|
Books by Chinweizu
The West and the Rest of Us
(1975) /
Decolonising the African Mind
(1987) /
Voices from
Twentieth-century Africa (1988)
Invocations and
Admonitions (1986);
Energy Crisis and Other Poems
(1978);
Anatomy of Female Power
(1990)
Towards the Decolonization of
African Literature (1980)
* *
* * *
Nigeria and White
Supremacy
A Letter in Response to
"Nigeria A Failed State in
the Making?"
By Chinweizu
|
My impression in
reading Chinweizu is that Nigeria, despite
its oil wealth, is not a model African state
because of "white supremacy." I derive this
impression or conclusion from this Chinweizu
statement:
"White power
controls Black Africa today through country
presidents, generals, company directors and
Board chairmen who are all black. White
supremacy, as a matter of historical record,
does not disappear with the emergence of
even a complete phalanx of black office
holders. For example, Nigeria is under the
thumb of white supremacy, though it has been
ruled for some 50 years by black Heads of
State, all-black legislatures, all-black
armies, etc." (Chinweizu, Commentary in "The
Death of White Supremacy?")
From Emmanuel Franklyne Ogbunwezeh we get
an entirely different perspective on
Nigeria. He concludes in his
Nigeria A Failed
State in the Making? that the
Nigerian governments and its officials,
especially, and its "populaces" are the
causes of the lack of support for general
free education and other deteriorating
aspects in Nigeria, rather than "white
supremacy."
Emmanuel Franklyne
Ogbunwezeh allows that there probably should
have never been a Nigeria. He says, “The
country Nigeria was an imposition. . . . our
constitution was an imposition.” Ogbunwezeh
points out, “Just like in Animal Farm,
we exchanged our slavery to British official
whims to the capricious and monumental
indiscretions of Nigerian politicians. This
exchange created a crop of home-grown
colonial Lords, who exploit the people like
their former Lords did.”
That is to say,
Ogbunwezeh does not allow Nigerians to
escape their responsibilities for the
present state of their conditions: “The
home-grown masters have now new masters:
namely their inordinate greed. They shipped
their loot to Switzerland; housing it in
numbered accounts. The rape of the country
assumed the same trajectory in both epochs.
Our local pirates in some space of four
decades succeeded in out-performing the
colonial masters in greed, thievery and
plunder of our commonweal.”—Rudy |
Rudy,
Like Neely Fuller,
Jr. said, "If you don't understand white supremacy—what
it is, and how it works—everything else that you
understand will only confuse you."
The picture painted
by Franklyn,
though illuminating as far as it goes, does not go far
enough. It is like a picture of a train that leaves out
the engine. To complete the picture we need to add the
role of the white supremacy institutions of the new
imperialism in initiating and maintaining the disaster
that is Nigeria.
If we understood
the devious ways of white supremacy, in this stage of
what Nkrumah called "Neo-colonialism", we would see that
my account and Franklyn's are not contradictory or
alternative accounts, but are complementary. Franklyn
describes the body of the snake, I pointed at its head
)albeit in passing, in the context of our discussion of
white supremacy). The combined and fuller picture allows
us to see how the mess in Nigeria serves a white
supremacy which manipulates Nigeria through institutions
like the IMF, the World Bank, the UN agencies, The
(British) Commonwealth, which link Nigeria to the global
system of white supremacy.
Nigeria, like other
black African countries, has been misruled by local
Black Comprador Colonialists whose paramount interest is
to preserve the subordination of their countries to the
imperialist interests of their "former" colonial
masters. It is that subordination that permits them to
loot their own people for their imperialist masters, and
allows them, as the junior partners and agents of
imperialism, to keep a share of the loot, which is their
own consuming interest.
Of course, to that
end they have frustrated, in their own local interests,
any attempt to develop an autonomous polity that is
answerable to its own people, that responds to the
will/desires of its own people. A Nigerian polity that
responds to its own people would have less to hand over
to the imperialist masters, and would come under
imperialist pressure and attacks. A current example is
Mugabe's Zimbabwe. For so long as Mugabe did not try to
take back the land stolen by the whites, he was okay.
