|
Invisible
Man Thoughts on Summerhill Seven's
Notes
of a Neurotic
By
Dennis Leroy Moore
Craziness
on the Sleeve
| "Sanity
is not the goal. Since this book is by a self-proclaimed
schizophrenic who inhabits a skitsofrantic life, then
the lack of this state of being, often referred to as
sanity, would have made these sololoquies
impossible." —
Summerhill Seven, "Trialogue" |
I
first met Alim Akbar in the summer of 2002 in New York City. I
had been asked to direct a play about a group of local gamblers
in a Harlem bar and had the arduous task of assisting the
producer with the casting. I was not in the best of moods, was
recovering from a nervous breakdown earlier that year, and was
making a weak attempt at returning to directing plays which I
had given up three years earlier in personal pursuit of
filmmaking and writing. That summer, and well after that, I
constantly had feelings of fragmentation, detachment, and rabid
paranoia.
I
felt comfortable, however, upon meeting and eventually working
with Alim Akbar aka Summerhill Seven. You see, Alim is
also a mad man.
I
didn't know much about Alim and still don't. I know what I have
to know and seldom ask or pry into his personal affairs and he
seems to do the same. Our paths crossed, we ran in the same
circles for a period, got high once or twice together, and even
dated the same girl once. The girl was a writer from Chicago.
She wasn't crazy. This poor girl was psychotic and when I told
Alim I would quit seeing her if he wanted to date her, he
quipped: "Uh-uh, no, no
you can have her."
I
know he misses his mother, he was married once, he writes every
day like a junkie looking for a fix, he adores Shakespeare, and
shares my love for the avant-garde. I always liked the fact that
he was a lawyer. He seems to dig that I went to Julliard—but
didn't graduate. We respect one another's art and the demons
that seem to rage within us. Alim was easily the most
charismatic and fearless actor I had worked with in 2002 and
certainly one of the most passionate and determined actors I
have ever known.
We
live in a moment in time that is crunched down-held up-sewn
within the seams. We are hanging onto dear life in a punching
bag that dangles on its last leg. No one is willing to risk it
all to express the pain around us. No one is willing to
free-fall as the majestic clowns and poets of the old were
willing to do. In short, we are all afraid of the good fight.
This is a problem far too great for me to go into right now, but
one that keeps popping up in my head even as I try to gain
distance on the "the scene" in America from Berlin,
where I write this.
Alim
is easily ten years my senior, we are just barely contemporaries
and commentators of the same generation. What I hold inherently
sacred and vital to life Alim does as well. This is what
attracts me to his writings in his book. You see, at times, I
feel like I have written it. (And no, to clarify he's the schizo,
I'm labeled the more fashionably
—
ahem — "Bi-polar")
|
I
readily admit that the Americans have no poets; I cannot
allow that they have no poetic ideas."
—Alexis
de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Part II/Book One |
Notes
of a Neurotic is an eclectic mélange of poems, humorous
interludes, observations, and dramatic fiction. It is designed
to "heal the emotions of the reader, the speaker, and the
writer." This
book is clearly a work of art that is reflective of the chaos in
this world; a journey of an unstable man trying to find his way
in this world. It is in many ways the spiritual biography of
Alim Akbar. Part manifesto, part confession — it
is the current analogy in literature to what I tried to
accomplish with my 2002 film As an Act of Protest.
And
being one of the only artists in New York City to publicly and
proudly support my film (he taught it and screened it to his
students), Alim's work shimmers with a similar fever that mine
has been dipped in. That is the fever of the split atom, the
"crazy" urban black intellectual, the scared
revolutionary artist—the
neurotic. What I tried to do formally and structurally within my
own directorial work Alim has done as a writer. The difference
is that where I may or may not have succeeded (my opinion alters
depending on the day and my mood), I believe Alim has.
Dashes
and flashes of brilliance flicker, for example, in his
Schizophrenic "Skitsofrantic Soliloquies" section.
These come off as haiku or proverbs or as they have been aptly
described as "the fruit of the poet tree." In
"Observation," he writes:
| I
find that my life is a lot happier when I avoid white
men in robes, whether they are black or white . . .
robes. |
Writing
as an Arab American, he poignantly writes:
|
George
Bush declared war on somebody and I don't know who and I
am losing my mind because everyone I know doesn't like
me and everyone I know doesn't trust me. |
Alim's
wicked and cool sense of humor stands to attention in
"Peace," which easily could have been part of a
Richard Pryor monologue in the 1970's. Check it out:
|
I
prayed for peace and got it!
