Growing into Spiritual Manhood—1810-1823

Nathaniel's Recognition of Southampton Slave Reality

In 1810, a brutal change occurred in Nat’s plantation status. About forty-four years old, Ben Turner died. His testament (Deed Book 14, p. 81) willed Nat, his fellow servants, and 360 acres of land to John Clark’s older brother Samuel Turner, who became also a trustee of Turner’s Methodist Church (Nat Turner Insurrection—1831, tapes 1-2).

 In 1809, Samuel Turner, about twenty-one years old, was about twelve years older than his younger brother John Clark. Ben Turner’s death forced the two young boys, Nat and John Clark, each to go his different way to start a new life. The death of a master was a cataclysmic event, as turbulent and destructive as any natural disaster.

According to F. Roy Johnson, "All thirty of the old master’s thirty slaves were divided between their mistress [Elizabeth] and her five children. Nat, his mother, and six other blacks—Sam, Lydia, Drew, Chary [spelled also, C-h-e-r-r-y], Miver, and Elick were already in the possession of Samuel Turner, the oldest son" (The Nat Turner Slave Insurrection, p. 27).

Whatever John Clark inherited from his father, which he would not receive until he came of age, did not approach what Samuel received by the law of patrimony, that is, the greater part of the estate. In this manner, the patriarchal system of Virginia’s slavocracy disinherited those born after the oldest son. John Clark as a child, was probably as befuddled as Nat by the events that followed Ben Turner’s sudden death..

At this stage, Nat Turner, ten years old, had not a glimmer of the world that awaited him. He had not yet reached puberty. He was still fairly free spirited; he was a child who had to be taught to be a slave. The economic-minded Samuel Turner, Ben Turner’s son, would be his guide into that hell that was slavery. We do not know fully Samuel Turner’s regard for the little Christian slave child who became a part of the Turner household. When Nat was born, Samuel Turner was about thirteen years old.

Any adolescent would probably have viewed such a child as an intruder, especially a child who attracted so much attention and approval, especially from his father Ben Turner. The death of Benjamin Turner must have caused many resentments to rise to the surface, among both the black and white Turners. Doubtless the separation of John Clark and Nat Turner was the only means by which Nat Turner could fulfill his destiny as a prophet, an apostle of that "old-time religion."

Ben Turner was no longer present to indulge Nat, the miracle child, and his intellectual attainments. He had been a central figure in the Ben Turner household. Samuel Turner, his new master, had no intent to indulge him. Like Harriet, while Ben Turner lived, Nat was a house servant, a house boy. As a slave of Samuel Turner, a third-generation Methodist and slaveholder, that was no longer possible. Though Ben Turner expanded his ownership of slaves at his father’s death, the moral wrongs of slavery still disturbed his sensibilities.

From Nat’s perspective, Ben Turner had not become coarse. In Sam Turner’s generation, however, the moral dilemma of slavery resolved itself on the economic side. Having fewer slaves than his father before him, Sam Turner needed farm hands. There was a downturn in the Virginia economy. Like other slave children, at ten to twelve, Nat was introduced to field work and then the plow.

Naturally, the boy Nat felt a measure of resentment, maybe even hatred. For Sam Turner denied Nat that essential right needed by every human being: a viable choice. In his World Justice article John Francis Maxwell pointed out definitively the horror at the core of slavery: "The slave, man, woman or child is deprived of the natural vocational right to arrange and live his own life, to choose his own vocation, his own work, his own leisure-recreation. This state of deprivation is the necessary consequence of being in the ownership of a master who can transfer him, by sale and purchase, to another master" ("The Development of Catholic Doctrine Concerning Slavery," p. 189). 

One man’s inheritance becomes another man or woman or child’s undeserved disinheritance and displacement. Nat’s intimacy with John Clark, which had the tenor of one brother for another, was also undermined and his opportunities to study formally ceased.

Conscious of plantations rumors and his own complexion, Turner may have felt deep down that he too was a "son" of Ben Turner—the bastard son, disinherited. That tormenting state of not knowing who the father is, as is evident in Fred Douglass’1845 Narrative, must have been a prevalent phenomena among many young Christian male slaves, even to those who had much less on which to base their suspicions.

Patriarchy when injudicious has always generated discontent, intrigue, and fratricide. In such mythic contests for power, "legitimacy" is always a central question. By this time, Tom, his spiritual father, had run away and escaped. Turner was alone in a male world with none to intercede.