But when he began to respond to his people's land
hunger, he became a pariah and came under sanctions and
destabilization from the white supremacist powers like
the UK, the USA and the EU.
In contrast,
Nigeria, under Obasanjo, handed to the foreign creditors
a whopping $12bn to allegedly get Nigeria debt-free
(which it did not) while leaving Nigeria with badly
decayed roads, power supply, education, etc. that still
need massive capital injection to refurbish them.
Needless to say, the debt-free mirage was just a scam.
Nigeria is still not debt free and still goes aborrowing.
But since Obasanjo
was a loyal servant to the white imperialist powers, he
had a free hand to rig elections, sack villages that
contested his misrule (e.g., Odi in the Niger Delta was
sacked by Obasanjo's soldiers), and to loot to his
greed's content. By the way, the bulk of the loot from
what is misnamed "corruption" gets stashed away in the
banks of Europe and America, thus adding to the total
plunder that the imperialists extract. In that way, even
the much decried corruption of the Nigerian elite ends
up serving the white powers. It also bribes the Black
compradors with part of the imperialist loot so they
don’t buck the system.
We need to keep
this fuller picture in view if we are to understand the
so-called "failed state" of Nigeria. Nigeria, from the
viewpoint of its population, is a failed state, has
always been a failed state, i.e., a state that has
failed to serve them or address their interests. And it
has been that way right from its founding by the British
a century ago. But it is not yet a failed state from the
standpoint of its British and other imperialist masters.
It has always served the white power interest, and
consistently, at the expense of the interests of its
population, during both the period of White Expatriate
colonialism which ended in 1960, and the period of Black
Comprador colonialism that began in 1960. We need to be
ever mindful of these two senses of the phrase “failed
state”.
Incidentally, though Nigeria is financially in a
position to give free education to all its
citizens—let’s leave aside the matter of the damaging
white supremacist content of that education—part of why
it does not do so is that much of its resources is
pumped abroad to the coffers of the white supremacists
through "debt" repayments and the routine looting by the
foreign companies and their Nigerian comprador agents.
If Obasanjo had chosen to apply to Nigeria's needs the
$12bn he eagerly handed over to the white shylocks,
there would be more than enough funds for the free
education Franklyn is talking about, and for much else.
Nigeria could
become like Kuwait, Dubai etc., or even like Cuba, if it
organized to use its oil earnings in the interest of its
population. But for 50 years, the Black comprador
colonialists have not seen fit to organize that. With
their Eurocentric education and blancophile brainwashing
and their mental allegiance to White supremacy, they
have fallen for every conman advice that the white
supremacists gave them on "development", especially
through the IMF and the World Bank and the foreign aid
outfits like Britain's ODA and America's USAID.
The ways of white
supremacy are comprehensively devious. In fact one of
its uses for the "independence" imperialism granted its
colonies was to enable it to deny responsibility for
what its Black comprador agents do to their own people,
even though it is all part of what they are prompted and
encouraged to do for the continuing imperialist plunder
of these "ex-colonies". These black misgovernments are
serving as monkey's paws and fall guys for the
plundering of Black Africa by and for the white powers.
Like the Black
Slavers in the era of the Chattelization Wars, a.k.a.
the Slave Trade, and like the plantation overseers and
house niggers of ante-bellum USA, the Black colonialists
of today operate within the framework and mandate given
them by white supremacy, but they add their own peculiar
twists to the master's mandate. The executive anarchism
of the Nigerian comprador elite just happens to be,
perhaps, the most abominable of these local twists to
the basic mandate given by white supremacy to its
local black agents.