I
was so dam bored I saw a dog and shot it.
The
dog came back to haunt me,
Smoking
a blunt and drinking coffee.
Can
you imagine a dog with a caffeine high?
But
cool cuz he has chronic burning in his mind's eye? |
Alim
is a theater artist and I say this to re-iterate his approach
and style to writing and assembling the works collected in
"Notes." In many ways, I feel relieved that he has
begun to accomplish what I was waiting for. A new black literary
voice who had one foot in theater, one foot in poetry, and one
foot - 'er hand - in
outer space, or somewhere.
Cosmic
Humor is what I suppose we can call it. Something I myself have
been tempted to explore. The combinations and mixes and the
rapid pace of the altering styles is one of the main features of
the new wave of Black American fine artists that emerged in the
late 20th-early 21st century. Most of us who were interested in
expressing his or her own unique voice—particularly
those of us in Northern urban areas—did
it in whatever vein we saw fit, even when the moods and shapes
changed drastically from one moment to the next.
Some
just don't understand the jazz of our work. Charles Mingus said
that for him Byrd was it—
the greatest—simply
because he was expressing how he felt. The greatest self
expression abounds in simplicity, and yet its meanings and
emotions are so doubled and tripled and full of inborn
contradictions and philosophies about life you can experience
the work over and over and never get tired of it.
Form
follows function in Alim's Theater of Neurosis. And just when I
feel Alim is going along with the flow of the stream and giving
in to what the audience wants, he opts to swim his own way. This
is his saving grace and what keeps him rooted as an artist. His
interest in people, his pathologies, his political convictions,
his sexual appetites, his impish desire at times to shock
and annoy, most importantly—his
sensitivity to the musical tones of life and the presence of
death in our every day existence. In his own unique way, Alim
has created a post-modern metropolitan black Spoon River
Anthology. Yes. This is another bizarre connection I have to
Alim. The River Flows, the 1993 adaption, was the first
off-Broadway play I ever did. I played Death himself and was
like a character torn from "Notes." These are not
coincidences, for things don't just happen—they
happen justly.
In
"Notes," Alim liberally sprinkles his book with quotes
from everyone from Saint Baldwin (James) to the prophetic rancor
of early Baraka (LeRoi Jones) and the poetic wisdom of William
Shakespeare. These quotes serve to remind the reader of either a
theme or concept being explored or expressed and/or to give the
actor reading it a cerebral inspiration on the page that may
lead him down the correct path as he begins to dramatically
interpret and perform a specific text. The book—a
slim 148 pages—is
packed with conceptual ideas, puns, clever plays on words and
titles (i.e. poet
tree, poemedies, essalogues, etc.) but I am not interested in or
willing to indulge us into the meanings behind those phrases or
titles or explain how "clever" Alim can be.
Who
cares? Real art is not about being clever. It is about
expressing how much you know about life. And for all of Alim's
broader appeal (when he performs, my wife refers to him as
"the thinking man's Will Smith" in the sense that he
is good-looking and charming enough to be able to garner a
willing and very harmless mixed crowd) and his ability to hold
court with a potentially more varied audience than me, for
example, his strength is not in the trappings and superficial
aspects of his more liberal and accessible poetry. No. It is, I
believe, in the heart and soul of his prose and
monologues-proper. Or what he refers to as his "Essalogues."
This is where Alim excites me the most and where he is at his
best.
Heads
Up
The
short story "Heads" is one of the most provocative and
honest pieces in the entire collection. In its Raymond Carver-esque
minimalism, tongue-in-cheek bravado, and muted satire, Alim's
narrator recounts how he killed three white people (a racist
punk, a lawyer, and a landlady) and is completely at wits end
working and living with white people. They are simply too much
to deal with and they do nothing but constantly aggravate and
annoy.
The
entire idea—whether
it is treated humorously or with straight up tragic
insinuations—of
killing white people or the "oppressor" is one that
has infiltrated and consumed a great deal of modern Black
American art work. It runs through the plays of LeRoi Jones/Amiri
Baraka, the music of Public Enemy, and has been finessed and
relayed masterfully by composers such as Bob Marley and is
hinted at within the canvasses of the painter Aaron Douglas. Not
literally, but in spirit.
