|
Books by
and about W.E.B. Du Bois
The
Suppression of the African
Slave Trade (1896) /
The
Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study (1899) /
The
Souls of Black Folk:
Essays and Sketches
(1903) /
John
Brown (1909) /
The
Quest of the Silver Fleece
(1911) /
Darkwater:
Voices Within the Veil
(1920)
Gift of Black Folk: The Negroes in the
Making
of America (1924) /
Dark Princess: A Romance
(1928) /
Black Reconstruction in America
(1935) /
Black Folk, Then and Now
(1939)
Color and Democracy: Colonies and Peace
(1945) /
The World and Africa: An Inquiry
(1947) /
In Battle for Peace
(1952)
A Trilogy:
The Ordeal of Monsart (1957)
Monsart Builds
a School (1959)
Worlds of Color (1961)
/
An ABC of Color:
Selections (1963)
Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Toward an
Autobiography of a Race Concept
The
Autobiography of W.E.B. Du Bois: A Soliloquy on Viewing
My Life from the Last
Decade of Its First
Century
(1968)
* * *
* *
Shirley Graham Du Bois,
His Day Is Marching On: A Memoir of
W.E. B. Du Bois (1971)
Leslie Alexander Lacy.
The Life of W.E.B. Du Bois:
Cheer the Lonesome Traveler (1970)
Du
Bois on Reform: Periodical-based
Leadership for African Americans.
Edited and Introduced
by Brian Johnson. New York Altamira Press (A Division of Rowman
& Littlefield Publishers, Inc.), 2005
David Levering Lewis,
W.E.B. Dubois: Biography of a Race * * *
* *
Negroes and the
Crisis of Capitalism in the United States
By
W.E.B.
Du Bois
How “free” was the
black freedman in 1863? He had no clothes, no home,
tools, or land.
Thaddeus Stevens begged the government
to give him a bit of the land which his blood had
fertilized for 244 years. The nation refused.
Frederick
Douglass and
Charles Sumner asked for the Negro the
right to vote. The nation yielded because only Negro
votes could force the white South to conform to the
demands of
Big Business in
tariff legislation and
debt
control. This accomplished, the nation took away the
Negro’s vote, and the vote of most poor whites went with
it.
A fantastic
economic development followed. In the South the land was
rich and the climate mild. There was sun and rain for
grain, fruit, and fiber. There were natural resources in
rivers, harbors, and forests. In the bosom of the earth
lay coal, iron, oil, sulphur, and salt. All this either
already belonged to or was practically given by the
government to the landholder and capitalist. Only a
small part of it went to labor, black or white.
Capital was needed
to develop this economic paradise. Government furnished
much of this capital free to the landholder and
employer. Railroads were subsidized, and rivers and
harbors improved; private wealth largely escaped
taxation. The North, fattened on tariff legislation,
money control, and cheap immigrant labor, poured private
capital into
the South. When Southern labor lost half
its vote, landholders and capitalists filled the state
legislatures and Congress with servants of exploitation.
This gave all the powerful
chairmanships in Congress to
the South under
the Democrats, and large influence under
Republicans. During
World War I, a large part of the
military training program was located in the South, and
the government overpaid interested landlords and
merchants and contractors to the tune of hundreds of
millions of dollars—a performance which was to be
largely repeated in
World War II. During the
[Great]
Depression,
most relief money paid out in the South went to
landlords, not to workers.
During and after
World War II, Southern industry moved into high gear.
The Federal government poured billions of grants-in-aid
into the South. Washington was lavish with “Certificates
of Necessity” to build new factories, and owners of oil
wells were given tax rebates for depletion of the oil
which God gave the nation; and today they seek to grab
the $80 billion worth of oil underseas.
Above all, the
South furnished and boasted of one of the largest pools
of cheap, docile, unorganized labor, skilled and
unskilled, in the civilized world. This mass of labor
was historically split into white and black, each hating
and fearing each other to a degree that persons
unfamiliar with the region cannot begin to imagine.
Southern labor was further split into organized and
unorganized groups; and finally, all American labor was
split by red-baiting and the smear of “Communism.”
Here was a paradise
for the investor, which the state governments improved.
