ChickenBones: A Journal

for  Literary & Artistic African-American  Themes

   

Home    Visit Our Store (Books, DVDs, Music, and more)

Google
 

Can We Un-Teach Racism and Racial Oppression?

I began by telling them that Scott was born a slave, in Virginia in 1799 and that he

was owned by Peter Blow, a plantation owner. Scott was never given a chance

 to learn to read and write remaining illiterate his whole life

 

 

Teaching Dred Scott to City College

Students on Public Transportation

By Amin Sharif

That I do not own a car is a conscious, not a financial decision. I take public transportation. Rather than a hardship it provides numerous worthwhile opportunities. I like this mode because it keeps me close to the folk and helps me to gage the reactions of people on various issues. Today, while making my commute from work, I happened to remark to some young, black high school students that March was the month that the Dred Scott decision was issued. Now, these weren’t just any high school students. They attend the prestigious City College -- a high school known for producing at least one black Rhodes Scholar and a United States Congressmen.*  So one thus expects the scholars of City College to state with ease the importance of the Dred Scott Case 

At the time the Rhodes Scholar, the United States Congressman, and I attended City, we took American History under the watchful eye of Dr. Samuel Banks. Dr. Banks was a black man loved by all of his students, black, white, brown, and yellow. He was a man of keen intellect and compassion. He, in short, was a rare bird and knew it. He brooked no insult from his white colleagues, many of whom openly despised him. And, he brooked no laxness from his students. I credit Dr. Banks with singlehandedly developing my interest in all things black and African. I say this not only to praise Dr. Banks but to decry the state of affairs that has taken place at my alma mater since both I and Dr. Banks have long ago left City behind. Suffice to say, not a single high school student knew anything about Dred Scott. So, it was left to me to explain the importance of the Dred Scott case to my young friends.

I began by telling them that Scott was born a slave, in Virginia in 1799 and that he was owned by Peter Blow, a plantation owner. Scott was never given a chance to learn to read and write remaining illiterate his whole life. In 1830, the Blow family moved to Missouri which had been admitted into the Union as a slave state in 1820. This occurred due to the Missouri Compromise. I briefly explained to the student about the Compromise and went on with my story. While in Missouri, Peter Blow decided to sell Scott to a Dr. Emerson, a traveling military surgeon. As a consequence, Dred Scott traveled with his new master to the state of Illinois (a state that did not allow slavery), as well as, to the free (from slavery) territory of Wisconsin. But, Dr. Emerson died in 1843 and Scott, his wife Harriet, and their children become the property of Dr. Emerson’s wife.

For three years, Scott and his children were hired out by Ms. Emerson. But in 1846, Dred Scott sued Ms. Emerson for his freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. A year later, the Circuit Court in St. Louis threw out the case but the Court allowed Scott to re-file his case. Scott did this and won his freedom in the second trial. But, Ms. Emerson decided to challenge this decision of the Court and the case ended up before the Supreme Court. This occurred in 1856.

In 1857, the Supreme Court heard the Scott case now brought by Ms. Emerson’s brother who has just recently taken over possession of his sister’s estate. The Supreme Court of the United States soon ruled against Scott and he wound up back in the hands of Ms. Emerson’s brother.  Now, here comes the strange twist of fate. Ms. Emerson had re-married in 1857 and regained Scott from her brother. But, her new husband is AGAINST SLAVERY! He returns Scott and his family to the Blow Family in Virginia (Scott’s original slave masters) and they SETS SCOTT AND HIS FAMILY FREE!! Scott eventually returned to St. Louis, Missouri and there dies of tuberculosis.

“Slavery was a fickle master,” I told my now captive audience of students. “Ms. Emerson fought to hold on to Scott, his wife Harriet, and their two daughters until almost the end. Only the anti-slave sentiments of her husband saved Scott and his family from the chains of slavery. The Supreme Court at that time of Scott’s case was headed by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney who was a slave owner from right here in Maryland. So it was obvious that Scott was not going to get any justice from him.” 

I ended my lesson by, more or less, quoting the Honorable Chief Justice Taney's words that declared: “No black slave could ever be a citizen of the United States of America. Slavery was allowable everywhere in the United States.” The rest of the ride home was, more or less, in silence. I turned to the brother next to me and said, “Sometimes, you got to take things into your own hand.” He just smiled and told me how crazy I was.

*By the way that Congressman I mentioned is the Honorable Elijah Cumming, a very good friend. The Rhodes Scholar was Kurt Schmoke who became mayor of Baltimore. 

*   *   *   *   *

 

 

 

 

 

 

updated 13 October 2007

 

 

Home  Amin Sharif  TableEdHistNegro

Related files: Dred Scott Case