|
Libya and the
Brutality of Nations
By Emmanuel Franklyne Ogbunwezeh
The Choir Sings
Again!
The
choir of imperialism sings currently in
Libya. The
overtures in Iraq and Afghanistan are not ended, yet the
choir must sing because that is its raison d’ etre! The
Libyans, like their North African neighbors, wanted to
stage their own opera to the deities of
self-determination. This was after decades under the
fossilized jackboots of a political dinosaur. They were
midway in the very first sonatas to freedom, when a
foreign orchestra of aristocratic greed hijacked the
arena; and has continued to conduct the performance ever
since. Here the voice is definitely Jacob’s but the hand
is clearly Esau’s. Gadhafi is certainly defeated. But
Libya is lost. The orchestra of foreign vultures, hungry
for Libyan oil is about to complete its oratorios of
destruction, sung to send off Gadhafi. But this story is
set to have a second part. The symphonies written in
Libyan blood has entered its crescendo. Aristocracies
of capital have once again dusted off their dogmas of
profit. The ideologies of greed have raised their
banners again. Imperial greed is about to dragoon
another hapless country into its orbit of exploitation.
The plunder is about to begin! Libya is on the chopping
block.
With the Conference of Istanbul and Paris in full swing;
Libyan oil is being scrambled out, and apportioned to
the war profiteers. The Libyan puppets are being
selected and screened. The real occupation has begun.
Gadhafi is to be decapitated. He has fallen. He did not
leave quietly. His neck has definitely booked an
appointment with the hangman’s noose, just like
Sadaam Hussein before him. That is how empire does business. If
you are in its good graces, you can rape your own people
all you want. You can fart on their heads all you want.
You can steal them blind all you want, and no evil shall
befall you. Go ask
Mobutu Sesse Seko. But once you fall
out of favor with empire, the guillotine awaits your
neck. Gadhafi should go write his own obituary! His ass
is history. He is simply toast. Empire is merciless.
Like a mafia enterprise, it decapitates its opponents
and sends its enemies to swim with the fishes.
Currently, this choir sings alongside a murderous
orchestra of Arab racism against Black Africans. It is
genocide in plain sight. It is ethnic cleansing at the
least excuse. Blacks are once more been targeted by
angry Libyans, who have seen an outlet to cast them in
the mold of scapegoats. Those who preferred Libyan
oil
more than their human rights slogans are simply watching
in unconcern and political correctness. The Libyan
opposition is now committing more crimes against their
Black compatriots, and other foreigners with Black skin,
who are resident in Libya, than Gadhafi ever did at this
time in his own revolution. In spite of the pretenses to
democratic aspirations, piggybacked on NATO weapons, and
America’s tacit approval, the Libyan opposition is
massacring its black population to extinction. The world
watches in inaction. Puerile declarations are heard over
the staccatoral inelegance of bombs and bullets. It is
really a dangerous time to be a black man in Libya!
All
in all, the choir is still singing. We are a long way
from hearing the last song. Whenever the choir takes on
this last song, it is never going to be a dirge to
avarice. The present congress of strange bedfellows
hovering over Libya, have made that option a guaranteed
impossibility.
It is a theatre
of Avarice!
The
theatre of global geopolitics has forever been an amoral
jungle. It is an horrendous one. This is the arena,
where men empowered by the force of their arms and the
privileges of their station, take leave of their
humanity in deference to their greedy ambitions. This
theatre has forever underwritten and scaffolded the
brutal imperialism of economics over ethics. In this raw
theatre redolent of
Hobbes’ state of nature; there
subsists an obscene triumphalism of raw power over the
rights of man.
Thomas Paine should be weeping in his
grave. He should weep because the glory of humanity is
slain upon these high places, and
Machiavelli rejoices!
This triumphalism underwrites a belligerent sense of
privilege for the rich few, who since the dawns of
feudalism, must lord it over the swath mass of humanity,
emasculated by their fears, armored ignorance, civic
apathy, and socio-pathological timidities. Since the
days of buccaneering pirates, sailing for God and
plundering for country; this arena has licensed the
princes of the earth in their perverted deployment of
power in service to obscene ends. This citadel of
oppression, to achieve its ends of erecting oppressive
structures with little resistance to its intention from
the people, it unfurls and consistently peddles a social
narrative, which reinforces the farce that might is
always right. This is the narrative, which not only
provides the amoral detergents for power to launder its
iniquities; but helps her to hoist and canonize what we
have come to identify as the brutality of nations.
