|
White
Dog
Of Hellhounds and Racism
A Film Review by
Amin Sharif
|
I got to keep movin’
blues fallin’ down like hail
blues fallin’ down lile hail . . .
And the days keep worryin’ me,
there’s a hellhound on my trail . . .
Robert
Johnson, “Hellhound on My Trail”
|
When Attorney
General Eric Holder characterized the United States as a
“nation of cowards when it comes to race,” he might well
have been referring to Paramount Studio and the Beverly
Hills-Hollywood branch of the NAACP in 1981. It was in
that year that Paramount Studios decided at the behest
of the NAACP and other forces to shelve Director Sam
Fuller’s controversial film
White Dog. Now, almost three decades later, the
film has been released to the general public on DVD as
part of the Criterion Collection of “important classic
and contemporary films.”
Fuller’s
White Dog is based on an equally controversial
nonfiction work by Romain Gary in which he and his wife,
actress Jean Seberg, find “a stray German shepherd that,
they soon discover, has been trained to attack black
people on sight.” In Gary’s book, the couple decided to
attempt to have the dog retrained and as recorded in J.
Hoberman’s critique of both the film and book—Sam
Fuller, Unmuzzled—they turn the dog over to a Black
Muslim trainer for the task. In what can only be called
literary irony, the Black Muslim trainer succeeds in
retraining the dog. The only problem is that now the dog
has been trained to attack whites—not blacks—on sight.
Both as a literary
work and film,
White Dog is concerned with the effects of
racism as an integral part of American society. The
question that White Dog posits is whether the
racist elements within American society can be
“retrained” or must they be annihilated by any and all
means necessary. In 1981, when
White Dog was made this was not a theoretical
question. For by then, white flight from America’s urban
centers was a fact. And right wing politicians were
calling for a white moral majority to give them a
mandate to reverse the gains made by blacks and other
minorities during the Civil Rights era.
Perhaps sensing
this retreat from a commitment to Civil Rights and
progressive politics, Sam Fuller may have thought that
by making
White Dog that he would jolt the public to once
again consider the question of racism in America. That
he was certainly familiar with the potency of the
subject matter is attested to by the fact that he was
made aware of white dog phenomenon as far back as the
1930s when he covered the Ku Klux Klan for the New
York Evening Graphic. But by the time
White Dog even the vivid black and white images
of (white) dogs attacking black men, women and children
during civil rights demonstrations had receded from
America’s consciousness. So from the very beginning,
Fuller’s
White Dog had an uphill battle.
Despite the
obstacles placed in the path of film, Fuller somehow
found a way to bring a relevant and stark vision of
modern racism to the American movie screen. This is not
to say that the film is not without its flaws. The
film’s leading actress Kristy McNichol was just
graduating to adult projects when
White Dog was filmed and appears a bit
inexperienced for the role. There are veteran actors
Paul Winfield and Burl Ives who have significant roles
in the film. And they play their roles well. But there
is an unevenness that exists in the film that can not be
overlooked. Yet Fuller’s over all vision and his ability
to transverse the difficult subject of contemporary
racism raises the film far above these minor flaws.
Ultimately what emerges is a film that is well worth
viewing particularly for younger Americans who may be
unfamiliar with the mythological and historical material
from which the film is drawn.
Much of the success
of the film is accomplished by Fuller’s reworking Gary’s
novel. His film opens with Julie Sawyer, a young actress
played by McNichol, colliding with a beautiful white
German shepherd while driving on an isolated country
road. Sawyer rushes the dog to an animal hospital where
she finds that she must pay for its treatment. Reluctant
to take responsibility for the animal, Sawyer only
concedes to care for the dog after being told that it
might end up in the city pound if it should go unclaimed
by its owner. Soon, a bond of love is established
between Sawyer and the dog. And all seems well.
It is not until the
dog pads into a small town not far from Sawyer’s
isolated home after chasing a rabbit that we get our
first indications of how dangerous a “white dog” can be.
For as soon as the animal spies a black truck driver, it
launches an attack upon the unsuspecting black man. It
is days before the dog returns to Sawyer’s home. And in
the interim, we have no idea how many black people may
have been attacked by the dog—or if it has attacked
anyone at all. The only suggestion we have of the
animal’s vicious nature is its blood stained coat which
is dutifully washed clean by Sawyer.
The next attack
comes when Sawyer and a black actress friend are filming
a commercial at a studio. It is then that the dog breaks
the leash that holds him fast to a pole and leaps upon
the back of the actress inflicting serious injuries that
require hospitalization. Sawyer is at once stunned and
perplexed by the behavior of her loving pet. It is only
when she is told by her boyfriend that her pet is an
“attack dog” trained to seek out black victims does
Sawyer gain an inkling of the malevolent force that she
has brought into her own house. Sawyer’s boyfriend urges
her to take the dog to the pound and have it euthanized.
But Sawyer believes that she can save her pet, that it
can be trained to unlearn its function as a “white dog.”
It is at this point
in the film that Sawyer embarks on a mission to find a
kind of latter day dog whisperer—a person who can cut
out the animal’s malevolent tendency to attack black
people. She finds such a trainer in the person of Keys
played by Paul Winfield. Sawyer is introduced to Keys
through Carruthers, played by the noted folksinger Burl
Ives. Carruthers is the owner of Noah’s Ark which is
part refuge and part training center for animals used in
commercials and films. Though Carrauthers is skeptical
that Sawyer’s pet can be retrained, Keys who is an
anthropologist believes that white dogs can indeed be
salvaged. In fact, the retraining of white dogs has been
Keys’ personal mission for years—though all his efforts
to date have failed.