Labor laws in the South were lax and carelessly
enforced; company towns arose under complete corporate
control; the police and militia were
organized against
labor. Race hate and fear and scab tactics were
deliberately encouraged so as to make any complaint or
effort at betterment liable to burst into riot,
lynching, or race war.
The result has been
startling. In 1919 the South turned out less than a
fifth of our mining products; by 1946 the proportion had
risen to nearly half. The value of manufactures in the
South has risen in thirty years from a tenth to nearly a
fifth of the national total. Many of the new and
promising industries are seeking the South; since World
War II, no less than $11 billion has been invested there
in new industrial plants. The Southeast already has 80
percent of the nation’s
cotton mills and virtually all
the new
chemical fiber industry. It is drawing the
woolen and worsted mills, and the textile machinery
mills will soon follow.
Paper and pulp mills and
plastics represent hundreds of millions in new
investments. The Southwest is perhaps the
fastest-growing chemical empire in the world.
This newest South,
turning back to its slave past, believes its present and
future prosperity can best be built on the poverty and
ignorance of its disfranchised lowest masses—and these
low-paid workers now include not only Negroes, but
Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and the unskilled, unorganized
whites. Progress by means of this poverty is the creed
of the present South.
The Northern white
worker long went his way oblivious to what was happening
in the South. He awoke when the black Southern laborer
fled North after World War I, and he welcomed him by
riots. Slowly, however, the black man has been
integrated into the unions, except those in whose crafts
he was not skilled and had no chance to learn. One of
these was the
textile unions. They excluded Negroes. It
is taking a long time to prove to them that their
attitude toward Negroes was dangerous. If Negro wages
were low in the South, what business was that of New
England white labor? Today the union man sees that it
was his business. The factories are moving out of New
England and the North into the South. One hundred
thousand textile workers are idle. This illustrates a
paradox of capitalism: in the South, the nation, and the
world, the workers are too poor to buy the textiles they
need; while machinery is able to make more textiles than
its owners can sell at the prices they demand.
Wages in the South
are 20 percent lower than in the North, and Negro wages
as a legacy from [the National Industrial Recovery Act],
are at least 20 percent below white wages. This wage
differential between North and South represents
increased profits of $4 to $5 billion a year. Small
wonder that the Negro population in the rural South
decreased by 50,000 in the last decade, and that the
number of Negroes in the North increased by 55 percent.
Of nine million industrial workers in the South, less
than three million are unionized. Last year 40,000
members of the
CIO Textile Workers Union, which excludes
Negroes, struck in the South, and spent $1,250,000 in
five weeks. They lost, and their membership fell from 20
to 15 percent of the operatives. The
carpetbaggers today
are the vast Northern corporations which own the new
Southern industry, and the
scalawags are the Southern
politicians whom they send to state legislatures and
Congress.
The organized
effort of American industry to usurp government,
surpasses anything in modern history, even that of
Adolf
Hitler from whom it was learned. From the use of
psychology to spread truth has come the use of organized
gathering of news to guide public opinion and then
deliberately to mislead it by
scientific advertising and
propaganda. This has led in our day to suppression of
truth, omission of facts, misinterpretation of news, and
deliberate falsehood on a wide scale. Mass capitalistic
control of books and periodicals, news gathering and
distribution, radio, cinema, and television has made the
throttling of democracy possible and the distortion of
education and failure of justice widespread. It can only
be countered by public knowledge of what this government
by propaganda is accomplishing and how.
In the nation as a
whole we have full employment and high wages for most
skilled workers, but this state of affairs is maintained
by manufacturing arms and ammunition which rapidly
deteriorate in value, and by giving it away and paying
for it by taxes which lower high wages, and by high
prices. How long can we maintain this merry-go-round?
What now must
American Negroes say to this situation? This question
raises another: what is the real nature of this group
today?
There are nearly 15
million persons of known Negro descent in this country;
two-thirds of these are in the
former slave states,
somewhat fewer than a third are in the North, and a half
million are in the far West. This
distribution marks a
notable change from the recent past: in 1860,
nine-tenths of the Negroes were in the slave South; in
1900, there were only 900,000 in the North.