We all need to
continually deepen and update our understanding of white
supremacy and its manifold and morphing ways if we are
to see its dominant and directing roles in our
condition. We also need to understand the roles of its
black colonialist agents among us, and their own special
contributions to the mess. If you want more insights
into the Nigerian case, I can send you "Black
Colonialists"—an interview I did two years ago on the
roots of the trouble with Nigeria. You could also read
The West and the Rest of Us,
for insights on the ways and means of white supremacy
especially during the post WWII transition to Black
colonialism in Africa.
* *
* * *
Responses
Nigeria: White Supremacy, Criminal or Traitorous
Behavior
Chinweizu, the
criminal and corrupting behavior of African heads of
state, I suspect, existed long before there was the
British, the French, or the Americans. This point was
made by the Malian writer Yambo
Ouologuem in his novel
Bound to
Violence and in his 1971 interview in
Commonweal. Yambo said,
"It was the black aristocrat who made black people
become Negroes. If you look at the entire history, you
find there were three stages of oppression: blacks
oppressing blacks, Arabs oppressing blacks, and whites
oppressing blacks" (Yambo
Ouologuem). So we have come full circle. Now we have
again "blacks oppressing blacks."
There has always
been a "global" struggle for resources and power. Indeed
that struggle has "morphed" in magnitude and character.
And there probably has always been enticements from
foreign powers. But because there are external
enticements (say from the West), there is no reason to
conclude that the enticing power (say USA or France or
UK or white global corporations like oil companies) or
the powers that lend some sort of assistance in a
nation's reign (say China's recent sale of tanks to the
Khartoum government) that we can conclude that that
nation (say Nigeria or Sudan or South Africa) is a mere
puppet of foreign influence (the agents of "white
supremacy").
Nigerian (or South
African or Sudanese) leaders made political decisions—without
an American gun at their heads, or a French tank on the
lawn of government house, or UK threats of invasions—about
Nigeria (or South Africa or Sudan), its people, its
economies, its internal development. We (Nigeria or
South Africa or blacks leaders in the diaspora) will
never have a situation in which there will be no foreign
power that will not provide enticements as well as
threats. The onus of the national oppression problem
settles on black leaders and heads of state, not on the
heads of foreign states or the heads of global
corporations.
If you want to call
the present black national oppression,
"neo-colonialism," okay. But do not make a fool of us
and common sense and say that this neo-colonialism was
instituted and is sustained by "white supremacy" and
there is nothing these leaders can do about it. If you
insist on doing so, you must offer much more evidence of
this "Black Comprador" relationship in which black
leaders are being compelled to oppress and murder their
own people and that they are receiving direct payments
from Western corporations and Western states to do so.
As you have pointed
out with regard to the Khartoum government, it is not so
much that they are subject to the foreign powers who
sustain "Arab Supremacy," that is, that they are not
puppets of Saudi Arabia or Egypt or Syria, but rather
that their heads are filled with Islamic political
ideology that they are willing to slaughter and displace
their own citizens because of native greed. If you are
suggesting that the heads of states for Nigeria and
South Africa are operating in such a was as they are in
oppressing their native populations because their heads
are filled with foreign ideologies and greed, I might
agree. But that indeed is a far cry from saying that
Nigeria and South Africa are the puppets of "white
supremacy."
Chinweizu, your
view of "white supremacy" as the primary culprit
in
Nigeria or South Africa's present difficulties is
essentially different from that of
Emmanuel Franklyne Ogbunwezeh, who says,
“The home-grown masters
have now new masters: namely their inordinate
greed. They shipped their loot to Switzerland;
housing it in numbered accounts. The rape of the country
assumed the same trajectory in both epochs. Our local
pirates in some space of four decades succeeded in
out-performing the colonial masters in greed, thievery
and plunder of our commonweal” (my italics).
