|
Walter
Hall Lively
Civil Rights Activist & Black
Liberationist (1942-1976)
By Rudolph Lewis
He
made you a bigger and better person than you believed yourself to
be. The man I am about to tell you a story about made you feel
that the world could be a better place than it was, than the
rat-infested holes many were forced to live in because of their
color and their class. The starvation wages that many of the poor
of Baltimore received were shameless. He believed that the poor of
Baltimore, those who did the work nobody else wanted to do, were
deserving of more than businessmen and politicians would allow.
The
wrongheadedness and recalcitrance of these forces of power
required critical conflict. By all well-meaning souls, these men
of privilege and self-interest had to be engaged to do justice We
each, he believed, had a responsibility, a duty, to reach out to
the poor and the poor reach out to each other in unity and power.
We all had the responsibility to work for a better arrangement
than the existing one of the crudest exploitation and a political
oppression based on race and class. Much of the grief and anguish
of ghetto life could be eliminated with the good will of all
sectors of the community -- academia, church, unions, community
groups, businesses, and government.
I
speak of Walter Hall Lively (1942-1976). He built no lasting
institutions. All those fell by the wayside, for whatever the
reason.
|
The 80s and the 90s--the era of the "me" and "do your own
thing" generations would have been foreign and unthinkable
to him. Many, nevertheless, knew him and desired to be in
his presence and were touched by him.
From
1964 to the 1974, Walter was probably the most well-known and
recognizable Negro in Baltimore. He was known by the highest
political figures in the state as well as the most lowly on Gay
Street or Pennsylvania Avenue, the petty hustler as well as the
storefront church madame. He was one of them. He could stir them
up and he could quiet them down. He rubbed elbows with gangsters
as well as the polished businessmen of the Chamber of Commerce and
the Greater Baltimore Committee. He was many things to many
people.
|
 |
| Above right: Leaders
conferring--Walter H. Lively, Jr. discusses civil rights
with veteran strategist and rights advocate Delegate Troy
Brailey. Both men are credited with advances made by
blacks in the Sixties. |
In
our age of cynicism, when each man wants to know what's in it for
him or her, Walt would be an innocent idealist, lacking in the
sophistication of the real deal. Yet he was no fool, let that be
understood. He just had a big soul and a sense of rightness. His
legacy is that he touched men's hearts and made them better men,
not only for themselves but for the world we all must live in. The
list would include Fred D. Mason, Bob Moore, Kinya Kiongozi,
Robert "Kaki" Mc Queen, and Melvin Brown. Many
others, including me, came under Walt’s influence. He inspirited
lots of people and from all walks of life.
The
Run for City Council
Two
months before I met Walt, I had just turned nineteen. He was
twenty-four or maybe twenty-five. He seemed much older then. He
was only thirty-four years old when he left us and now I’ve
grown old enough to be his father. But Walt was born old, like it
is with some men, ancient as the mountains. Walt was my first
tutor, the first to introduce me to Baltimore and Baltimore
politics.
It
was my third year of school in Baltimore when in October 1967 Walt
came to Morgan State College and spoke at the Student Center. It
was about the same time that SNCC’s Stokley Carmichael came
chanting "black power" and Baltimore County’s Spiro
Agnew came campaigning for the black vote to get into the
governor’s mansion. Walter wanted Morgan students to join his
campaign to become a councilman in East Baltimore.
In
1967, Negroes were about half of the population of Baltimore and
in half of the six council districts they were half or more than
half. These were poor working class and church-going Negroes. Men,
women and children, many of them a generation from the rural
South, living in the squalor of East Baltimore and West Baltimore
below North Avenue. Little of the federal housing we see today
existed. The marks of oppression were heavy in this population.
Though
Negroes were half of the population, they were not the ruling
half. They were the lower half. They were not even half of the
City Council. Negroes controlled only the Fourth District, that
which existed in the Pennsylvania Avenue area, which used to be
center of the Negro entertainment district. The First and Third
Districts were clearly white and working class, many ethnic
groups—Eastern and Southern Europe.