Even
my own early work constantly wrestled with my own anger and
frustration over what to do when living in a racist society.
Alim's treatment of the matter is less directly heavy handed,
however, and not as tragic. It is much more absurd and has the
maturity it takes to see the scenario through a simple and clean
filter: it's all a day's work. The humor is venomous and already
present in the opening paragraph:
|
I mean the
idea of killing four white people in the twenty-first
century
just for
what, to redress some historical wrong? I just
simply was not with it.
But now,
that I have already killed three, I am starting to get
into it.
I mean, I really am starting
to get the hang of
it. |
Funny
stuff. Very dry, very simple. What makes it funny is the element
of truth behind it, what makes it creepy is that you know the
narrator is tired and doesn't have time for jokes. Or perhaps
the former is the latter and the latter is the former?
I don't know, now I've confused myself. Anyway, it
doesn't matter—what
the story reveals and how Alim seems to express it so
effortlessly is what counts. Our narrator tells us he killed his
first victim because he was called a "nigger," he
killed his second victim because he couldn't stand working with,
for, under this incredibly arrogant and prejudiced man who was
one of the head lawyers in a law firm that had hired our
brown-skinned narrator.
Any
black person who has ever worked in an office setting or
corporate environment instantly recognizes the sort of white
male that Terry Apath is. This is where you know that the bond
and anticipated audience of this story is black because
of the casualness and simplicity unto which the story is
relayed. As with the tradition of African American literature,
the story is very oral and has a great deal of
"signifying," and radicalizing simply within the
speech/text.
I
point this out because I do find it important that black writers
still approach their work in such a cool and naturally stated
way. In an era of "Who is your audience?" and "No
one will understand your references, people are not smart as
they used to be," it is refreshing that Alim invites the
reader into his world, into his neurosis and doesn't comment on
what they may or may not understand. Instantly you are a
confidante and this is what made some of the white listeners
uncomfortable at the Book Party in February 2005, when portions
of the book were read in public.
Not that anyone objected, no.
White
people will never object to anything considered
"artistic," within a black or mixed milieu for fear of
being labeled racist or a "phony liberal."
They will just roll their eyes, squirm, or smirk—as
if to say "That is sooo hateful, I could never...! I'm more
developed than you, gosh you people with your
Superfly-Shaft-Badass-anger. I've seen it all before! I'm Jewish
and I don't write stories or fantasize about killing Germans or
Arabs!"
First
of all that would be a lame excuse and a ridiculous comparison.
But of course they don't have to write about anything similar—white
people take out all their aggression directly. They don't have
to write stories, they can blow up countries. They don't believe
in art or therapy and when they they do—they
site only musical artists. As if to imply that music is
"free" from any political-social relevance...I am
obviously generalizing here to make a very serious point.
Most
Americans (particularly the young white American) miss the point
when evaluating or simply even reading real African American
fiction. It would
be misleading, however, to imply that Alim writing for white
people. He isn't. And when he does he makes it clear that he is.
But this problem infiltrates black readers' minds as well as
whites. There shouldn't be a need to specify or diffuse either
way but we all know history and the way this world works.
My point: if White Americans aren't going to
read their masters or really dig into their own problems—the
way Bob Dylan and Paul Simon did thirty-five years ago, then
they had better read and taste the folk art of the Black
American if they want to begin to understand their country,
their world, their history—their
neurosis.
Alim doesn't write about Pimps in the street
and spray "hip" derogatory terms throughout his work.
He's beyond that, even though it is what is expected from Black
writers and filmmakers. He doesn't exploit
"blackness," women, or the so-called "urban
jungle." His
grievances are real. He reveals the scowl behind the grin, the
anger that is just below the surface.
But for all his genuineness, no one seems to
pay attention to Alim or several other artists working within
the same mix. Folks will say: "Well, he's got no audience,
yet cause he hasn't been on TV or featured on the front page of
the Arts & Leisure section of the NY Times, or he hasn't
debut with some rising Pop Star-Gangster-Wanna-be-Hip Hop
buffoon. Lies and excuses, my friends. But the reason this cuts
deep is because being a theater artist almost lends itself to
invisibility.
Besides the Lincoln Center effete crowd and a
few organizations, and a handful of WASPS in New England or
Boston or even in good old "progressive" San Francisco—the
theater means very little to people. Artists or otherwise. I
often wonder if maybe that's not the way it has always been.
