|
Towards a Black Aesthetic
By Hoyt W. Fuller
The black revolt is
as palpable in letters as it is in the streets, and if
it has not yet made its impact upon the Literary
Establishment, then the nature of the revolt itself is
the reason. For the break between the revolutionary
black writers and the “literary mainstream” is, perhaps
of necessity, cleaner and more decisive than the noisier
and more dramatic break between the black militants and
traditional political and institutional structures. Just
as black intellectuals have rejected the NAACP,1
on the one hand, and the two major political parties, on
the other, and gone off in search of new and more
effective means and methods of seizing power, so
revolutionary black writers have turned their backs on
the old “certainties” and struck out in new, if
uncharted, directions. They have begun the journey
toward a black aesthetic.
The road to that
place—if it exists at all—cannot, by definition, lead
through the literary mainstreams. Which is to say that
few critics will look upon the new movement with
sympathy, even if a number of publishers might be daring
enough to publish the works which its adherents produce.
The movement will be reviled as “racism-in-reverse,” and
its writers labeled “racists,” opprobrious terms which
are flung lightly at black people now that the piper is
being paid for all the long years of rejection and abuse
which black people have experienced at the hands of
white people—with few voices raised in objection.
Is this too harsh
and sweeping a generalization? White people might think
so; black people will not; which is a way of stating the
problem and the prospect before us. Black people are
being called “violent” these days, as if violence is a
new invention out of the ghetto. But violence against
the black minority is in-built in the established
American society. There is no need for the white
majority to take to the streets to clobber the blacks,
although there certainly is enough of that;
brutalization is inherent in all the customs and
practices which bestow privileges on the whites and
relegate the blacks to the status of pariahs.
These are old and
well-worn truths which hardly need repeating. What is
new is the reaction to them. Rapidly now, black people
are turning onto that uncertain road, and they are doing
so with the approval of all kinds of fellow-travellers
who ordinarily are considered “safe” for the other side.
In the fall 1967 issue of the Journal of the National
Medical Association (all-black), for example, Dr.
Charles A. De Leon of Cleveland, Ohio, explained why the
new turn is necessary: “If young Negroes are to avoid
the unnecessary burden of self-hatred (via
identification with the aggressor) they will have to
develop a keen faculty for identifying, fractionating
out, and rejecting the absurdities of the conscious as
well as the unconscious white racism in American society
from what is worthwhile in it.”
Conscious and
unconscious white racism is everywhere, infecting all
the vital areas of national life. But the revolutionary
black writer, like the new breed of militant activist,
has decided that white racism will no longer exercise
its insidious control over his work. If the tag of
“racist” is one the white critic will hang on him in
dismissing him, then he is more than willing to bear
that. He is not going to separate literature from life.
But just how
widespread is white racism—conscious and unconscious—in
the realm of letters? In a review of Gwendolyn Brooks’s2
Selected Poems in the old New York Herald
Tribune Book Week back in October 1963, poet
Louis
Simpson began by writing that the Chicago poet’s book of
poems “contains some lively pictures of Negro life,” an
ambiguous enough opener which did not necessarily
suggest a literary putdown. But Mr. Simpson’s next
sentence dispelled all ambiguity. “I am not sure it is
possible for a Negro to write well without making us
aware he is a Negro,” he wrote. “On the other hand, if
being a Negro is the only subject, the writing is not
important.”
All the history of
American race relations is contained in that appraisal,
despite its disingenuousness. It is civilized, urbane,
gentle and elegant; and it is arrogant, condescending,
presumptuous and racist. To most white readers, no
doubt, Mr. Simpson’s words, if not his assessment,
seemed eminently sensible; but it is all but impossible
to imagine a black reader not reacting to the words with
unalloyed fury.
Both black and
white readers are likely to go to the core of Mr.
Simpson’s statement, which is: “if being a Negro is the
only subject, the writing is not important.” The white
reader will, in all probability, find that clear and
acceptable enough; indeed, he is used to hearing it.
“Certainly,” the argument might proceed, “to be
important, writing must have universal values,
universal implications; it cannot deal exclusively
with Negro problems.” The plain but unstated assumption
being, of course, that there are no “universal values”
and no “universal implications” in Negro life.
Mr. Simpson is a
greatly respected American poet, a winner of the
Pulitzer Prize for poetry, as is Miss Brooks, and it
will be considered the depth of irresponsibility to
accuse him of the viciousness of racism. He is probably
the gentlest and most compassionate of men. Miss Brooks,
who met Mr. Simpson at the University of California not
many months after the review was published, reported
that the gentleman was most kind and courteous to her.