Nathaniel Turner learned, however, that which can not be dismissed must be borne. The plow gave the boy Nat solitude and the opportunity to develop his spiritual as well as his physical gifts. He developed great upper-body strength, endurance, and determination. The drudgery and monotony of farm work gave him hours of silence to study his thoughts and feelings and his place in the world. With his regard ever on God and righteousness, Turner learned, as other wise men before him, when one road becomes blocked, faith finds another. That is, fortitude and perseverance find their mark.

Abandoned by the Elders of the local Methodist Church to the life of a field slave, Nat did not overly despair. God was still with him and continued to bless him and increase in him both faith and reason, bestowing upon him scientific knowledge and religious insight. "While employed," Turner told Gray, "I was reflecting on many things that would present themselves to my imagination, and whenever an opportunity occurred of looking at a book when the school children were getting their lessons, I would find many things that the fertility of my own imagination had depicted to me before."

Most likely, Ben Turner, and later Samuel, possessed family libraries to which Nat and John Clark had access. Turner was becoming ever more self-conscious of his own spiritual gifts.

To stave off his own frustrations, having been removed away from central stage, Nat disciplined both his mind and heart. For God had marked him on his head and breast. So he prayed and fasted when not engaged in his master’s service, but he also made practical use of his intellect. Nat experimented "in casting different things in moulds made of earth." In these experiments, we find, possibly, a mirror to his soul’s turmoil. If his "casting" involved metal rather than, say, clay, then the experiments become clear.

The combined experiments, including the making of paper and gunpowder, suggest Turner attempted to make a shotgun. This particular intellectual play or desired production, seemingly, symbolized Nat’s natural anger and his urge to strike out. At this stage of his development, his religion, conservative and sincere, however, counseled obedient perseverance.

Nat Turner was keenly aware directly of how the religious world of the departed Ben Turner was slipping away. From 1810-1822, the liberal leanings of Methodism gradually faded. Possibly affected by the Prosser conspiracy, the Baptists and Methodists, between 1808 and 1812, began to reverse their policies on Christianizing slaves. Though Prosser did not use religion himself, there were slave preachers among his conspirators who used the Moses story to motivate his listeners to join Gabriel.

One aged Richmond preacher defended his ministry, thus: "I never preached any doctrine but that they should serve God and their masters faithfully. But, as for others who preached, I know they did not advise the same thing" (Egerton, pp. 53-54). The older Methodist sympathy for persecuted Christian slaves declined; competition came from only scattered pockets of Presbyterians, Episcopalians, Baptists, and Quakers. By 1820, "Methodism moved from a persecuted, radical sect to dominant church." (Williams, pp. 167-168).

With an economic downturn, Virginia slavery became more vicious. In 1818, with the corn prices declining and the soil ruined by tobacco and poor soil management, more and more slaveowners began to see their slaves as "black gold," that which could be traded in a financial crisis, without consideration of family life or attachments. With President Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana Territory and the subsequent expansion of cotton production, the Lower South became a market for slaves, especially since there was no international source for African slaves, the external slave trade having been banned constitutionally in 1808.

W.E.B Du Bois, however, in his The Suppression of the African Slave Trade (1896), established definitively that the African trade continued up to and beyond the Civil War. But its flow was not adequate to feed the hunger of Deep South slavery. This new internal trade in Christian slaves was an innovation, for Virginians tended to free their excess slaves or provide them an opportunity to obtain their freedom.

During the thirty years before the Civil War, however, Virginia bred slaves like crops, "improving the line." The market became extremely lucrative. The price of slaves tripled, from about $400 in 1830 to $1200 in 1860. The Old Dominion became the greatest exporter of slaves from the Upper South, about 300,000, an average of about 10,000 a year (The Negro in Virginia, p. 180). Being "sold down the river" (an expression of Virginia origin) was an ominous shadow over the head of every Virginia black.

According to M.I. Finley of the University of Cambridge, "any given slave had a virtual 50% ‘chance of being sold at least once in the course of a 35-year lifetime’ and on average ‘would witness 11.4 sales of members of his family of origin and of his own immediate family’ . . . . ‘the threat of sale was sufficiently large to affect the life of every slave" ( Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology). What awaited them was not a better life, but the sweaty drudgery of the rice fields of South Carolina, the mosquito-infested turpentine swamps of Georgia, or the semi-tropic sugarcane bayous of Louisiana.

*   *   *   *   *

update 28 June 2008