|
International Woodworkers Union Organizing in the South
A DIRECTOR PROFILES HIS ORGANIZERS
International Woodworkers
of America Southern Regional Office
95 Merpitts Avenue, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia
December 16, 1955
Mr. A.F. Hartung,
President
Int'l Woodworkers of
America, AFL-CIO
418 Governor Bldg.
Portland 4, Oregon
Dear Brother Hartung:
In accordance with our conversation of December 15, I
am submitting below the names of the former CIO representatives that
were working on I.W.A. projects when the merger convention was held and
now working under Jack Livingston.
Earl W. Davis -- Richmond, Virginia Research and
Education
James R. Cochran - Presently assigned to do
administrative work at Louisville, Mississippi, D.L. Fair Lumber Co.,
and organizing Koppers Company, Granada, Mississippi, 150 employees.
Also, contacts already made for his next assignment at Macon, Georgia at
Maxwell Brothers Box Factory, 400 employees. Brother Cochran is a very
valuable man to the I.W.A. and has been assigned to I.W.A. under the
direction of the Southern Director since January 1952 to do
administrative and organizational work.
Joe Moore - Orlando, Florida. Organizing Cummer-Graham
Co., Lacohee, Fla. election set December 16, 1955, and I personally am
not too concerned about this man as he does not fit into the plans of
I.W.A.
John Hooper Riffe - Organizing with Joe Moore in
Lacohee, Florida. Will be a valuable man with a little more experience
and I would like to keep him assigned to the I.W.A. as long as the
Federation is paying him.
A.S. O'Bannon - Assigned to the strike at W.T. Smith
Lumber Company, Chapman and Greenville, Ala. A valuable man and all the
work he has done since going on the CIO payroll has been done for the
I.W.A. I would like very much to keep this man and would have no
objections to putting him on our staff if necessary and an opening
occurred.
William (Bill) Rowe - Organizing Winnfield,
Louisiana. Olin-Matheson Corp. 400 employees. Card signing in progress
now. After this campaign is finished I am not personally concerned about
continuing his services.
Elijah Jackson - Negro organizer, assigned to Corbett
Lumber Company, Wilmington, N.C. election December 16, 1955. No new
assignment. A very good man when working alone but has trouble getting
along with other organizers white or colored. I do not feel that he
would fit into the I.W.A. other than to be used as long as the
Federation pays him.
If you desire any further information on this matter,
please advise.
Fraternally yours,
J. L. Baughman
Southern Director
* * *
* * * *
IWA ORGANIZER ARRESTED
International Woodworkers
of America
Affiliated with Congress
of Industrial Organizations
418 Governor Building
Portland 4, Oregon
June 6, 1956
Mr. Boyd Leedom, Chairman
National Labor Relations
Board
Washington 25, D.C.
Dear Sir:
I am writing you relative to a situation that has
developed in Dublin, Georgia which I believe involves policies of the
National Labor Relations Board. This case should be of great interest to
the Board and to the General Counsel if the policies of the Board are to
be carried out without the direct interference of local and county
officials in the conduct of legal Union activities under the provision
of the Act.
The facts in this case are as follows: Some time ago
the Representative of the AFL-CIO, Mr. James Cochran, who was assigned
to work in behalf of our International Union on organizational work in
the States of Georgia, started contacting the employees of the Georgia
Plywood Company at Dublin, Georgia. A vast majority of employees signed
application cards with our Union.
There was no disturbance at any time in or about the
plant or around the town of Dublin but immediately there was
considerable agitation on the part of local business people against the
organization of any workers in the area. The basic background of this
agitation is discovered in the fact that a citizen's council meeting was
held in Dublin at which most of the business men of Dublin were present.
Mr. Frank Twitty, Floor Leader in the Georgia Senate, made a keynote
speech concerning labor organizers creating dissension and strife in
Dublin and how such could be prevented.
At this citizen's meeting the Mayor and Council
informally adopted an ordinance, unconstitutional on its face, which
makes impossible requirements of labor union representatives in Dublin,
Georgia. Later the Mayor and Council formally adopted the ordinance
which requires a license of $2,500 and also requires for anyone
licensed, to be a resident of Dublin for a period of years. It also
required that for each man organized, a fee to be paid to the City.
With such an ordinance passed by the Council it was
impossible to carry out normal organizational activities within the
confines of the City of Dublin so Mr. Cochran held organizational
meetings with the employees of Georgia Plywood Company outside of the
City of Dublin with a great degree of success until the Company began
actively discriminating against the workers who had actively supported
the Union within the plant.
Some time in April a Mr. Andrews, employed by the
Company, was seen by the Company officials to have a Union card in his
possession. On the following day he was discharged on the pretext of
being personally objectionable to the other employees. Other instances
of gross discrimination were carried on by the Company to discourage
organization. A charge was filed with the Regional Director of the
Atlanta Board against the Company and certain supporting evidence was
taken by a representative of the National labor Relations Board from the
employees who were affected, including Mr. Andrews.
