ChickenBones: A Journal

for Literary & Artistic African-American Themes

   

Home  Visit Our Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)

Google
 

 Today Black America needs political figures that are similarly mindful of the imperfect

constituency that they represent. Advancing a solely black agenda will ultimately advance no agenda

 

 

 Barack Obama: Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. (Crown 2007)

Barack Obama: The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream. Random House/ Hardcover, 608 pages $27.95

*   *   *   *   *

Of Obama and Oakland

By Keenan Norris

Glen Ford's article, published in ChickenBones and also available at Black Agenda Report, regarding Barack Obama's visit to the Edmund Pettis Bridge in Selma, Alabama is indicative of the largely negative stance taken by hard-line black liberals in regard to Mr. Obama's presidential campaign. Ford suggests that Obama is a politician, first and foremost, principally concerned with acquiring power; and that Obama only promotes an agenda that speaks to black people's needs when it is politically advantageous to him. Thus, depending on whether Obama is speaking in Selma, Alabama or in Palm Springs, California, the man is liable to profess far different political agendas; consequently, he is no more trustworthy for blacks (or, to follow this logical line, for any other group of people) than his white rivals on the campaign trail.

As a California black, where people of my race represent only about six to seven percent of the statewide population and where blacks rank as the third-largest minority group, it has long been clear to me that despite our urgent and specific needs as a race, black people cannot successfully advocate for more equitable public school funding or legislation against environmental racism or any of our other myriad needs without joining the relevant mainstream political debate. To require that a black candidate for president or any other national office adhere to a specifically black agenda makes little sense in a country where blacks make up only about thirteen to fifteen percent of the overall population. Any black politician making a serious attempt at the presidency should advocate for black issues up to but not beyond the point that those issues conflict with the wants and needs of the rest of his constituency, white, Asian, Latino, etc. The candidate should be honest with black people and explain that because his constituency is racially various, where the specific demands of any one group supersede the demands of the majority of his constituency he must, of necessity, side with the majority. The invisible hand of institutionalized racism would not guide such a sea change, but the quite visible and imminently understandable hand that tallies votes and weighs imperfect options.

Abraham Lincoln skillfully reconciled his racist white Northern constituency with a radical minority of abolitionists and created out of that uneasy pairing the most significant legislation in U.S. history; not only the Emancipation Proclamation, but the legislative underpinning of Reconstruction. Dr. King managed to balance the radicalism of SNCC and the gestating Black Power Movement with cautious, moderate white liberals like John F. Kennedy and held together a movement that was, despite its failures, one of the most extensive social justice movements in history.

Today Black America needs political figures that are similarly mindful of the imperfect constituency that they represent. Advancing a solely black agenda will ultimately advance no agenda. In South Central Los Angeles and Houston, Texas, Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee represent predominantly Latino districts. Their support for the rights of immigrant laborers, which, in truth, often-times do not coalesce with but contradict the needs of working-class black people, is the kind of issue for which less-loved black politicians are so often taken to task. But the reality of political life outside of black cities like Baltimore, Detroit, and Gary and in the nation itself is that blacks represent not a numerical majority but a dependent minority. We must, therefore, argue not from a position of self-defeating weakness that masquerades as power, but from a position of relative and shifting strength.

To take the immigration issue, for instance: instead of defending our dead-end working-class jobs from Mexican immigrants, we need to unite with people of other races that share our under-served neighborhoods and advocate for an education system that makes its primary goal not social promotion or ethnically-identified coursework but math, computer, and multi-language skills that are relevant to the white-collar work force. In addition, we need to identify those unionized working class jobs that still pay well and make a concerted effort, through extra-educational means, to dominate those professions.

*   *   *   *   *

Barack Obama came to Oakland recently. The event was free, a kind of festival, really; the crowd was vast, disorganized, constituted primarily of people under thirty; the mood was casual, police and security not in evidence.

Oakland. The home of the most principled legislator in either the Congress or the Senate, Barbara Lee; the home of the old Congressman and new Mayor Ron V. Dellums. Oakland: today the most Californian of all California's cities. Without anything close to a majority population (blacks are the majority-minority representing somewhere between 30-35% of the population), Oakland possesses significant minorities of Mexicans, El Salvadorans, East and Southeast Asians, Tongans, Samoans, Arabs and European-descended people. The crowd at the City Center was either primarily white or primarily black. I couldn't tell which.

In his speech, Obama made self-congratulatory reference to legislation he wrote and helped pass in Chicago requiring police interrogations to be videotaped (a popular selling point in the historical home of the Black Panthers). He also came back several times to his steadfast opposition to the war in Iraq, which dates back to its original declaration, when support for the U.S. invasion was widespread. Obama was not lying and to charges that he is attempting to be all things to all people and in the process selling out black America, it should be noted that Obama is on record predicting that an invasion of Iraq would result in a "dumb" war in 2002 and 2003. This is hardly a moot point for black people when one considers that we make up one-quarter of U.S. military personnel and are thus over-represented two-to-one in view of our population percentage (12-13%) within the nation. Obama has written legislation proposing the swift withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Other of his claims, such as the institution of a universal healthcare system by the end of his first term in office, are not exactly irrelevant to the quality of black lives.

The fact that none of these issues are solely black issues and that none of these issues is exclusive of the needs of the white majority is, of course, smart campaigning. Obama's campaign is a practical one and he will, apparently, be the first non-white candidate to make a truly serious run at the presidency. The inclusive nature of his platform is also the reason that he has so many detractors among hard-line black liberals. There is a strain of always-oppositional, anti-establishment black intellectual thought present in the internet media, academia, and grassroots political organizing that is fine so far as it goes but that needs to be left on message boards, in lecture halls, and at neighborhood rallies. All politics is not local. If we, as black people, want a real share of fortunes in the political, professional, and academic world that extends beyond our neighborhoods and self-perpetuating ghettoes, we need to embrace a way of being in the world that does not wed itself to unrealistic demands, that is smart-minded, inclusive even of opposing forces and which is focused finally on our long-term goals for equity, access, and power.

I have no idea what will become of Mr. Obama's presidential campaign, and, personally, I feel Mrs. Clinton would probably make as good, if not a better nominee for the Democrats. But I want us as black people to recognize militancy for what it is, a local strategy, and to learn how to represent our interests in a practical manner in the wider world.

*   *   *   *   *

Keenan Norris works as an adjunct community college professor in the Bay Area and is pursuing his Ph.D. at UC Riverside. His work has been published in the Santa Monica, Evansville and Green Mountains Reviews, as well as internet entities Rhapsoidia and ChickenBones. He was a contributing author to Inlandia: A Journey Through the Literature of California's Inland Empire.

posted 31 March 2007

 

 

 

 

 

updated 22 October 2007 / 13 January 2008

 

 

Home  Obama 2008 Table  Religion & Politics

Related files:  Coal, Charcoal, and Chocolate Comedy  fresno gone     Freedom Vision