|
Neo-Liberalism:
Dictatorship of the Market
By M.P. Parameswaran
The word
‘globalization’ like many other words such as
‘socialism’ or `participation' has been used to denote
many concepts, sometimes quite contradictory. So also is
the word ‘liberalism’. We use these words with a
specific understanding. Globalization does not, for us,
mean the ever-expanding vista of human civilization or
the shortening of distance across the globe due to
improved transportation and communication. It does not
mean the slow, but certain, spread of science and
technology and ability to survive, to far off corners.
It does not mean internet and the treasures of knowledge
it has made available to all who can use it. These are
not the products of what we call globalization but
agents which have facilitated it. We mean by
globalization the incessant movement of speculative
capital, of enterprises, of goods and services across
the globe; we mean by it the so called free market, in
fact a dictatorship of the market controlled by
super-powerful transnational corporations, we mean by it
the enforcement of the will of global capital, whose
political and military godfather is USA, across the
world through economic, political and wherever
necessary, military coercion.
As was pointed out earlier, capitalism cannot survive
without continuously expanding production and exchange
of goods and services. For this it should have control
over natural resources and markets all over the world.
Capitalism emerged and evolved rather spontaneously, in
Europe, four centuries ago. The story of its global
expansion, of colonization, of wars for control over
colonies are all well-known. No need to repeat them
here. Since it all started as an opposition to feudal
and princely powers, since it enlisted the broad masses
of the people, it was called ‘liberalism’ at that stage.
Capitalists required the liberation of economy from the
clutches of lords and kings.
They conceived the concept of "Abstract Market," an
omnipotent entity capable of delivering maximum
happiness to maximum number of people. It was given the
best theoretical foundations by Adam Smith. The essence
of this theory is that neither the State nor any other
regulatory authority shall interfere with the ‘free’
functioning of the market, that market can regulate
itself to the best interests of all. The deceptiveness
of this argument has been well explained by Karl Marx
and Frederic Engels. We also know that Lenin’s
characterization of the early 20th
century imperialism as the highest and last stage
of capitalism was correct. Capitalism could not have
endured in that form any more. It led to two world wars.
It led to persistent economic crises. Finally, liberal,
market- controlled capitalism was temporarily abandoned
and in place came up the concept of ‘welfare state,’ as
advocated by Keynes.
The success of the Russian revolution, the economic
strength exhibited by it, the series of revolutions that
took place subsequently—all these accelerated the
transformation of capitalism from ‘ the dictatorship of
the market’ to the concept of a `benevolent welfare
state.' This helped capitalism to survive. Its essence
still survive in the Scandinavian countries. Welfare
State was not, however, compatible with the essence of
capitalism, which advocates survival of the strongest in
the battle-ground of the market. Quite akin to the
Olympics of ancient Rome, the rules of this battle were
neither fair nor just. The capitalists always had the
State’s support, of its police, courts, jails and army.
The State was theirs.
When, towards the end of 20th
century, the socialist experiments began to
degenerate, more through subjective causes than through
objective reasons, liberalism began to reassert. The
first results were Reaganomics and Thatcherism. When the
final collapse came in late eighties and in 1990,
liberalism came out in its new form—neoliberalism—controlling
the sovereign states through economic bondages and
wherever necessary through military force. It was
liberalism in new form—neo-liberalism—because the main
‘commodity’ being exchanged in the market was ‘ finance
capital’ or speculative capital. The equation is no more
M1-C-M2,
but M1-M2-M3.
Capital transactions form more than 98% of the total
global trade. Capital got almost delinked from
production or to put it more scientifically, productive
capital is enslaved by speculative capital.
And,
therefore, to save the situation, many economists argue
for delinking the two. And this is the essence of
‘localism,’ which we will discuss in detail later.
Before that, let us look into the present situation a
little deeper. One can see several long- term tendencies
:
(i) Increasing inequality: vulgar enrichment of a
few and abject impoverishment of many;
(ii) rapidly decreasing reserves of natural
resources and increasing levels of environmental
degradation;
(iii) increasing loss of human behaviour patterns
which have hitherto helped the species to survive.
All these were visible even a century ago. However,
there were people who put forward the simplistic
argument that the rich, after all, will have to spend
their wealth in this world only and in the process it
gets redistributed among the poor. When a country as a
whole becomes rich, whether the rich like it or not, a
part of it will reach the poor too. This argument is
known as ‘Trickle-down Theory.’ In the long run the gap
between rich and the poor will necessarily have to come
down. This theory is not only wrong but also a
falsehood. The rich-poor gap has always been increasing.