In
this international arena; individual micro-universes of
parochial interests jostle for supremacy. These
interests are the primeval kinds. This explains why in
these amphitheaters, whatever the powerful consider as
their national interests, or the interests of the
aristocratic and elitist cabal dictating its national
direction is king. These interests trump the nobility of
their ethics and supersede the sanctity of their
philosophies. It towers above the dogmas of their
religions and the doctrines of their ideologies. Here,
every noble philosophy of politics is divested of
meaning and impregnated with slogans of deceit. In fact
with the right arrangements, this jungle hosts, has
hosted, and will continue to host the essential arena,
where even the most avowed of ideological enemies could
meet to define and fine-tune the strategies for gobbling
up anyone who stands in the way of their self-interests.
History saw Communist Russia joining
Nazi Germany to
crucify and apportion Poland to their avaricious estates
when it suited their fancies. The same Russia later
joined the Western Allies to kick the shit out of
Hitler, when their interests so dictated. History also
chronicled the same perfidious congress of vultures in
Biafra. The same Soviet Russia joined Britain who was
their ideological enemy, to support Nigeria’s genocidal
aggression against Biafra, when their oil interests
swung in that direction; trumping their ideological
parallelism with ‘capitalist’ England.
Some may contend that that was ‘yesterday’, when the
Cold War held some very dark sway over much of global
alliances and realignments. But the end of the
Cold War
never nullified the fact that whenever imperial
feudalism is on steroids, it convokes a congress of
vultures.
Feudalism did not die with the storming of the
Bastille. Neither did imperialism expire with the
nominal independence of many erstwhile colonial
possessions. They simply shook off their ancient garbs
and reappeared in modern robes dyed with the tinctures
of legal respectability and social acceptance. But they
never lost their fangs or oppressive edges. They refined
them. Citadels of oppression and establishments of
obscene privilege are very sly and treacherous. They die
hard. They are very smart parasites; lecherously sucking
the lifeblood of a society, until the people wake up to
want to end that relationship. They shuffle off their
discredited shells and jump onto the next host, and keep
on doing what they know how to do best; namely
oppressing the masses to fund their obscene
privileges.
In
these Olympian hills of interests, ‘Profit’ is the most
powerful god worshipped by all participants. To that
end, every other god or goddess of every political or
philosophical realm is compelled to abjure himself or
herself, and genuflect in timorous subservience to
‘Profit Almighty’. This explains why the corridors of
all micro-epicenters of modern power are stalked and
overpopulated by lobbyists trading influences and
peddling leverages to proselytize and exact worship and
patronage for the Mammon of their atavistic interests.
This also explains why the United Nations, in spite of
the hallowed nobility of its declarations, has become an
impotent puppet, used by powerful nations to
rubber-stamp and justify their aggressive covetousness
of other people’s resource.
That the United Nations could degenerate into a rubber
stamp of rich, powerful and erstwhile imperialistic
Metropoles is really a testament to the futility of our
pretenses. The UN was brow-beaten by the rogue American
government under
George Walker Bush,
Dick Cheney and
Donald Rumseld; to sanction the invasion of Iraq for no
just cause. It sanctioned the decapitation of Sadaam
Hussein at America’s orders. That such an August body
could allow itself to be deployed as an instrument of
vengeance, by an aggrieved superpower, which
manufactured fictions to justify its aggressions against
a less powerful nation that harbors a resource the
superpower deemed its strategic national interest, is
really the nadir of the ridiculous. That it could also justify the invasion of Libya by NATO over an
anticipated crime that Gaddafi was billed to commit in
future is now the last straw that has converted this
body from a credible one to a simple theatre of infamy,
where power establishments of transnational and
supranational avarice go to get legitimacy for their
crimes.
The
brutality of nations is when a congress of international
vultures constitutes itself into the murderers of
peoples and undertakers of nations in order to usurp the
resources of those nations for its own profit. Vultures
are scavengers; the undertakers of nature. They are
uninvited guests to every meal convoked by death in the
wild. Any animal that is unfortunate to cause its own
expiration becomes food for vultures within microseconds
of that transition. Sometimes, vultures are known to
sense when an animal is on its way to death. Some
scavengers are known to hasten this process. Some others
wait for the animal to take a bow. Although the death
and decadence of any society attracts the undertakers of
nature; any well-endowed or resource-rich society that
trades in retrogression is on its way to expiration. To
that end, it sends malodorous, olfactory invitations to
the imperial scavengers to come knocking on the door.
The stench of a well-endowed and resource-rich society
on its way to corruption, and decay convokes the beasts
of every land and clime to come dine off its carrion.
Libya is today the feast as well as the venue, where
every beast of many lands and climes have been ushered
in to apportion the land to their avaricious estates.
Libya became a venue because the Libyans for long
through their inaction, allowed Gadhafi, a
megalomanic dictator to sit atop their sources of
national and social legitimacy for a long time. The
integrity of the State under the dictator decayed and
paved way for his madness to plunge the nation into
anarchy, when the people demanded that he return
the sovereignty back to them. Had the Libyans opposed
him sometime after his revolution, they would have taken
back their land then, and forestalled the invasion of
their land by the vultures that are now pretending to
love democracy while they have only an eye for Libyan
oil.