For
those who believe playwright Suzan Lori-Parks or David Mamet
still have any true power or progressive instincts on stage—they
are holding worthless promissory notes. Mamet imitates himself,
Parks cashes in on what the mainstream audiences will expect her
to turn in or evaluate—
particularly as an African American woman. Neither is of the
current state of consciousness emanating within the arts
(whatever is left of it, that is) and both are very
comfortable.
Those
looking for the real news, the truthful insights, and the still
untamed social and political observations should read Alim's
work and go underground—wherever
that is. I guarantee the monologues and theatrical texts that
Alim offers are a thousand times purer, personal, and poetic
than anything in the mainstream theater or poetry houses.
Because, similarly, if Russell Simmons destroyed comedy with Def
Jam Comedy (as Bernie Mac claims he did) then he absolutely
murdered poetry with his Def Jam Poetry.
Nowadays,
it is typical and passe' to hear some Black or Latino or East
Asian or Middle Eastern poet or some gay white chick with
piercings get on stage and whine (these people don't even know
how to scream) about racism, sexism, the War in Iraq—all
in familiar and rhetorical cadences, with a wink, nod, and bow
to the word(s) "my nigga," "George
Bush-shit," and/or something to do with
"pussy-bush-the ghetto-the street-Gucci-Donna Karan-Park
Ave-USA-" Blah, blah, blah, blah.
Empty.
It's all empty. Such is the nature of pop. Particularly when it
is popular to assume a stance of righteous anger. Alim himself
is not innocent of any of these popular and accepted streams of
current poetry, but Alim is not a poseur. He's been to the
gutter and back. He's lived and as much as he loves poetry, even
he has admitted that—similar
to the state of hip hop and Pop music—the
poetry in NYC scene is dead. It is dead because it has been
co-opted.
Poetry,
like the theater, is dead because it still sells itself out to
pimps who want to rape it. Poets continue to bend over (like
their cousins—the
independent filmmakers) and completely ignore their pride,
talent, and soul. Why should poets perform on main stage
theaters, why should filmmakers want their films to be seen in
malls? Is that the most we can achieve and hope for? Wouldn't we
rather gather in someone's intimate apartment and create our own
studio? Are artists that contemptuous of each other that we
really can't work together because we all just want to be richer
than each other and get revenge on our un-supportive families or
patronizing bosses or apathetic teachers?
The
poets of the night are dead—because
they want to be. They drop their pants, grab their ankles and
give up any virtue or innocence left. They are like victims who
beg to be raped and then cry when someone tells them
"Are you nuts? You need to do something about this!
You need to call the police!"
Keeping
that in mind, read the following and imagine it is the last
scene of a play. Imagine you saw every meretricious slice of
nonsense on Broadway, then got a headache from the imposters
Off-Broadway. You went home, vomited, felt a lot better and
swore to yourself over that toilet-bowl that you would never go
"drinking" again. A friend begs you (or if you have no
friends imagine a little angel flies into your face) to go and
read/see Alim's work and "taste" something new. You
go, taste it, and realize maybe even half-way through—that
what you are drinking ain't new, it's just what most of us under
40 are constantly denied: truth within the arts.
So,
imagine: you are seated
somewhere and it is dark. There is a slight chill that runs up
your spine. There are maybe twenty people in this audience.
Under the moon, the stage lights flash up from below—they
are dim and but we see our Narrator clearly—because
we experience something almost foreign in its brightness. The
lights slowly dim as our Narrator admits (perhaps in a choked up
whisper):
|
Terry
was fun to kill; killing the landlord was out of anger
and I just did it because. It was kind of funny,
technically speaking I am not sure if it was on the same
day because the Arabs start their day in the dark at 12
am. But, as you already know the landlord was Jewish,
and for the life of me I don't know when they start
their day. But since her Jewishness was incidental to
the cause of her death, I guess it didn't really matter.
I just strangled her for no more than a minute or two. I
had on the same blue-green Isotoner gloves that I
strangled Terry with. |
Our man tries to smile, but can't. He looks at
his gloves, lights a cigarette, and looks out into the audience.
Blackout.
*
* * * *
This
is the first part of an essay in Two Parts By Dennis Leroy Moore.
Originally reviewed March 5, 2005,
Revised for publication July 29, 2005 © Copyright
7/29/05 * * * *
*
posted 30 August 2005
/ update 1 July 2008 |