new Old Left
politics.
They however have not received as extensively the
patronage of the Democratic Party, as have members of
the OCRE, many of whom have gone on to be high placed
politicians and multi-millionaires who jacked up the
White establishment and the DP for personal ends on the
race issue, as have Young, Jackson, and others. We know
about Jackson’s sexual indiscretions. There have always
been such jokes about black Baptist preachers. Jackson
and Young are now entertainers for the corporate news
media.
That patronage ends up in the kind of speech and
analysis that we got from Young. You can see in their
faces that they went on to be lustful pigs, using
whomever they could, even African states to fill their
pouches.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=breSVtVYSmo
* *
* * *
This is a
particular historical moment when I truly regret the
absence of the powerful spirit and courage many of
blacks possessed during the Black Power Movement.
Because many whites thought there might be repercussions
in response to racist behavior and discourse, whites
often moderated their words and behavior. And there were
blacks who reciprocated when whites spoke and behaved in
a racist fashion! Since the Reagan era, many whites have
increasingly resurrected, embraced, and asserted a most
virulent, but subtle, racism.
The increasing articulation of racist code
words/messages or the use of racist symbols (e.g., the
hangman's noose) are the continuation of strategies
historically designed to intimidate, humiliate, and
terrorize blacks. And of course, we cannot overlook the
growing numbers of police murders of blacks today.
Racists, like the Clintons, hold problematic views of
blacks; hence, they lie to themselves by saying they are
not racist. They embrace the notion that whites are the
only ones who merit human status (see Lewis Gordon,
BAD
FAITH AND ANTIBLACK RACISM). Look at the damn Clintons!
They seem to think that Obama, merely because he is
black, is unqualified, and, therefore, does not deserve
to be president of the USA. Hence, they say any perverse
thing about him.
Trying to elevate
themselves, the Clintons lie without concern for the
truth. I have concluded that they just are compulsive
and political liars! They have said that they are
throwing the sink (actually, a sink full of shit) at
Obama, hoping that something sticks. How decadent!
HOWEVER, TO RAISE THE SPECTER OF HIS ASSASSINATION GOES
OVER THE LINE! This is the kind of discourse that
asserts that Obama, and by extension other blacks, does
not even have the right to exist! Now, what in the hell
is Michelle Obama to think of the Clintons and other
whites who link Obama with assassination? She loves her
husband and their children, but she has to listen to
evil whites who wish violence against him. They wish the
end of his existence. Damn! This is no laughing matter!
But the violence of the oppressor calls into existence
counter-violence of the oppressed.
We cannot/must not respond to these threats to our very
existence with silence, invisibility, and fear. I am
outraged and angered. In the face of racist evil,
outrage and resentment clearly are morally justifiable,
even required! There are times when long-standing
resentment and rage need to result in protest, revolt,
and rebellion--when protest, revolt, and rebellion also
become morally defensible. Didn't we learn this profound
lesson by reading Frantz Fanon's revolutionary book, THE
WRETCHED OF THE EARTH?
Do not let the Clintons off the hook! Never forget what
racist pigs they are! Refuse to forgive or to reconcile
with the Clintons! Hillary's NY constituents should
decide collectively not to re-elect her to the US
Senate. She is a crass individual, who doesn't deserve
to represent any people, anywhere, anytime, any more!—Floyd
* *
* * *
If Hillary was in the lead in
Delegates and Barack was behind with no way of
surpassing her, He would have been forced out of the
race a long time ago...demand that she goes!
Dear Friend,
Some leaders in the
Democratic Party are playing with fire. They think that
they can betray the will of millions of voters—and
choose Hillary Clinton as the nominee, regardless of
whether or not she is the choice of the voters. We can't
let this happen. It would be the largest
disenfranchisement in modern history, and it would mean
the Democratic Party giving their stamp of approval to a
clear and consistent pattern of race-baiting by the
Clinton campaign.
If we make our
voices heard, we can stop it. Please join us in signing
an open letter to leaders in the Democratic Party—DNC
Chair Howard Dean, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi,
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and all
superdelegates—demanding that they reject an outcome
that involves trampling voting rights and legitimizing
the politics of division and fear: http://www.colorofchange.org/dems/?id=2506-130612
By the time the
last vote is cast on June 3rd under the rules of the
Democratic Party, it's unlikely Hillary Clinton will
beat Barack Obama among voters. But there's a chance
that superdelegates will hand Clinton the nomination
anyway.
This would be a
shocking attack on democracy, and it would destroy the
Democratic party's credibility on protecting the right
to vote. Black people have a long history of fighting
against voter suppression, and now the Democratic Party
will be the enemy in that fight. As bad as that would
be, there's another reason that a coup by party insiders
would threaten racial progress.
Senator Clinton's
plan to have superdelegates hand her the nomination
doesn't make sense without a parallel strategy—she has
to stoke enough division and race-based fear among
Democratic voters to convince superdelegates that white
voters will not vote for Senator Obama in the general
election. One of Clinton's key arguments to
superdelegates is that America won't elect a Black man,
and therefore she's the better choice for Democrats to
beat John McCain. While she makes that argument in
private to superdelegates, in public Clinton's campaign
and her surrogates are doing everything they can to
damage Barack Obama by ginning up fear and division and
playing to the worst instincts of our society. It's an
insult to Black people and all Americans, Obama and
Clinton supporters alike.
The pattern has
been clear and consistent to some party leaders. Last
week, according to the Washington Post, James Clyburn--
who as House Majority Whip remains neutral and is the
highest ranking Black member of Congress—accused the
Clintons of marginalizing Black voters. Referring to
this strategy in another interview, Clyburn said that
“Nothing in this campaign has been by accident.”
Congressman Clyburn
warned that “black people are incensed” over the
divisiveness of the Clinton strategy and that it
threatens an irreparable breach between Black people and
the Democratic Party. He's right. And if superdelegates
hand Clinton a victory despite her defeat among voters,
they will be condoning and rewarding that strategy.
Some party leaders
have expressed strong concern about superdelegates
overruling voters. But as a whole, superdelegates have
not made it clear that they will respect the will of
voters. Today, we want to send a clear, unequivocal
message to superdelegates and other party leaders:
Reject the idea that the nomination can be won with a
strategy that preys on racism, sows division, and
disenfranchises millions of voters.
Please join us:
http://www.colorofchange.org/dems/?id=2506-130612
Thanks.
Please
click on the link sign your name to the petition and
pass this important email on to everyone you know.
Thanks, Antoinette
Antoinette Carter-Pugh
Workers Compensation Risk
Manager
INTERLINE BRANDS, INC. /
200 East Park Drive, Suite 200 / Mount Laurel, New
Jersey 08054
Tel: 856-533-3199 / Fax:
856-505-1662 /
acartpugh@interlinebrands.com
* *
* * *
posted 25 May 2008 |