|
Books by Alice Walker
Why War Is Never a Good Idea /
The Third Life of Grange Copeland /
Meridian /
The Temple of My Familiar /
The Color Purple
By The Light of My Father's Smile /
Revolutionary Petunias & Other Poems / In
Search of Our Mothers' Gardens: Womanist Prose
* * *
* *
Lies,
Truth and Unwaged Housework
A Response to The
Lie That Unraveled the World
By Peter
Taylor
For the past weeks your column "The Lie
That Unraveled the World" has been resonating inside of me.
First, your words sent me back to a speech
delivered by C. L. R. James in Brixton, London in August 1981.
Titled "Three Black Women Writers: Toni Morrison, Alice
Walker, Ntozake Shange", this talk is recorded in At the
Rendezvous of Victory. You may already be familiar with this
book (if not I obviously recommend it), in which case please
excuse me for quoting the first two paragraphs in full.
I have chosen three books to discuss: Sula by
Toni Morrison; Meridian by Alice Walker; and Nappy Edges by
Ntozake Shange. These books are by three Black women, though I
haven't chosen them because they are Black Women, but because
they are very fine Black writers. They are first-class writers.
Meridian and Nappy Edges I would place in the very front rank of
books being published in the United States today. There is
another reason, also, that I was particularly interested in
these: they represent a social movement in the United States.
Women all over the world seem to have
realized that they have been exploited by men. Marx pointed out
many years ago that women were more exploited than the
proletariat. (This is a remarkable thing for him to have said.)
Now women are beginning to say: "Who and what are we? We
don't know. Hitherto we have always tried to fit ourselves into
what men and what masculine society required. Now we are going
to break through that." These three women have begun to
write about Black women's daily lives.
Black women in America for hundreds of years
have been scrubbing, sweeping, cleaning, picking up behind
people; they have been held in the background; kept for sex. And
now Toni Morrison, Alice Walker and Ntozake Shange have taken
these Black women and put them right in the front of American
literature. They can't be ignored any more. So it seems that in
the women's movement, as usual in the United States, Black
people took part; and they have taken a part in it which, as I
hope to show you, is important not only to Blacks, but to
society as a whole.
If you are indeed "taken as a madman for
speaking of Walker's 'relevance'", then you are clearly in
the finest of company.
And further on, you write: "For, in
Walker's novels, race is indeed significant, but it is never the
final determinant."
Again, C.L.R. James expresses a similar
reading. While summing up his comments on Sula, James says:
"She [Toni Morrison] is also saying that the real
fundamental human difference is not between white and Black, it
is between man and woman."
I agree with this truth. I leave aside the
absurdly obscene 128 gradations, which official France attempted
to impose on people in the colonies (pre-Haitian revolution),
and the three or four categories into which apartheid South
Africa attempted to divide the people, and also the one-drop
regime of the United States. For all our complexions, there is
only one race - the human race. Even modern science now agrees,
and with nuff respect to Peter Tosh:
|
No matter where you come from
If you're a human
Then you're an African. |
As they say in Jamaica, "When we are
cut, we all bleed red".
Rather, the relation between a man and a
woman is fundamental because this is the relationship through
which the human race creates the human beings who live on into
the future. And after the birth, these relationships of the
mother with the father, and of both with the child, remain, for
years, fundamental to the survival and growth of this member of
the next generation.
This fundamental relationship does not exist
between equals. And of course, it functions to maintain, to
perpetuate, to reproduce this inequality of power between
individuals. As you write in your essay:
America, Europe and also most of the nations
and peoples of the earth have oppressive [patriarchal]
hierarchies ritualized and institutionalized that lend
themselves to the brutal oppression of women, children, and the
weak.
And again:
|
Historically, in America, the
hierarchy (patriarchy) has been structured white male,
then white female, followed by all other persons, black
male, black female, etc. At the very bottom of all these
women in the world languishes the black female, cleaning
up everybody's shit, always forced to defend her
morality (read: sexuality), her appearance (read:
beauty), her intelligence (read: humanity). |
Now, your words sent me back to
Sex, Race
and Class by Selma James of the International Wages for
Housework Campaign. Published some thirty years ago, this
pamphlet, along with their other writings, expresses the
analytical triumph of the revolutions of the sixties.
A hierarchy of labour-powers, to which there
corresponds a scale of wages. Racism and sexism training us to
acquire and develop certain capabilities at the expense of all
others. So planting cane or tea is not a job for white people
and changing nappies is not a job for men and beating children
is not violence. Race, sex, age, nation, each an indispensable
element of the international division of labour. Our feminism
bases itself on a hitherto invisible stratum of the hierarchy of labour-powers - the housewife - to which there corresponds no
wage at all.