Not our Own
Motherfucker!
Gadhafi has not earned our sympathy.
He was no Hannibal! With so many years as the absolute
ruler of Libya, he naturally degenerated into a
political dinosaur, and anachronistic relic of an
expired era. He was an evolutionary hangover of Africa’s
political missteps. He fell into the illusions of
omnipotence. He accelerated his steps into the trashcans
of historical irrelevance, which is the destiny of every
tyrant. He deluded himself with his presumptions.
His eccentricities blinded him to the expiration of his
time. He overstayed his welcome, and was abandoned by
the gods of reason.
He was no Hannibal!
Hannibal remains one of the most brilliant military
strategists of all time. This guy struck fear into the
hearts of Rome. His name was dread to Roman ears. He was
a thorn in the ass of an empire, which overreached
itself in stealing and pillaging other people’s lands.
Hannibal fought to free his people from the clutches of
empire. But Gadhafi grew to become the centre of the
problem he came to solve.
He was no Hannibal!
But
be that as it may, history will forever attest to the
bad-will, sepulchral hypocrisy, and shameless
opportunism that marked NATO’s involvement in Libya.
NATO, in spite of its narrative that sounded more
caritative than political, never intervened to
prevent Gaddafi from slaughtering his own people. If it
were so, where was NATO, when the Hutus were
slaughtering their Tutsi neighbors in Rwanda? Where NATO
as Khartoum under
Bashir was slaughtering the Darfuris
for good measure? Where is NATO as Assad slaughters
Syrian protesters on the streets of Damascus? NATO’s
military intervention on behalf of the opposition was a
ruthless, calculated, and coldly executed imperial
maneuver targeted at Libya’s resources. It was not a
charity mission aimed at freeing the Libyans from
Gadhafi’s clutches. It was empire on a mission.
The empires of today, like the imperiums of history,
have risen to become debauched, diabolical ogres that
ran on the softwares of exploitation.
Empires do not only steal “OPL”-Other Peoples Lands,
they steal whatever they can and desire. They confiscate
other people’s symbols of power and units of value. That
explains why the empire of corporate aristocracy, armed
with a belligerent sense of privilege is raping
societies across the world today, in the name of
globalisation. It also explains why many billionaires,
are so very evasive of paying taxes; but have the fluid
effrontery to stake claims to the goodies of the State.
It seems that what being a celebrity buys you today is
that you get almost everything for free, and believe
that you have a right to it.
That is what the Libyans should always keep in mind.
They may be exchanging Gaddafi’s yoke for a foreign one.
All in all, the yoke remains. It may be a simple change
of guards. The Libyans if they are not careful may be
exchanging Gaddafi’s raw enslavement for the polite
slaveries of an imperial power.
Gaddafi’s problem was not that he was not a
motherfucker. Everyone knows that. He was like every
other political motherfucker that Western interests
support and undergird. His major problem was that he was
his own motherfucker. He was not a bitch to be bent over
by any of the interests greedily horny for Libyan
resources. If Gaddafi had been the West’s motherfucker,
NATO would have armed him to slaughter his own people. But he was a motherfucker with his own will. By
that, he violated the principal rule in being an
asshole. The rule states that to be an asshole in charge
of a resource rich country, you must be an asshole of
some powerful country, or you must be powerful enough
to let any junkyard dog know that to approach you is to
be eaten by the tiger. He neither had the Euro-American
alliance on his side, nor does he have the Chinese on
his side. He dismantled his nuclear program, which could
have deterred his detractors. He was his own
motherfucker, but lacked the power or the back-up to
take on the armada of international patrons, who decides
which motherfucker would keep on raping his own people,
and which one should be decapitated.
If
he had the Chinese on his side, like Bashir does in
Sudan, he would have gotten away with murder. If he had
the Chinese and the Russians on his side, like
Mugabe
does in Zimbabwe, he could have kept on raping his
people till now, without consequence to his throne. But
he was his own motherfucker; the worst thing a
motherfucker could ever be.
And
he will pay for it with his head! To be a tyrant and
a motherfucker are mutually exclusive. Both of them
will earn you an accelerated visit to the hangman’s
noose fashioned by rogue empires. Sadaam saw it
first-hand. Gadhafi is next in line.