The group is not
homogeneous and is in process of rapid change. From a
predominantly rural group in 1900, it is today mainly
urban. As late as 1940, 7 million Negroes in the United
States lived on farms and 6.5 million in cities. In
1950, 6 million were on farms and 9 million lived in
cities! These large-scale shifts, of course, create
great strains on family and social life.
These Negroes are
closely integrated into the industry of the nation, but
the character of that integration is rapidly changing.
From being predominantly farm laborers, today 83 percent
are in non-agricultural occupations and only 17 percent
on farms. Of the former, 40 percent are servants and 19
percent are laborers; skilled and semi-skilled workers
represent 30 percent. A little over a tenth of the
employed Negro population is in business and the
professions.
This indicates a
group of poor people, especially those remaining in the
South, where their median wage is about $1,000 a year.
The Southern farm laborers are even poorer. For example,
in South Carolina, nearly half the Negroes on farms earn
less than $500 a year. Southern whites have a median
wage of $2,000, and Northern whites $3,000.
Most American
Negroes are as a mass ignorant. Perhaps two-thirds can
read and write, if we depend on draft statistics which
are lower than the census report of 11 percent
illiteracy. This naturally follows from the poor,
segregated Negro school system. In the South, adult
Negroes have had on the average half as many years of
schooling as whites. Most colored adults in the North
had their education in the South, and show it in lack of
training.
The proportion of
the Negro population that has attained
middle-or
upper-class status can only be guessed at. Some surveys
indicate that in cities like New York and Chicago,
perhaps seven to ten percent of Negro families have
incomes of over $5,000 a year, and 20 percent receive
from $3,000 to $5,000; while from five to ten percent
are in the slums, earning under $1,000. On account of
continued disfranchisement in the South,
only 40 percent
of Southern Negroes vote; but in the North, Negroes
wield political power and hold some important offices.
What now is the
attitude of this upper group toward the present
capitalistic crisis in America? For the most part they
are capitalists in thinking, believing in “making
money,” in saving and investing. When they hire labor
they exploit it as do their white neighbors. In
businesses, like insurance, they employ the same methods
as white insurance companies, within the protection of
color discrimination. The colored landlord is no
different from the white. Many Negro fortunes have been
gained in antisocial activities like gambling.
Negro Americans,
like whites, are subject to the mass propaganda by which
monopoly of news gathering and distribution;
concentrated ownership of radio, cinema, and television;
and financial control of publication, make democratic
government nearly impossible today by denying knowledge
of the truth to the average man. But Negroes are
repelled by the custom of calling agitation for Negro
rights “Communism.” This has caused some sudden
reversals of snap judgment by officials in high places,
but it makes the average black man suspicious, and this
suspicion may increase.
Today any Negro
leader who is willing to testify to the “free and equal”
position of Negroes in America can get free travel to
Asia, Europe, or Africa, with no passport difficulties.
Even if he will not testify but is willing to keep
still, a variety of perquisites, including scholarships,
are available.
Some
Negro leaders
with much to lose in property, credit, or reputation
have yielded to panic; two colored authors in recent new
editions of their books have deleted references to Paul
Robeson and myself in order to appease the witchhunters.
Much time and thought of misguided intellectuals has
been devoted to helping deprive American Negroes of
natural leadership or to scaring them into silence by
threat of imprisonment, loss of work, or by smearing
them as “Communists.”
Negro colleges especially are
silenced and influenced by funds raised by
Big Business
and visits from distinguished capitalists. Their courses
in sociology, economics, and history are carefully
watched.
This kind of
suppression and censorship, however, does not solve
anything; it but complicates the situation. For a time
it may deprive Negroes of some of their best-trained and
wealthiest leaders, but despite this, the color bar,
will not release the main mass of the group. The bar may
bend and loosen. Rich Negroes may travel with less
annoyance; they may stop in the higher-priced hotels and
eat in the more costly restaurants; the theaters and
movie houses in the North and Border States may let down
the bars. Beyond that, because of constitutional law and
mounting costs, the wall of segregation in education may
be breached. But with all this, what results? The color
bar in this nation will not soon be broken. Even as it
yields in places the insult of what remains will be more
deeply felt by the still half-free.