The
Second (Gay Street and Hopkins Hospital), Fifth (Edmondson
Village), and Sixth (Cherry Hill area) were the other political
areas in contest. Walt and others believed that the white
democratic club in the Second District was most vulnerable.
For
Walter had been working in the Gay Street/Broadway area since 1964
when he and a group of interracial students from Morgan, Goucher,
and Hopkins formed Union for Jobs and Income Now (U-JOIN) had been
working with the poorest of the poor on issues of housing,
unemployment, welfare, and business opportunities.
He
was well-known and well-liked, if not, at least by some,
well-loved. He lived among them as one of them. They knew he could
have had more if he were not concerned for them. They wanted and
needed to believe in someone. And Walt was their man. Like them,
he was resourceful and like many of the poor, he was daring,
resilient, and deceptive—like the folk has always had to be.
Like
the state of Maryland, Baltimore, is/was a Democratic town. If a
candidate won in the September primaries, he was a shoe in,
because voters in Baltimore voted Democratic. The 1967 September
primary produced two of the three member of an "all-white
slate, Clement J. Prucha, an incumbent, and Joseph V. Mach, a
former state senator.
 |
Robert L. Douglass, the Negro engineer and systems analyst,
came in second in the Democratic primary to earn a place on
the November ballot.
That
both
Mach and Prucha might sit in the Baltimore City Council that
represented a black Baltimore that was half of the population
was, for Walter, an outrage. Something had to be done. His work
with the poor, low waged black workers in East Baltimore for the
last three years qualified him more than these fellows of the
all-white slate. For he knew that they would do nothing about
black poverty and powerlessness in the Second district.
|
| My
Friend--Late mayor and governor, Theodore R. Mckeldin is
shown giving his personal endorsement to the 2nd district
candidacy of Walter H. Lively for City council in 1967.
Here the former mayor and governor not only backs his
endorsement for an AFRO photographer, but drapes a
brotherly arm around Mr. Lively's shoulders to prove it.
(The above image was painted by Kaki, based on Afro
photo.) |
Walter
came up with the scheme to run for a council seat in the Second on
the Republican ticket. Republicans do not win in Baltimore. But
Walter figured that with the right combination of factors and
conditions a Republican could win in Baltimore. It was Spiro
Agnew, however, who proved him right.
Walter
was registered as an Independent. He, however, convinced
Republican mayoral candidate Arthur Sherwood and a member of the
Second District Republican State Central Committee to run him in
the general election as a republican candidate. Irvin C.
Alexander, one of the three Republican nominees, resigned to make
room for Walter to run.
The
decision was announced on October 4, 1967 (a Wednesday), in The
Sun as follows:
"Walter
H. Lively, the militant young Negro civil rights leader, will be
nominated to fill the vacancy on the Republican councilmatic
ticket in Baltimore’s Second district. . . . Mr. Lively’s
nomination, which is to made formal tomorrow at a meeting of the
committee, will be a first in the recent history of Baltimore
politics. Never in memory has a major party put forward as a
standard bearer a civil rights activist of the Lively type.
"The
prospective candidate is currently director of the Union for Jobs
and Income Now, a militant group which, as Mr. Lively put it
yesterday, ‘is designed to involve poor people in solving their
own problems involving jobs, housing, and welfare. He has been a
leader of civil rights demonstrations and, on occasion, has been
placed under arrest."
Walt
was nothing is not persuasive. The Republicans had nothing to lose
and everything to gain. They were thrilled by the very real
possibility that Walter could outstrip Macha in the general
election It was an odd coalition of liberal and moderate Democrats
and Republicans, restless neighborhood people, and militant
interracial college students.