There is no reason to doubt it. The essential point here
is not presence of overt hostility; it is the absence of
clarity of vision. The glass through which black life is
viewed by white Americans is, inescapably (it is a
matter of extent), befogged by the hot breath of
history. True “objectivity” where race is concerned is
as rare as a necklace of Hope diamonds.3
In October 1967, a
young man named
Jonathan Kozol published a book called
Death at an Early Age, which is an account of his
experiences as a teacher in a predominantly Negro
elementary school in Boston. Mr. Kozol broke with
convention in his approach to teaching and incurred the
displeasure of a great many people,. Including the
vigilant policeman father of one of his few white
pupils. The issue around which the young teacher’s
opponents seemed to rally was his use of a Langston
Hughes poem in his classroom. Now the late
Langston Hughes was a favorite target of some of the more
aggressive right-wing pressure groups during his
lifetime, but it remained for an official of the Boston
School Committee to come to the heart of the argument
against the poet. Explaining the opposition to the poem
used by Mr. Kozol, the school official said that “no
poem by an Negro author can be considered permissible if
it involves suffering.”
There is a direct
connecting line between the school official’s rejection
of Negro poetry which deals with suffering and Mr.
Simpson’s facile dismissal of writing about Negroes
“only.” Negro life, which is characterized by suffering
imposed by the maintenance of white privilege in
America, must be denied validity and banished beyond the
pale. The facts of Negro life accuse white people. In
order to look at Negro life unflinchingly, the white
viewer either must relegate it to the real of the
subhuman, thereby justifying an attitude of
indifference, or else the white viewer must confront the
imputation of guilt against him. And no man who
considers himself humane wishes to admit complicity in
crimes against the human spirit.
There is a myth
abroad in American literary criticism that Negro writing
has been favored by a “double standard” which judges it
less stringently. The opposite is true. No one will
seriously dispute that, on occasions, critics have been
generous to Negro writers, for variety of reasons, but
there is no evidence that generosity has been the rule.
Indeed, why should it be assumed that literary critics
are more sympathetic to blacks than are other white
people? During any year, hundreds of mediocre volumes of
prose and poetry by white writers are published, little
noted, and forgotten. At the same time, the few creative
works by black writers are seized and dissected and, if
not deemed of the “highest” literary quality, condemned
as still more examples of the failure of black writers
to scale the rare heights of literature. And the
condemnation is especially strong for those black works
which have not screened their themes of suffering,
redemption and triumph behind frail façades of obscurity
and conscious “universality.”
Central to the
problem of the irreconcilable conflict between the black
writer and the white critic is the failure of
recognition of a fundamental and obvious truth of
American life—that the two races are residents of two
separate and naturally antagonistic worlds. No manner of
well-meaning rhetoric about “one country” and “one
people,” and even about the two races’ long
joint-occupancy of this troubled land, can obliterate
the high, thick dividing walls which hate and history
have erected—and maintain—between them. The breaking
down of those barriers might be a goal, worthy or
unworthy (depending on viewpoint), but the reality
remains. The world of the black outsider, however much
it approximates and parallels and imitates the world of
the white insider, by its very nature is inheritor and
generator of values and viewpoints which threaten the
insiders. The outsiders’ world, feeding on its own
sources, fecundates and vibrates, stamping its progeny
with its very special ethos, its insuperably logical
bias.
The black writer,
like the black artist generally, has wasted much time
and talent denying a propensity every rule of human
dignity demands that he posses, seeking an identity that
can only do violence to his sense of self. Black
Americans are, for all practical purposes, colonized in
their native land, and it can be argued that those who
would submit to subjection without struggle deserve to
be enslaved. It is one thing to accept the guiding
principles on which the American republic ostensibly was
founded; it is quite another thing to accept the
prevailing practices which violate those principles.
