|
Books by Du Bois
The
Suppression of the African
Slave Trade (1896) /
The
Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study (1899) /
The
Souls of Black Folk:
Essays and Sketches
(1903) /
John
Brown.(1909) /
The
Quest of the Silver Fleece
(1911) /
Darkwater:
Voices Within the Veil
(1920)
Gift of Black Folk: The Negroes in the Making
of America (1924) /
Dark Princess: A Romance
(1928) /
Black Reconstruction in America
(1935) /
Black Folk, Then and Now
(1939)
Color and Democracy: Colonies and Peace
(1945) /
The World and Africa: An Inquiry
(1947) /
In Battle for Peace
(1952) /
A Trilogy:
The Ordeal of Monsart
(1957)
Monsart Builds
a School (1959) nd
Worlds of Color (1961)
/
An ABC of Color:
Selections (1963)
The
Autobiography of W.E.B. Du Bois: A Soliloquy on Viewing
My Life from the Last
Decade of Its First
Century
(1968)
* * *
* *
Shirley Graham Du Bois,
His Day Is Marching On: A Memoir of
W.E. B. Du Bois (1971)
Leslie Alexander Lacy.
The Life of W.E.B. Du Bois:
Cheer the Lonesome Traveler (1970)
Du
Bois on Reform: Periodical-based
Leadership for African Americans. Edited and Introduced
by Brian Johnson. New York Altamira Press (A Division of Rowman
& Littlefield Publishers, Inc.), 2005
A Du Bois Bibliography
* * * *
*
Jacob and Esau
[Or Lying & Stealing--Jacob's
Thumbprint]
By W.E.B. Du Bois We have
got to stop making income by unholy methods; . . . to stop lying
. . . that a civilization based upon the enslavement of the
majority of men for the income of the smart minority is the
highest aim of man.
I
remember very vividly the Sunday-School room where I spent the
Sabbaths of my early years. It had been newly-built after a
disastrous fire; the room was large and full of sunlight; nice
new chairs were grouped around where the classes met. My class
was in the center, so that I could look out upon the elms of
Main Street and see the passersby. But I was interested usually
in the lessons and my fellow students and the frail rather
nervous teacher, who tried to make the Bible and its ethics
clear to us. We were a trial to her, full of mischief, restless
and even noisy; but perhaps more especially when we asked
questions.
And on
the story of Jacob and Esau we did ask questions. My judgment
then and my judgment now is very unfavorable to Jacob. I thought
that he was a cad and a liar and I did not see how possibly he
could he made the hero of a Sunday-School lesson.
Many
days have passed since then and the world has gone through
astonishing changes. But basically, my judgment of Jacob has not
greatly changed and I have often promised myself the pleasure of
talking about him publicly, and especially to young people. This
is the first time that I have had the opportunity.
My
subject then is "Jacob and Esau," and I want to
examine these two men and the ideas which they represent; and
the way in which those ideas have come to our day. Of course,
our whole interpretation of this age-old story of Jewish
Mythology has greatly changed. We look upon these Old Testament
stories today not as untrue and yet not as literally true. They
are simple, they have their truths and yet they are not by any
means, the expression of eternal verity. Here were brought
forward for the education of Jewish children and for the
interpretation of Jewish life to the world, two men: one small,
lithe and quick-witted; the other tall, clumsy and impetuous; a
hungry, hard-bitten man.
Historically,
we know how these two types came to he set forth by the Bards of
Israel. When the Jews marched North after escaping from slavery
in Egypt, they penetrated and passed through the land of Edom;
the land that lay between the Dead Sea and Egypt. It was an old
center of hunters and nomads, and the Israelites, while they
admired the strength and organization of the Edomites, looked
down upon them as lesser men; as men who did not have the Great
Plan.