That is, you place your
emphasis on external influence and puppetry (rather than
traitorous behavior), whereas
Ogbunwezeh places his emphasis on a problem of internal
governance and national or individual character (that
is, criminality). If you eliminate such individuals
whose emphasis is greed for money and power, he implies,
Nigeria and South Africa and others such black states
have a greater possibility of building up individuals
who dwell on the true and good and thus the likelihood
of developing model states. The political problem is not
across the ocean but much closer to home.—Rudy
* *
* * *
Pre-Obama White Supremacy
I have Pre-Obama
thoughts about "white supremacy". I have been thinking
about this phrase "white supremacy" for a long time,
especially every time you, Rudy, have brought it up again
and again to prove your several points about it. Almost
three years ago, your arguments suggested that you
believed it existed in large measure. Lately, you seem
to be arguing from the point of greater responsibility
among Blacks, as if White Supremacy is not monolithic.
Then I noticed that I tended to agree with both the new
you and with Chinweizu, which really made no sense to
me. How could both of you be correct, I thought?
But then, lately, as I have tried to imagine a pre- and
a post-Obama America, I have come to this conclusion:
Even where and when only one of us in America or the
world is confused about White Supremacy's existence,
that confusion suggests that White Supremacy's hegemony
over us is, indeed, in our cognitive struggles. The
thing about this white supremacy is that even if it were
never again practiced—if white America did nothing to
racialize us ever again—it would not cease to exist. Its
greatest control over us is in making us think that it
does not exist in any degree any longer.
Here is my best example of why I believe it does exist
in a palpable way and does hold sway over our cognitive
activity. Remember—my example does not assume that
there is a Barack Hussein Obama on the horizon. If Obama
becomes our next President and proves to be what we hope
he will be for all America, then my example may no
longer make sense (for me at least).
So here's my pre-Obama thinking about white supremacy:
It does not matter one iota which party is in the White
House. And it does not matter which Ray Nagin or Tavis
Smiley or Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton or Mark Morial or
black police chief or black school board superintendent
is in position. No, it especially does not matter which
party is in the White House! When the Democrats or the
Republicans lose the White House, the outgoing party—all
the aides and staff people, and some Congress
administrators and members—spreads out into the Greater
Washington, D.C., or into home states, and assumes
lucrative appointments.
They simply await
their turn to return. Nothing transformative emerges.
And then the next party gets in, and the outgoing folks
take up their appointments in the land and await their
turn to return. Nothing transformative emerges. The two
parties simply swap positions, dust off the chairs, and
assume business as usual in this land of free-market
politics.
And Black on Black crime in America and Africa continues
to increase. You can not convince me that down in our
counties and cities and states, and among the tribal and
sectarian divisions of Africa, that we cannot halt crime
on this planet. I am convinced that Supremacy does not
want to stop it, because it's the best way to rid the
planet of unwanted peoples—just let them kill one
another. Let them die on dope and sadness and religious
slogans.
It is because the face of White Supremacy is sometimes
also black that we think that White Supremacy is
diminishing and that we are our own responsibility. But
it's the same lesson being perpetrated over and over
again! We argue about its existence while it exists. We
commit crimes against one another while it exists. We
are still as a nation and as an African continent on
lesson one. Supremacy was our first teacher in the New
World and all we are doing is mimicking our First
Teacher.—Mackie
* *
* * *
Two Aspects of
White Supremacy: Practice and Cognitive
My changed view on
"white supremacy" surfaced in 2008 after Iowa voted for
Barack Obama. So it is a recent thinking. It's an inward
questioning that is going on. In some sense in these
correspondences and editorials, I’m thinking out loud.
I expected that in Iowa Obama would come in at best in
third. He came in first. It shocked me and many other
Americans—black and white. I concluded that white people
I had in my head did not correspond to actual white
people in America, at least not to all of them. This vote suggested that no position
in America existed that a black person could not occupy.
In short, that Jim Crow politics and any extension of it
were dead in America.
Your view of “white
supremacy” is most serious and thoughtful, especially
since it is not wholly and entirely political as was the
case with my previous discussions in the pieces Nigeria and White
Supremacy and
The Death of White Supremacy? Yours is a far more
nuanced perspective. That’s the path, I think, we should
take by necessity if we are to be fair and balanced in
talking to ourselves and talking to white people about
"white supremacy."