Do you know of the work of the International
Campaign for Wages for Housework? They can be reached at http://www.allwomencount.net/.
The revolutions of the sixties - Black,
women, youth/student, anti-colonial - broke-up the set of
capitalist social relations which had been formed during The
Great Depression and formalized during World War II. Expressed
in the formula "a fair day's wage for a fair day's
work", the assembly line materialized the production of
this relationship between variable and surplus value. Crucially,
this assembly line ran out the factory gate, through the
community and back again. Seen from the point of view of the
circuit of commodity-capital, the very first step was the
realization of the value embodied in the commodity.
Not merely the sale of goods for a profit,
this process had to reproduce labour-power for the waiting
factory gates, i.e., to produce labour-power willing to again
perform a fair day's work for a fair days wage. During this
"age of Keynes", the formal relationship of money to
commodity-capital was fixed, pre-determined, and guaranteed by
the U.S. government - US$35.00 = 1 oz of gold.
Fuelled by the historic growth in the
productivity of labour-power, the revolutions of the sixties
attacked and overturned the power relations of capital all up
and down the international hierarchy of labour-powers. By the
early seventies, rulers of the "big power nations"
were openly discussing the "crisis of governability",
i.e., the refusal by people to accept their rules.
No longer could capital rely on its circuit
as commodity-capital to command sufficient labour-power, to
accumulate sufficiently. Formally, the relationship between
money and commodity-capital (of dollars to gold) was severed -
the U.S. government changed the rules by renouncing its
guarantee.
When the working class imposes choices on
capital, then capital always chooses against the working class.
Freed of its fixed link to commodity-capital,
the U.S. dollar has been backed, since then, by U.S. power and
wealth, its value determined by the amount of labour-power it
can command. I think this is best seen in the circuit of
interest-bearing capital, which both begins and ends outside any
circuit of material production. Please don't get me wrong, we
live and struggle in a very material (including spiritual)
world. Indeed, "Big Oil" was first to really take
advantage of the severed relation between money and
commodity-capital by raising the dollar value of its commodity
(with no reference to wages whatsoever) at a rate described as
"the oil shock".
Immediately however, this accumulation
created and exponentially expanded "petrodollars",
i.e. money in the form of interest-bearing capital. And, despite
its ever-expanding mass, the primacy of interest-bearing capital
still required the imposition of a spike in interest rates, to
levels greater than those existing "at any time since Jesus
Christ walked this earth". The unprecedented expansion of
debt during the Reagan years merely confirmed and expressed the
ongoing domination of capital in its interest-bearing form.
As Marx notes:
|
The relations of capital assume their
most externalized and most fetish-like form in
interest-bearing capital. We have here M-M', money
creating more money, self-expanding value, without the
process that effectuates these two extremes. [It is]
capital yielding a definite surplus-value in a
particular period of time. In the form of
interest-bearing capital this appears directly,
unassisted by the process of production and circulation.
Capital appears as a mysterious and
self-creating source of interest - the source of its own
increase. The result of the entire process of
reproduction appears a property inherent in the thing
itself.. It becomes a property of money to generate
value and yield interest, much as it is an attribute of
pear-trees to bear pears.. As the growing process is to
trees, so generating money appears innate in capital in
its form of money-capital. |
These appearances are of course false - and
their maintenance requires the telling and the living of lies by
the whole of society. And at the top the lies have become total:
9/11 Commission states: There were no links
between Iraq and Al-Qaeda. Bush replies: There were links
between Iraq and Al-Qaeda.
The Black Commentator has portrayed
this brilliantly in their picture of the Bush pirates floating
in a bubble outside and above the world of human relations - a
bubble of self-reproducing lies. In Issue 48 they write
"The American "bubble" is a mostly white place,
where fantasies of supremacy are passed around to justify
[ongoing] privilege and aggression."
In reality, interest-bearing capital is
"the result of the entire process of [capitalist]
reproduction", i.e. it is money, which, is accepted by all
in society as being able to return, after a certain period of
time, along with a specified amount of surplus-value, a
predetermined quantity of unpaid labour. In this way, capital
accepts and assumes into the future its continued rule.
The success of this assumption that the
ongoing functioning of the entire society will enable its
continued accumulation of unpaid labour, this projected and
desired future is actually created and produced by the unwaged
labour of women. Daily, their unpaid work produces and
re-creates the working-class with our set of internal
hierarchical relations, i.e., the working-class in our social
relationship to capital.
Since the mid-seventies, capital has
stretched, and then stretched again, the international hierarchy
of labour-powers and its corresponding scale of wages. Not only
raising the top, the focus of capital's attacks have been on
anchoring the bottom. Everywhere, these have focused explicitly
on health care, education, social welfare, structural
adjustments, privatization, migration controls, mass Black
incarceration, etc. The result, first and foremost, is more work
for women - work that is performed for little pay and for no
pay.