Walt
made himself presentable. He went to the flea market bought a
couple of suits, white shirts, and shoes. Altogether he spent
about $35. This was his campaign budget and on that he ran. That
is to say, he ran on his character and ingenuity. One writer
wrote: "he wears white shirts with button down collars under
a set of Ivy league tweeds. His hair, once shaggy and uncombed,
now sits parted and crop." Walter was malleable. He could be
anything; he could do anything. Many believed it. And thus many
expected very much of him. Maybe too much. Maybe I did also.
But
it was near election day that I first met Walter Lively
and his wife Lydia; and then Bob Moore, who worked with Walter in
U-JOIN before joining SNCC. It was after Bob went to prison that I
spent most of my time then with Walt and Fred Mason developing
Liberation House Press and a black bookstore
The
conservative and civil rights opponents considered Walter the
biggest danger to the white community. Walter believed he could
the black vote, but he had to get it out to vote. He got the
volunteers. But he needed a margin.
Walt
set out to show a large number of whites living in the district
that he is not an extremist but an idealist. He sipped tea with
Bolton Hill matrons. The charmed ladies of Bolton Hill thought he
would be a refreshing and welcome addition to the council.
Walt
explained that his campaign was "based on whether or not a
council can be elected that will carry out the programs of either
mayoral candidate. For there is an undue burden on people who can
least afford it – homeowners, renters, and small wage
earners." He received the support of the Republican Spiro
Agnew and former Governor Theodore R. McKeldin. Out of 16,000 to
17,000 votes cast for the top three positions Walter lost by only
3500 votes, with less than thirty days to organize and campaign
with no money.
Personal
Background
Walter
was born and raised in Philadelphia. He was the oldest of eight
children. His home from eight (8) to eighteen (18) was
Philadelphia's Tasker Homes, one of the city's earliest public
housing projects. He, his siblings, and his parents shared a small
apartment. His father left home when Walt was thirteen (13), never
to return.
Walter's
father was resourceful. Though he never finished high school, he
managed to get to college and become an accountant. "For a
couple of years," according to Walt, "we were an
aspiring bourgeois family. He was fairly light and he started
getting promoted. they were putting him up front as the official
company Negro. then he developed into a heavy drinker." When
his father left, his mother, also fair-skinned, and her children
had to go on welfare.
Walt
helped the family by working at odd jobs. He worked in stores from
the time he was twelve (12). Possibly, such enterprise provided
the opportunity for him to become skilled at talking and
communicating with people from all walks of life. He later got a
job as a helper on a huckster wagon and gradually took over the
business when the huckster, who like to drink, had trouble getting
up early enough in the morning to beat him to the wagon.
He
got the huckster business organized. He left the inner city where
he lived and went into the townhouse area. According to Walt,
"you could boost prices up there. You might say we polished
up our class analysis. We're take the same fruit, but fix it up in
nice little boxes. later we went out to the real bourgeois part of
town where my aunt was a maid--we got all the maids organized to
buy my stuff."
In 1960, Walter graduated
from South Philadelphia High School. Two noteworthy incidents
occurred before Walter finished his pre-college studies. When he
was fourteen years old, in 1956, after hearing his peers sitting
around complaining, Walter organized a picket line to protect the
monetary practice of a newspaper distributor, and won their
grievance. In the second incident, he learned that race mattered,
even among friends. Walter lived in a very multicultural section
of South Philly. Not long before he graduated from high school,
there was a killing of a white kid by a black kid. he noticed that
his white friends began to behave differently toward him as if he
had killed the white kid.
The summer after
his high school graduation, Walter worked on construction jobs.