When the whole
caste structure finally does fall, Negroes will be
divided into classes even more sharply than now, and the
main mass will become a part of the working class of the
nation and the world, which will surely go socialist.
As long as caste
remains, the Negro leaders are bound to their own group.
This group, despite its class differences in income
property, education, and type of work, is still
bound
together by a certain unity usually called racial, but
really cultural. It has an art and literature and
intricate ties of social intercourse. Negroes intermarry
with each other almost exclusively and live largely in
the same neighborhoods. They gain information about
themselves and about Africa and the West Indies only
from some 200 weekly newspapers and various magazines
which also have something of a special interpretation of
the facts as relating to this group. These periodicals,
to attract white advertising and political dole, are
becoming timid and suppressing news; yet they cannot
become too timid or they will lose readers.
The Negro group is
continually pushed toward socialistic experiment; the
churches try it in recreation and relief; the fraternal
orders’ experiment in insurance; the fraternities give
scholarships; there have been trials of consumers’
cooperation. In time, this group with any increase in
pressure, might become a veritable school of socialism.
A Negro of talent,
education, and money may not live in a Negro ghetto; he
may not attend a Negro church, and he may welcome whites
to his home and table. Less often, but now and then, his
children or friends may marry white persons. He may be
elected to public office with the help of white votes
and be referred to in the public press without being
carefully designated as “colored.” But such cases will
be exceptional. For the most part,
the educated
well-to-do American Negro is firmly bound to his
powerful group. His memories are memories of its
oppressions, insults, and repressions. He rejoices in
its victories. He cannot break off from the Negro church
entirely and the Negro vote will be his chief dependence
in elections. His family will chiefly marry Negroes, and
Negroes will constitute the main body of his friends and
acquaintances. Consequently no matter how self-centered
he may be, he will not be able to avoid exercising some
leadership in the group of which he is a part, not only
by inner attraction but also by outer force.
In the white world
he will not be a member of any church or social club; he
will not be nominated to public office except in a Negro
district. He may be endured in an exclusive neighborhood
but not welcomed. His reception in hotels, restaurants,
and public entertainments in the North will vary
according to locality. In the South and border states he
will almost invariably be excluded. If he tours the
nation in his car, most of the “motels” will exclude
him. In his leadership and social thinking, therefore,
he must consider the future of his race or he will
neglect himself and his family.
What this paper is
considering is the question of the critical place which
this segregated group of Negroes will occupy as the
crisis of capitalism in the United States develops. This
crisis of American capitalism could be rendered more
serious than it is if the leadership of a tenth of the
nation should fail in its responsibilities. The crisis
arises from the fact that this nation under the control
of Big Business is trying stubbornly, and in defiance of
the clear historical development of the world since
World War I, to oppose
state socialism. This Negro group
is at present far from being revolutionary. Its fault
rather has hitherto been yielding to pressure and bowing
in fatal humility when resistance and retaliation would
have been best not only for the Negroes themselves but
for their oppressors as well.
What will American
Negroes answer to the challenge of socialism? What part
will they think the State should play in future industry
and development? The Negro must see that his advance so
far has depended on federal action rather than on states
rights or individual initiative. Federal action
emancipated him from slavery and is his lone hope for
stopping lynching, enacting [a
Fair Employment Practices
Committee], and getting justice in the courts.
But far beyond this
is the inevitable relation of the colored folk of the
United States to the colored peoples of America, Africa,
Asia, and the world. When a great nation like the
Soviet
Union not only refuses to draw the color line but cannot
conceive of such barbarism, in the face of the color
prejudice which nearly
every white nation of Europe and
North America practices—what can, what must Negroes
think? When
China went Communist the impact on the Negro
race was tremendous, and no amount of yelling and
shrieking will change this. Russia taught her peasants
to read and write in a generation. The United States
leaves a third of her Negroes
illiterate after 90 years
of half-hearted effort. If the darker world gradually
finds that socialism is the only answer to the color
line, then the colored peoples of the world will go
socialist and black Americans will perforce march in the
ranks. They will not so much lead as be pushed by their
own people.