Now the
Great Plan of the Israelites was the building of a strong,
concentrated state under its own God, Jehovah, devoted to
agriculture and household manufacture and trade. It raised its
own food by careful planning. It did not wander and depend upon
chance wild beasts. It depended upon organization, strict
ethics, absolute devotion to the nation through strongly
integrated planned life. It looked upon all its neigh-hors, not
simply with suspicion, but with the exclusiveness of a chosen
people, who were going to he the leaders. of the earth.
This
called for sacrifice, for obedience, for continued planning. The
man whom we call Esau, was from the land of Edom, or
intermarried with it, for the legend has it that he was twin of
Jacob the Jew. But the idea of the Plan with a personality of
its own took hold of Europe with relentless grasp and this was
the real legacy of Jacob, and of other men of other peoples,
whom Jacob represents.
There
came the attempt to weld the world into a great unity, first
under the Roman Empire, then under the Catholic Church. When
this attempt failed, and the empire fell apart, there arose the
individual states of Europe and of some other parts of the
world; and these states adapted the idea of individual effort to
make each of them dominant. The state was all, the individual
subordinate, but right here came the poison of the Jacobean
idea. How could the state get this power? Who was to wield the
power within the State? So long as power was achieved, what
difference did it make how it was gotten?
Here
then was war--but not Esau's war of passion, hunger and revenge,
but Jacob's war of cold acquisition and power.
Granting
to Jacob, as we must, the great idea of the family, the clan,
and the state as dominant and superior in its claims,
nevertheless, there is the bitter danger in trying to seek these
ends without reference to the great standards of right and
wrong. When men begin to lie and steal, in order to make the
nation to which they belong great, then comes not only disaster,
but rational contradiction which in many respects is worse than
disaster, because it ruins the leadership of the divine machine,
the human reason, by which we chart and guide our actions.
PROFIT
AND POWER AS MOTIVES
It was
thus in the middle ages and increasingly in the seventeenth and
eighteenth and more especially in the nineteenth century, there
arose the astonishing contradiction: that is, the action of men
like Jacob who were perfectly willing and eager to lie and steal
so long as their action brought profit to themselves and power
to their state. And soon identifying themselves and their class
with the State, they identified their own wealth and power as
that of the State. They did not listen to any argument of right
and wrong; might was right; they came to despise and deplore the
natural appetites of human beings and their very lives, so long
as by their suppression, they themselves got rich and
powerful.
There
arose a great, rich Italy; a fabulously wealthy Spain; a strong
and cultured France and, eventually, a British Empire which came
near to dominating the world. The Esaus of those centuries were
the Jews but the chief fact is, that no matter what his blood
relations were, his cultural allegiance lay among the Edomites.
He was trained in the free out-of-doors; he chased and faced the
wild beasts; he knew vast and imperative appetite after long
self-denial, and even pain and suffering; he gloried
in food, he traveled afar; he gathered wives and concubines and
he represented continuous primitive strife.
THE
LEGACY OF ESAU
The
legacy of Esau has come down the ages to us. It has not been
dominant, but it has always and continually expressed and
re-expressed itself; the joy of human appetites, the quick
resentment that leads to fighting, the belief in force, which is
war.
As I
look back upon my own conception of Esau, he is not nearly as
clear and definite a personality as Jacob. There is something
rather shadowy about him; and yet he is curiously human and
easily conceived. One understands his contemptuous surrender of
his birthright: he was hungry after long days of hunting; he
wanted rest and food, the stew of meat and vegetables which
Jacob had in his possession, and determined to keep unless Esau
bargained.
"And
Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit
shall this birthright be to me? And Jacob said, Swear to me this
day; and he swore unto him: and he sold his birthright unto
Jacob."
THE
LEGACY OF JACOB
On the
other hand, the legacy of Jacob which has come down through the
years, not simply as a Jewish idea, but more especially as
typical of modern Europe, is more complicated and expresses
itself something like this: Life must be planned for the Other
Self, for that personification of the group, the nation, the
empire, which has eternal life as contrasted with the ephemeral
life of individuals. For this we must plan, and for this there
must be timeless and unceasing work. Out of this, the Jews as
chosen children of Jehovah would triumph over themselves, over
all Edom and in time, over the world.