The
Euro-American foreign policy, as well as that of every
other empire, has always been to search out, and
install their own ‘motherfuckers’ as puppets across
many resource-rich nations on earth. Once you resist
that, kegs of gunpowder, rain of bombs, or armadas of
deadly firepower would remind you who the boss is. In
the world of polite wars of today, the CIA and the
MI5
together with the French, German, and Belgian
intelligence would be given the mission of either
engineering your assassination, or sabotaging your
government. That explains why Presidents of resource
rich countries like Nigeria, must hurry to the White
House or
No.10 Downing Street to have their
job details read out to them immediately after their
(s) election. So much for the sovereignty of such
countries! If you show some personal initiative that is
not cleared with Whitehall or Washington, then heaven or
hell would be invited to receive a visitor. Ask Patrice
Lumumba or Thomas Sankara. And if you dare go rogue
sometime after becoming their motherfucker, a hangman’s
noose would teach you a lesson you would never live to
forget, or a bullet will drill the lesson into your
skull to remind you to behave in your next incarnation.
Ask
Sadaam Hussein and
Osama bin Laden, and they will
tell you.
Empire has always incubated the ‘motherfuckers’ that
obey its dictates. It kills
those ones that develop a mind of their own, or who go
rogue. This explains why innocent bad guys that run
afoul of imperial dictatorial expectations are hanged,
while the guilty bad guys that are in league with the
powers that be, are called good friends and strategic
partners. Why kick Sadaam Hussein’s or Gaddafi’s ass,
and leave that of the
Saudi royal family that have been
funding terrorists that attack the interests of major
NATO countries? Why kick Gaddafi’s ass and leave that of
Nguema Teodoro Obiang
in Equatorial Guinea, who is not
only stealing his people blind but slaughtering
opposition into submission? Why Gaddafi and not
Assad?
Why Gaddafi and not the beleaguered idiots raping
Nigeria and rendering the Niger Delta a superlative
ecological wasteland? Empire does not kill to do anyone
a favour but itself. That is the only reason for
NATO’s
involvement in Libya. Every other thing is a
manufactured narrative of hypocritical provenance.
‘La Isla de la
Tortura’ and the Dangers of Neo-Imperial Hypocrisy
Those arming the Libyan opposition in their justifiable
dissidence, postures themselves as impresarios of
freedom. Some of them claim to be descendants of, and
creators of a noble heritage; an empire of freedom,
which began at the European renaissance, and spans most
of Europe and America. But the fact remains that an
empire of freedom is an
oxymoron. It is like
materialism constructing metaphysics. They are mutually
exclusive terms and facts. Empires are absolute control
freaks. It is a tyranny of restraints. Freedom on the
other hand, is the
dictatorship of liberty. To that
end, when a wolf is about to gobble a lamb for dinner
before the comity of nations, it manufactures narratives
to suit his designs and justify his aggression.
For
donkey years, Gadhafi was an asshole of international
proportions even to his own people. But the West
that guzzled, and was drunk on Libyan oil, was too drunk
to see that. They sold him the weapons to oppress
his own people and keep them from asking questions about
what transpired with the billions that Libya made off
her oil resources. The West was having a time of their
lives. Libyan oil came cheap to finance their
indiscretions. This bought their consciences and blinded
them to the plight of the Libyan people. Now that
Gadhafi fell out of favor based on the vociferations
of his oppressed subjects, baying to throw off their
yoke, the Western Imperiums; versed in the ancient
art of dissimulation, knew that the best option is
that if you cannot beat the wind of revolutionary
changes, blowing across the Arab world at the moment,
you must hijack and control it. If you cannot beat them,
just arm them and lead them from behind.
To
control the revolution, they armed the opposition.
They scrambled a coalition to dislodge Gadhafi. They
brought out the dossier of dirt they had on him
all along, thereby creating a narrative that
demonized Gadhafi so much so as to bag him a
hanging in the courts of public opinion. But this
guy has been their partner in crime all these years.
Who talks about honor among thieves?
To
that end, these narratives and postures, which are meant
to deceive the unwary, are all parts of the deceptive
tools in the arsenals of empire. In fact, it is the
systemic default of empire. It must necessarily
manufacture consents, and meanings to sell its
iniquitous ontology. It must necessarily pretend to
values it never possesses, due to the demands of its
nature. It pretends to be a defender, and promoter of
freedom, while to be an empire is to be a structural
antithesis of liberty.
In
Libya, strange bedfellows came together again. Just like
it did in Afghanistan, when the CIA was arming Osama bin
Laden to fight the Russians. In Libya, guys like
Tripoli's new rebel military commander,
Abdel-Hakim
Belhaj, who was designated a terrorist by the CIA,
targeted for rendition, tortured, and handed over to
Gadhafi’s goons, is now a commander of the opposition
army, armed with NATO arms, European, Qatari, and
Turkish, money to fight Gadhafi.
Abdel-Hakim
Belhaj was
arrested in Thailand, tortured by the CIA, and handed
over to Libya, where he was tortured and sentenced to
death. But the revolution came. And the CIA and MI6
changed sides. The guy that was a part of the oranges
squeezed out, and the juice sent to the CIA and MI6 is
now in a position of power in the New Libya. I wonder
what that holds in store for US and British interests.