The rebellion in
the streets is the black ghetto’s response to the vast
distance between the nation’s principles and its
practices. But that rebellion has roots which are deeper
than most white people know; it is many-veined, and its
blood has been pulsating to the very heart of black
life. Across this country, young black men and women
have been infected with a fever of affirmation. They are
saying, “We are black and beautiful,” and the ghetto is
reacting with a liberating shock of realization which
transcends mere chauvinism. They are rediscovering their
heritage and their history, seeing it with newly focused
eyes, struck with the wonder of that strength which has
enabled them to endure and, in spirit, to defeat the
power of prolonged and calculated oppression. After
centuries of being told, in a million different ways,
that they were not beautiful, and that whiteness of
skin, straightness of hair, and aquilineness of features
constituted the only measures of beauty, black people
have revolted. The trend has not yet reached the point
of avalanche, but the future can be clearly seen in the
growing number of black people who are snapping off the
shackles of imitation and are wearing their skin, their
hair, and their features “natural” and with pride. In a
poem called “Nittygritty,” which is dedicated to poet
LeRoi Jones,4 Joseph Bevans Bush put the new
credo this way:
|
… We all gonna come from behind those
Wigs and start to stop using those
Standards of beauty which can never
Be a frame for our reference; wash
That excess grease out of our hair,
Come out of that bleach bag and get
Into something meaningful to us as
Nonwhite people—Black people …
|
If the poem lacks
the resonances of William Shakespeare, that is
intentional. The “great bard of Avon” has only limited
relevance to the revolutionary spirit raging in the
ghetto. Which is not say that the black revolutionaries
reject the “universal” statements inherent in
Shakespeare’s works; what they do reject, however, is
the literary assumption that the style and language and
the concerns of Shakespeare establish the appropriate
limits and “frame of reference” for black poetry and
people. This is above and beyond the doctrine of
revolution to which so many of the brighter black
intellectuals are committed, that philosophy articulated
by the late Frantz Fanon5 which holds that,
in the time of revolutionary struggle, the traditional
Western liberal ideals are not merely irrelevant but
they must be assiduously opposed. The young writers of
the black ghetto have set out in search of a black
aesthetic, a system of isolating and evaluating the
artistic works of black people which reflect the special
character and imperatives of black experience.
That was the
meaning and intent of poet-playwright LeRoi Jones’
aborted Black Arts Theater in Harlem in 1965, and it is
the generative ideas behind such later groups and
institutions as Spirit House in Newark, the Black House
in San Francisco, the New School of Afro-American
Thought in Washington, D.C., the Institute for Black
Studies in Los Angeles, Forum ’66 in Detroit, and the
Organization of Black American Culture in Chicago. It is
a serious quest, and the black writers themselves are
well aware of the possibility that what they seek is,
after all, beyond codifying. They are fully aware of the
dual nature of their heritage, and of the subtleties and
complexities; but they are even more aware of the
terrible reality of their outsideness, of their
political and economic powerlessness, and of the
desperate racial need for unity. And they have been
convinced, over and again, by the irrefutable facts of
history and by the cold intransigence of the privileged
white majority that the road to solidarity and strength
leads inevitably through reclamation and indoctrination
of black art and culture.
In Chicago, the
Organization of Black American Culture6 has
moved boldly toward a definition of a black aesthetic.
In the writers’ workshop sponsored by the group, the
writers are deliberately striving to invest their work
with the distinctive styles and rhythms and colors of
the ghetto, with those peculiar qualities which, for
example, characterize the music of a John Coltrane or a
Charlie Parker or a Ray Charles.7 Aiming
toward the publication of an anthology which will
manifest this aesthetic, they have established criteria
by which they measure their own work and eliminate from
consideration those poems, short stories, plays, essays
and sketches which do not adequately reflect the black
experience. What the sponsors of the workshop most hope
for in this delicate and dangerous experiment is the
emergence of new black critics who will be able to
articulate and expound the new aesthetic and eventually
set in motion the long overdue assault against the
restrictive assumptions of the white critics.
It is not that the
writers of OBAC have nothing to start with. That there
exists already a mystique of blackness even some white
critics will agree. In the November 1967 issue of
Esquire magazine, for instance, George Frazier, a
white writer who is not in the least sympathetic with
the likes of LeRoi Jones, nevertheless did a commendable
job of identifying elements of the black mystique.
Discussing “the Negro’s immense style, a style so
seductive that it’s little wonder that black men are, as
Shakespeare put it in The Two Gentlemen of Verona,
‘pearls in beauteous ladies’ eyes,’ ” Mr. Frazier
singled out the following examples:
|
The formal daytime attire
(black sack coats and striped trousers) the
Modern Jazz Quartet wore when appearing in
concert; the lazy amble with which Jimmy
Brown used to return to the huddle; the
delight the late “Big Daddy’ Lipscomb took
in making sideline tackles in full view of
the crow and the way, after crushing a ball
carrier to the ground, he would chivalrously
assist him to his feet; the constant cool of
‘Satchel’ Paige; the chic of Bobby Short;
the incomparable grace of John
Bubbles—things like that are style and they
have nothing whatsoever to do with ability
(although the ability, God wot, is there, too).
It is not that there are no white men with style, for
there is Fred Astaire, for one, and Cary Grant, for
another, but that there are so very, very few of them.