Now it
happens that so far as actual history is concerned, this dream
and plan failed. The poor little Jewish nation was dispersed to
the ends of the earth by the overwhelming power of the great
nations that arose East, North, and South and eventually became
united in the vast empire of Rome. This was the diaspora, the
dispersion of, curiously represented by various groups of
people: by the slum-dwellers and the criminals who, giving up
all hope of profiting by the organized State, sold their
birthrights for miserable messes of pottage. But more than that,
the great majority of mankind, the peoples who lived in Asia,
Africa and America and the islands of the sea, became
subordinate tools for the profit-making of the crafty planners
of great things, who worked regardless of religion or ethics.
CENTURIES
OF EXPLOITATION
It is
almost unbelievable to think what happened in those centuries,
when it is put in cold narrative; from whole volumes of tales,
let me select only a few examples. The peoples of whole islands
and countries were murdered in cold blood for their gold and
jewels. The mass of the laboring people of the world were put to
work for wages which led them into starvation, ignorance and
disease. The right of the majority of mankind to speak and to
act; to play and to dance was denied, if it interfered with
profit-making work for others, or was ridiculed, if it could not
be capitalized.
Karl
Marx writes of Scotland: "As an example of the method of
obtaining wealth and power in the 19th century; the story of the
Duchess of Sutherland will suffice here. This Scottish
noblewoman resolved, on entering upon the government of her clan
of white Scottish people to turn the whole country, whose
population had already been, by earlier processes, reduced to
15,000, into a sheep pasture. From 1814 to 1820 these 15,000
inhabitants, were systematically hunted and rooted out.
All
their villages were destroyed and burnt, all their fields turned
into pasture. Thus this lady ~ appropriated 794,000 acres of
land that had from time immemorial been the property of the
people. She assigned to the expelled inhabitants about 6ooo
acres on the sea-shore. The 6ooo acres had until this time lain
waste, and brought in no income to their owners. The Duchess, in
the nobility of her heart, actually went so far as to let these
at an average rent of 50 cents per acre to the clansmen, who for
centuries had shed their blood for her family.
The
whole of the stolen clan-land she divided into 29 great sheep
farms, each inhabited by a single imported English family. In
the year 1835 the 15,000 Scotsmen were already replaced by
131,000 sheep.
EXPLOITATION
OF COLONIES
"The
discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation,
enslavement and entombment in the mines of the Indian
population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the
East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the
commercial hunting of black-skins, signalized the rosy dawn of
power of those spiritual children of Jacob, who owned the
birthright of the masses by fraud and murder. These idyllic
proceedings are the chief momenta of primary accumulation of
capital in private hands. On their heels tread the commercial
wars of the European nations, with the globe for a theatre. It
begins with the revolt of the Netherlands from Spain, assumes
giant dimensions in England's anti-jacobin war, and continues in
the opium wars against China."
Of the
Christian colonial system, Howitt says: "The barbarities
and desperate outrages of the so-called Christians, throughout
every region of the world, and upon people they have been able
to subdue, are not to be paralleled by those of any other race,
in any age of the earth. This history of the colonial
administration of Holland-and Holland was the head capitalistic
nation of the 17th century-is one of the most extraordinary
relations of treachery, bribery, massacre, and meanness."
Nothing
was more characteristic than the Dutch system of stealing men,
to get slaves for Java. The men-stealers were trained for this
purpose. The thief, the interpreter, and the seller were the
chief agents in this trade, the native princes the chief
sellers. The young people stolen, were thrown into the secret
dungeons of Celebes, until they were ready for sending to the
slave-ships.
The
English East India Company, in the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries, obtained, besides the political rule in India, the
exclusive monopoly of the tea-trade, as well as the Chinese
trade in general, and of the transport of goods to and from
Europe. But the coasting trade of India was the monopoly of the
higher employers of the company. The monopolies of salt, opium,
betel nuts and other commodities, were inexhaustible mines of
wealth.