This may be the genesis of another Osama bin Laden in
the most proximate potency! Time will tell.
One
can see here, that like in every other historical
instance, neo-imperial designs remain an
enterprise in suffocating hypocrisy. Most of the
countries that are now in gangsterist congress to
oust Gadhafi were in the same armada of political
hypocrisy that was hand in gloves with him. The same
guys that wanted him out right now are the very same
guys that were doing dirty business with him;
shortchanging for donkey years, the same Libyan people
they now claim to love so much, as to lend them arms and
ammunitions in their push to depose Gadhafi. Gadhafi was
their bad guy. Libya was their ‘La Isla de la tortura’,
and Gadhafi was their torturer-in-chief.
In
Ghadafi’s plight, the bubble of western hypocrisy has
been busted. Western democracies in most recent times
have distanced themselves from torture in deference to
political correctness. They claim that they do not
torture. Not in reverence to any lessons of history. Not
in respect to any religion or ethics; after all the
Christian religion was at the vanguard of the
inquisition. Although
medieval inquisition was a
European invention, one would have thought that the
heritage of human knowledge would have recommended the
futility of torture in human affairs. That was not to
be. The West, instead of torturing her enemies,
contracts it out to countries with rogue leaders
like Gadhafi. They used him as their proxy torturer
in chief. He did their tortures for them. This
explains why the
US and the UK shipped suspected
terrorists to his torture chambers, to be grilled,
tortured, and dehumanized in ways that those countries
would not want to be identified with. They funded and
financed Gadhafi’s tortures, and are now hounding
for his head, since their need of him has expired.
The Brutality of Nations and the Feudalism of Capital
Every people have a right to self-determination. The
pretense that democracy is a western invention is simply
that; a pretense, with no basis in reality.
Self-determination has always been the hunger of the
human heart. But whenever an imperial cabal of
international buccaneers, rides roughshod upon these
legitimate aspirations of a people to deliver its viral
loads of tele-guidance mechanisms, aimed at kicking out
a native dictator and replacing him with a
Sonderkommando of locally-groomed puppets, then that
land is lost to its people. That land is forced to host
the brutality of nations. You cannot kick out a
monkey to replace him with a chimp. They still share
the same genetic ancestors.
Imperialism has always canonized
shameless
opportunism. It seeks, creates, or hijacks primeval
fault-lines and fissures of discontent in the body
politic of the societies it craves to conquer. It hypes
this up; sugarcoating and masquerading its metaphysics
of exploitation, under slogans of democracy and freedom.
It actively seeks opportunity to deliver its gifts of
Trojan horses to these societies under the ruse of
helping them resolve internal issues; while the long
term goal is the tying of this society onto its apron
strings, so that the conquered would yield their labor
and resources to finance the extravagancies of empire.
Examples of this abound in the contact between empire
and the conquered peoples across the globe. In
pre-colonial Africa, it exploited tribal tectonic
plates in many African nations to organize the slave
trade. When these depopulated nations caved in to this
demographic plunder of the crème de la crème of its
humanity, imperial guns and canons were ushered in to
advance and consolidate the imperial hunger for
territories and resources.
History is
nothing but the chronicle of the brutality of nations!
In
the march of civilization, this brutality has always
advertised itself before the entire world, against all
canons of decency. From the days of ancient Troy, to the
thresholds of tomorrow, the brutality and treachery of
nations will remain the major furniture of that
chronicle of perfidy, which mercenary narratives
describe as the march of civilization.
For
the powerful, it is the propensity of choice. Whenever
the pseudo-aristocratic cabal of elitist interests,
ruling many expiring, and ethically bankrupt citadels of
power, rise in furtherance or defence of their
interests, in areas they consider ‘their spheres of
interest’; they are ready to consult hypocrisy, convoke
infamies, and crucify peoples, and nations in between
their avaricious estates. All these are in order
to satiate the yawning abyss of their impious
ambitions.
The
contemporary version of this transnational cabal, which
in exuberant days of supremacist eugenics,
identified themselves as ‘the masters of the universe’,
has forever been ruthless in exploiting human beings and
resources, and stashing them up for their private use,
under the ruse of capitalism. This cabal does not
give a hoot if millions of indigenous people inhabiting
fragile ecosystems like we see in the
South American
Amazon forests or the Nigerian
Niger Delta are evicted
off their lands, to make way for multinational
corporations to strip their land of coal, and oil to
finance the greed of this cabal. Human lives or the
sanctity thereof makes no meaning to greed in the
thraldom of impious ambition. Wars are engineered and
financed predicated on a shock doctrine, which essays to
design a socio-economic or political tabula rasa, upon
which rogue interests would write their version of
progress and history.