When capital attacks, it is working class
resistance that illuminates.
Even as capital was moving to consolidate its
rule in its interest-bearing form, women in the International
Wages for Housework Campaign were already "making visible
the stratum at the bottom of the hierarchy of labour-powers -
the housewife - to which there corresponds no wage at all".
This unwaged labour of housewives is the fundamental source of
the surplus-value accumulated by interest-bearing capital. Of
course, patriarchy predates capitalism. And from its beginning,
capital has exploited this power of men over women.
Now, however, this fundamental human
relationship has been incorporated by capital into the very
centre of its process of reproduction. No longer do the factory
workers versus the assembly-line owners adequately express the
class relation; rather, it is the unwaged housewife in
confrontation with the moneylenders.
Even as the ever-expanding accumulation of
interest payments continues, so also will our opposition to a
barbaric, vampire-like, money-shitstem based on false
appearances and lies. By laying bare the lie of man's dominion
over woman, Alice Walker is speaking the truth. As such, she
points the way for us all. As you wrote, we must stop the lies,
and start telling the truth. In so doing, by telling the truth,
we help create a future of equal rights and justice.
Power to the sisters and therefore to the
class. Peter Taylor is
a long-time resident of Toronto, Canada. he was in the
youth/student movement of the sixties, and later worked with
Payday, an international network of men organizing with the
International Wages for Housework Campaign. After marriage, he
has actively tried to help his wife raise three children to
young adulthood. Throughout, the message and heartbeat of
conscious, roots reggae have nourished his spirit and body.* *
* * *
|
My parents met and fell
in love in Mississippi during the civil rights movement. Dad
[Mel Leventhal], was the brilliant lawyer son of a Jewish
family who had fled the Holocaust. Mum was the impoverished
eighth child of sharecroppers from Georgia. When they
married in 1967, inter-racial weddings were still illegal in
some states. My early childhood was very happy although my
parents were terribly busy, encouraging me to grow up fast.
I was only one when I was sent off to nursery school. I'm
told they even made me walk down the street to the
school.When I was eight, my parents divorced. From then on I
was shuttled between two worlds—my father's very
conservative, traditional, wealthy, white suburban community
in New York, and my mother's avant garde multi-racial
community in California.
I spent two years with
each parent—a bizarre way of doing things. Ironically, my
mother regards herself as a hugely maternal woman. Believing
that women are suppressed, she has campaigned for their
rights around the world and set up organisations to aid
women abandoned in Africa—offering herself up as a mother
figure. But, while she has taken care of daughters all over
the world and is hugely revered for her public work and
service, my childhood tells a very different story. I came
very low down in her priorities—after work, political
integrity, self-fulfilment, friendships, spiritual life,
fame and travel. My mother would always do what she
wanted—for example taking off to Greece for two months in
the summer, leaving me with relatives when I was a teenager.
Is that independent, or just plain selfish?
—How
my mother’s fanatical views tore us apart
by Rebecca Walker |
 |
* *
* * *
Amazon's Alice Walker Page
* * *
* *
Report of the
Research Committee
on Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings
Thomas Jefferson Foundation
January 2000
Conclusions
Based on the
examination of currently available primary and
secondary documentary evidence, the oral histories
of descendants of Monticello's African-American
community, recent scientific studies, and the
guidance of individual members of Monticello's
Advisory Committee for the Robert H. Smith
International Center for Jefferson Studies and
Advisory Committee on African-American
Interpretation, the Research Committee has reached
the following conclusions:
Dr. Foster's
DNA study was conducted in a manner that meets the
standards of the scientific community, and its
scientific results are valid.
The DNA study,
combined with multiple strands of currently
available documentary and statistical evidence,
indicates a high probability that Thomas Jefferson
fathered Eston Hemings, and that he most likely was
the father of all six of Sally Hemings's children
appearing in Jefferson's records. Those children are
Harriet, who died in infancy; Beverly; an unnamed
daughter who died in infancy; Harriet; Madison; and
Eston.
Many aspects of
this likely relationship between Sally Hemings and
Thomas Jefferson are, and may remain, unclear, such
as the nature of the relationship, the existence and
longevity of Sally Hemings's first child, and the
identity of Thomas C. Woodson.
The
implications of the relationship between Sally
Hemings and Thomas Jefferson should be explored and
used to enrich the understanding and interpretation
of Jefferson and the entire Monticello community.—Monticello
* * *
* *
Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account
Thomas
Jefferson (April 13, 1743 –
July 4, 1826) was the principal author of the
Declaration of Independence
(1776) and the
Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom
(1777), the
third
President of the United States
(1801–1809) and founder of the
University of Virginia
(1819). He was an influential
Founding Father and
an exponent of
Jeffersonian democracy.
