|
Book by John Maxwell
How to Make Our Own News: A Primer for Environmentalist and Journalists
* * * * *
The Human Factor
By John Maxwell
Even the notoriously noncommittal
Kofi Annan must have been surprised when a journalist
questioned his credentials for refereeing the current
Mideast free-for-all.
At a press conference in Rome after
the failed Middle East peacekeeping talks, an English
speaking journalist drove hard at Mr Annan. Didn’t the
UN Secretary general think that his condemnation of
Israel for deliberately bombing the UN position
undermined his qualifications to be an honest broker in
the conflict?
Annan pointed out that the questioner
misquoted him. He did not say “deliberate bombing” but
“apparently deliberate bombing.”
It was a little hard to understand
why the questioner chose to tackle Annan on that point,
since it had been clear for some time that there was no
question that Israel had bombed the UN outpost after
having been warned several times that they were firing
perilously close to the UN position.
In fact, Israel’s commander in the
field, who could see the UN position, was warned at
least ten times, at least six of those times by an
Irish member of the UNIFIL team. And when israel finally
destroyed the post it was done by way of a bomb and a
precision guided missile. If that doesn’t sound at least
like an ‘apparently deliberate” act I can’t imagine
what could.
Israel’s frustration is showing.
The plan was to teach its enemies a
short, sharp lesson, to castrate Hezbollah and to punish
the Lebanese for allowing ‘terrorists’ to hijack their
country. Even the Lebanese government seemed to agree at
the beginning of the conflict. It might be a good thing
to discipline Hezbollah, it suggested. But that soon
turned to something else.
The Lebanese Prime Minister and
Foreign Minister were soon saying that Hezbollah were
Lebanese, patriotically defending their homeland. In
fact, Hezbollah is a party and is included in the
Lebanese Cabinet. The turnaround in attitude came when
it became clear that far from being taught a short,
sharp lesson, Hezbollah was fulfilling its promise to
surprise Israel and the world. In two weeks of
relentless bombardment the Israeli incursion has still
not got past first base in Lebanon, and on Wednesday, at
Bint Jabayl, a town they said they had surrounded, if
not captured , the Israel Defence Force suffered a
brutal setback, losing nine troops killed and many more
wounded in intense fighting. The Israelis have
admitted losing 33 soldiers; Hezbollah have said they
have lost 35.
The Israelis have said that their
assault was precisely aimed at Hezbollah assets, not at
the civilian population. Clearly civilian losses
included 600 people (according to the Lebanese
government), about 200 of them children; 5,000 homes,
one toilet paper factory, one bottle factory and 150
other businesses. Nearly one million Lebanese have been
driven from their homes.
By Thursday afternoon a partial list
of other important Lebanese assets destroyed by Israel
included:
The Beirut Lighthouse and the ports
of Beirut, Tripoli and Jounieh.
Three (3) Dams, two (2) power
stations and one (1) sewage plant; 62 Bridges, 22 gas
stations, 72 road overpasses, and 600 kilometers of
road.
In the realm of communications
Hezbollah’s Al manar TV station was one of two TV
stations destroyed ALONG with two mobile phone networks
And finally in addition to this
impressive list of presumably military targets we must
add one military airport, two civil airports, 4 radar
installations and one (1) army barracks.
According to ReliefWeb:
“As of July 26, WHO reported … more
than 1,267 people are injured. The conflict has affected
an estimated 800,000 people, including internally
displaced, individuals under siege, refugees, and asylum
seekers.
“OCHA estimated that 710,000 people
have fled their homes, and the majority are now located
in Beirut, Tyre, Sidon, the Chouf mountains, and the
Alea region. Although the majority of displaced are
staying with relatives and friends, approximately
125,000 are staying in schools and public institutions
in Lebanon, and 150,000 have crossed the border into
Syria. According to international media reports,
remaining residents in southern Lebanon cannot leave due
to ongoing attacks and damaged infrastructure.”
The UN children’s Fund (UNICEF)
estimates that 45 per cent of the displaced population
are children. Approximately half of them – about
125,000 are living in 587 schools and shelters and in
are in urgent need of water storage and tankers,
improved sanitation, and health kits.
UNICEF says: “… the insecure
situation especially in southern Lebanon has severely
restricted UNICEF’s ability to reach the affected
population outside of Beirut. UNICEF joins the rest of
the UN family in its call for safe corridors for the
delivery of aid to all affected children.”
Israel's security Cabinet decided to
step up its air campaign against Lebanon on Thursday,
but said it would not expand its ground offensive after
the death of nine of its soldiers in fighting for Bint
Jbeil the day before.
The Beirut Daily Star reports:
“According to Elias Hanna, a researcher of military
affairs, the decision to limit the ground campaigns was
made because "Israelis are traumatized by their negative
experience during the invasion of Lebanon in 1982."
"They are afraid of suffering more
losses in every village they try to conquer," Hanna
added.
The researcher said internal
political calculations are also affecting Israel's
military strategy.
"The ruling coalition includes the
conservative Likud Party, which is constantly trying to
prove that the withdrawal from Southern Lebanon in 2000
was a mistake in the first place," Hanna said.
The Israeli daily Haaretz said
Israeli consensus over a large-scale offensive in
Lebanon is beginning to "crack."
“…critics are starting to say the
government launched the offensive hastily, with no exit
strategy, and many fear the country is again being
dragged into a quagmire across its northern border."
The truth is that Israel has got
itself into an unholy mess from which it has no easy
exit. Since its initial strategy seemed to be based on
an easy, lossless victory, a sort of war college
setpiece, driving back Hezbollah to its caves, the fact
that they have taken nearly two weeks to make any
impression in their ground offensive frightens many
Israelis.