Progress for this cabal means more profit for the
powerful interests. The poor
majorities across the world are simply means to this
end. Where both interests accidentally intersect, it is
touted as the beauty of capitalism. Capitalism is
beautiful when the CEOs and their camp-followers, which
is not up to one tenth of one per cent of the world’s
population, own more property and clout than 87% of
the world population. Their media mouthpieces run
with that in celebratory masturbation. But for billions
across the world, it is feudalism dressed in borrowed
robes. It is medieval feudalism on modern steroids. It
is the feudalism of capital.
Historical Manifests!
That the march of civilization has been a persistent
convocation of brutality by the strong against the
weak is an understatement. Against all canons of decency
that humanity hypocritically adapts sometimes, we have
seen evil having a walk-over, above all our sublime
declarations. Imperial buccaneers have always
consulted extreme violence to conquer or break the
revolutionary will of any people or group who wants to
shake off the yokes of oppression. The brutality of
nation is the impulsive propensity of the rogue
micro-empires and aristocratic cabals of privilege,
ruling the major global power centres, to consult
perfidious narratives and treacherous violence, to
secure and advance their neo-colonial interests.
Since the dawn of history, the brutality of nations has
been manifest.
From
Scipio Africanus, who built ‘coalitions of
common interests’ across the aisles of the ancient Roman
senate, to bay for the destruction of
Carthage; to
George W. Bush, who created a laughable “coalition
of the willing”, to sack and plunder Iraq, at the
dictates of the Euro-American oil profiteers led by
Halliburton; those who hold power have never had
qualms of conscience deploying it against those
principles they profess, whenever their parochial and
insular interests are on the line. ‘Carthage must be
destroyed’, became the ‘slogan of imperial atrocity’
upon a people that Rome could neither dominate, nor
tolerate.
Hannibal lost. Carthage was destroyed. The
debauched senators and patricians of Rome then went home
to luxuriate in the most unspeakable of debaucheries,
underwritten by the wealth stolen off the conquered
peoples, and colonies, that were under the yoke of Rome.
As
Carthage lay in ruins, the unearned privileges
ploughed off the backs of the vast peoples and cultures
that were conquests of Rome started inducing a
socio-cultural decay that led to the decline and
eventual fall of Rome.
Africa being parcelled out to competing European
interests in 1885 Berlin was fuelled and underwritten by
this same conceptual climate of eugenic feudalism,
in which these interests view the world and its
resources as being created for their game, and
convenience. This also explains why
Poland was
crucified in between two thieves; namely the defunct
USSR and
Nazism, according to
Fulton. J. Sheen;
while the whole world watched.1 That
equally explains the tragedies of
Biafra. It
explains the convocation of an international
conglomerate of strange bedfellows; whose sworn duty was
to starve Biafran women and children to extinction, to
achieve their goals of having free access and cheap
concessions on the
Niger Deltan oil fields. It equally
explains why the whole world looked on in conspiratorial
silence as
Saro Wiwa was arraigned before a
Kangaroo judicial inquest, and executed for daring to
challenge Shell BP’s rapacious plunder of his backyard.2
Proof that Biafra was bludgeoned to safeguard British
access to cheap oil was picturesquely presented by
Andy Rowell
and his colleagues. We invite them to
speak for themselves:
|
The
Biafran War that started in 1967 nearly
ripped Nigeria apart. It also threatened
Shell-BP oil operations which had been
growing in the region for the past decade.
Political, ethnic and economic factors all
played a part in the build-up to the war,
but at its heart the conflict was about oil.
It was ‘not so much a war to maintain the
unity and integrity of the country, . . .
as a desperate gambit by the Federal
government to win back the oil fields of the
Niger Delta from Biafra.3 |
Our
authors intending to clear all doubts as to who was
driving the war cited the Prime Minister’s Personal
Minutes to the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary of
29th July, 1969, FCO 67/212 in their submission of the
following analysis:
|
An
indication of how concerned the British were
about the war is given in a document sent
from Harold Wilson, the then Prime Minister,
to the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary.
Dated some three weeks into the war, it
states: ‘It is of national importance that
Shell BP investment in Nigeria, which is a
major British interest of crucial importance
for our balance of payments positions and
for our economic recovery, should be
protected, I therefore wish that everything
should be done, as a matter of the greatest
possible urgency, but for the present within
the context of our existing policy on
Nigeria, to help Shell BP and the Federal
Nigerian authorities to establish effective
protection of our oil investments’.4 |
They further revealed conscious complicity of the
British government in the atrocities perpetrated on the
innocent women and children of Biafra, thus:
|
Although
the British government saw Shell BP’s oil as
‘our’ oil, they had a problem: they could
not be seen to become directly involved in
the war. The Foreign Secretary Michael
Stewart replied to the Minister that the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
(FCO) were
in ‘continuous touch with Shell’ and David
Barran over what to do.5 |
The
British underwrote genocide in Biafra pursuant to their
greed for Oil. Anglo-American micro-empires of the 18th
to the 21st century have been underwriting the hijack
and overthrow of foreign governments to satiate their
greed for resources and influence. Dick Cheney’s and
the
American Enterprise Institute’s hijack, and
redirection of the terror narrative to
sack Sadaam
Hussein in Iraq, and gain access to Iraqi oil is equally
an offshoot of this feudal conceptual scheme. The
same is NATO’s tongue-in-cheek reasons, for
bombing
Gaddafi to smithereens, to secure Libya for puppets
amenable to imperial dictation.