The
employees themselves fixed the price and plundered at will the
unhappy Hindus. The Governor-General took part in this private
traffic. His favorites received contracts under conditions
whereby they, cleverer than the alchemists, made gold out of
nothing. Great English fortunes sprang up like mushrooms in a
day; investment profits went on without the advance of a
shilling. The trial of Warren Hastings swarms with such
cases.
Here is
an instance: A contract for opium was given to a certain
Sullivan at the moment of his departure on an official mission.
Sullivan sold his contract to one Binn for $200,000; Binn sold
it the same day for $300,000, and the ultimate purchaser who
carried out the contract declared that after all he realized an
enormous gain. According to one of the lists laid before
Parliament, the East India Company and its employees from
1757-1766 got $30,000,000 from the Indians as gifts alone.
TREATMENT
OF ABORIGINES
The
treatment of the aborigines was, naturally, most frightful in
plantation colonies destined for import trade only, such as the
West Indies, and in rich and well-populated countries, such as
Mexico and India, that were given over to plunder. But even in
the colonies properly so-called, the followers of Jacob outdid
him.
These
sober Protestants, the Puritans of New England, in 1703, by
decrees of their assembly set a premium of $200 on every Indian
scalp and every captured red-skin: in 1720 a premium of $500 on
every scalp; in 1744, after Massachusetts Bay had proclaimed a
certain tribe as rebels, the following prices prevailed: for a
male scalp of 12 years upward $500 (new currency); for a male
prisoner $525, for women and children prisoners $250; for scalps
of women and children $250.
Some
decades later, the colonial system took its revenge on the
descendants of the pious p11-grim fathers, who had grown
seditious in the meantime. At English instigation and for
English pay they were tomahawked by the red-skins. The British
Parliament, proclaimed blood-hounds and scalping as "means
that God and Nature had given into its hands."
With
the development of national industry during the eighteenth
century, the public opinion of Europe had lost the last remnant
of shame and conscience. The nations bragged cynically of every
infamy that served them as a means to accumulating private
wealth. Read, e. g., the naive Annals of Commerce of
Anderson.
Here is
trumpeted forth as a triumph of English statecraft that at the
Peace of Utrecht, England extorted from the Spaniards by the
Asiento Treaty the privilege of being allowed to ply the
slave-trade, between Africa and Spanish America. England thereby
acquired the right of supplying Spanish America until '743 with
4,800 Negroes yearly. This threw, at the same time, an official
cloak over British smuggling.
Liverpool
waxed fat on the slavetrade. Aihin (1795) quotes that
"spirit of bold adventure which has characterized the trade
of Liverpool and rapidly carried it to its present state of
prosperity; has occasioned vast employment for shipping sailors,
and greatly augmented the demand for the manufactures of the
country; Liverpool employed in the slave trade, in 1730, 15
ships; in 1760, 74; in 1770, 96; and in 1792, 132."
A
PROMISE UNFULFILLED
Henry
George wrote of "Progress and Poverty" in the 1890's.
He says: "At the beginning of this marvelous era it was
natural to expect, and it was expected, that labor-saving
inventions would lighten the toil and improve the condition of
the laborer; that the enormous increase in the power of
producing wealth would make real poverty a thing of the past.
Could a
man of the last century (the eighteenth)--a Franklin or a
Priestley--have seen, in a vision of the future, the steam-ship
taking the place of the sailing vessel, the railroad train of
the wagon, the reaping machine of the scythe, the threshing
machine of the flail; could he have heard the throb of the
engines that in obedience to human will, and for the
satisfaction of the human desire, exert a power greater than
that of all the men and beasts of burden of the earth combined;
could he have seen the forest tree transformed into finished
lumber-into doors, sashes, blinds, boxes or barrels, with hardly
the touch of a human hand; the great workshops where boots and
shoes are turned out by the case with less labor than the
old-fashioned cobbler could have put on a sole; the factories
where, under the eye of one girl, cotton becomes cloth faster
than hundreds of stalwart weavers could have turned it out with
their handlooms; could he have seen steam-hammers shaping
mammoth shafts and mighty anchors, and delicate machinery making
tiny watches; the diamond drill cutting through the heart of the
rocks, and coal oil sparing the whale; could he have realized
the enormous saving of labor resulting from improved facilities
of exchange and communication-sheep killed in Australia eaten
fresh in England, and the order given by the London banker in
the afternoon executed in San Francisco in the morning of the
next day; could he have conceived of the hundred thousand
improvements which these only suggest, what would he have
inferred as to the social condition of mankind?