The poor have become poorer, the rich, richer. Look at
Table 1. It shows how much the per capita income of nine
rich countries in the world has grown up from 1960 to
1990 and 2002. It also shows the situation of nine poor
countries. The incomes given are in terms of Purchasing
Power Parity dollar. The table is constructed from Human
Development Reports of 1993 and 2004.
In the sixties, the average per capita income of the
richest 20% of the world countries was 30 times that of
the poorest 20%. By 1997, this has risen up to 86 times.
Inequality had doubled. The wealth of three richest
individuals in this world is more than the combined
wealth of 35 poor countries in the world. The total
wealth of the top 200 individuals exceeds the combined
wealth of the poorest 41 per cent—2400 million of the
world population. One rich = 12 million poor! 2% of
their wealth per annum is sufficient to give primary
education to all children in the world.(9)
Table 3.1 Per-capita income of nine rich and nine
poor countries in PPP dollars
|
RICH COUNTRIES
|
Country |
Income PPP $ |
|
|
1960 |
1990 |
2002 |
|
|
1. USA |
9,983 |
21,499 |
35,750 |
|
|
2. Switzerland |
9,313 |
20,874 |
30,010 |
|
|
3. Canada |
7,758 |
19,232 |
29,480 |
|
|
4. Sweden |
6,483 |
17,014 |
26,050 |
|
|
5. France |
5,344 |
17,405 |
26,920 |
|
|
6. Inland |
4,718 |
16,446 |
26,190 |
|
|
7. Austria |
4,476 |
16,504 |
29,220 |
|
|
8. Japan |
2,701 |
17,616 |
26,940 |
|
|
9. Spain |
2,701 |
11,279 |
21,460 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
POOR COUNTRIES
|
Country |
Income PPP $ |
|
|
1960 |
1990 |
2002 |
|
|
1.Zaire |
379 |
367 |
- - |
|
|
2. Afghanistan |
775 |
714 |
- - |
|
|
3.Chad |
785 |
559 |
1,020 |
|
|
4. Africa |
806 |
768 |
1,170 |
|
|
5. Somalia |
891 |
834 |
- - |
|
|
6. Liberia |
967 |
857 |
- - |
|
|
7. Sudan |
975 |
949 |
- - |
|
|
8. Madagascar |
1,013 |
704 |
740 |
|
|
9. Zambia |
1,172 |
744 |
840 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not
only between countries, but also within them,
inequalities have been increasing. This is particularly
so in the erstwhile socialist countries after the
collapse of the socialist experiment. These countries as
well as the Scandinavian countries, which followed
welfare economics both in spirit and body were the most
egalitarian in the world. The inequality factor measured
as the ratio of average incomes of the richest 20% and
poorest 20% used in the range 3 to 4. Today, in the old
Soviet Union areas, it is about 14. Brazil, which
embraced neo-liberal globalization quite early,
continues to be one of the most inequituous
countries in the world, the inequity factor being about
96. USA also is very inequituous-inequality factor being
57. Even in the case of Scandinavian countries it has
doubled, to 6-7. World over, inequity has increased and
is increasing. In many countries, even absolute poverty
has increased. This is an inevitable consequence of
neoliberalism—of the dictatorship of the market.
The experience of the initial phase of liberal economy
was not different. By the middle of the 19th
century India, together with many other colonies,
had been forcefully linked with global market. Viceroys
taught by die-hard liberal economists were ruling India.
During the second half of the 19th
century, under the reign of Queen Victoria, two
devastating famines struck India—first during 1859-1860
and second during 1897-1901. The severe droughts had
caused grain production to drop down by about 20 – 30%.
But this was not the cause for famine which killed,
according to the most conservative estimate, 13 million
people. Some estimates put the toll at 29 million. There
was no cash with the village farmers and agriculture
workers. There was no employment. Whatever surplus grain
they had with some farmers were exported out of the area
and out of the country. The Viceroys banned relief works
like food for work, grain subsidy and grant, etc.,
citing that such measures will be interfering with the
'freedom' of the market that is freedom to make money,
causing starvation. The great Indian Railways did a
yeomen service to these free marketeers by quickly
transporting grains from the hinter land, where it was
not safe surrounded by hungry millions to the safe
coastal towns from where it could be exported
profitably. (10)
Capital Runs Amuck
In the stock exchanges across world the daily
transaction of shares is amount to a trillion and half
dollars. The value of goods and services produced in the
entire world per day will be only about 2% of this.