The
micro-empires of today are those groups of powerful men
and corporations, who view the globe as the
playground of their greed and inordinate ambitions.
This supranational league of elites and aristocracies
are possessed of this belligerent sense of privilege,
which makes the annihilation of peoples, cultures and
heritages possible, whenever it stands on the way of
their profit. These micro-empires are actual
enfleshments of the principalities, powers, and wicked
force of darkness envisaged in the
Pauline epistles.
This is borne out by their unhinged readiness to
advertise brutal ethical bankruptcy in their
dealings with anyone who stands against their global
dominance. This explains why Libya is today the
playground for the advertisement of this brutality of
nations.
To
that end, anyone who is deceived by the sugar-coated
narratives oozing out of the Western media and their
satellites to the actual intentions of the patrons of
that revolution need to wake up and smell the coffee.
Libya is lost unless the Libyan people wake up to the
danger of surrendering their sovereignty to the
puppets that are presently being appointed by the
imperial Metropoles to manage Libyan affairs post
Gadhafi. The Libyan people must rise up now and reclaim
their revolution from the outside interests that are
now massed on the borders, waiting to install their
lackeys on the tribunes of Libyan power.
Notes
1 Cf.
George J. Marlin. ‘September 1, 1939’, article in the
Catholic Thing, September 1, 2009 edition,
http://www.thecatholicthing.org/content/view/2126/41/
accessed on 22nd of January, 2010.
2 Rowell, A., Marriot, J. and Stockman,
L.,
The Next Gulf: London, Washington and Oil Conflict in
Nigeria: London: Constable and Robinson Ltd.,
2005, p.72.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid., p.73
5Loc. cit.
Emmanuel Franklyne
Ogbunwezeh is a Nigerian Social and Economic
Ethicist and Philosopher. I am interested in Politics,
Philosophy, Society, Ecology, Social and Economic
Ethics, History, Human Development, African Issues,
Global Governance and Sustainability issues, Good
governance and Human Rights, Literature. He blogs at
http://ogbunwezeh.blogspot.com/
What constitutes a
disservice to our faculty of judgment, however, is to
place obstacles in the way of assembling truth's
fragments, remaining content with a mere one- or
two-dimensional projection where a multidimensional and
multifaceted apprehension remains open, accessible and
instructive.—Wole
Soyinka, Between Truth and Indulgences
* *
* * *
|
One Hell of a Humanitarian Mission—30,000 Bombs Over Libya
Thomas C. Mountain —2 September 2011—After some 8,000 bombing raids, with estimates of 4 bombs used per attack NATO has already dropped over 30,000 bombs on Libya. That’s almost 200 bombs per day for 6 months, some tens of thousands of tons of high explosives. With an estimated 2 Libyans killed per bomb and without a single NATO casualty the Western regimes have massacred over 60,000 Libyans in the past half year with the rebels themselves having said there have been 50,000 Libyan deaths. One hell of a humanitarian intervention isn’t it? . . . A major problem for NATO and its Libyan Quisling League a.k.a the National Transitional Council (NTC) is that most of rebel military is now under the leadership the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a self described affiliate of Al Queda in the Maghreb (North Africa). The “general” in command of the mainly ethnic Berber rebel fighters that have captured the Libyan capital, known as the Tripoli Military Council, is the head of the LIFG. One of his top commanders is head of the Benghazi based rebel army. With the recent murder of “General” Younnis, former head of the Libyan secret police and once considered the most feared man in the country, the LIFG has now taken over leadership of almost all of the most effective fighting forces of the Libyan rebellion. . . . South African President Jacob Zuma has condemned the NTC leaders as embezzlers and demanded they return the tens of millions of dollars the NTC top leaderships is charged with stealing during their days in office in the Libyan government—Counterpunch |
 |
* *
* * *
President
Robert Mugabe's UN Speech
Empires and
Lynching /
The
Lynching of Robert Mugabe
* *
* * *
Launching the Pedagogical
History of Africa Project in Harare yesterday [5
September 2011] , President Mugabe said . . .