"It
would not have seemed like an inference; further than the vision
went it would have seemed as though he saw; and his heart would
have leaped and his nerves would have thrilled, as one who from
a height beholds just ahead of the thirst-stricken caravan the
living gleam of rustling woods and the glint of laughing waters.
Plainly, in the sight of the imagination, he would have beheld
all these new forces elevating society from its very foundation,
lifting the very poorest above the possibility of want,
exempting the very lowest from anxiety for the material needs of
life; he would have seen these slaves of the lamp of knowledge
taking on themselves the traditional curse, these muscles of
iron and sinews of steel making the poorest laborer's life a
holiday, in which every high quality and noble impulse could
have scope to grow."
This
was the promise of Jacob's life. This would establish the
birthright which Esau despised. But, says George, "Now, we
are c6ming into collision with facts which there can be no
mistaking. From all parts of the civilized world," he says
speaking fifty years ago, "come complaints of industrial
depression; of labor condemned to involuntary idleness; of
capital massed and wasting; of pecuniary distress among
business; of want and suffering and anxiety among the working
class. All the dull, deadening pain, all the keen, maddening
anguish, that to great masses of men are involved into the words
'hard times' which afflict the world today." What would
Henry George have said in 1933 after airplane and radio and mass
production, turbine and electricity had come?
BIRTH
OF REVOLT
Science
and art grew and expanded despite all this, but it was warped by
the poverty of the artist and the continuous attempt to make
Science subservient to industry. The latter effort finally
succeeded so widely that modern civilization became typified as
industrial technique. Education became learning a trade.
Men
thought of civilization as primarily mechanical and the
mechanical means by which they reduced wool and cotton to their
purposes, also reduced and bent human kind to their will.
Individual initiative remained but it was cramped and distorted
and there spread the idea of patriotism to one's country as the
highest virtue, by which it became established, that just as in
the case of Jacob, a man not only could lie, steal, cheat and
murder for his native land, but by doing so, he became a hero
whether his cause was just or unjust.
One
remembers that old scene between Esau who had thoughtlessly
surrendered his birthright and the father who had blessed his
lying son; "Jacob came unto his father, and said, My
Father: and he said, Here am I; who art thou? And Jacob said
unto his father, I am Esau thy first-born; I have done according
as thou badest me: arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my
venison, that thy soul may bless me." In vain did clumsy,
careless Esau beg for a blessing-some little blessing.
It was
denied and Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing: and Esau
said in his heart, "The Days of mourning for my father are
at hand; then I will slay my brother Jacob." So revolution
entered--so revolt darkened a dark world. The same motif was
repeated in modern Europe and America in the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries, when there grew the super-state called the
Empire.
The
Plan had now regimented the organization of men covering vast
territories, dominating immense force and immeasurable wealth
and determined to reduce to subserviency as large a part as
possible, not only of Europe's own internal world, but of the
world at large. Colonial imperialism swept over the earth and
initiated the First World War, in envious scramble for division
of Power and Profit.
Hardly
a moment of time passed after that war, a moment in the eyes of
the Eternal Forces looking down upon us when again the world,
using all of that planning and all of that technical superiority
for which its civilization was noted; and all of the accumulated
and accumulating wealth which was available, proceeded to commit
suicide on so vast a scale that it is almost impossible for us
to realize the meaning of the catastrophe.