These money exchanges have practically nothing to do
with production. They are merely speculative exchanges.
A new terminology has emerged: Casino Capitalism. It is
interesting to have the changes that has taken place in
the character of market transactions from commodity
exchange to money exchange. The different stages can be
depicted as follows:
| Commodity – Commodity C – C
Commodity – Money – Commodities C – M – C
Money – Commodity – Money M – C – M
Money – Money – Money M – M – M |
Barter Money as mediator
Capitalism
Casino Economy |
The stock exchanges are no different from the gambling
dens in Las Vegas, Atlanta City or Monte Carlo. The
capital involved in stock trade has very little to do
with the production process. It is no longer a part of
the classical quartet: Land – Labour – Capital –
Organisation. Unfortunately, through structural
adjustments and liberalization of capital market, the
whole economy and the productive activities of the
developing countries are strongly bound to the footloose
speculative capital. In order to safeguard the economy
of any country, it has to de-link the speculative
capital from productive capital and provide protection
for the later. This is partial or selective de-linking.
Footloose capital impacts not only on developing
countries but developed countries too. Productive
capital has no qualms in flying without any notice from
one country to another where it can earn more profit.
Yesterday, the enterprise was working. Today, when the
workers reach the factory it is closed. The machinery
may be there—but the factory has been relocated in
another country. Their families are impoverished. Small
shop owners, schools, banks, barber saloons and other
enterprises lose customers. They too are forced to close
down. The town loses its vitality. It becomes a ghost of
what it earlier was. Even the US is replete with such
ghost towns.
Economy: The economic insecurity engendered by
neo-liberal globalization in developing countries is
well demonstrated by the quick cascade of events in 1997
– 99 period which emaciated the so-called `Asians
Tigers’—South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines,
Thailand, etc. During the 1990 – 95 period, the net
foreign direct investment in these countries was about
90 billion dollars. In the 1997-98 period, 12 billion
dollars were just withdrawn. Their economy collapsed
like a house of cards—the GDP came down by 11%.13
million people were thrown out of employment. The prices
of essential commodities shot up. Real wage level came
down up to 40-60% in Indonesia. Arson and looting became
commonplace. Law and order broke down. True, they have
come back to a partly stable situation, but not to the
original glory. The behaviour of finance capital has
become totally unpredictable. It flows madly across the
globe, round the clock, thanks to internet revolution.
Though it can be consciously used by the power to be to
kill opposition, often even they lose control over it.
Capital becomes autonomous, free from the capitalist.
Mexico, Brazil, Argentina—all have been reduced to
grinding poverty by finance capital—this is
neo-liberalism.
Employment: Global expansion of neo- liberal
capitalism made it easy for enterprises to merge, to
relocate, to dilute rights of workers, to destroy job
security and to reduce social security measures. In
fact, neo-liberalism demands all these. Unemployment in
Chile is about 30%, in Columbia it is 39%. No wonder, it
has become the narcotic capital of the world. Even
Europe could not escape the vagaries of footlose
capital. The unemployment level remained about 10% for
more than a decade. About 35 million unemployed. All new
jobs are created in the informal—totally
insecure—sector.
Health: AIDS is a disease which has spread all
over the world like a wild forest fire—a truly
globalized phenomenon. By 1998, 33 million persons have
been afflicted. Every year 6 million new victims emerge.
It has spread to even isolated corners on the globe. In
developing countries, every day 16,000 persons are added
to the list. The life expectation in nine countries in
Africa will be, by 2010, less than what it was in
1960—17 years less than what it is today. The Botswanian
people have come to the conclusion that within one
generation, they are all going to die and are in a mood
to enjoy their remaining `Decameron Nights.' In the
process, they are accelerating self- extinction. And
what do neo-liberalists do? Make money. Sell drugs at
exorbitant prices! The more the demand for drugs, the
merrier they are!