For one of the
truisms of Obama's rhetoric, I believe, is that we
Americans (black and white) are more alike than
different and that white Americans are more accepting of
black Americans than we think. The former hostilities
and hatreds and prejudices are declining rapidly,
especially among the younger generations, who have had
no experience of Jim Crow or no sense what it was really
like, as we of our generation have no real sense of the
antebellum slave world of the Southern states, except
through literature.
You have broken
"white supremacy" up into two aspects 1) as practiced
and 2) as cognition. In some sense I can testify to both
aspects. The first relates to the palpable easily
perceivable racial exclusion whose basis is the
inferiority of the Negro; in short, that the Negro is
another species of being who should not be granted the
same rights and privileges of citizenship as whites. I
was raised in this segregated world and observed and
experienced it in separate educational facilities and
in transportation on buses between southern Virginia and
Baltimore. I had little or no contact with whites except
in public places, at stores or in the fields of work.
Jim Crow politics
laid the ground and conditioned my adulthood. It only
began to change as I was making my way to college with
the federal passage of the 1964 and 1965 racial
integration laws. Probably by the 1980s they were more
or less fully in force. But my Jim Crow conditioning was
not fully wiped away. As Dick Gregory pointed out
recently, he hears a police siren behind him and he
holds the steering wheel tighter and when the police car
passes him by he thanks God. I do not think that black
kids today have the racial fears that their grandfathers
have or had. So in some sense I see this as the
cognitive aspects to which you refer.
That is, that
"white supremacy" exists in our minds and hearts because
of its former palpable existence in our lives and that
our recognition of it was a means of survival. Possibly
older whites retain some of this white skin privileging
and wish for its return. But for many blacks every act
or symbolical aspect of racism reminds us of its former
sway and the possibility of its resurfacing with its
former sway. One might compare this mental state to
those Jews who survived the reign of Hitler or their
descendants and that any or the slightest hint of anti-semitism
unsettles, whether that person is a practicing Jew or
whether he or she has only a Jewish grandmother.
Now for the second
part. I suppose indeed that "white supremacy" can have a
black face if that means that a black person can assert
racist opinions with respect to blacks and commit racist
acts against blacks. But these are insignificant
vestiges or shadows of that which was a state of white
supremacy. There were such persons as Anglo-Africans,
but often these persons were also black nationalists and
Pan Africanists, such as Alexander Crummell, the mentor
of W.E.B. Du Bois, who thought that English should be
the language that all Africans should adopt and who
thought as well very little of African languages. Of
course, he did not view blacks as inferior, which I
think one must assert as the key aspect of white
supremacy.
Have we eliminated
every vestige of racism in our society? No. Will racists
with white supremacy views continue to exist? Yes. Are
there sick white people who receive pleasure from black
deaths and suffering? Possibly.
The world we grew
up in has changed, Mackie. We are far beyond the world
of our childhood. Many more opportunities exist now for
blacks and their children. The world is changing quickly
for better and worse, but not necessarily in the old
categories of the past. Admittedly, race and ethnic
distinctions will for sometime yet be used in economic
exploitation and for political positioning. They have
some impact in our justice and educational systems which
remain in great need of reform.
But many of these
problems are the result of economic policies that have
been signed onto ignorantly or thoughtlessly by both
blacks and whites, for more selfish economic reasons
than for racial reasons, though these policies may have
an anti-black impact. For instance, there are too
many Americans working more than 60 hours a week for
less than $10 an hour. Deregulation of the economy and
anti-union practices have had an impact on the expansion
of the criminal justice system as well as deleterious
impact on the education system, and have had a greater
impact on blacks than whites, for blacks started farther
down the ladder of success because of past racial
crimes.
