|
Self-Help A Stolen Word Wielded as a Weapon Against
Black Activism
By BAR executive
editor Glen Ford
The mantra of "self-help" has been
fashioned into a club to bludgeon or shame African
Americans into inaction on all fronts that might
challenge real power relationships in the United States.
Stripped of all meaning other than philanthropy,
non-controversial volunteerism, individual
entrepreneurial pursuits, and varieties of motivational
exercises, the shrunken term is deployed as a deterrent
and warning against mass political action. Especially in
recent years, Self-Help and its attendant terms
"self-reliance," "self-discipline" and "personal
responsibility" have been stolen and twisted by
right-wing forces in both white and Black society, to
morally defame those who would organize Popular Power in
opposition to Money Power.
From Faith-Based Initiative-funded
preachers, to corporate groomed and financed Black media
propagandists, to the near-incoherent
rantings of Bill Cosby, to the raw cynicism of
George Bush's White House, a stilted version of Black
Self-Help is presented as the wise and moral alternative
to "Sixties-style" mass movement-building. A logical
outgrowth of this insidious, calculated word piracy is
the theory of "victimhood," used to pillory anyone that
dares to indict the rulers for their past and present
crimes against African Americans. "Stop acting like a
victim, and you won't be a victim," snap the sneerers -
the equivalent of the common white demand that Blacks
"get over it."
Victimhood theory fits nicely with
some forms of narrow, dwarfish Black nationalism, which
is much more common than the number of dashikis sold
yearly would suggest. "Don't ask the white man for
nuthin', stand up like a man!" Of course, the admonition
is irrelevant, since "the white man" has never given up
a stitch of his unearned privilege and power in response
to polite requests - that is, in the absence of a demand
and implicit, credible threat. The directive to "stand
up" while at the same time do nothing to confront those
who put and keep Black people down, is pure bravado -
and harmless to the powers-that-be. Which is how they
like it.
The Black/white right-wing's
attempted usurpation of the civilized qualities
"self-reliance," "self-discipline" and "personal
responsibility" amounts to slander against Black
ancestry. To be successful, all mass movements had to
rely on themselves, be more disciplined than the
oppressor, and imbue participants with a deep sense of
both personal and collective responsibility for their
actions. The entirety of the Freedom Movement was a
glorious saga of collective Self Help, Self-Sacrifice,
and Self-Growth, that transformed African Americans, the
nation, and the world.
Having nothing to offer a people in
dire need of a mass movement against increasingly
hostile Power - except bromides, navel-gazing, and
"prosperity churches" - the status-quo crowd robs the
English vocabulary, expropriating for themselves the
terms for all that is virtuous, while risking...nothing.
At the desired end of the process, the poor are to be
left without even the words to defend themselves. Worse,
when you steal people's words, you steal pieces of their
minds.
Induced Shame
The self-styled self-helpers thrive
on banalities and generalities, through skillful use of
which they get applause and "amens" from folks who
should know better - who would actually like to confront
en masse the real sources of Black economic and
social hyper-vulnerability. Chanting the mantras of
"self-help," "self-reliance," "self-discipline" and
"personal responsibility," they induce group shame - an
extremely debilitating, rather than liberating, emotion.
(Preachers have long understood that folks will pay good
money to be released from shame.) Substantial sections
of the audience transfer their shame to the most
powerless among them, who become the repositories of all
that ails Black America.
John McWhorter, the vile Black
servant for the reactionary Manhattan Institute, even
blames the poor for the Katrina catastrophe. Under
direct questioning from a radio talk show host, just
months after the deluge, McWhorter explained the horrors
of New Orleans' Coliseum/concentration camp,
this way: "What we see in Katrina is single women
who also have a great many children."
Such is the logic of the Right, in
blackface. It is pointless to spend precious time
arguing with these walking pollutants. Instead, let us
explore the limits of their narrow definition of
Self-Help - a definition that rejects mass action.