It is Keys who
relates the origin and history of the white dog to
Sawyer. “They are taken as pups,” he tells her, “and
beaten by black slaves or winos and drug addicts until
they come to see black skin as their enemy.” Keys words
are an understatement if the full truth be known. "White
dogs" are the source of the mythical hellhound sung
about by bluesmen like Robert Johnson. Some were said to
be especially bred for size, viciousness, and tracking
ability. These dogs could take down a black man and tear
him to pieces with little or no effort. They were the
scourge of every runaway slave and every black man
attempting to escape a lynch mob. It is only now when
African Americans are no longer hemmed in by slavery and
Jim Crow segregation that the white dog no longer haunts
their dreams.
Keys immediately
finds out that the retraining of Sawyer’s pet is a
daunting test. This is the strongest, most vicious
animal that he has ever worked with. He is even given to
doubt his mission when the white dog escapes the center,
chases a black man into a church, and mauls him to
death. When Sawyer finds out about the murder, she has
finally had enough. She commands Keys to shoot the dog
but Keys refuses to do so. He instead continues to
retrain the animal and is rewarded when the dog takes
food from his own black hand. To confirm that his
retraining has taken hold, Keys brings in a black friend
to approach the dog and finds that the animal seems to
have overcome its desire to attack black people
altogether. And a once doubting Carruthers having
personally observed a change in the animal’s behavior is
the first to concede that Keys may have indeed succeeded
in his lifelong mission to retrain white dogs. But
despite Carruther’s pronouncements, Keys is far less
certain of his success.
Eventually, Sawyer
is called to retrieve her reformed pet from the center.
But before Sawyer can leave to pick up the animal, she
is confronted by the true owners of the white dog. In a
masterful stroke of filmmaking, Fuller reveals that the
owner of the white dog is not a member of the Klan or a
right wing fanatic. He depicts the owner as an affable
middle aged white man accompanied by his two adorable
grandchildren.
And it is at this
point that Fuller who has now warmed to his task begins
to raise doubts about the status of the white dog in the
minds of the viewer. For when Sawyer’s dog approaches
her at the center, there is a moment when it appears to
be preparing to attack her. But at the last second our
view of the animal changes and the dog seems to have
reverted to being her docile pet once more. Perhaps
suspecting that Sawyer’s dog has not truly changed its
malevolent behavior, Keys trains a gun upon the animal
during its reunion with its master. Keys’ suspicion
would prove prophetic. For when Sawyer bends down to
embrace her pet, the animal catches a glimpse of
Carruthers, leaps from her embrace and mauls the man to
death. Keys has no alternative but to shoot the white
dog in an unsuccessful effort to save his friend’s life.
It is here that the film ends leaving the viewer to
ponder its many metaphors and much praised symbolism.
In an excellent
companion pamphlet that comes with the DVD of the film,
Armond White in an essay entitled “Fuller v. Racism”
states that “no movie is ahead of its time, just ahead
of the cultural gatekeepers.” That
White Dog could be shelved simply because it
brought into question the way that race in America was
addressed was and continues to be an unforgivable act.
Though White seems to believe that the NAACP and
Paramount Studios were being practical in their actions
concerning the film, others can not help but find a kind
of obtuse view of artistic expression on their part. Was
Fuller’s film worthy of being seen by the general public
in 1981? Of course, it was. How could the NAACP object
to any honest dialogue concerning race especially at a
time when black and white citizens were questioning (and
still question) the relevance of the organization in the
lives of everyday black men and women?
Setting all this
aside,
White Dog is and continues to be an important
film that should be seen by every American regardless of
race. I advise that parents bring their children into
the room while viewing the film—although the film is
certainly not fare for children under twelve—and discuss
its contents with them. College students and community
activists should develop discussion groups around the
film. It is only when American society is willing to
view race from all sides, confronting its contradictory
and paradoxical character that it will finally have the
courage to do away with its malevolent effects. Buy
White Dog, for it is film well worth having.
If you like this article consider making a donation
* * *
* *
Other Commentary
Critics praised the film's hard line look at racism and
Fuller's use of melodrama and metaphors to present his
argument, and its somewhat disheartening ending that
leaves the impression that while racism is learned, it
can not be cured. Reviewers consistently questioned the
film's lack of wide release in the United States when it
was completed and applauded its belated release by
Criterion.
Wikipedia
Samuel Fuller’s
throat-grabbing exposé on American racism was
misunderstood and withheld from release when it was made
in the early eighties; today, the notorious film is
lauded for its daring metaphor and gripping pulp
filmmaking. Kristy McNichol stars as a young actress who
adopts a lost German shepherd, only to discover through
a series of horrifying incidents that the dog has been
trained to attack black people, and Paul Winfield plays
the animal trainer who tries to cure him. A snarling,
uncompromising vision, White Dog is a tragic
portrait of the evil done by that most corruptible of
animals: the human being.
Criterion
* * * *
*
|
Go,
Tell Michelle
African American Women Write to the New First Lady
Edited
Barbara A. Seals Nevergold and Peggy Brooks-Bertram |
 |
* * *
* *
* * * * *
posted 10 April
2009 |