Culture: In the beginning of the last century,
Gandhiji exclaimed : I don't want to be shut up within
the four walls of my home. Let the cultural winds from
all over the world blow into it, freely. Still I will
stand firm on my soil, on my culture. I will not be
blown away. Unfortunately, his followers lost their
hold. They were blown away. The indigenous cultures all
over the world are being blown away and replaced by one
culture that of capitalism, one of consumerism. America
exports more dollars worth of films—filthy ones at
that—than even narcotics. It is said that in 1997
Hollywood films have cashed, globally, 37 billion
dollars. Television is the most wide spread and the
quickest of all media today. Together with internet
system, it has shrunk the entire globe into one village
(or town!), reduced it into one mono-culture.
This has created a sense unsettlement which can not be
explained, but only felt. A sense of insecurity. The
overall level of real insecurity for individual human
lives, integrated world over, is increasing. It could be
direct physical threat from local people running beresk,
it could be from road rage, it could be from wars and it
could be from natural calamities triggered at by global
warming and climatic changes. The economic insecurity
and the cultural degeneration are kindled in human minds
their `reptilian instinct'. This has led to unimaginable
increase in crimes of various kinds.
The consumption of narcotics is rocketing. Even in the
former socialist countries, which earlier led a
relatively stable and settled life, crimes related to
narcotics increased by 8 times during the 1990 – 1997
period. Flesh trade is booming. Every year, about half a
million girls and women are `exported' to West European
countries by these traders. An annual business of 7
billion dollars. The US can be proud (or ashamed!) that
it has got maximum number (and percentage) of people in
jails. The criminal syndicates have strong global
networks. They are stronger than UNO, their annual
business is about 1500 billion dollars. They can buy or
bury any political leader, industrialist, police or
defense officer anybody. They use information technology
most effectively!
Environment: Capitalism cannot exist even for a
day without expanding production of goods and services.
This we have noted. Production involves use of natural
resources and release of wastes to the environment. An
eco–catastrophe is looming large over the horizon.
Global warming, unpredictability of weather, natural
disasters like tsunamis, twisters, droughts and floods,
drying up of rivers, dwindling ground water wealth,
desertification, declining health of soil, loss of
biodiversity, reduction in marine life, ever depleting
stock of fossil fuels and minerals . . . all these and
many others have put humans and the entire life on
earth in a situation of ecological insecurity. Yes,
neo-liberalism accelerates this, because it is a system
of the 'dictatorship of the market,' which is
ecologically insensitive.
Nation, Society: Political and communal tensions
and strife's are concomitant products of the sense of
insecurity described above. Instances world over are
numerable: India, Pakistan, China, Sri Lanka, Cambodia,
Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Chechnya, Bosnia, Afghanistan,
Palestine, Iraq, Israel . . . the list is too long. It
has been estimated that during the eight years between
1989 and 1998, 61 armed conflicts have taken place. Of
these, as many as 58 were internal conflicts. Increasing
bitterness of religious fundamentalism and blind
terrorism result from this sense of individual social
and national insecurity. The basic reason for the 9/11
suicide attack on the World Trade Centre was the
criminal expansion of capitalism world, impoverisation,
cultural collapse, social insecurities—all caused by
neo-liberal globalization.
Species Madness: And today the entire human
species has begun to lose the ability to think
rationally. They have invented a new rationale to
justify the present—wars, treachery, killings,
profit-mongering, in fact, everything: humans are by
nature selfish. Selfishness is the basic characteristic
of the species. Collectivity, sense of brotherhood and
even the concept of family all are qualities
artificially created by the society. Basic instincts are
prone to come up at the slightest provocation. There is
a small element of truth in it, but much of it is false
too. The basic characteristic of any human being, for
that matter any life form, is to remain alive, to resist
death. This is an individual, biological quality.
Whatever it does can be attributed to selfishness. But
the word is normally used not to connote instincts, but
conscious actions. Another characteristic of any life
form is reproduction—maintaining the species. For all
higher forms of life this requires. To gather food and
to save oneself from being eaten by others, even the
less evolved life forms depend on collective action.
In the case of humans, this collectivity is highly
evolved. Humans were weaker than many contemporary
animals. The species survived because it learnt to act
collectively. Human language greatly helped this
collectivity. Those individuals in the pack who lacked
in collectivity, who didn't have the propensity for
collective action, gradually must have got eliminated.
The survivors were those who had a general propensity
for collective action. Hence collectivity is not merely
a cultural attribute, but an evolutionary character.