True Self-Help
Earlier this year, Black Agenda
Report and CBC Monitor circulated a petition with a list
of seven demands for presentation to the Congressional
Black Caucus. All were rooted in issues that lay at the
core of the Historical Black Political Consensus;
positions around which many generations of African
Americans had coalesced. Most were related to existing
legislation before Congress.
|
1. Dismantle
racially selective mass incarceration.
2. Aid and empower
those dispersed and dispossessed by Katrina.
3. End the war in
Iraq now.
4. Get the U.S.
military out of Africa.
5. Transform the
cities and create millions of jobs.
6. Establish truly
universal, single payer health care.
7. Ensure voting
rights. |
Not one of these righteous demands
can be accomplished by some diluted, narrow Self-Help as
preached by the Cosbys of Black America, and most are
actively opposed by Black corporate "conservatives."
Churches can and do operate "prison ministries" - a
worthy project - but that cannot dismantle an "intake"
mechanism that operates at every level of the criminal
justice system, from omni-surveillance of poor Black
communities to the inevitable result: one million
African Americans behind bars.
The crime of Katrina cannot be
addressed absent empowerment of residents to direct the
spending of many tens of billions of dollars in
"reconstruction and return." This requires a national
mobilization of millions of Black people to confront
Power, directly. Volunteers have already poured in by
the tens of thousands, but can only provide some
amelioration, as all admit. True Self-Help -
decisive help for New Orleans - must come from mass
political action.
Local Self-Help groups can counsel
limited numbers of returning veterans of the Iraq war,
or advise young people not to join the military. But
only a mass movement (or inevitable U.S. defeat) can
cause the United States to withdraw from Iraq, quit its
military buildup in Africa, and cease threatening the
survival of the planet.
No amount of community-based
resources can revamp urban structures to the benefit of
masses of city-dwellers; this is a nation-building task.
Black entrepreneurship is an admirable enterprise, but
it does not significantly alter relationships of power
in a world ruled by multinational corporations. Only
People Power can do that, and in the process create the
jobs that will sustain the African American presence in
the cities.
Community-funded neighborhood clinics
save thousands of lives, but none of them pretend to be
the solution to Third World-like Black mortality rates.
Universal health care can only be won in a twilight
struggle with for-profit medical, insurance and drug
corporations and their servants in government.
The right to vote must ultimately be
ensured by a mass movement that poses a threat to Power
that makes fairness at the ballot an attractive
trade-off for the current vote-suppressors. Such was the
case in the Sixties, and so it remains.
Take Back the Term: Self-Help
The right-wing theft of the term
Self-Help is a sacrilege against our heroic dead and
Black history, itself. Wasn't Harriet Tubman engaged in
Self-Help when she escorted hundreds of slaves out of
bondage? Didn't the Pullman Porters exemplify Self-Help
in their decades of struggle for recognition as a union
- and as men? Were not the young lunch counter
integrators involved in Self-Help, as they put their
bodies in danger and their academic careers at the mercy
of handkerchief-head Black college administrators? Was
the Mississippi Freedom Summer of 1964 something other
than Self-Help? Who would have done it but ourselves,
and the allies we enlisted? Are the youthful
Black Panther Party members who aggressively monitored
police in Oakland, California, to be expelled from the
Self-Help definition? Did scores of Party members die
helping other people than their own? Is the fight for a
living wage beyond the pale of Cosby and Co.'s Self-Help
parameters? Does the mass demonstration at Jena,
Louisiana, qualify as Self-Help?
How dare rascals and poseurs attempt
to steal our language - and heritage.
Frederick Douglass would be horrified
at the mangling of Black political culture, mugged
directly or indirectly by Money Power's intervention in
Black affairs. Douglass, a man of many words, treasured
only two:
"Agitate, Agitate, Agitate. Organize,
Organize, Organize."
That's Self-Help.
Source:
Black Agenda Report
* * * *
*
posted 31 October 2007 |