In turn, blacks
have to adapt at a quicker rate to cultural,
economic and political changes. As presently organized,
American society, less tolerant, provides fewer chances
for catching up. This new state of things requires more
restraint, more focus, more discipline, more
discretion. These internal changes cannot be organized
on the basis of racial pride. There might indeed be too
much racial pride, especially of the warped kind.
Immigrants are coming into the country and on the basis
of character they are out achieving our young men and
women.
These positive acts
of awareness and social consciousness by politicians,
religious, social and business leaders, I think,
combined with a friendlier economy of corporate
regulation for the working man will cut into those
markings and statistics that ideologues brandish as
emblematic of the existence of white supremacy.—Rudy
* *
* * *
Dear Rudy,
What you are ignoring is the fact
that 90% of Black people in any Western culture are also
"White Supremacist".You can't be Culturally British or
Culturally French or Culturally American without being
"White Supremacist".In Africa, as well, a very large
portion of the most Colonized areas are made up of
people who have a "Quasi White Supremacist" mentality.
The fact that they still have their own languages,
traditions, names, etc. is what keeps them from being
totally WS, but they are still carriers.
The description you gave of Blacks
and our "self-undoing" is true, but then so is
Chinweizu's argument.
Otherwise, why would 90% of black
women wear processed hair? Why would 90% of black men
desire Mulatto women and consider them black? Why do we
accept the idea that Mulatto OBAMA is to be the "first
Black President" when in fact he's the first "Biracial"
President? We accept all of this, because we,
too, harbor White Supremacist belief systems. You can't
have a SEXIST society, Rudy, unless the Mothers of the
boy children are also predominately sexist.
You can't have a EUROCENTRIC
society unless most of the people in it adhere to
Eurocentrism.
How many Black men in America dress
in African garb every day, Rudy? How many Black men in
America have endeavored to speak an African language in
their daily lives? No, to be culturally American, is
White Supremacy itself.
Who is featured in the Black man's
music videos, Rudy? The white man's mother (or an
imitation of her).—Kola
* *
* * *
Kola, I love you too much to argue
with you.
But let me say this. All the instances of incongruence
you point out are in some ways humorous and point out
contradictions in the racialized life of the modern as
well as the post-modern world, and attempts to reconcile
them. They are one might say hangovers passed down from
an experience of white supremacy. Or they are the result
of nonwhites living in a society in which the majority
of the population is of European extraction. Most of the
acts you have chosen to highlight are choices rather
than impositions. Some of them I do not care for but I
find most tolerable or desirable.
I am culturally an American. And I in no way consider
the popular culture "white," neither in its music, its
dance, its speech, in contemporary art, in body
language, its food, its literature, even in its dress.
The cultures of the world have come to this land and
found a place. American culture is, what they say in New
Orleans, a gumbo, very unique and very global.—Rudy
* *
* * *
Rudy, I love you, too, King.
Feel free to argue
with me anytime, because I respect your opinion so much.
You and Chinweizu are my Lion Kings. Also feel free to
curse me out. If people could actually see my movements,
facial expressions and tone of voice when I say things
they find "volcanic"---they would see that I am a
comical, loving wise-talking black mother. Not the
serious bitch they envision. I am always prepared to
change my mind, but no one ever tries to change it.
They fear me. Which is ridiculous. My thing is this—I
love my people. You are one of my favorite ones.
On another note:
Rudy, I still have not gotten the book deal that my
agent expected,therefore, I am not able to send you the
money I had planned just yet. Hold tight, however,
because it will happen.—Kola
* *
* * *
Blame-mongering vs. Factor-analysis
First of all, let me make it clear that I am not
interested in "blame". I am a scientist, my interest is
in investigating the factors relevant to a phenomenon,
not in assigning blame. I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND THE
DIFFERENCE!!! Blame mongering is for moralizers; factor
analysis is for problem solvers."—Chinweizu
* *
* * *
Chinweizu, Is "white supremacy" some unembodied
phenomena unattached to persons that one studies like
one studies say AIDS? The social sciences are among the
weakest and most inexact of sciences and some might say
that it is not science at all, except when statistics
are used. In any case, all science must in some way deal
with morality and ethics, especially when one is dealing
with human behavior.