Once the social environment begins to discount
collectivity and uphold the animal principle of
`survival of the strongest,' `the species is likely to
become extinct not because of external enemies but due
to internal fights. Humans are gradually losing the
sense of being one in a community. Even the strongest
ties, the family ties, are broken.
This is most widespread in the so-called advanced
capitalist countries. In the US, in Europe, in the
metropolitan towns of the developing countries, that
warm and soothing relationship amongst father, mother,
brothers, sisters, cousins, nephews, nieces . . . all
that make humans humane are being weakened and
destroyed. It is a sad fact of history that humans,
while enlarging the collectivity from the family to the
tribe, to the nation, to the world, did not succeed in
strengthening of these ties. But, because of being
humane, humans are able to realize this weakness and so
can rectify it and guide its own social evolution. But
today it has to be stated that humanity is affected by a
sort of 'species madness.' Many other species have
become extinct because of this type of collective loss
of evolutionary behaviour patterns.
Limits to Growth: One marked symptom of this
madness is the greed to consume, consume more and more.
As if afraid that nothing will by left behind because
others will consume. This is so evident in the so-called
developed—in fact, they are diseased—societies. In these
societies, there is a mad growth in the number of
gambling dens, five-star hotels, roads, cars, throwaway
culture, etc. One of the causes for the failure of the
socialist experiments of the 20th century, as noted
earlier, was its inability to distinguish human
(socialistic) consumption and capitalistic consumption.
Even today, China is trying to ape the US in all its
follies.
The 1973 Club of Rome report "Limits to Growth" was most
violently opposed by socialist thinkers. Some of the
figures given in it were questionable. But the essence
was not. Today there is no argument regarding limits to
natural resources. Table 3.2 below gives a recent (1994)
estimate of the duration of availability of certain
selected metals at the then existing levels of
consumption. These levels are increasing, because
developing countries have to increase them for mere
sustenance. So, in fact, the exhaustion period could be
even shorter.(11)
Table 3.2 Availability Period of Certain Metals
|
Metal |
Years |
|
Aluminum
Iron
Nickel
Mercury
Tin
Copper
Lead
Zinc |
207
152
59
45
41
33
22
20 |
There is the question: What do we mean by
sustainability? By this we don't mean availability for
one generation, not even for hundred or thousand years,
but for millions of years. Maybe, we can discover new
materials to substitute these metals. But they too have
limits. The only way for long- term sustainability is
the possibility of cent per cent recycling—to get back
the desired materials in the desired form from extremely
diluted conditions from wastes. Technologies are to be
developed for this. It will demand substantial amounts
of energy. Fossil fuels will suffice for only one
generation or two. The only long-term solution is the
ability to extract solar energy effectively. All these
have been pointed out elsewhere in this book. However,
the pressing importance of this have not been understood
either by politicians or by scientists. The latter
includes the scientist-president of the country of
Mahatma Gandhi, who speaks about nuclear bombs and
missiles and not solar homes!
The
conflicts—which have become endemic for control over the
Gulf countries, continuing for at least the past half a
century—have their origin in the scramble for the last
resources of oil. In essence, every conflict has at its
root, this narrow economic self-interest. Today, the
mode of existence of the human species is one of
mutually destructive conflicts and not of creative
cooperation. The great question is this: can we reverse
the situation? The answer: potentially, yes.
A Paradise for Criminals: There are a few who
argue that globalization offers a few goods things too,
besides the above- mentioned economic—political—social
threats. For example, the time contraction made possible
by the information technology revolution. Information
can flow in seconds today when earlier it had taken
days. It has benefited researchers and also ordinary
persons. But it has benefited more the stock exchanges,
speculators in Tokyo and Paris, in London and New York.
The transnational corporations can negotiate mergers,
exchanges, freeze stocks, stop production, all on global
scales. But information technology is most effectively
used by criminal syndicates. The networks of illegal
traffickers in weapons, in narcotics, in explosives are
global and efficient. Today this is a major empire,
overruling nation- states. The Sicilian mafia, the
Japanese Yakusa, the Arab Al Khaida.... these are
terrifying names. It is disconcerting to note that
though outwardly all these are illegal setups, their
leaders occupy in many countries, rulers' chairs.
Politics in almost all countries is highly criminalized.
This is true of the US or India, of Italy or Pakistan.
