Katrina,
Bush, and Capitalism
Tea Party Anyone?
By Mary Meekins
|
If fifty million people
say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
—Bertrand Russell
The federal government's
costs related to Hurricane Katrina could easily approach
$100 billion, many times as much as for any other
natural disaster or the $21 billion allocated for New
York City after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
--New York Times (September 6, 2005) |
Read the first paragraph extracted up there
and just couldn't read anymore. I'm not a Democrat. I'm not a
Republican. I'm not an across-the-board conservative, moderate,
or liberal. I'm not a feminist or a womanist. Out of all the
world's ‘ist’s and ‘ism’s and subcategories, the only
label I willingly, and gladly, accept is humanist—cut from the
same cloth as other "make/spread love, not war" types.
Somewhere between laid-back Jimmy Buffet,
"love them anyway" Mother Theresa, Nelson Mandela, and
Pope Jean Paul II, there's me.
That said, add capitalist to the
"not" column up there because it's horribly
incongruent with the first major tenet that I believe in: and
that's that people come before all else.
The reason I stopped reading the article is
because my anger started to shoot through the roof: It's totally
illogical to me that we can open the vaults after a plane slams
into a building, after a quake threatens to split a state into
two, or after a hurricane pummels a city, but we can't pry it
open (and better people's lives) on disaster-free days when the
sun's shining and the skies are blue. To my eyes and ears,
accepting that status quo is the equivalent of accepting that 2
+ 2 = 5. It just doesn't make sense and my mind doesn't/won't
accept it.
It's not that the money's not there: Given
the staggering sum of disaster-relief dollars that magically
materialize after a catastrophic event, there's a slush fund or
a money tree somewhere. If we've got $100 billion
post-catastrophe, we've got $100 billion prior to one.
It's the same way I question why it is that
we can, illogically, finance an inmate's degree yet deny that
same all-expenses-paid scholarship to those on the outside
who've stayed on the right side of the law.
That same $100 billion could've been used
to shore-up levees and refurbish underprivileged gulf coast
schools and neighborhoods long before Katrina entered the
picture. But Katrina's small-school thinking.
Be it a tornado in Kansas, a hurricane in
Florida, a quake in California, or a levee-breach in New
Orleans, I've always wondered where the clean-up/rebuild funds
come from. What line item in the expense column...what
piggy-bank...are they raiding? $350 million for post-tsunami aid
in Asia. where did that come from? $100 billion for New Orleans?
Where did that come from?
My point is not to slam crisis-relief
efforts but to ask why—if funds can arbitrarily be voted on,
approved, and appropriated, on a moment's notice in the face of
disaster—they're not voted on, approved and appropriated when
the daily headlines are screaming that more and more people are
living paycheck to paycheck and slipping deeper and deeper into
poverty.
Capitalism's nothing more than a caste
system and poverty, and all its ripples, an underscore. We LET
people go without. We LET people live in poverty. We LET people
die. We limit worldviews instead of expanding them.
It's not a Black issue. It's not a White
issue. It's an issue of the "haves" opting to reward
death and destruction instead of life. And we, the people, LET
them.
That mouthful said, am I saying that, with
or without catastrophic events, race is not an ongoing issue in
this country? No. Am I absolving George Bush of gross
negligence? No...pigs will fly first. Am I absolving all those
at other levels who failed? No. Am I saying that race had
nothing to do with sluggish recovery efforts? No. All of those
things are true if you're looking at the small picture but if
you zoom out and view the bigger picture, George Bush is a
symptom of a much larger problem.
As an American, and as an African-American,
"Impeachment!" was my first reaction to last week's
events but, honestly, that's just a band-aid approach. It might
save us from three more years of immediate incompetence but what
about the inevitable future clones cast from Bush's mold?
Impeachment's like having a major
toothache, yet taking aspirin day after day instead of facing
the dentist's chair and drill.
Republican. Democrat. Federal. State.
Local. The system is broken and bankrupt and it requires more
than a band-aid to heal it. What it needs now...what it's needed
for a long time...is a major overhaul. Not just a "talking
head" change but a mutiny on the bounty: throw out the
Constitution, throw out every branch and level of government as
we know them—and start again from scratch.
You don't rent an apartment, buy a house,
or drive a car and NEVER make repairs (major or minor). Yet
that's the way this country/government runs. We're working off
of a document that was drafted centuries ago.
If the world has a Drama Queen, the United
States wears the winning sash and tiara. And the worst part is,
most of the wounds are self-inflicted. Switzerland, Norway,
Greenland, Canada—the nations that rarely make the headlines.
Granted, they're by no means perfect, but what are they doing
right that we're doing wrong? Why can't we learn from those
who've at least got it halfway right?
Capitalism is dividing us—and killing
us—in more ways than one. It's a foolish thing. Yet, as the
Titanic sinks deeper and deeper into the sea, the band plays on
and the passengers continue their dance.
It's way past time for the American public
to throw another Boston Tea Party and take this country back.
* *
* * *
Mary Meekins, currently residing in
Maryland, is a publishing phenomenon (in her own mind, anyway!).
Actually, she's an inquisitive student of the universe, an
"accidental novelist," and a freelance writer. As well
as a novel-in-progress, she writes essays and short stories for
various blogs, magazines,
and other publications. posted 9 September 2005 |