Even in the dock, the black man has an air about
him—Adam Clayton Powell, so blithe, so self-possessed,
so casual, as contrasted with Tom Dodd, sanctimonious,
whining, an absolute disgrace. What it is that made
Miles Davis and Cassius Clay, Sugar Ray Robinson and
Archie Moore and Ralph Ellison and Sammy Davis, Jr. seem
so special was their style.…
And then, of course,
there is our speech.
For what nuances, what
plays of light and shade, what little sharpnesses
our speech has are almost all of them, out of the black
world—the talk of Negro musicians and whores and
hoodlums and whatnot. ‘Cool’ and all the other words in
common currency came out of the mouths of Negroes.
‘We love you madly,’ said
Duke Ellington, and now the phrase is almost
a cliché. But it is a quality of the Negro’s
style—that he is forever creative, forever
more stylish. There was a night when, as I
stood with Duke Ellington outside the
Hickory House, I looked up at the sky and
said, ‘I hope it’s a good day tomorrow. I
want to wake up early.’
‘Any day I wake
up,’ said Ellington, ‘is a good day.’
And that was style. |
Well, yes.…
Black critics have
the responsibility of approaching the works of black
writers assuming these qualities to be present, and with
the knowledge that white readers—and white
critics—cannot be expected to recognize and to empathize
with the subtleties and significance of black style and
technique. They have the responsibility of rebutting the
white critics and of putting things in the proper
perspective. Within the past few years, for example,
Chicago’s white critics have given the backs of their
hands to worthy works by black playwrights, part of
their criticism directly attributable to their ignorance
of the intricacies of black style and black life. Oscar
Brown, Jr.’s rocking soulful Kicks and Company
was panned for many of the wrong reasons; and Douglas
Turner Ward’s two plays, Day of Absence and
Happy Ending, were tolerated as labored and a bit
tasteless. Both Brown and Ward had dealt satirically
with race relations, and there were not many black
people in the audiences who found themselves in
agreement with the critics. It is the way things are—but
not the way things will continue to be if the OBAC
writers and those similarly concerned elsewhere in
America have anything to say about it.
(1968)
Endnotes
1. National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People,
founded in New York in 1909 to empower and enfranchise
African Americans.
2. African American author, poet,
and lecturer (b. 1917).
3. Largest known blue diamond (112
karats); found in India and now held at the Smithsonian.
4. Amiri Baraka: poet, educator,
editor, political activist, and award-winning playwright
(b. 1934).
5. Martinican psychiatrist and
author of several important critiques of racism and
colonialism (1925–1961).
6. A nonprofit writers’ workshop in
Chicago founded by Fuller.
7. African American jazz musicians.
*
* * * *
Hoyt W. Fuller
1923–1981
Called by Addison
Gayle Jr. “the voice of young black writers across the
country who dared to differ … with … the mainstream of
American literature,” Hoyt Fuller was a forceful critic
of Western standards, practices, and awards in the arts
and cultural practices of the United States. Born in
Detroit, Fuller graduated from Wayne State University,
where he majored in literature and journalism.
Relentless in his pursuit of inequities of
representation and reward where black America was
concerned, Fuller sought to convince all black writers
and cultural workers to formulate new African-inspired
values and models of creativity.
When Fuller assumed
editorship of the journal Negro Digest, the
little magazine was devoted to collecting stories and
news releases on black social, political, and athletic
activities across the country. In 1970, after a few
years as editor, Fuller changed the name of the journal
to Black World. This name change reflected the
editor’s commitment to making his own work and that of
the journal an arm of the new Black Aesthetic. Fuller
himself wrote reviews and scathing denunciation of what
he considered egregious Western cultural erasures of
black art and achievements. He published poems, essays,
short stories, and forums by the new workers in the
Black Arts and black power movements. Such writers as
John A. Williams, Mari Evans, Etheridge Knight, Carolyn
Fowler, Carolyn Rodgers, and Alice Walker found their
bylines in Black World.
When Black World
was threatened with discontinuation by Johnson
Publishing Company, masses of black people assembled in
the street outside the company’s Chicago office and
burned copies of Ebony, its glossy black bourgeoisie
magazine. But as pressures from the police and U.S.
counterintelligence forces mounted, Johnson’s hand
against Black World was strengthened; the
magazine went out of circulation in the mid-1970s.
However, Fuller,
joined by a committed group of black activists, founded
a successor journal named First World.
Volunteering time, money, and professional skills, the
First World collective often found itself
sleeping on the floor of Fuller’s Atlanta home and
planning revolution over the only mean they could
afford—pizza. The Atlanta home became an African mecca
in the midst of a reactionary storm blowing across the
land.