All age-old social contracts are being broken down. It
is urgent that humanity formulate new social contracts.
If humanity is to be diverted from the present suicidal
path, a new society has to be created. Another world has
to be created.
And
Another World is Possible. Capital is running amuck and
humans too.
Source:
Geocities. Another
World Is Possible—Thoughts about a Fourth World,
Chapter Three
* * *
* *
Dr. M. P.
Parameswaran, author of
Empowering People: Insights from a Local Experiment
in Participatory Planning, received a
Bachelor's degree in Engineering from the College of
Engineering, Kerala, India in 1956, and a Ph.D. in
Nuclear Engineering from the Moscow Power Institute
in 1965. He was a scientist with the Bhabha Atomic
Research Centre, Bombay, from 1957 to 1975. Since
1975 he has been a full-time activist with the
Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad
(KSSP). Dr. Parameswaran also currently serves as
the Vice-Chair of the Bharat Gyan Vigyan Samiti (BGVS)
and as the Chair of the Total Health and Sanitation
Mission, Kerala.
The
Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad
(which literally means the Science Writers' Forum of
Kerala) has earned wide acclaim for activities
related to generating environmental consciousness,
literacy campaigns, and decentralized, micro-level
planning. The KSSP is a recipient of the Right
Livelihood Award (dubbed the alternate Nobel Prize)
in 1996, the UNESCO Literacy Award (King Sejong
Prize) in 1990, the UNEP's Global 500, and the
Vriksha Mitra award.—IndiaTogether
M. P.
Parameswaran is an
Indian
nuclear engineer and eminent science
contributor. He is an atomic scientist and
educationist of India. He played an important role
in Indian Nuclear program. He was born on January
18, 1935 in
Kerala. In 1956, he received
Bachelor’s degree in
Engineering from the College of Engineering,
Kerala. He then joined
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
Bombay in 1956 as a scientist and continued
there up to 1975. From 1969 to 1973 he also worked
as the assistant director of the State Institute of
Languages in Kerala, on a deputation from BARC. He
got PhD in
Nuclear Engineering from
Moscow Power Engineering Institute in 1965. . .
.
MP is also a
prolific writer. He has written 29
popular science books in
Malayalam and two in
English. His books give a panoramic view of
science.
Radioactivity, atomic science,
Astronomy,
Mathematics,
political science,
social science,
ecology—these
are some of the varied subjects he has dealt with in
his books. A vision of "A New World—A
New India" guides his thoughts and actions. He was
the recipient of two national awards, one for
science popularisation and another for literacy.
Articles written by him in various
periodicals run to more than 300. He has
received
Government of India awards for Books for
Neoliterates (1962) and Basic and Cultural
Literature (1964). He also received an Award for
Children's Literature in 1982.
He was also an
active member of Communist Party of India (Marxist)
for 33 years, before being expelled for writing an
ideological book 'Fourth World' which envisions a
world based on decentralised democracy and an
economic production that is detached from
consumerism, but the party views it as a rejection
of Marxist principles. In 2007, he also acted in a
Malayalam movie named 'AKG' about the Communist
leader A K Gopalan in which M. P. Parameswaran
donned the role of Kerala's first Chief Minister E M
Sankaran Namboodiripad (EMS).—Wikipedia
* * *
* *
Social ideas of an n-scientist
While suggesting alternatives to globalisation, he
said direct action, both defensive and offensive,
was required and we have to clearly declare it a
war-like situation. "Let us declare a people's war
against sell-out policies, against fundamentalism,
against cultural degradation, against consumerism
and against mafias of all form. This is a war to
save the human species from self-destruction, to
free human beings from animal limitations, to
realise the true human potential," says Dr.
Parameswaran, the spirit behind the formation of the
All India People's Science Network
Dr.
Parameswaran, who has blended Gandhism with Marxism
and his own type of Socialism, has devised new forms
of offensive defence against the aggression by the
so called corporate world, which he calls
``corporate mafia''. He suggests an extensive and
intensive boycott of goods produced by the
trans-national corporations. He preferred developing
smaller technologies for producing quality goods for
all and organising a mega network of consumers and
cooperative societies involving millions of
households.
He suggested
that a massive citizen education programme of more
than one year's duration be envisaged to educate all
about the ill-effects of forced globalisation and
the benefits of local self-reliance. A cultural
offensive to be used against cultural imperialism by
organising scientists, artists and writers. The
natural resources available in various States, he
said, should belong to the people and shall not be
allowed to be sold over to private profiteers.