From the fall of 1960 to the spring of 1961, he worked as a lab
technician and attended night school at the University of
Pennsylvania, where he studied "logic, reading, writing, and
arithmetic.) Though his formal study was interrupted by his
participation in the civil rights struggle, I, as well as others
who knew him, was impressed by his breath of knowledge. he seemed
to know something about everything and could carry on an
intelligent conversation on almost any topic. many believed,
moreover, Walter could do and accomplish whatever he set his mind
on. From
1961 to 1962, Walter participated in Freedom Rides in Maryland on
Route 40 and farther down the Eastern Seaboard. It was in 1961
that he first came to Baltimore. he spent a night or two in the
Elkton jail. he was jailed twenty-two (22) times for his civil
rights activity. His longest stay in jail was six days in North
Carolina. By
the fall of 1962, Walter was back at the University of
Pennsylvania. There he joined the Student Peace Union, an
organization that "pushed for an end to bomb tests and a
test-ban treaty, and all that jazz." On campus, Walter also
organized a University NAACP chapter. In Philadelphia, he also
organized a chapter of Congress of Racial Equality (CORE). At
twenty-one years old, Walter was chosen to be the Philadelphia
director for the March on Washington (1963). U-JOIN:
The Struggle for Baltimore's Poor Walt
came to Baltimore for a little while in 1961 with the Freedom
Rides and after the March on Washington in August 1963, he came to
stay. Maybe he understood that there was a vacuum in militant
Negro leadership in Baltimore and thus there was a place in the
city for him and his skills as an organizer. He came to Baltimore
with a unique approach.
| Photo
below: Protest Leader--Walter , as executive
director of the Urban Coalition, is shown leading a 1968
protest march in front of Maria's carry-out restaurant. A
restaurant employee shot at a Negro youth with several
shotgun blasts. In response, the owner George P. Xanthos
fired his son and several other employees including his
daughter-in-law, and night manager. |
 |
Walter
organized student volunteers to work with Baltimore's inner-city
poor. He had been influenced by the Students for a Democratic
Society (SDS), which had socialist leanings. SDS wanted to
mobilize the unskilled and the unemployed to fight for social
justice. Most in the organization did not know how to do that
among black workers, many of whom had arrived from the South
within that present generation.
Walter
actually put the notion into practice. He pulled together a
multiracial group of students from Goucher College, Morgan state,
and Johns Hopkins to work in the "ghetto," the black
slum areas, primarily East Baltimore. |
By 1964 Union for Jobs and
Income Now (U-JOIN) was born. with its headquarters on Gay Street,
U-JOIN was described as a private grassroots organization that
attempted to help the poor to help themselves. The
initial focus of U-JOIN was a criticism of poverty program as it
was organized in Baltimore. The prime criticism was that the
program was patriarchal and irrelevant in how it sought to assist
the poor. "Talking about the poverty program," Walt told
the local papers, "is like talking about a dying woman. You
can't be truthful and discreet at the same time." None of the
original eleven (11) members of the Community Action Commission
was poor. In
October 1965, the militant organization forced Buddy young, former
Colt halfback, to resign as poverty program commissioner. Walt had
no regrets about this action against the then popular and
well-known Negro. "He was an Uncle Tom," Walt explained,
"controlled by white people. We knew if he missed three
meetings in a row, he was off the commission. We wanted them to
put poor people on it." By 1968, there were twenty-one (21)
people on the commission; as a result of Walt and U-JOIN, ten (10)
of them were poor people. U-JOIN
also advised people who received unemployment of their rights and
helped them to collect money due them. In May 1966 U-JOIN began to
tackle the housing situation by organizing a petition for a new
provision in the housing code to outlaw potbelly stoves, unvented
gas heaters, and manual hotwater heaters. The landlords defeated
the measure.
In June 1966,
U-JOIN proposed a program to put money in the hands of the poor.
They wanted to hire 99 men from the ghetto for a beautification
program. City Council never adopted the program. To show up the
city, U-JOIN sponsored clean-up programs and built playgrounds on
vacant lots.
By August 1966,
U-JOIN had wrenched a major concession from the People's Court,
traditionally a rent collection agency. Walt had encouraged
renters to strike, to withhold their rents in escrow. A People's
Court Judge upheld the escrow and another would do the same.
In November 1966, however, the Supreme Bench of Baltimore ruled
the judge could not hold money in escrow. later, an escrow bill
was passed.