Black colleges and
universities in Atlanta—always bastions of learning and
respectability—refused to hire Fuller to teach. So he
journeyed to Ithaca, New York, to teach at Cornell
University. Much of his salary was plied into the work
of First World.
In the book
Journey to Africa, Fuller wrote cogently about one
of the most significant times of his life. The
autobiographical work anticipates the efforts of Alex
Haley’s Roots by several years. Fuller’s account
consists of three essays that outline the work of Pan-Africanism.
Commencing with the observation that being “American”
has often entailed a search for roots in Europe; Fuller
describes how as a very young man he sought out African
origins. In this quest, he joined such earlier Pan-Africanists
as George Padmore and W. E. B. Du Bois.
Journey to
Africa was released by Third World Press of Chicago,
one of the new publishing venues of the Black Arts
movement. An inspired editor and enthusiastic supporter
of the Black Arts, Fuller served as an elder statesman
for such cultural organizations as the Organization of
Black American Culture (OBAC) in Chicago. He was also a
key organizer for various Pan-African festivals and
celebrations both in the United States and Africa. An
indefatigable proponent for the emergence of a new
African people in the Americas, he was found dead of a
heart attack on an Atlanta street in 1981.
In his obituary for Fuller,
historian Robert Harris proclaimed, “He challenged us to
document and to preserve Afro-Americans culture, the
bedrock of our experience in this country and informed
at its source by Africa.
Note: The author of this
bio-sketch is unknown.
* * * * *
Hoyt William Fuller Collection [1940-1981 (32
linear feet)]—Atlanta University Center/Robert W.
Woodruff Library—Archives and Special
Collections—Atlanta, Georgia—contains correspondence,
manuscripts, publications, photographs, and memorabilia
spanning his career until his death in 1981. His
correspondence, both personal and professional, is
copious and includes letters sent to and received from
family, friends and literary associates. The manuscripts
in the collection consist mainly of his published short
stories, poetry, essays and lectures, including those
written under the pen name "Bari Barrows."
Finding Aid
Ellison on Hoyt
W. Fuller, Negro Digest, and Black World
Ishmael Reed: You once wrote
for Black World, is that correct?
Ralph Ellison:
No, for the old Negro Digest; or more precisely,
they reprinted a short story which appeared first in the
New Masses. The Negro Digest was founded
by Alan Morrison and George Norford, then with the
coming of World War II, it was taken over by the founder
of Johnson Publication. Black World is actually a
metamorphosis of the Negro Digest.
IR: What
would you say was the source of the conflict between you
and the present editor of Black World?
RE: That’s a
mystery to me, but the conflict is one-sided. I don’t
know the man, and you can look high and low, but you
won’t find an attack nor even an ironic comment coming
from me. I suppose his motive is ideological.
IR: But, at
the same time he’s lashed out at you, hasn’t he?
RE: Oh, yes,
over and over again. He’s made me a sort of scapegoat. I
don’t know why, but perhaps it’s simply because I’ve
been around longer. And yet, there are older writers
than myself who are still active. It could have
something to do with my reputation; if so, I guess, it’s
a matter of negative flattery.
IR: George
Schuyler has been around, but they don’t even mention
him. As you say, the conflict is ideological. What would
you consider Fuller’s ideology to be?
RE: I
suppose it’s some sort of Black nationalism—I almost
said “Black racism”—but, whatever it is, it seems to
have given him an Ellison phobia. All I know is that
I’ve never replied to his attacks. My attitude toward
this complex Negro American situation leads me to feel
that there’s so little to be gained from our fighting
with one another that there’s so little to gain from our
fighting with one another that I can afford to ignore
such attacks. I learned long before I became a writer
that there were Blacks who preferred to put you down
rather than try to understand your point of view. Either
you agreed with them, or you were the enemy. Black
ideologists complain that white people are always giving
us hell, but, in truth, we get our first hell from one
another.
We suffer
chronically from Booker T. Washington’s
“crabs-in-a-basket” syndrome: let one crab try to climb
out, and others try to yank him back. But, perhaps this
is inevitable. After all, we grow up in our segregated
communities and have our initial contacts and
contentions with our own people. So our initial
conflicts are with those near at hand. But then there is
the factor of race as it operates in the broader
society. Following the Reconstruction, Southern Blacks
in many localities were allowed to kill one another
without too much fear of punishment, so people who
didn’t dare lift a hand against a white man would give
other Blacks hell. I guess we’re observing that tendency
being acted out by today’s Black ideologists. They seem
to hate Negroes worse than white racists.