Of
course, this sweeps us far beyond anything that the peasant lad
Jacob, with his petty lying and thievery had in mind. Whatever
was begun there of ethical wrong among the Jews was surpassed in
every particular by the white world of Europe and America and
carried to such length of universal cheating, lying and killing
that no comparisons remain.
THE
IMPASSE OF OUR TIME
We come
therefore to the vast impasse of today: to the great question, What
was the initial right and wrong of the original Jacobs and Esaus and
of their spiritual descendants the world over? We stand convinced
today, at least those who remain sane, that lying and cheating and
killing will build no world organization worth the building.
We have got
to stop making income by unholy methods; out of stealing the
pittances of the poor and calling it insurance; out of seizing and
monopolizing the natural resources of the world and then making the
world's poor pay exorbitant prices for aluminum, copper and oil;
iron and. coal. Not only have we got to stop these practices, but we
have got to stop lying about them and seeking to convince
human beings that a civilization based upon the enslavement of the
majority of men for the of the smart minority, is the highest aim of
man.
THE
FAULTS OF ESAU
But as is
so usual in these cases, these transgression: of; Jacob do not mean
that the attitude of Esau was flawless. Ibe conscienceless greed of
capital does not excuse the careless sloth of labor. Life cannot be
all aimless wandering and indulgence if we are going to constrain
human beings to take advantage of their brain and make successive
generations stronger and wiser than the previous. There must be
reverence for the birthright of inherited culture and that
birthright cannot be sold for a dinner course, a dress suit or a
winter in Florida. It must be valued and conserved.The method of
conservation is work, endless and tireless and planned work and this
is the legacy which the Esaus of today who condemn the Jacobs of
yesterday have got to substitute as their path of life, not
revengeful revolution, but building and rebuilding. Curiously
enough, it will not be difficult to do this, because the great
majority of men, the poverty-stricken and diseased are the real
worker~ of the world. They are the ones who have made and are making
the wealth of this universe, and their future path is clear. It is
to accumulate such knowledge and balance of judgment that they can
reform the world, so that the workers of the world, receive just
share of the wealth which they make and that all human beings who
are capable of work, shall work. Not national glory and empire for
the few, but food, shelter and happiness for the many. With the
disappearance of systematic lying and killing, we may come into that
Birthright which so long we have called freedom: that is, the right
to act in a manner that seems to us beautiful; which makes life
wbrth living and joy the only possible end of life. This is the
experience which is Art and Planning for this is the highest
satisfaction of civilized needs. So looking back upon the allegory
and the his-tory, tragedy and promise, we change our subject and
speak in closing of Esau and Jacob, realizing that neither was
perfect, but of the two, Esau had the elements which lead more
naturally and directly to the salvation of man; while Jacob with all
his crafty planning and cold sacrifice, held in his soul the things
that are about to ruin mankind: Exaggerated national patriotism,
individual profit, the despising of men who are not the darlings of
our particular God and the consequent lying and stealing and killing
to monopolize power.
HOPE
FOR A NEW WORLD
May we not
hope that in the world after this catastrophe of blood, sweat and
fire, we may have a new Esau and Jacob; a new allegory of men who
enjoy life for life's sake; who have the Freedom of Art and wish for
all men of all sorts the same freedom and enjoyment that they seek
themselves and who work for all this and work hard.
Gentlemen
and ladies of the class of 1944: In the days of the years of my
pilgrimage, I have greeted many thousands of young men and women at
the commencement of their careers as citizens of the select
commonwealth of culture. In no case have I welcomed them to such a
world of darkness and distractions as that into which I usher you. I
take joy only in the thought, that if work to he done is the measure
of man's opportunity, you inherit a mighty fortune.
You have
only to remember that the birthright which is today in symbol draped
over your shoulders, is a heritage which has been preserved all too
often by the lying, stealing and murdering of the Jacobs of the
world, and if these are the only means by which this birthright can
he preserved in the future, it is not worth the price. I do not
believe this, and I lay it upon your hearts to prove that this not
only need not he true, but is eternally and forever false.
The
Talladegan, November, |