By late 1966,
U-JOIN had organized independent neighborhood groups. Rescuers
from Poverty, organized to help welfare recipients, was set up in
June 1966. It also sought to open up job opportunities and
increase welfare grants. In 1967 Tenants for Justice in Housing
was also organized. During its 1966 rent-strike campaign, U-JOIN
also conducted a voter registration drive. Also,
during this same period the Self-Help Housing Program was
organized. it sought to help poor people with housing disputes
with landlords and to improve neighborhood sanitation. It was the
first poverty program ever drafted by residents of the area
themselves. Jim Griffin, i believe, headed up this organization
which had its office on North Avenue near Greenmont Avenue and
Barclay Street. Through
a program of "responsible radicalism" Walter Lively had
changed the chemistry of the life of the poor in the Gay Street
and the Pennsylvania areas. The poor of Baltimore gained
confidence in itself and its latent power. It was Walter's view
that "fighting for bread and butter and a good roof is a
fight for freedom." U-JOIN
continued to sharpen its tactics and focus. As a result of many
shouting matches at City Hall, Walter Lively made a name for
himself among the poor and the powerful in the state. Walter's run
for political office was just another tactic developed by U-JOIN
to put poor people into political action to improve their status
and raise the consciousness of the community. But many
misunderstood, especially the powerful and the professional
flunkies and opportunists, his motivation and thus misjudged him.
This fact will become more evident. SNCC,
CORE, & Black Militancy Late
1967 Bob Moore returned to Baltimore (his hometown) from Atlanta,
Georgia, and the Deep South where he worked for civil rights for
two or three years with the Student Non-Violent Coordinating
Committee (SNCC). (Read
essay on Bob Moore, "Forty Years of Determined
Struggle.") On his return, Bob, who had worked with U-JOIN
before he left Baltimore, set up a SNCC office at 432 E. North
Avenue and raised the cry of "black control of black
communities." To
save expenses and refocus its efforts to accommodate the Black
Power movement U-JOIN shared office space with SNCC on North
Avenue. With the rise in black consciousness, Walter was no longer
interested in developing and sustaining a multiracial
organization. U-JOIN faded into the background while Walter
developed other vehicles to heighten the struggle. The
building at 432 E. North Avenue later became the home of
Liberation House Press, a print shop geared for movement
activities and a training ground for the young black men Walter
drew to his various programs. The press developed more fully after
two events. Baltimore's four-day rebellion (April 4-8, 1968), a
response to the assassination of Martin Luther King who was-loved
for his fight for worker's rights (especially in Memphis,
Tennessee, with garbage workers), found the press in its nascent
stages. Yet equipped to print leaflets to close shops on Greenmont,
Gay, Pennsylvania and Mondawmin (all black shopping areas) to
honor King's death. With the decline of SNCC, Bob Moore joined the
union movement, specifically the union for Baltimore garbage
workers and then Local 1199. Then there
was CORE, a major militant player about town. Like U-JOIN, CORE
had its office on gay Street during the years 1966 up until the
riots. It became more militant in its demands on the city when it
changed its local leadership the summer of 1967 from Walter S.
Brooks to Danny Gant. With its national organizers, CORE attempted
to find and develop local leadership. Danny Gant
impressed me with his militancy and outrageousness. For some
reason or another, I went with Danny Gant (I was then with SNCC)
to Mayor D'Alesandro's office and Danny sat down and put both feet
on the mayor's desk. For me, then, it was an extraordinary act.
Maybe it was a kind of one-upmanship in that SNCC and its cry of
"Black Power" drove many to the left, to more militant
and radical acts. The mayor, however, made no comment about
Danny's feet, as if it were a small matter or an exhibition that
was tolerable. Walter's run for office also had
an impact on CORE. Lincoln O. Lynch, CORE's associate national
leader, described Walter as a prototype for political candidates
whom CORE wished to discover and to back in its efforts to develop
a "strong black political consciousness." But there were
no such people as Walter waiting to be discovered. Walter had a
history and a record of struggle, with CORE and other groups.