But as I see it, we
are part of the larger American society and thus subject
to the same pressures and responsibilities that must be
confronted by other writers. Sure, we can cling
intellectually to the relative safety of what is now
termed the “ghetto,” where it appears that there are no
consequences to flow from our attacks upon one another,
but I see this as but another form of the obscenity we
have in the vicious crimes Blacks commit against other
Blacks. There are bigger and more important targets for
intellectual assault out there in the broader society.
Given the
complexity of American society and the difficulties of
art, I have always felt that it was more important for
to learn how to write than to be a H.N.I.C.*—which seems
to be the goal of certain Black critics. Instead, you
keep trying to maser those ideas, those
perspectives—wherever they arise—that will make the most
sense out of your experience. Black ignorance has little
to contribute to the achievement of freedom.
Source: The
Essential Ellison (Interview)—Ishmael Reed, Quincy
Troupe, Steve Cannon. Ishmael Reed’s and Al Young’s
Y’Bird • Copyright © 1977, 1978 Y’Bird Magazine
* * * * *
A Memory of Roots
By Hoyt W.
Fuller
It might be encouraging—as well as
ironic—to advocates of Negro History as a subject in
school curricula to know that children in another part
of the world will know our past. That this other part of
the world is Africa is all the more fitting. In the
Cameroun, for example, children will study the works of
Negro writers from Phillis Wheatley to James Baldwin.
And, in doing so, they will be able to recreate in their
own minds the whole sweeping, bitter, violent saga of
men and women from the shores of Africa enriching other
continents with their blood and sweat and spirit. In the
Cameroun, the production of suitable textbooks to serve
this purpose will be a part of the task of Thomas L.
Melone, professor of letters at the normal high school
of the Federal University of the Cameroun. Mr. Melone,
who is fluent in German and English—as well as in French
and a variety of African dialects—is currently touring
the Americas in search of material for his project. In
the United States, he made the Grand Tour, traveling
from New York City westward and southward, meeting en
route contemporary writers and visiting historical
landmarks associated with writers of the past. Later in
the year, he will fly off to Brazil, that other American
country stamped so indelibly with the genius of Africa.
Mr. Melone’s travels will take him to the Caribbean, of
course, and to the northern rim of South America. One
imagines his journey to be endlessly fascinating and
significant—characterized by discoveries and
recognitions with touch and move the soul. And, finally,
there is the practical achievement of having traced the
children of Africa across the seas and found their
descendants retaining still, in their art and
literature, the memory of their roots.
Source: Negro
Digest • March 1964 • Vol. XIII • No. 5
* * *
* *
* *
* * *
|
Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in
America
By Melissa V.
Harris-Perry
According to the
author, this society has historically exerted
considerable pressure on black females to fit into one
of a handful of stereotypes, primarily, the Mammy, the
Matriarch or the Jezebel. The selfless
Mammy’s behavior is marked by a slavish devotion to
white folks’ domestic concerns, often at the expense of
those of her own family’s needs. By contrast, the
relatively-hedonistic Jezebel is a sexually-insatiable
temptress. And the Matriarch is generally thought of as
an emasculating figure who denigrates black men, ala the
characters Sapphire and Aunt Esther on the television
shows Amos and Andy and Sanford and Son, respectively.
Professor Perry
points out how the propagation of these harmful myths
have served the mainstream culture well. For instance,
the Mammy suggests that it is almost second nature for
black females to feel a maternal instinct towards
Caucasian babies.
|
 |
As for the source
of the Jezebel, black women had no control over their
own bodies during slavery given that they were being
auctioned off and bred to maximize profits. Nonetheless,
it was in the interest of plantation owners to propagate
the lie that sisters were sluts inclined to mate
indiscriminately.
* * * * *
 |
Salvage the Bones
A Novel by Jesmyn Ward
On one level, Salvage the Bones is a simple story about a poor black family that’s about to be trashed by one of the most deadly hurricanes in U.S. history. What makes the novel so powerful, though, is the way Ward winds private passions with that menace gathering force out in the Gulf of Mexico. Without a hint of pretension, in the simple lives of these poor people living among chickens and abandoned cars, she evokes the tenacious love and desperation of classical tragedy. The force that pushes back against Katrina’s inexorable winds is the voice of Ward’s narrator, a 14-year-old girl named Esch, the only daughter among four siblings. Precocious, passionate and sensitive, she speaks almost entirely in phrases soaked in her family’s raw land. Everything here is gritty, loamy and alive, as though the very soil were animated. Her brother’s “blood smells like wet hot earth after summer rain. . . . His scalp looks like fresh turned dirt.” Her father’s hands “are like gravel,” while her own hand “slides through his grip like a wet fish,” and a handsome boy’s “muscles jabbered like chickens.”
|
Admittedly, Ward can push so hard on this
simile-obsessed style that her paragraphs risk
sounding like a compost heap, but this isn’t usually
just metaphor for metaphor’s sake.
