|
Oprah's Good
Intentions
By Rev. Irene Monroe
The Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy
for Girls in Henley-on-Klip, just 25 miles south of
Johannesburg, opened on January 2 . Zeroing in on the
country's substandard educational system, Oprah's
academy is one huge step toward remediation.
But Oprah's generous gift has received condemnation at
home and abroad, questioning her philanthropic motives,
and raising ethical questions of what it means for
Americans to give to Third World countries without
imposing self-serving agendas and their own moral
imperatives.
In a country plagued by HIV/AIDS, on
a continent with approximately 53 million orphans, 12
million of whom lost at least one parent to AIDS, and
with all the diseases and concomitant problems that come
with poverty, Oprah's extravagance for only 152
girls has many people wondering. Why would she spend $40
million on one school when she could have spent $1
million on 40 schools - if her objective is to improve
and democratize education for girls throughout South
Africa. For many grassroots organizations and
activists in South Africa, fails to distribute her huge
donation in a way that produces the greatest good for
the greatest number. In the eyes of Oprah's critics, the
academy is a a shrine built to herself on a world stage
disguised as good will.
Many South African educators worry
that Oprah is replicating the American paradigm of elite
education. While they applaud Ms. Winfrey's goal
to educate young girls to become the country's future
leaders, they worry that the project might produce a
privileged class that will not only become disconnected
from their families and friends, but also disinterested
in the ongoing struggles of their communities. Too many
of Africa's educated classes leave family and village
for a chance at success, never to return. Consequently,
the monies and resources poured into these students
never benefit their communities, and contribute to their
country's brain-drain.
Another criticism of Oprah's excesses
is in the design of the school: luxuries the girls have
never seen the likes of such as fireplaces in each
building, white duvets for each bed, a beauty parlor,
and yoga spa. Oprah's critics feel that she's imposing a
vision of American "bling bling," when most South
African students would be content with school uniforms,
books and meals. On the other hand, these critics may
seem to suggest that because these young black girls
have not had such creature comforts in their lives they
do not deserve them.
Others ask why the question of gender
was not raised during the international effort to rescue
the "Lost Boys of Sudan" who were displaced or orphaned
in their country's second civil war.
In South Africa there is another type
of war going on that profoundly and disproportionately
impacts females. Violence against women has not abated
since the end of Apartheid. South Africa has come to be
known as the rape capitol of the world. The Medical
Research Council reports that 58% of young boys and
girls between the ages of 10 and 19 do not view forced
sex as sexual violence, and believe that girls and women
do not have a right to say no to their boyfriends and
husbands. Every six hours a South African woman is
killed by her partner, lesbians are often subjected to
gang-rape to punish them for not being "real women," and
millions of women are infected with HIV/AIDS because of
gender-based violence.
Unquestionably, Oprah should be
applauded for her effort to empower young South African
girls. However, she disempowers them and diminishes her
gift by ignoring community sensitivities.
While it is admirable for Americans
to want to help Third World countries in need, it is
equally as important for us to respectfully ask how
we can best meet those needs - the cardinal rule in
International Philanthropy 101. Otherwise, Americans'
donations - albeit motivated by good intentions, as
Oprah's is - will continue to be perceived by Third
World countries as unexamined acts of benevolent
paternalism, at best, or unbridled colonialism, at
worst. Why? Because how we give matters as much as what
we give.
* *
* * *
Rev. Irene Monroe is a public
speaker and free-lance journalist based in Cambridge,
MA. She can be contacted at
revimonroe@earthlink.net
posted 2 February 2007 |