I did not note any factor analysis in your expositions.
What stood out was racial ideology."—Rudy
* *
* * *
Rudy, I suspect Chinweizu thinks that your goal or end
in everything you write is to establish blame. I think
he believes that that is your conclusion and not one of
your several premises leading up to a more significant
facor. So you need to clear that up. Of course, one way
to clear all of this up is for all of us to keep reading
Chinweizu and you. So, for me, you do not need to
withdraw your own personal take on Chinweizu's
scholarship.
I am sure—well,
certainly, I hope—that
when Chinweizu calms down and thinks about it, he'll
reason that while scholars can have no hold, outside of
the classroom, over how readers process, experience,
interpret, read their scholarship. Chinwezu calls his
work factor analysis. Rudy suggests—for him as a
reader—that
Chinwezu's work is blame analysis, and Rudy does not
mean this negatively.
Failure analysis might be a better term, because the way
factor analysis is used in the The West and the Rest
scholarship—whether
the term is mentioned in the scholarship to hand or not,
these texts concentrate on the failure of the West
against Islam.
There is a whole slew of The West and the Rest texts in
print. Here are just two Google lists.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+West+and+the+Rest&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+West+and+the+Rest+of+Us&btnG=Google+Search
Chinweizu's work is, indeed, a comprehensive example of
factor analysis. Whether implemented in the physical or
mathematical or psychological or sociological sciences,
factor analysis reduces the plethora of variables under
observation and discussion by grouping and then
analyzing these variables down to the most overarching
category or factor. What Chinweizu has published on this
web site certainly amounts to being very excellent
examples of factor analysis in the social sciences,
particularly on the clash of civilizations between the
West and the Rest.
This West and the Rest scholarship—not
necessarily Chinweizu's, I hasten to add—is
usually framed as The West and the Rest Against Us. The
rest here are the Arab or Islamic lands. Roger Scruton's
work falls into this frame:
ROGER SCRUTON
http://www.morec.com/scruton/ [VIDEO LECTURE]
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-scruton092302.asp
Chinweizu's scholarship, I believe, analyzes the
pre-colonial, colonial, and post-colonial criminality of
Africans against their own people and sets this
criminality up side by side with that of the West in
equal weight and measure. He points out the failure in
both our houses. He does not blame. He shows where and
how we have all failed. That said, if readers wishes to
use this scholarship to place blame where blame may need
to be placed, these readers need to reveal what end they
have in mind. We already know that the goal or end of
most of the The West and Rest scholars is to privilege
Christianity over Islam, the West over the Rest.
I would also suggest that Chinweizu could be more
forthcoming and reveal his underlying end in his
scholarship. What motivates him to do this scholarship
and not some other kind? What end does he want to
accomplish? Surely, his aim is not only "objective
scientific scholarship." We have known far too long now
that such a motivation driving our scholarship is a
myth. Everything has subconscious as well as conscious
slant.
A BUDDHIST ANALYSIS OF FAILURE (BLAME/FACTOR) ANALYSIS
http://www.bpf.org/tsangha/loy-westrest.html
—Mackie
The West and the Rest of Us: White Predators, Black
Slavers and the African Elite
By Chinweizu
* * *
* *
* * * * *
|
The New Jim Crow
Mass Incarceration in the Age of
Colorblindness
By Michele Alexander
Contrary to the
rosy picture of race embodied in Barack
Obama's political success and Oprah
Winfrey's financial success, legal
scholar Alexander argues vigorously and
persuasively that [w]e have not ended
racial caste in America; we have merely
redesigned it. Jim Crow and legal racial
segregation has been replaced by mass
incarceration as a system of social
control (More African Americans are
under correctional control today... than
were enslaved in 1850). Alexander
reviews American racial history from the
colonies to the Clinton administration,
delineating its transformation into the
war on drugs. She offers an acute
analysis of the effect of this mass
incarceration upon former inmates who
will be discriminated against, legally,
for the rest of their lives, denied
employment, housing, education, and
public benefits. Most provocatively, she
reveals how both the move toward
colorblindness and affirmative action
may blur our vision of injustice: most
Americans know and don't know the truth
about mass incarceration—but her
carefully researched, deeply engaging,
and thoroughly readable book should
change that.—Publishers
Weekly |
 |
* *
* * *
 |
Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in
America
By Melissa V.