She conveys something fundamental about Esch’s fluid state of mind: her figurative sense of the world in which all things correspond and connect. She and her brothers live in a ramshackle house steeped in grief since their mother died giving birth to her last child. . . . What remains, what’s salvaged, is something indomitable in these tough siblings, the strength of their love, the permanence of their devotion.—WashingtonPost
* * * * *
|
Ancient, Ancient: Short Fiction
By Kiini Ibura Salaam
Ancient, Ancient collects the short fiction by Kiini Ibura Salaam, of which acclaimed author and critic Nalo Hopkinson writes, ''Salaam treats words like the seductive weapons they are. She wields them to weave fierce, gorgeous stories that stroke your sensibilities, challenge your preconceptions, and leave you breathless with their beauty.'' Indeed, Ms. Salaam's stories are so permeated with sensuality that in her introduction to
Ancient, Ancient, Nisi Shawl, author of the award-winning Filter House, writes, ''Sexuality-cum-sensuality is the experiential link between mind and matter, the vivid and eternal refutation of the alleged dichotomy between them. This understanding is the foundation of my 2004 pronouncement on the burgeoning sexuality implicit in sf's Afro-diasporization. It is the core of many African-based philosophies. And it is the throbbing, glistening heart of Kiini's body of work. This book is alive. Be not afraid.''
|
 |
* *
* * *
 |
Karma’s Footsteps
By Mariahadessa Ekere Tallie
Somebody has to tell the truth sometime, whatever that truth may be. In this, her début full collection, Mariahadessa Ekere Tallie offers up a body of work that bears its scars proudly, firm in the knowledge that each is evidence of a wound survived. These are songs of life in all its violent difficulty and beauty; songs of fury, songs of love. 'Karma's Footsteps' brims with things that must be said and turns the volume up, loud, giving silence its last rites. "Ekere Tallie's new work 'Karma's Footsteps' is as fierce with fight songs as it is with love songs. Searing with truths from the modern day world she is unafraid of the twelve foot waves that such honesties always manifest. A poet who "refuses to tiptoe" she enters and exits the page sometimes with short concise imagery, sometimes in the arms of delicate memoir. Her words pull the forgotten among us back into the lightning of our eyes.—Nikky Finney /
Ekere Tallie Table
|
Her Voice /
Mother Nature: Thoughts on Nourishing Your
Body, Mind, and Spirit During Pregnancy and Beyond www.ekeretallie.com
* *
* * *
Life on Mars
By Tracy K. Smith
Tracy K. Smith, author of Life on Mars has been selected as the winner of the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for Poetry. In its review of the book, Publishers Weekly noted the collection's "lyric brilliance" and "political impulses [that] never falter." A New York Times review stated, "Smith is quick to suggest that the important thing is not to discover whether or not we're alone in the universe; it's to accept—or at least endure—the universe's mystery. . . . Religion, science, art: we turn to them for answers, but the questions persist, especially in times of grief. Smith's pairing of the philosophically minded poems in the book’s first section with the long elegy for her father in the second is brilliant." Life on Mars follows Smith's 2007 collection, Duende, which won the James Laughlin Award from the Academy of American Poets, the only award for poetry in the United States given to support a poet's second book, and the first Essence Literary Award for poetry, which recognizes the literary achievements of African Americans.
|
 |
The Body’s Question (2003) was her first published collection. Smith said Life on Mars, published by small Minnesota press Graywolf, was inspired in part by her father, who was an engineer on the Hubble space telescope and died in 2008.
* * * * *
 |
Natives of My Person
By George
Lamming
Natives of My Person focuses on slave
traders of the sixteenth century. The novel
reconstructs the voyage of the ship Reconnaissance,
which is led by a character known as the Commandant.
To atone for his past cruelties and barbarism, the
Commandant plans to establish a Utopian society on
the island of San Cristobal. The enterprise fails
for many reasons: fighting amongst the crew, loss of
interest, greed, and an inability to erase the past.
The novel argues that an ideal society cannot be
built by those who have committed moral atrocities
and unnecessary bloodshed in their past. . . .