Luxury, conspicuous and extravagant consumption
should be considered as unethical and anti-social.
It is immoral to have a star or stylish living in a
country with so much of poverty, ill health and
illiteracy, he said.
* * *
* *
A Fourth World outlook
To know the
world does not mean knowing only the word. One has
to learn from interactions with the world. The
literacy campaign was initiated in 1989. At a
discussion in Delhi, where the UNESCO director
general and many important people from the
Government of India were present, it was argued that
it is not possible to mount a campaign for literacy
in India. This is because, elsewhere where there was
such a campaign—Cuba, China , Tanzania, Burma or
Russia—there had also been a major social upheaval.
So a literacy campaign could only succeed either
with or after a social revolution, but not before
it. Since there was no semblance of any revolution
in India, such campaigns could not succeed. Our own
experience has been that on the basis of science we
have been able to mobilize people for campaigns,
ranging from the silent valley movement to lectures
on astronomy. In fact, in 1987 we mobilized tens of
thousands of people for a major science campaign,
the Jan Vigyan Jatha. So we argued that it is not
necessary for literacy to follow social revolution.
Rather, literacy could accelerate social revolution.
They said there was no precedence for that. I said
that anything which is first cannot have precedence.
So, let us try it first.
However the
initial trial should be in a place where it is
easiest to achieve success, viz. Kerala. This is
because in Kerala, the literacy level was higher
than in other places. In addition, the KSSP was a
very large organization with 40,000 members and
units everywhere. It had a lot of credibility, and
the Ernakulam district collector at that time was a
former vice president of the KSSP. He said that he
would be game to such an experiment which would help
make Ernakulam 100% literate. So, we joined forces
and the government of India gave about Rs. 1 crore.
We then had to mobilize about 15,000 volunteers to
educate approximately 170,000 people. These
volunteers conducted saturation propaganda through
face to face discussions, multimedia and street
theater. They visited every household. Ultimately
160,000 people enrolled, and of these, 130,000
became literate. This meant that they could read and
understand around 35 words per minute, write 7 or 8
words per minute without mistakes, and perform
numerical calculations with two digit numbers.
Beyond this, we took each of them on 3-4 visits to
the police station, post office, bus stand,
collector's office etc. Most of the villagers were
afraid to go to these places. So this exercise
helped to increase their confidence level, and
reduce their fear of the bureaucracy.
This
achievement in Ernakulam caught the imagination of
people all over the country. Similar campaigns were
started in Pondicherry (Tamil Nadu), Bijapur
(Karnataka), Midnapore (West Bengal), and Durg
(Madhya Pradesh). The following year, it spread
nationwide.
However, the
term 100% literacy is used figuratively. In reality,
nothing is 100% - about 70-80% of people may be
functionally literate, while the other 20% may be
marginally literate. So anything above 90% should be
known as total literacy and not 100% literacy. But
even that term is a misnomer when expanded to the
rest of India, and should instead be referred to as
a mass literacy campaign.
Nevertheless,
total literacy became a fashion and about 400
districts in India took it up. Every collector and
minister took it up as a prestige issue. The result
is that about 120 million people participated in the
literacy campaign. Of these, about 20% became
totally literate, while the rest could only sign
their name. But even this was a massive process
which required a volunteer force of more than 10
million. Each volunteer committed about 400 hours
per year. During the process, the outlook of the
volunteers changed by discussing with and learning
from groups of people who had enrolled in the
campaign. Many of the learners were more
knowledgeable than the volunteers. The volunteers
knew only the alphabet. So, an interesting
relationship started. As a result, the demand for
primary education shot up since these people wanted
their children to be literate. Initially there was
extreme cynicism, and to break that we needed plenty
of optimism.
This achievement may not be called literacy per se.