Lynch believed that Walter would be an excellent candidate
in ten years for Baltimore's first black mayor. Urban
Coalition: The Liberal White Response With
other major cities exploding in flames and with U-JOIN locally
highlighting the nexus of poverty, race, and powerlessness,
Baltimore's liberal elite was forced to make an attempt to get on
top of the problem. They were familiar with the Kerner Commission
Report which had outlined the devastating effects of institutional
racism. By December 20, 1967, leaders in business, labor, civil
rights, education, religion, and government had come together to
form the "Urban Coalition." Its first meeting, however,
occurred only April 16, 1968, almost two weeks after the city's
racial conflagration. Many in the public felt that the
organization was thus created as an "anti-riot group."
|
Photo below: Theodore R.
McKeldin. former mayor of Baltimore and governor of
Maryland. |
| Former Governor Theodore R. McKeldin was
named chairman of the Urban Coalition. Two vice-chairmen
were named, both popular and well-known Negroes: Parren J.
Mitchell, the city's anti-poverty director and Homer E.
Favor, director of Urban Studies at Morgan States College.
Gilbert Rosenthal, president of the Baltimore Association
of Commerce, was named as secretary of the Coalition and
Wilmer V. Beall, president of the Maryland Council of
Churches, was named treasurer. |
 |
With his respectable run for City Council in
October and November 1967, Walter, then the leading Negro activist
for the poor, was named executive director of the Urban Coalition.
the executive director was scheduled to be paid $13,000; the
chairman of the coalition, $20,000. McKeldin, however, rejected
the salary. In addition to Walter, the Coalition also hired an
administrative director at $9,500 and two secretaries. The
objective of the Coalition was to diagnose slum problems of
housing, economic development, job and legislation and to
recommend corrective medicine. the naive view was that the
Coalition would "seek to find out what is wrong and correct
it." How these problems were to be corrected in a timely
manner was never really made clear. For in a sense, those in the
Coalition, though liberal; were part of the problem. And, thus,
the leader of the poor, namely, Walter, was placed in a situation
that he too would become part of the problem. But Walter was time
enough for such traps. His home was in the briar patch. The
city was a partner in the Coalition and there were promises that
the City council would help to finance the Coalition to the tune
of $20,000. the political conservatives and right wing elements in
the City Council, which included Mach and Prucha (Second District)
and Reuben Caplan (Fifth District) and the state legislature,
which included John A. Kutowski and Joseph M. Wyatt, did not
attack the Urban Coalition itself. These reactionary elements
attacked Walter Lively, the executor director. This
reactionary group of politicians was a "subversive."
Moreover, the police had arrested Walter during the
"riots." They found Walter present at several fires, and
arrested him for arson. Walter, however, was released and the
charges dropped for they had no proof. In addition, Walter had
assisted General Gelston of the National Guard in the Pennsylvania
area in getting people of the street. Reuben Caplan leveled
another attack. He charged that Walter had called a State Senator
a "white gangster." These reactionary
elements decided to make their voices heard by a decrease in the
city's contribution by the amount of Walter's salary. William
Boucher III, director of the Greater Baltimore Committee, went
before the City Council to plead for the city's full financial
participation. Moderate members of the City Council, such as City
Council President William Donald Schaefer and City Comptroller
Hyman Pressman, were also apprehensive about Walter's part in the
Coalition. The City council, thus cut the funds, but they were
restored by then Mayor Tommy D'Alesandro. The
Coalition office was on the 27th floor of the new 222 Saint Paul
in downtown Baltimore. I visited the office once while Walter was
director. It was a long way from Gay Street or from North Avenue.
The office was sparse and sterile. He was operating on a small
budget of less than $50,000 a year which went mainly into salary
and the lease of office space. The liberal elite associated with
the Urban Coalition certainly had a different notion than Walter
to what purpose the Coalition would serve. Walter
saw the Coalition as a means to heighten the contradictions
between the poor and the rich, the powerful and the powerless.