"The history that must be written by our African
scholars and academics here is the history that focuses
on African people in struggle as creators of their own
destiny rather than mere consumers of stories written
about them by passive on-lookers who oftentimes happen
to be non-African outsiders . . . . Real history belongs
to a people in struggle and not to the interpreters of
history. The people themselves are the makers of history
and therefore the real historians. The interpreters are
mere raconteurs of history and not the actual
history-makers as is often wrongly implied . . . Only
this way can we avoid history written by colonialists as
'winners'. Our real winners are the people, whose real
history or struggle the so-called winners would like to
distort and suppress . . . You cannot be a historian of
African people if you do not share their cry or their
laughter. No. The African sensibility, reflected in
African culture and worldview, is the only accurate
compass to guide a historian who is genuine about
writing African history. . . . Slavery and colonisation
do not themselves constitute African history. They
disrupt and falsify the trajectory of African history.
They dehumanise Africans to fit into the scheme of
European capital. The ideology of racism is created as a
parallel process to rationalise the oppression of
Africans. . . . I need not stress that it is imperative
to edify educational systems, which embody the African
and universal values so as to ensure the rooting of
youth in African culture in the context of a sustainable
and participatory development. This way we continue to
foster the spirit of unity in Africa as embodied in the
African Unity Charter”—AllAfrica
* *
* * *
Libya: The Return of Colonialist Bondage
Libya could break up like Somalia—Samir Amin—2011-09-07
Speech on Libya Situation
Gaddafi: A System of His Own
Libya Getting it Right: Pan-African
Libya Geopolitics
Oedipus and Ordinariness
Obama, Political Cynicism, and
the Tea Party Gaddafi: A System of His Own
Libya Getting it Right: Pan-African
Tea Party Nationalism: A Critical
Examination
“White” Cloud Storms Africa / Coalition of Crusaders Join with al Qaeda
Speech on Libya Situation (Obama) /
Obama, Political Cynicism, and the Tea Party
/ Can Libya Survive NATO?
(Vijay Prashad)
The race is on for Libyas oil, with Britain and France
both staking a claim
Free enterprise and the economics of slavery /
Econocide: British Slavery in the Era of Abolition
* *
* * *
|
The Next Gulf: London, Washington and Oil
Conflict in Nigeria
By
Andrew Rowell and James Marriott
On
November 10, 1995 the Nigerian government
executed activist and author Ken Saro-Wiwa
along with eight other Ogoni activists.
Their deaths brought the plight of their
people and the role of British oil companies
in Nigeria to the attention of the world.
Ten years on, Nigeria and the other
oil-producing countries of West Africa have
only grown in strategic and economic
importance to both Europe and the United
States. The recent coup in Sao Tome and the
botched attempt in Equatorial Guinea both
indicate that the West is taking a much
closer interest in the region. Recent
history suggests that the people of West
Africa will receive little benefit from the
revenues from oil and gas, and that they
will suffer instead from the dire
environmental effects of pollution. Andrew
Rowell and James Marriott here explain how
western companies cooperate with local
elites in West Africa to maintain control
and they trace a long and ongoing history of
colonial and neo-colonial exploitation. They
explore Washington and London's new interest
in the region and they report on the efforts
of local people to ensure that the benefits
of development are shared more equally. |
 |
* *
* * *
|
|
Sister Grief: Defined and Conquered in Jesus
By Yvonne Terry-Lewis
"Sister Grief: Defined and Conquered in Jesus" is an engaging book that confronts the universal experience of living with death and dying. The author personifies the personal loss of loved ones as "Sister Grief." The book, partly autobiographical, provides a holistic plan for conquering grief through faith, through a special relationship with Jesus. This plan is designed to help navigate one through the grieving process.
The book includes personal stories, poetry, testimonials, letters, practical suggestions, and strategies based on a love for the divinity in one's life. Although the circumstances that cause grief may be sad, this book is filled with love, encouragement, and hope that lead one towards spiritual health and wholeness.
What Consolation Is Christ to Suffering
The Michael D Terry Scholarship Board |
The White Masters of the
World
From
The World and Africa, 1965
By W. E. B. Du Bois
W. E. B. Du Bois’
Arraignment and Indictment of White Civilization
(Fletcher)
* *
* * *
Ancient African Nations
* * * * *
If you like this page consider making a donation
* * * * *
Negro Digest /
Black World
Browse all issues
1950
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
____ 2005
Enjoy!
* * * * *
The Death of Emmett Till by Bob Dylan
/
The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll
/
Only a Pawn in Their Game
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson Thanks America for
Slavery /
George Jackson /
Hurricane Carter
* *
* * *
The Journal of Negro History issues at Project Gutenberg
The
Haitian Declaration of Independence 1804
/
January 1, 1804 -- The Founding of
Haiti
* * * * *
* *
* * *
posted 9 September 2011
|