The United States,
with its existing social structure, cannot today abolish
the
color line despite its promises. It cannot stop
injustice in the courts based on color and race. Above
all, it cannot stop the exploitation of black workers by
white capital, especially in the newest South.
White
North America beyond the urge of sound economics is
persistently driving black folk toward socialism. It is
the United States which is straining every effort to
enslave Asia and
Africa, and educated and well-to-do
black Americans are coming to know this just as well as
anybody. They may delay their reaction; they may hold
ominous silence. But in the end, if this pressure keeps
up, they will join the march to
economic emancipation,
because otherwise they cannot themselves be free.
Source:
Monthly Review April 1953
posted 2 February 2011
* * *
* *
Slavery and Its Legacies at Emory University: Reflections on History and
Accountability
* * *
* *
|
Driven West
Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears to the Civil War
By A.J. Langguth
USC professor of
journalism Langguth (Union, 1812) maintains America's first
civil war occurred during the 1830s when Andrew Jackson
expelled Indian tribes from the Deep South. Recounting the
events from 1825 through the Civil War (which forced the
Cherokees to choose between North and South), he puts in
context the expulsion of the Cherokees from the South and
their tragic Trail of Tears. Langguth proceeds through
chapters that each focus on one figure in the drama, from
John Calhoun to Cherokee chief John Ross. By 1820, wars and
draconian peace treaties had already eliminated many Indians
from the South. Exhorted by Southern white leaders to move
to Oklahoma territory, some complied, but many refused; some
became Christian.
The end came when Andrew Jackson overcame Northern
opposition to the 1830 Indian Removal Act. The army ejected reluctant
Indians and with little planning for the long trip, 25%–50% percent of
the 50,000 deportees died of disease and starvation. Readers of this
engrossing, profoundly depressing history may not consider the fight
over Indian removal civil war, but few will doubt that it represents a
bitter North–South conflict in which the bad guys won.—Publishers
Weekly |
 |
* * *
* *
* * *
* *
 |
The Price of Emancipation
Slave-Ownership, Compensation and British Society at the End
of Slavery
By Nicholas Draper
When colonial slavery
was abolished in 1833 the British government paid £20
million to slave-owners as compensation: the enslaved
received nothing. Drawing on the records of the
Commissioners of Slave Compensation, which represent a
complete census of slave-ownership, this book for the first
time provides a comprehensive analysis of the extent and
importance of absentee slave-ownership and its impact on
British society. Moving away from the historiographical
tradition of isolated case studies, it reveals the extent of
slave-ownership among metropolitan elites, and identifies
concentrations of both rentier and mercantile slave-holders,
tracing their influence in local and national politics, in
business and in institutions such as the Church. In
analysing this permeation of British society by slave-owners
and their success in securing compensation from the state,
the book challenges conventional narratives of abolitionist
Britain and provides a fresh perspective of British society
and politics on the eve of the Victorian era. .—Cambridge
University Press |
* * *
* *
|
The Race between Education and Technology
by Claudia Goldin and
Lawrence F. Katz
During the 20th century
both technology and education raced forward in the US,
generating massive economic expansion and rising standards
of living. Throughout the century, technological changes
increased the relative demand for skilled labor, while the
rapid expansion of first high schools and then higher
education simultaneously increased the relative supply of
skilled labor. Goldin and Katz carefully examine the
historical and economic forces behind this expansion in
education, extracting crucial evidence from the remarkable
Iowa State Census of 1915, and they argue very plausibly
that the relative demand for skilled labor grew at a fairly
constant rate over the century. They conclude that
"education ran faster" than technology "during the first
half of the century," causing a considerable drop in
economic inequality, but that "technology sprinted ahead of
limping education in the last 30 years," leading to the
recent upsurge in inequality. The rate of return on
educational investments has become, once again, very high.
Why have education levels increased so sluggishly in the
face of these massive rewards? The answers are not entirely
clear, nor are the optimal public policies, but the authors
offer much food for thought. A must read.—R.
M. Whaples (Choice ) |
 |
* * * *
*
update 17 April 2012
|