Harris-Perry
According to the
author, this society has historically exerted
considerable pressure on black females to fit into one
of a handful of stereotypes, primarily, the Mammy, the
Matriarch or the Jezebel. The selfless
Mammy’s behavior is marked by a slavish devotion to
white folks’ domestic concerns, often at the expense of
those of her own family’s needs. By contrast, the
relatively-hedonistic Jezebel is a sexually-insatiable
temptress. And the Matriarch is generally thought of as
an emasculating figure who denigrates black men, ala the
characters Sapphire and Aunt Esther on the television
shows Amos and Andy and Sanford and Son, respectively.
Professor Perry
points out how the propagation of these harmful myths
have served the mainstream culture well. For instance,
the Mammy suggests that it is almost second nature for
black females to feel a maternal instinct towards
Caucasian babies.
As for the source
of the Jezebel, black women had no control over their
own bodies during slavery given that they were being
auctioned off and bred to maximize profits. Nonetheless,
it was in the interest of plantation owners to propagate
the lie that sisters were sluts inclined to mate
indiscriminately.
|
* *
* * *
|
The Persistence of the Color Line
Racial Politics and the Obama Presidency
By Randall Kennedy
Among the best things about
The Persistence of the Color Line
is watching Mr. Kennedy hash through the
positions about Mr. Obama staked out by
black commentators on the left and
right, from Stanley Crouch and Cornel
West to Juan Williams and Tavis Smiley.
He can be pointed. Noting the way Mr.
Smiley consistently “voiced skepticism
regarding whether blacks should back
Obama” . . .
The
finest chapter in
The Persistence of the Color Line
is so resonant, and so personal, it
could nearly be the basis for a book of
its own. That chapter is titled
“Reverend Wright and My Father:
Reflections on Blacks and Patriotism.”
Recalling some of the criticisms of
America’s past made by Mr. Obama’s
former pastor, Mr. Kennedy writes with
feeling about his own father, who put
each of his three of his children
through Princeton but who “never forgave
American society for its racist
mistreatment of him and those whom he
most loved.” His father distrusted
the police, who had frequently called
him “boy,” and rejected patriotism. Mr.
Kennedy’s father “relished Muhammad
Ali’s quip that the Vietcong had never
called him ‘nigger.’ ” The author places
his father, and Mr. Wright, in
sympathetic historical light. |
 |
* * * * *
The White Masters of the
World
From
The World and Africa, 1965
By W. E. B. Du Bois
W. E. B. Du Bois’
Arraignment and Indictment of White Civilization
(Fletcher)
* *
* * *
Ancient African Nations
* * * * *
If you like this page consider making a donation
* * * * *
Negro Digest /
Black World
Browse all issues
1950
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
____ 2005
Enjoy!
* * * * *
The Death of Emmett Till by Bob Dylan
/
The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll
/
Only a Pawn in Their Game
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson Thanks America for
Slavery /
George Jackson /
Hurricane Carter
* *
* * *
The Journal of Negro History issues at Project Gutenberg
The
Haitian Declaration of Independence 1804
/
January 1, 1804 -- The Founding of
Haiti
* * * * *
* *
* * *
ChickenBones Store
(Books, DVDs, Music, and more)
posted 5 March 2008
|