ChickenBones: A Journal

for  Literary & Artistic African-American  Themes

   

Home  ChickenBones Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more) 

Google
 

The authors of the American Constitution appreciated the value of the writ to personal

liberty, and established express limitations upon its suspension. The initial presumption

that prevailed prior to the Civil War had been that the states were peculiarly

competent to preserve individual liberties. Federal habeas corpus was not held to

properly extend to state prisoners who asserted a federal claim if the purported

violation occurred in a court of competent jurisdiction. 

 

 

The Phillips County Riot Cases

By Harrison Bennett

 

When the violence that occurred in Phillips County, Arkansas, in the fall of 1919, subsided, the formal processes of the law were set in motion against African-Americans who had allegedly been prepared to foment an "insurrection" against the whites of the area. But the machinery of the law would be commandeered by a community intent upon working other forms of violence: sentences of death against those who had escaped the lynch mobs and repudiation of the notion that equal protection under the law was to be realized in Phillips County. 

The litigation would culminate, however, in a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that would actually undermine the capacity of a local community to permanently deprive or deny the rights of those who might be prosecuted in its courts. The authority of the federal courts to review state court deliberations for constitutional errors would be fundamentally changed as a result of the Phillips County cases, making any future effort to utilize courts of law as vehicles for channeling the rage of a mob much less likely to succeed. Though a small recompense for those terrorized and murdered during the Elaine Riot, this legacy ensures that their suffering was not entirely in vain.

In late October and early November of 1919, a Phillips County grand jury, which included no blacks, returned indictments against 122 blacks (including 73 charges of murder) for their alleged participation in what local authorities had identified as an "insurrection" against the white communities and institutions of the area. The trial that would culminate in a landmark constitutional ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court began on November 2, 1919, and concerned a charge against Frank Hicks of first degree murder against Clinton Lee, with Frank Moore, Ed Hicks, J. E. Knox, Paul Hall, and Ed Coleman charged as accessories. 

Blacks had been excluded from the petit jury which heard the cases. The accused were not permitted to engage in pre-trial consultation which their lawyers, who chose to neither subpoena witnesses on their behalf or place their clients on the stand. In addition, "an adverse crowd threatened the most dangerous consequences to anyone interfering with the desired result," which was clearly the death of the defendants.

The jury convicted Frank Hicks of first-degree murder after a mere eight minutes of deliberation. Moore, Ed Hicks, Hall, and Coleman were convicted of murder in the first degree as accessories, following only seven minutes of deliberation. The principal evidence produced against them was the testimony of two black witnesses, Walter Ward and John Jefferson, who stated that they were present when Frank Hicks, in the company of other black men, fired at Clinton Lee, as well as the testimony of Helena municipal court judge J. Graham Burke, who claimed that Ed Hicks, Knox, and Coleman confessed they were among this company. 

Altogether, twelve men were convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to die by electrocution. Arkansas media accounts contrasted the state’s reaction to the "insurrection" to that which followed similar incidents in Washington, D. C. and Chicago with some pride, arguing that, "Through it all, the law…was in control." The men were promptly scheduled to die on December 27, 1919 and January 2, 1920.

Motions for new trials were filed on December 18, 1919, by Colonel George W. Murphy, a former Confederate soldier and Arkansas attorney general, retained by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and Scipio Africanus Jones, a former slave who was retained by an Arkansas-based defense committee, on behalf of all twelve defendants who had been sentenced to death, arguing that their opportunity for fair trials had been precluded by the mob atmosphere and adverse publicity that accompanied the proceedings that condemned them. 

They were also, according to the motion, denied due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, because they had been given neither an opportunity to prepare a defense with their counsel or adequate notice of the charges levied against them. They were also denied the equal protection of the law (also a Fourteenth Amendment claim), it was argued, because blacks had been excluded from the grand and petit juries which decided their fates.