Although
Natives of My Person
has a historical setting and deals with the voyage
of the Reconnaissance, a vessel ostensibly engaged
in the slave trade, a specific historical
phenomenon, it is only partly accurate to describe
it as a work of historical realism. Its realist
component is not to be found in its fidelity to
period costume, living conditions, or similar
revealing detail. Instead of the veneer of
verisimilitude that such usages provide, the novel
locates its realism in the way in which it
elaborately recapitulates an outlook. |
George Lamming: Contemporary Criticism
* * * * *
|
Season of Adventure
By George
Lamming
First
published in 1960, Season of Adventure details
the story of Fola, a light-skinned middle-class
girl who has been tipped out of her easy hammock
of social privilege into the complex political
and cultural world of her recently independent
homeland, the Caribbean island of San Cristobal.
After attending a ceremony of the souls to raise
the dead, she is carried off by the unrelenting
accompaniment of steel drums onto a mysterious
journey in search of her past and of her
identity. Gradually, she is caught in the
crossfire of a struggle between people who have
"pawned their future to possessions" and those
"condemned by lack of learning to a deeper
truth." The music of the drums sounds throughout
the novel, "loud as gospel to a believer's
ears," and at the end stands alone as witness to
the tradition which is slowly being destroyed in
the name of European values. Whether through
literary production or public pronouncements,
George Lamming has explored the phenomena of
colonialism and imperialism and their impact on
the psyche of Caribbean people. |
 |
* *
* * *
 |
Alexander
Crummell: A Study of Civilization and Discontent
By Wilson J. Moses
This
remarkable biography, based on much new
information, examines the life and times of
one of the most prominent African-American
intellectuals of the nineteenth century.
Born in New York in 1819, Alexander Crummell
was educated at Queen's College, Cambridge,
after being denied admission to Yale
University and the Episcopal Seminary on
purely racial grounds. In 1853, steeped in
the classical tradition and modern political
theory, he went to the Republic of Liberia
as an Episcopal missionary, but was forced
to flee to Sierra Leone in 1872, having
barely survived republican Africa's first
coup. He accepted a pastorate in Washington,
D.C., and in 1897 founded the American Negro
Academy, where the influence of his ideology
was felt by W.E.B. Du Bois and future
progenitors of the Garvey Movement. A
pivotal nineteenth-century thinker, Crummell
is essential to any understanding of
twentieth-century black nationalism. |
* * *
*
|
Beyond Katrina
A Meditation on the Mississippi Gulf Coast
By
Natasha Trethewey
Beyond Katrina is poet Natasha
Trethewey’s very personal profile of the
Mississippi Gulf Coast and of the people
there whose lives were forever changed by
hurricane Katrina.
Trethewey spent her childhood in Gulfport,
where much of her mother’s extended family,
including her younger brother, still lives.
As she worked to understand the devastation
that followed the hurricane, Trethewey found
inspiration in Robert Penn Warren’s book
Segregation: The Inner Conflict in the South,
in which he spoke with southerners about
race in the wake of the Brown decision,
capturing an event of wide impact from
multiple points of view. Weaving her own
memories with the experiences of family,
friends, and neighbors, Trethewey traces the
erosion of local culture and the rising
economic dependence on tourism and casinos.
|
 |
She chronicles
decades of wetland development that exacerbated the
destruction and portrays a Gulf Coast whose
citizens—particularly African Americans—were on the
margins of American life well before the storm hit. Most
poignantly, Trethewey illustrates the destruction of the
hurricane through the story of her brother’s efforts to
recover what he lost and his subsequent incarceration.
Renowned for
writing about the idea of home, Trethewey’s attempt to
understand and document the damage to Gulfport started
as a series of lectures at the University of Virginia
that were subsequently published as essays in the
Virginia Quarterly Review. For
Beyond Katrina, Trethewey has expanded this work
into a narrative that incorporates personal letters,
poems, and photographs, offering a moving meditation on
the love she holds for her childhood home.
* * * * *
The White Masters of the
World
From
The World and Africa, 1965
By W. E. B. Du Bois
W. E. B. Du Bois’
Arraignment and Indictment of White Civilization
(Fletcher)
* *
* * *
Ancient African Nations
* * * * *
If you like this page consider making a donation
* * * * *
Negro Digest /
Black World
Browse all issues
1950
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
____ 2005
Enjoy!
* * * * *
The Death of Emmett Till by Bob Dylan
/
The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll
/
Only a Pawn in Their Game
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson Thanks America for
Slavery /
George Jackson /
Hurricane Carter
* *
* * *
The Journal of Negro History issues at Project Gutenberg
The
Haitian Declaration of Independence 1804
/
January 1, 1804 -- The Founding of
Haiti
* * * * *
* * * *
*
ChickenBones Store
(Books, DVDs, Music, and more)
posted 1 May
2009
|