Rockets are still hitting Haifa and
there is no progress on the ground in Lebanon. The
script was not supposed to be going this way.
Israel is now in a position where
'winning' seems implausible and anything less will look
suspiciously like defeat. Too many IDF soldiers are
being killed and the Israeli nation does not want to
accept massive casualties.
Having totally destabilised the Hamas
government of Palestine, Lebanon seemed a nice bit of
icing to add to that cake. Israel, the script went,
would then be able from a position of strength, impose
its solutions on the rest of the Middle East, backed by
its invincible partner, the United States.
They felt so confident that they
spoke of enforcing UN resolution 1559 demanding the
surrender of Lebanon and the disarmament of Hezbollah.
This demand is especially poignant, when it is
remembered that Israel has for fifty years, defied
scores of UN Security Council’s resolutions about the
settlement of the Palestinian question and the
establishment of a Palestinian state.
The Israeli calculus was based on the
doctrines of Ariel Sharon – who saw no reason to obey
any law which did not suit him – and a long line of
Israeli statesmen who have nibbled away at Palestinian
rights and Palestinian property without fear of
successful challenge.
This all depended on Arab armies
which would fire a few rounds in the air and then
retreat, honour satisfied. Hezbollah, it turns out, is
made of sterner stuff. But Hezbollah should not have
taken Israel by surprise. It was that organisation after
all, which drove the Israelis to vacate Lebanon twenty
years ago after Sharon's bloody and unsuccessful attempt
to settle Palestine by way of Lebanon.
This time the defeat will be more
easily visible on a larger stage particularly because
the United States and Israel have postured so grandly
and played their cards so badly.
It was clear, as some Arab
commentators have said, that the mere kidnapping of
three Israeli soldiers was not the real reason for the
start of these hostilities. Soldiers have been kidnapped
before and exchanged for prisoners kidnapped by Israel.
The original kidnapping was, after
all, an attempt to pressure Israel into returning
several hundred civilians held by Israel without charge
and including dozens of women and children.
Somehow, the Western press, in
reporting the Palestine conflict, finds it difficult to
see Palestinian grievances as real and substantial. They
proclaim the illegitimate expression of the grievances
but ignore the legitimate grievances themselves.
Israel’s arrogant kidnapping of several Hamas cabinet
ministers was meant to teach a lesson, a lesson
perilously close to the dictum stated some years ago by
a Jewish rabbi at the funeral of a Jewish terrorist
named Dr Baruch Goldstein.
Goldstein walked into a mosque in
Jerusalem with a machine-gun and killed twenty-nine
Palestinians and wounded 125 others before he was torn
to pieces by the congregation.. At his funeral the
rabbi, one Yacov Perin declared "One million Arab lives
are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
Western commentators and the Israeli
government, echoed by Ms Condoleezza Rice and her
president, suggest that the real problem is the support
of terrorists by Syria and Iran. In calling for the
enforcement of the UN resolution it does not seem to
have crossed their minds that there are other, even more
relevant resolutions of the UN Security Council.
Whether the Israelis and the US
press believe so or not, the UN resolutions were not
anti-semitic, nor anti-Zionist nor anti-Jewish, but were
the world’s sincere attempts to deliver justice to both
sides – to people who have been holding the sharp end of
the stick ever since Joshua smote the Amalekites and the
Amorites, David smote the Philistines and the Romans
smote the Jews.
The problem is that the Israelis,
grievously wronged by European peoples, cannot believe
that they can live peacefully and occupy the same
general space as any other people. It is an exaggeration
to describe the attitude of the Zionists as believing
that the Bible is a title to Palestinian real estate,
but the behaviour of Ehud Olmert and those Israelis who
follow him, makes it seem very much that way. Olmert is
reported to have said he would drive Palestinians mad
with sonic booms.
Olmert and many, but not all his
predecessors, have behaved as if might is right, that
facts on the ground are tantamount to eternal truths.
Which is why some ‘democrats’ were so surprised that
the Palestinians, given a chance at democracy, elected
Hamas to be their government. And that the Lebanese have
now been radicalised, not by Hezbollah, but by the
Israel Defence Force. It does not seem to matter that
Hamas are Palestinians and Hezbollah are Lebanese,
legitimate expressions of their people, not imported
from anywhere else.
There is of course another
difficulty. To attempt to separate Hamas from Palestine
and Hezbollah from Lebanon on the ground that they are
terrorists would require the dismemberment of the
countries. The "Terrorists" have become integral with
the populations because they express the terrible
grievances of the people. Many Israelis over the years
have realised that you cannot impose peace through war
and injustice. Wise Israelis and others have been
pointing out for years that every Israeli victory seems
to produce a new and larger crop of enemies. The process
seems endless.
If we were to calculate the
suffering, the number of lives lost and destroyed on all
sides, the amount of treasure and culture lost, we would
be appalled, horrified, struck dumb, perhaps. It seems
acceptable in small doses, until we realise how corroded
our souls have become and how much of our civilisations
we have thrown into the trash along with the truth.
Any attempt to tell the truth in this
conflict is almost immediately denounced as anti-semitic
or pro-terrorist and invites violence of one sort or
another. But the much larger violences which are ignored
by propaganda are likely to be apocalyptic in scale when
they do happen, and are inevitable unless we begin to
face facts and tell ourselves the truth.
I cannot do my duty to my friend by
telling him the lies he wants to hear. If I do that, I
am setting him up for his enemy.
Copyright©2006 John Maxwell
jankunnu[at]yahoo.com
* * * * *
posted 29 July 2006 |