When the Circuit Court of Phillips County rejected their claims, Murphy and Jones appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court, which reversed the convictions of Ed Ware, Will Wordlow, Albert Giles, Joe Fox, Alf Banks Jr., and John Martin (henceforth Ware et al) due to a defect in the wording of the jury verdict, and affirmed the convictions of Frank Moore, Ed Hicks, J. E. Knox, Ed Coleman, and Paul Hall (henceforth Moore et al), because their constitutional claim had been forfeit when they failed to raise it at trial. 

The cases of the Arkansas defendants would henceforth proceed along two separate courses. The case of the Ware et al defendant’s was remanded to the Phillips County Circuit Court for retrial, and they were promptly convicted for a second time. This conviction would also be overturned by the state supreme court, however, because the discrimination against prospective black jurors which characterized the second trial was, argued the justices, contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1875. 

The Ware et al defendants would eventually win their freedom, ironically, because of the apathy of state authorities respecting the prosecution of their third trial. Their case had not been acted upon for over two years by April 1923, and Arkansas law provided that a defendant was entitled to discharge if the state failed to bring his/her case to trial after two terms of court. Accordingly, Scipio Jones requested, and received an order of release from the Arkansas Supreme Court on June 25, 1923.

But the only option available to the Moore et al defendants was to petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus. The writ of habeas corpus ("habeas corpus" in the original Latin means "you are ordered to have the body") was an instrument by which a magistrate or court could order the appearance of a person detained by another authority for the purpose of determining the legality of his/her detention. 

The authors of the American Constitution appreciated the value of the writ to personal liberty, and established express limitations upon its suspension. The initial presumption that prevailed prior to the Civil War had been that the states were peculiarly competent to preserve individual liberties. Federal habeas corpus was not held to properly extend to state prisoners who asserted a federal claim if the purported violation occurred in a court of competent jurisdiction. 

The so-called "jurisdiction doctrine" would dominate the habeas jurisprudence of the U. S. Supreme Court from the 19th Century well into the 20th Century. The Civil War and violent Reconstruction provided the impetus for passage of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867, which extended, for the first time, the benefits of federal habeas corpus to prisoners held in state custody. This statute would be the basis for the petition filed by counsel for Moore and his co-defendants.

The principal obstacle before them was the Court’s ruling in Frank v. Mangum, where the Court denied the habeas petition of Leo Frank, who had been tried under circumstances similar to those endured by the defendants in the Phillips Country cases. One could not claim, according to the majority in Frank, that the state denied due process to a defendant whose trial had been dominated by a mob if it supplied some form of corrective process. 

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, joined by Justice Charles Evans Hughes, dissented, reasoning succinctly that "Mob law does not become due process of law by securing the assent of a terrified jury." The decision nonetheless concerned the Moore et al defense team, because the state of Arkansas had provided the men opportunities to appeal their convictions in the state supreme court, which had concluded that "it was not necessarily the case" that their trials had been "an empty ceremony."

The Court, whose composition had changed significantly since the disposition of Frank v. Mangum, ruled in favor of the Moore et al defendants. Justice Holmes would author the opinion of the Court in Moore et al v. Dempsey, making his dissent in the Frank case the law of the land. 

The Court took note of the fact that: 1) the community leaders of Phillips County had effectively promised that they would secure the death of the defendants by legal process if it would desist in its attempts to lynch them; 2) testimony against the defendants apparently had been obtained by torture; and 3) "an adverse crowd (threatened) the most dangerous consequences to anyone interfering with the desired result." 

The Court was particularly concerned about the conduct of the proceedings themselves, including the exclusion of blacks from the juries, the lack of pre-trial consultation with counsel, their failure to request a change of venue, subpoena witnesses, or place their clients on the stand, and the disturbingly summary length of deliberations by the juries. 

Justice Holmes declared: "If the case is that the whole proceeding is a mask-that counsel, jury, and judge are swept to the fatal end by an irresistible wave of public passion, and that the state courts failed to correct the wrong, neither perfection in the machinery for correction or the possibility that the trial court and counsel saw no other way of avoiding an immediate outbreak of the mob can prevent this Court from securing to the petitioners their constitutional rights." 

The state court’s disposition of the facts of a case, where they touched upon the enforcement of a federal right, would no longer be deemed sacrosanct. Even "perfection in the machinery for correction," which satisfied the Frank majority, would not suffice if, in the final analysis, the violation of a federal constitutional right or liberty were allowed to stand. 