Walter told one reporter that the Coalition sought to increase the
power of low-income neighborhoods. The Coalition, according to
Walter, would not be "going in and paternalistic helping
people." Walter wanted the Coalition to be a kind of U-JOIN
on a larger scale with a bigger budget and powerful men behind
him. Deep down, the liberal political elite
expected that Walter wanted a soft, cushy position in which he
could make a career for himself and continue to rub elbows with
the rich and the powerful, to place himself in a position to make
another run for political office. Walter wanted to develop,
however, more effectively "independent and radical
approaches" to the problems of the poor. The Coalition would
differ from a civil rights organization by having more money and
management skills at its disposal; differ from government by
lacking restrictions on its political and financial dealings. Walter's
dream was to create in Baltimore a city that was "made up of
unions of self-supporting neighborhoods." These neighborhoods
initially would be channeled funds and techniques by the
Coalition. Walter wanted millions of dollars to flow into the
slums and into the pockets of the poor. Walter pursued a dream. he
did what one could even if others around or allied to him had
other plans. The Urban Coalition, of course, did not work and came
to nothing. For Walter was not a patsy, looking out for
self-interest.
| Photo below: Walter without
beard and with coat and tie, his election gear |
 |
Walter stayed with the Urban Coalition
barely six months. By November 1968, Walter resigned in
protest because the City Council did not confirm Walter P.
Carter as the head of the city's Community Action Agency,
the Model Cities Program. Some may think that such an
action on Walter's part was reckless, especially since he
had a wife and a child. But Walter also knew that
Baltimore's power elite was going to drag its feet in
doing anything to change the power equation in Baltimore. |
While executive direction of the Coalition,
Walter helped to settle the strike of Baltimore's sanitation
workers. With his exit from the Coalition, Walter worked a short
stint with the International Union of the American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) in its efforts to
organize city workers. Doing the Right Thing:
Closing the Book In late 1967 or early 1968,
Walter married Lydia Stancil, a Morgan State coed. Their son Malik
was born in about 1969. They had a place, I believe, in the 1000
black of Broadway, near Hopkins Hospital. I worked with Walter
until about 1971. At that time I became a staff member of Local
1199, which I had done some volunteer work in the 1969 organizing
campaign. There were others who followed me. Some of them included
Lee Uhuru and Kinya, who had worked with the cultural nationalists
of Soul School, located in the Freemont-Edmondson Avenue area. All
of us who worked full-time with Walt and his projects were on a
kind of subsistence pay. We were a part of the movement to make
this a better world and we believed that a better world was
coming. All of them were in our late teens or early twenties. We
were indeed idealist. So Walt not only had a number of young guys
who were with him in his projects to take care of, he also had his
own family. For Walter the struggle to raise the consciousness for
social justice was foremost in his mind. He did not seek the
bourgeois life to his wife's disappointment and eventually to her
hurt. Walter never had very much materially for
himself or his wife and son. he lived a meager existence. Much of
the money he accumulated was returned to projects geared to
achieve social justice. He wanted a life larger than the mundane
desires of men, to stand for social ideals of justice, equality,
and brotherhood. On the practical side, to remain a leader of his
time he knew he needed to retain his credentials with all of the
elements of the movement -- the nationalists, the Negro
middle-class leaders, New Left whites, young black intellectuals,
and the black poor. Most of all he wanted to maintain his true
calling as a representative of the poor. This indeed he
accomplished in his short life of thirty-four years. Several
of us became board members of a non-profit corporation which was
used to write grants. Some money was received from Cummins Engine.
Printing presses were acquired for Liberation House Press. The old
Pratt Library building in the 800 block of Broadway was acquired
for a black history museum. Walter also purchase land in
Pennsylvania that was used as a retreat for movement people and
inner-city kids. None of these projects were
ever fully developed. Quarrels and disagreements developed among
the guys who worker with Walter. We all however loved him and
respected him for his commitment, his knowledge, and his big soul.