Rather it could be referred to as an increased level
of awareness because of the increased demand for
education and active involvement. For instance,
movements like the Nellore anti arrack and the
quarry workers' women's movement developed as a
result of this campaign.
posted 27 November 2011
* * * * *
Fourth World Essays
Afro-America
& The Fourth World
The
Black Middle Class & a Political Party of the Poor (essay)
Dark
Child of the Fourth World
The
Fourth World and the Marxists
The
Fourth World: In the Belly of the Beast
New
Orleans: The American Nightmare
On
the Fourth World: Black Power, Black Panthers,
and White Allies
Why I Support
the Latino Demonstrators
Other Fourth World Essays
African
America –
A Fourth World (Waldron H. Giles)
Dark Child of the Fourth World Reaches Out
(Dennis Leroy Moore)
Fourth World Introduction (M.P. Parameswaran)
Fourth
World: Marxist, Gandhian, Environmentalist
(M.P. Parameswaran)
The Fourth World Multiculturalism (Rose Ure Mezu)
Fourth World Programme
M.P. Parameswaran)
Neo-Liberalism Dictatorship of the Market
M.P. Parameswaran)
The Rise and Fall of the Socialist World
M.P. Parameswaran)
* * *
* *
* * * *
*
 |
The Last Holiday: A Memoir
By Gil Scott Heron
Shortly after we republished The Vulture and The Nigger Factory, Gil started to tell me about The Last Holiday, an account he was writing of a multi-city tour that he ended up doing with Stevie Wonder in late 1980 and early 1981. Originally Bob Marley was meant to be playing the tour that Stevie Wonder had conceived as a way of trying to force legislation to make Martin Luther King's birthday a national holiday. At the time, Marley was dying of cancer, so Gil was asked to do the first six dates. He ended up doing all 41. And Dr King's birthday ended up becoming a national holiday ("The Last Holiday because America can't afford to have another national holiday"), but Gil always felt that Stevie never got the recognition he deserved and that his story needed to be told. The first chapters of this book were given to me in New York when Gil was living in the Chelsea Hotel. Among the pages was a chapter called Deadline that recounts the night they played Oakland, California, 8 December; it was also the night that John Lennon was murdered. Gil uses Lennon's violent end as a brilliant parallel to Dr King's assassination and as a biting commentary on the constraints that sometimes lead to newspapers getting things wrong. —Jamie Byng, Guardian / Gil_reads_"Deadline" (audio) / Gil Scott-Heron
& His Music Gil Scott
Heron Blue Collar
Remember Gil Scott- Heron |
*
* * * *
|
Greenback Planet: How the Dollar Conquered
the World and Threatened Civilization as We Know It
By H. W. Brands
In Greenback Planet, acclaimed historian H. W. Brands charts the dollar's astonishing rise to become the world's principal currency. Telling the story with the verve of a novelist, he recounts key episodes in U.S. monetary history, from the Civil War debate over fiat money (greenbacks) to the recent worldwide financial crisis. Brands explores the dollar's changing relations to gold and silver and to other currencies and cogently explains how America's economic might made the dollar the fundamental standard of value in world finance. He vividly describes the 1869 Black Friday attempt to corner the gold market, banker J. P. Morgan's bailout of the U.S. treasury, the creation of the Federal Reserve, and President Franklin Roosevelt's handling of the bank panic of 1933. Brands shows how lessons learned (and not learned) in the Great Depression have influenced subsequent U.S. monetary policy, and how the dollar's dominance helped transform economies in countries ranging from Germany and Japan after World War II to Russia and China today. He concludes with a sobering dissection of the 2008 world financial debacle, which exposed the power--and the enormous risks--of the dollar's worldwide reign. The Economy |
 |
* *
* * *
|

|
Sex at the Margins
Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry
By Laura María Agustín
This book explodes several myths: that selling sex is completely different from any other kind of work, that migrants who sell sex are passive victims and that the multitude of people out to save them are without self-interest. Laura Agustín makes a passionate case against these stereotypes, arguing that the label 'trafficked' does not accurately describe migrants' lives and that the 'rescue industry' serves to disempower them. Based on extensive research amongst both migrants who sell sex and social helpers, Sex at the Margins provides a radically different analysis. Frequently, says Agustin, migrants make rational choices to travel and work in the sex industry, and although they are treated like a marginalised group they form part of the dynamic global economy. Both powerful and controversial, this book is essential reading for all those who want to understand the increasingly important relationship between sex markets, migration and the desire for social justice. "Sex at the Margins rips apart distinctions between migrants, service work and sexual labour and reveals the utter complexity of the contemporary sex industry. This book is set to be a trailblazer in the study of sexuality."—Lisa Adkins, University of London |
* *
* * *
ChickenBones Store
(Books, DVDs, Music, and more)
update 17 April 2012
|