It was eventually agreed that the Moore et al defendants would plead guilty to charges of murder in the second degree, with their sentences to be retroactively counted. On November 11, 1925, their sentences were commuted by Governor T. C. Mcrae, and they were released several months thereafter.

It is difficult to overstate the importance of the Court’s ruling in Moore v. Dempsey, both as a matter of constitutional law and as a pivotal point in the history of American civil liberties. The case was one of the earliest indications that the Supreme Court might emerge as the principal defender of civil liberties in the nation. 

Once the Court began to formally apply the provisions of the Bill of Rights against the states, the importance of the Moore precedent would become clear. The Court had, in that case, pierced the veil that shielded the factual circumstances of a trial, conducted by the state, from federal judicial oversight. Henceforth, federal judges could, in addition to examining the form of the proceedings, actually replicate the work of the state courts of appeal by examining, and if necessary, rendering new decisions with respect to the facts.

Inferior federal courts would be enlisted in order that the meaning of the broad constitutional liberties the Court was incorporating against the states could be precisely articulated and adapted to a myriad of legal and factual circumstances. The federal writ of habeas corpus would be an indispensable instrument by which the "Due Process Revolution" would be accomplished. 

The supremacy and uniformity of federal law would have been far more difficult to achieve were it not for the liberal habeas regime inaugurated under Moore v. Dempsey. It is fitting that the atrocities at Elaine, prosecuted according to the conviction that African Americans should not be equal in any sense of that term, would provide the occasion for judicial action which, if only to a limited degree, would grant all Americans greater protection of their constitutional rights.

Source: http://www.clt.astate.edu/sarahwf/elainrt/justicehb.html  

*   *   *   *   *

Blood in Their Eyes
B
y Grif Stockley

Blood in Their Eyes is required reading for every Arkansas lawyer, because this time Grif Stockley reviews the work of a real Gideon Page, a black lawyer named Scipio Jones who read law to become licensed and became one of Arkansas' outstanding lawyers. Jones is credited with one of the most important cases in American history, Moore v. Dempsey 261 U.S. 86(1923), and standing alone many times, saved the lives of 12 innocent, albeit convicted, black sharecroppers from Elaine, Arkansas. The Elaine race riot, as history until now has called it, is an awful blemish on Arkansas history. It is such a blemish that most historians have treated it lightly or shied away from it. But Grif Stockley, an outstanding Arkansas lawyer in his own right, is not known for shying away from much of anything, and he tackles the issue head on in his first writing on Arkansas history. In typical lawyer fashion Stockley analyzes the facts and writes his brief in Blood in Their Eyes

*   *   *   *   *

 

Otis G. Clark survivor of 1921 Tulsa race riot dies at 109—Matt Schudel—26 May 2012—For years, few people dared to speak about what happened on the night of May 31, 1921, during one of the most deadly and devastating race riots in the nation’s history. Otis G. Clark, who was 18 at the time, had grown up in Greenwood, a thriving African American section of Tulsa. During a night that history almost forgot, Mr. Clark dodged bullets, raced through alleys to escape armed mobs and saw his family’s home burned to the ground. He fled Tulsa on a freight train headed north. He would eventually move to Los Angeles, where he was the butler in the home of movie star Joan Crawford. He later turned to preaching and was known as the “world’s oldest evangelist.” But for nine decades, he remained a living witness to a night of horror, when Greenwood died. Mr. Clark died May 21 in Seattle at age 109, family members told the Tulsa World newspaper. The cause of death was not disclosed. . . . A state commission finally issued a report on the riot in 2001.