One at a time, we each drifted away from him and the subsistence
movement life he lived and that others lived with him. Many of us
were concerned about our futures. All that was beyond Walt, for he
did not seek to plan our lives or counsel us about our individual
situations. He expected much of us, maybe too much. Either
you were with him or you were not. I believe he understood the
situation many of us were wrestling with. But he couldn't really
be our father, at most, only a big brother. He helped many of us,
personally. He lend out thousands of dollars that were never paid
back, including me. The last time I saw him he teased me about the
money; but it was not the money, but rather he felt I had
abandoned him and not kept in contact with him. It is one of my
few regrets. But the movement seemed adrift.
Walter had made plans, but I did not know how my life fit into all
of that. Though we worked collectively with Liberation House
Press, decisions were not made collectively, and the
incriminations began. And so I split. For the times had
changed. After he left the Coalition, Walter no longer sought
media attention. He had no listed telephone number and made
himself scarce in his own activities with Liberation House Press. Reverend
Vernon Dobson, a civil rights activist, then pastor of Union
Baptist Church on Druid Hill made these comments at Walter's
death:
| I guess I saw him a month ago. I can't say
he struck me as anything, but he never did. When other
young persons were caught up in clothes, he
over-dramatized his poverty. You couldn't judge by his
clothes or his countenance. . . . you couldn't pin him
down either. . . . he dealt with you, not the other way
around. According to the way his mind was set, he let you
into his living room or he kept you waiting in the
anteroom. the last time I saw him, he kept me in the
anteroom. |
Walter's mind was massive and his energy
boundless and had a thousand things going on at once. He needed a
trusted administrative assistant to manage his papers and his
affairs. But no such person was available. At his death, uncashed
checks were found under stacks of paper. Money was always a means
for him rather than an end in itself. Walter
died at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He was there ill for a few days. I
did not go see him, for I did not expect him to leave us so soon.
Fred Mason told me he said the queerest thing, while he was on
what would become his death bed, "Did you know Lenin never
learned how to play, the piano?" Walter was fond of both
Lenin, Trotsky, and Russian classical music, especially
Shostakovich (1906-1975). Walter got sick on his
birthday, August 27, 1976. he died September 11, 6;30 in the
morning, on an aneurysm, a cardio-vascular ailment. In another
sense, one may said that he died of a broken heart. he could not
effect the liberation of his people and he did not want to be a
sell-out. Even with his vast powers, he realized, he was not able
to accomplish all that he desired and decided to just give up the
ghost. He was not be fully appreciated in life and maybe in death
he might receive that recognition he rightly deserved. Besides
the former Lydia Stancil and his son Malik, Walter was survived by
a sister, Mrs. Deborah Carter, of Philadelphia; three brothers,
David, a student in North Africa, Donald, and Richard both of
Philadelphia; his mother, Lillian, of Philadelphia and his father
Walter H. Lively. His family took his remains back to
Philadelphia. Soon after Walt's death, there was
a farewell program for him in Baltimore. I attended this secular
program but did not speak. As I recall Bob Moore, Fred Mason, and
Kinya Kiongozi, and maybe Reverend Dobson spoke a few kind words.
None of us has really said goodbye to Walter. He remains in all
our hearts. For we know he's still on the battlefield. Walter
would be amused by my reference to him as a "Christ."
For I do not believe he was "religious" at all. He saw
much harm that otherworldly religions have done. He spoke of the
right or righteousness, of course. But I am stressing
similarities. Like Christ he was for the poor and he sought
liberation of the oppressed. And he sought what was just and
equitable. He found these Christian ideals, however, in socialist
ideologies, rather than capitalist-oriented ideologies. But the
greatest similarity was his selflessness, his willingness to
forego personal aggrandizement. But whatever are the proper
accolades for Walter, clearly, he made great sacrifices for the
powerless and the poor. If he were not God's son, indeed God
smiled on him. His deeds are worthy of our emulation and truly he deserves
our remembrance.
* *
* * *
posted 2 November 2007 / updated 18 May 2008 |