At this time I wish to point out that it was on the
request of the representative of the Board that Mr. Cochran accompany
him in making the contacts with the employees who were to give evidence
of unfair labor practices in the operation.
On May 7 we were advised that Mr. Andrews went tot he
employer and requested his job back. On May 8 his wife swore out a peace
warrant against Mr. Cochran and on May 9 Mr. Andrews returned to his
employment at Georgia Plywood Company.
We are advised by Mr. Cochran that he never spoke to
or saw Mrs. Andrews and that he talked to Mr. Andrews on two occasions,
once when he took the Labor Board statement in company of the Labor
Board Representative and later the same day when he went to Mr. Andrew's
house to ask about his brother giving a statement. No threats were made
to Mr. Andrews or to any member of his family and no conversations were
had with Mrs. Andrews at all.
At this point I wish to point out that on the only
occasion that Mr. Cochran was in the City of Dublin after the action of
the Council was when he was requested to make contacts with the
Representative of the Board.
On May 17 Mr. Cochran was arrested and taken before
the Justice of Peace. The Justice of Peace, Hill G. Thomas, on that
occasion berated Mr. Cochran for coming to Dublin and causing people to
lose their employment. No hearing was held on oath and when Mr. Cochran
was brought before the Justice of peace it was ordered that he be
committed to Laurens County jail in default of $1,000 bond. Mr. Cochran
states that he did not waive hearing.
On the afternoon of May 18 I went to Dublin in
company of our Southern Director, Mr. J.L. Baughman, and our attorney
from Atlanta, Mr. Goldthwaite, to attempt to obtain Mr. Cochran's
release from jail.
We had obtained a National Surety bond in the amount
of $1,000 which we had been informed was the amount of bond necessary to
obtain the release, which we attempted to tender to the Justice of
Peace. He refused it on the pretext that some local property owner was
required as surety. We asked him the names of local men who made bonds
but he refused to give the names of same and referred us to the Sheriff.
Mrs. Cochran was present in Dublin and was very
distraught concerning Mr. Cochran's being in jail. The Laurens County
jail, as I viewed it in visiting Mr. Cochran is a filthy place crawling
with bed bugs. It was my impression of the bastile that if a man spent
two days within its confines he would be so filthy that a fly would
slide off him.
We visited with the Sheriff at the suggestion of the
Justice of Peace and required as to the names of local bondsmen which he
refused to name. A Deputy Sheriff mentioned the name of Mr. Joyner who
runs a filling station across from the jail and occasionally made bond.
we had decided it better, due to the filthy condition of the jail, if
local bond could be obtained rather than to rely upon the petition for
habeas corpus which would require some time to obtain the release
because of a bad heart condition which Mr. Cochran has.
We inquired of Mr. Joyner as to whether he would go
the bond and he stated he had to consult with the Sheriff before doing
so. It was quite apparent, when contacting Mr. Joyner and others who
normally made bond, that they were in fear of the law enforcement
agencies so we offered to put up the cash collateral and pay the usual
premium sufficient to indemnify the bond if one could be obtained.
Mr. Joyner still had not talked to the sheriff. When
the Sheriff arrived at home, Mr. Joyner crossed the street and talked to
him. He then advised us he could not go on the bond.
We were finally able to get a property owner to go on
the bond after depositing $1,000 cash collateral and the Justice of
peace was forced to sign the release after having charged us $10.75
costs even though a hearing had never been held on the case.
It is worthy of note that on the afternoon of the
same day that Mr. Cochran was released, Mr. Andrews and his wife
contacted Mrs. Cochran and told her how sorry they were that they had
been forced to do the things that caused Mr. Cochran to be jailed.
In relationship to the matter, I might say that Mr.
Andrews was returned to the job at a higher rate of pay, payment for the
necessary action by his wife to have Mr. Cochran jailed on the pretext
that she feared for her life by Mr. Cochran even though he had never met
the lady.
First, it is apparent that the warrant was secured by
collusion between the City Council, Georgia Plywood Company and Mrs.
Andrews. Second, the commitment of Mr. Cochran without a hearing and
without a formal waiver of a hearing constitutes illegal detention.
Third, the requirement of a local bondsman was unreasonable and
arbitrary and further constitutes illegal detention. It is further
apparent from the circumstances that there was collusion between the
Sheriff and the citizen's committee, possibly the Justice of Peace and
the local bondsman, to prevent Mr. Cochran's release.
We raise these questions with you for a specific
purpose. We are not only concerned with the protection of our people who
are in the field and who are legally working at their task of
organization but also because we feel that the Board has some
responsibility in these particular cases when they ask representatives
of our Union to help obtain evidence which is the responsibility of the
Board's Agent to be obtained by his personal investigation.
We do not object to giving such assistance to the
Board in carrying out their responsibilities but we feel the Board has a
responsibility when they [our organizers] assist in the investigation by
the Board to see that they [our organizers] are protected and not jailed
in the process.
We would appreciate your action in this matter even
though it may require the use of the Department of Justice in making the
necessary investigation so our people's rights, civil and otherwise, may
be protected in assisting in the functions of the Board.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
Claude Ballard
International Vice President |