Otis Granville Clark was born Feb. 13, 1903, in Meridian, Okla., four years before Oklahoma became a state. His father worked for the railroad. In a 2009 interview for a Tulsa oral history project, Mr. Clark said one of his jobs as a boy was selling vegetables and groceries to a house occupied by what he called “sportin’ women.”WashingtonPost / Tulsaworld  / adlercent

Otis G. Clark was born on February 13, 1903, in Oklahoma. At the time, Oklahoma was still Indian Territory and it did not become a state until 1907.  At the age of 18, Otis was caught in the "1921 Tulsa Race Riot" in the Greenwood District of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Greenwood, at the time, was a mecca for African-Americans who, due to the oil boom, owned their own successful businesses. Otis fled Tulsa, riding the rails to California, seeking his biological father.—adlercentenarians

*   *   *   *   *

AALBC.com's 25 Best Selling Books


 

Fiction

#1 - Justify My Thug by Wahida Clark
#2 - Flyy Girl by Omar Tyree
#3 - Head Bangers: An APF Sexcapade by Zane
#4 - Life Is Short But Wide by J. California Cooper
#5 - Stackin' Paper 2 Genesis' Payback by Joy King
#6 - Thug Lovin' (Thug 4) by Wahida Clark
#7 - When I Get Where I'm Going by Cheryl Robinson
#8 - Casting the First Stone by Kimberla Lawson Roby
#9 - The Sex Chronicles: Shattering the Myth by Zane

#10 - Covenant: A Thriller  by Brandon Massey

#11 - Diary Of A Street Diva  by Ashley and JaQuavis

#12 - Don't Ever Tell  by Brandon Massey

#13 - For colored girls who have considered suicide  by Ntozake Shange

#14 - For the Love of Money : A Novel by Omar Tyree

#15 - Homemade Loves  by J. California Cooper

#16 - The Future Has a Past: Stories by J. California Cooper

#17 - Player Haters by Carl Weber

#18 - Purple Panties: An Eroticanoir.com Anthology by Sidney Molare

#19 - Stackin' Paper by Joy King

#20 - Children of the Street: An Inspector Darko Dawson Mystery by Kwei Quartey

#21 - The Upper Room by Mary Monroe

#22 – Thug Matrimony  by Wahida Clark

#23 - Thugs And The Women Who Love Them by Wahida Clark

#24 - Married Men by Carl Weber

#25 - I Dreamt I Was in Heaven - The Rampage of the Rufus Buck Gang by Leonce Gaiter

Non-fiction

#1 - Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention by Manning Marable
#2 - Confessions of a Video Vixen by Karrine Steffans
#3 - Dear G-Spot: Straight Talk About Sex and Love by Zane
#4 - Letters to a Young Brother: MANifest Your Destiny by Hill Harper
#5 - Peace from Broken Pieces: How to Get Through What You're Going Through by Iyanla Vanzant
#6 - Selected Writings and Speeches of Marcus Garvey by Marcus Garvey
#7 - The Ebony Cookbook: A Date with a Dish by Freda DeKnight
#8 - The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors by Frances Cress Welsing
#9 - The Mis-Education of the Negro by Carter Godwin Woodson

#10 - John Henrik Clarke and the Power of Africana History  by Ahati N. N. Toure

#11 - Fail Up: 20 Lessons on Building Success from Failure by Tavis Smiley

#12 -The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness by Michelle Alexander

#13 - The Black Male Handbook: A Blueprint for Life by Kevin Powell

#14 - The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates by Wes Moore

#15 - Why Men Fear Marriage: The Surprising Truth Behind Why So Many Men Can't Commit  by RM Johnson

#16 - Black Titan: A.G. Gaston and the Making of a Black American Millionaire by Carol Jenkins

#17 - Brainwashed: Challenging the Myth of Black Inferiority by Tom Burrell

#18 - A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life's Purpose by Eckhart Tolle

#19 - John Oliver Killens: A Life of Black Literary Activism by Keith Gilyard

#20 - Alain L. Locke: The Biography of a Philosopher by Leonard Harris

#21 - Age Ain't Nothing but a Number: Black Women Explore Midlife by Carleen Brice

#22 - 2012 Guide to Literary Agents by Chuck Sambuchino
#23 - Chicken Soup for the Prisoner's Soul by Tom Lagana
#24 - 101 Things Every Boy/Young Man of Color Should Know by LaMarr Darnell Shields

#25 - Beyond the Black Lady: Sexuality and the New African American Middle Class  by Lisa B. Thompson