Sarah "Sally" Hemings (Shadwell,
Albemarle County, Virginia,
circa 1773 –
Charlottesville, Virginia,
1835) was a
mixed-race
slave owned by
President
Thomas Jefferson
through inheritance from his wife. She was the
half-sister of
Jefferson's wife,
Martha Wayles Skelton Jefferson by their father
John Wayles. She was notable because most
historians now believe that the widower Jefferson
had six children with her, and maintained an
extended relationship for 38 years until his death.
When Jefferson's relationship and children were
reported in 1802, there was sensational coverage for
a time, but Jefferson remained silent on the issue.
Four Hemings-Jefferson children survived to
adulthood. He let two "escape" in 1822 at the age of
21 and freed the younger two in his will in 1826.
* * *
* *
Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American
Controversy
By Annette
Gordon-Reed
Attorney
Gordon-Reed (law, New York Law Sch.) presents a
lawyer's analysis of the evidence for and against
the proposition that Jefferson was the father of
several children born to his household slave Sally
Hemings. Gordon-Reed is not concerned with Jefferson
and Hemings as much as she is with how Jefferson's
defenders have dealt with the evidence about the
case. Her book takes aim at such noteworthy
biographers as Dumas Malone, who has been quick to
accept evidence against a liaison and quick to
reject evidence for one.—Library
Journal
* * *
* *
|
The Women
Jefferson Loved
By Virginia
Scharff
According to historian Scharff,
Thomas Jefferson’s “most closely guarded secrets,
the most fiercely maintained silences, all had to do
with the women he loved.” It stands to reason that
in order to fully understand a man as tremendously
gifted and as deeply flawed as Thomas Jefferson, one
must also understand and appreciate the women who
collectively formed the foundation of his life and
shaped the nature of his legacy. Although
Jefferson’s mother, daughters, granddaughters, wife,
and enslaved mistress were all fascinating women who
played distinct roles in his life and legend, they
were also creatures of their time and place, living,
enduring, and playing by the rules of a patriarchal,
male-dominated society. By studying these women
Scharff not only opens a window to the heart and
soul of one of our nation’s founders but also
resurrects their own contributions to our nation’s
history.—Booklist |
 |
The chapter on Sally
Hemings does not add much new information, but it certainly lays
out the facts we know in a comprehensive and well organized
fashion. Much like Professor Gordon-Reed, the author carefully
explains the strange dual-family existence that prevailed at
Monticello, and how servants integrated with the Jefferson
family as they all lived together. As regards the two daughters,
they too emerge from the historical darkness and we learn a
great deal about them and their important role in TJ's life and
activities. As I read each chapter, I learned all manner of
things of which I had not been aware, and I have read a lot of
material on TJ. So women are central to the story, but there is
also an abundance of additional facts and perspectives that very
much enhance the book. —Ronald
H. Clark
* * *
* *
 |
The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family
By Annette
Gordon-Reed
This is a scholar's
book: serious, thick, complex. It's also fascinating, wise
and of the utmost importance. Gordon-Reed, a professor of
both history and law who in her previous book helped solve
some of the mysteries of the intimate relationship between
Thomas Jefferson and his slave Sally Hemings, now brings to
life the entire Hemings family and its tangled blood links
with slave-holding Virginia whites over an entire century.
Gordon-Reed never slips into cynicism about the author of
the Declaration of Independence. Instead, she shows how his
life was deeply affected by his slave kinspeople: his lover
(who was the half-sister of his deceased wife) and their
children. Everyone comes vividly to life, as do the places,
like Paris and Philadelphia, in which Jefferson, his
daughters and some of his black family lived. So, too, do
the complexities and varieties of slaves' lives and the
nature of the choices they had to make—when they had the
luxury of making a choice. Gordon-Reed's genius for reading
nearly silent records makes this an extraordinary work.—Publishers
Weekly |
* * *
* *
The White Masters of the
World
From
The World and Africa, 1965
By W. E. B. Du Bois
W. E. B. Du Bois’
Arraignment and Indictment of White Civilization
(Fletcher)
* *
* * *
Ancient African Nations
* * * * *
If you like this page consider making a donation
* * * * *
Negro Digest /
Black World
Browse all issues
1950
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
____ 2005
Enjoy!
* * * * *
The Death of Emmett Till by Bob Dylan
/
The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll
/
Only a Pawn in Their Game
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson Thanks America for
Slavery
* *
* * *
The Journal of Negro History issues at Project Gutenberg
The
Haitian Declaration of Independence 1804
/
January 1, 1804 -- The Founding of
Haiti
* * * * *
* *
* * *
updated 22 December 2007 / updated 28
2008 |