*   *   *   *   *

To the Mountaintop

My Journey Through the Civil Rights Movement

By Charlayne Hunter-Gault

A personal history of the civil rights movement from activist and acclaimed journalist Charlayne Hunter-Gault. On January 20, 2009, 1.8 million people crowded the grounds of the Capitol to witness the inauguration of Barack Obama. Among the masses was Charlayne Hunter-Gault. She had flown from South Africa for the occasion, to witness what was for many the culmination of the long struggle for civil rights in the United States. In this compelling personal history, she uses the event to look back on her own involvement in the civil rights movement, as one of two black students who forced the University of Georgia to integrate, and to relate the pivotal events that swept the South as the movement gathered momentum through the early 1960s. With poignant black-and-white photos, original articles from the New York Times, and a unique personal viewpoint, this is a moving tribute to the men and women on whose shoulders Obama stood.

*   *   *   *   *

 

The Burning: Massacre, Destruction, and the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921

By Tim Madigan

Journalist Madigan (See No Evil: Blind Devotion and Bloodshed in David Koresh's Holy War) here tackles one of America's worst race riots, chronicling the shocking events of May 31 and June 1, 1921 when a white mob numbering in the thousands obliterated the African American community of Greenwood, OK, near Tulsa. Race riots and tensions were very common after World War I, but what makes the Greenwood incident unique was the unheard-of organization of the mob and the completeness of the destruction (35 city blocks systematically burned and destroyed along with hundreds of casualties). Though it is arguably America's worst race riot, surprisingly little has been written about it in the mainstream press. For this work, Madigan relied on taped interviews of survivors and witnesses, newspaper accounts, scholarly papers and theses, and interviews with the descendants of survivors. What results is a highly readable account of the circumstances and history surrounding the event and its aftermath. Truly an eye-opening book, this is essential reading for anyone struggling to understand race relations in America. Highly recommended for public and academic libraries.—Library Journal

*   *   *   *   *

The New Jim Crow

Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness

By Michele Alexander

Contrary to the rosy picture of race embodied in Barack Obama's political success and Oprah Winfrey's financial success, legal scholar Alexander argues vigorously and persuasively that [w]e have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it. Jim Crow and legal racial segregation has been replaced by mass incarceration as a system of social control (More African Americans are under correctional control today... than were enslaved in 1850). Alexander reviews American racial history from the colonies to the Clinton administration, delineating its transformation into the war on drugs. She offers an acute analysis of the effect of this mass incarceration upon former inmates who will be discriminated against, legally, for the rest of their lives, denied employment, housing, education, and public benefits. Most provocatively, she reveals how both the move toward colorblindness and affirmative action may blur our vision of injustice: most Americans know and don't know the truth about mass incarceration—but her carefully researched, deeply engaging, and thoroughly readable book should change that.—Publishers Weekly

*   *   *   *   *

The White Masters of the World

From The World and Africa, 1965

By W. E. B. Du Bois

W. E. B. Du Bois’ Arraignment and Indictment of White Civilization (Fletcher)

*   *   *   *   *

Ancient African Nations

*   *   *   *   *

If you like this page consider making a donation

online through PayPal

*   *   *   *   *

Negro Digest / Black World

Browse all issues


1950        1960        1965        1970        1975        1980        1985        1990        1995        2000 ____ 2005        

Enjoy!

*   *   *   *   *

The Death of Emmett Till by Bob Dylan  The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll  Only a Pawn in Their Game

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson Thanks America for Slavery / George Jackson  / Hurricane Carter

*   *   *   *   *

The Journal of Negro History issues at Project Gutenberg

The Haitian Declaration of Independence 1804  / January 1, 1804 -- The Founding of Haiti 

*   *   *   *   *

*   *   *   *   *

ChickenBones Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)

 

 

update 1 April 2012

 

 

 

Home    Civil Rights: Struggle for Black Power     Lynching Table

Related files: Scipio Africanus Jones  Moore v. Dempsey   Blood in Their Eyes    Phillips County Massacre  Jim Crow Riots  Lynching State By Race