|
Book by John Maxwell
How to Make Our Own News: A Primer for Environmentalist and Journalists
* * * * *
The World
Exhales
By John Maxwell
Like any smart bully, he caved when
faced by an opponent not afraid of him.
And although he had only days before
derided Nancy Pelosi as a freaky leftwinger from San
Francisco, on Wednesday he was perfectly polite and
prepared to address her as Madame Speaker, pledging to
work with her and acknowledging that she, like him, had
the best interests of the American people at heart.
The world breathed a huge sigh of
relief on Tuesday night when it became clear that the
American people were a lot smarter than their President
and his advisers. And I imagine that most people round
the world breathed another huge sigh of collective
satisfaction on Wednesday when the intelligence flashed
through the ether that the Generalissimo, Donald
Rumsfeld, Lord of Fallujah and Baron of Babylon, had
fallen on his sword. His ceremonial hara kiri
came just a week after Mr Bush had arrogantly dismissed
questioning journalists with the assurance that Mr
Rumsfeld would, like the Rock of Gibraltar, always be
there.
As they say – “ never say never”
again.
Mr Bush says he doesn’t read the
newspapers – which is probably good for his blood
pressure; because the comment from the United States and
the rest of the world is almost uniformly welcoming of
the catastrophic defeats suffered in Tuesday’s elections
by the Republican party.
Most of the world, accustomed to
substantial parliamentary majorities when one party
gets nearly 60% of the vote, must have wondered why it
was so difficult for the Democrats to take charge of the
parliament of the United States. They do not understand
that the US electoral system is largely a product of the
18th century, antedating the British Reform Act of 1834
by half a century, and designed to guarantee a stifling
stability to the affairs of the United States. Men who
had created a revolution to gain their own freedom
tried to ensure that their descendants were as hobbled
by 18th century mores as they had been by the British.
Although the first casualty of the American revolution
was a black soldier, Crispus Attucks, it took another
hundred years to abolish slavery and another century
after that, for all Americans to have the right to vote.
And although a great many Haitians,
including Henri Christophe, fought for American freedom,
Thomas Jefferson and his successors, including George
Bush, are still not reconciled to the idea of a free
black sovereign nation. Nor do they have any sense of
obligation to those from whom they extracted so much
tribute and treasure over so many centuries.
Which is why, for instance, the
electorates of so many American states approved
referenda on Tuesday outlawing Affirmative Action.
Affirmative Action had been intended to ameliorate the
oppressed condition of former slaves in the United
States.
The Republicans leadership,
representing much of what is most backward, ignorant and
atavistic in American society, were brought up short by
an electoral insurrection on Tuesday Even that,
however, could not overcome the racist slanders of the
Republican National Committee. The RNC posted a sly,
underhand TV commercial against Harold Ford in
Tennessee, intended to excite the most primitive fears
of Southern white men about the sexuality of black men.
This was not an isolated ‘error’.
Similarly slimy innuendoes were made against many
Democratic candidates of both sexes and all colours.
The most egregious was one that continued the Republican
tradition of accusing American war heroes of cowardice
while the real cowards presided over the slaughter of
hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and other lesser breeds
in the name of freedom and liberty.
In Palestine, at the height of the US
electoral campaign, Israel used the US Press’ total
preoccupation with trivia to carry out a genocidal
attack on the Palestinians, and their Parthian shot was
the killing of 19 people on Monday, eight of them
children and seven women.
On Wednesday Mr Bush pledged to
continue until ‘Victory’ in Iraq because the terrorists
never give up. Unfortunately he has never understood
that ‘terrorism” is the weapon of the desperate – of
those who believe that they cannot get justice except by
taking revenge on their oppressors or their surrogates,
innocent or otherwise
Sadly, the American Press have
never asked Mr Bush how he defines ‘Victory’ so that the
rest of us would know when it was achieved. Although he
said two weeks ago that he had abandoned the ‘stay the
course’ mantra and although he spoke of the need for
‘new perspectives’ in the ‘War on Terror’ it is apparent
that Mr Bush’s imagination allows of no new insights and
that he responds only to stimuli that he cannot ignore –
such as the rebellion on Tuesday.
Bush’s news conference on Wednesday
was in its own small way, an attempt to rewrite history.
No one listening to him would have gathered that the
people of the United States had, less than 24 hours
before, rejected the entire corpus of Presidential
deception, lies , dirty tricks and double speak, and
the culture of corruption built up round the Department
of Defense and his Vice President as well as among his
supporters in the Congress.
What may have given him pause,
however, was the news that his intellectual gurus, the
neo-fascists of the Project for the New American
Century, were beginning to publicly jump ship. These
bozos, including The Prince of Darkness, Richard Perle,
have had no scruple in biting the hand that fed them
In Vanity Fair
(http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/12/neocons200612)
the writer, David Rose, describes what happened: “As
Iraq slips further into chaos, the war's neoconservative
boosters have turned sharply on the Bush administration,
charging that their grand designs have been undermined
by White House incompetence. In a series of exclusive
interviews, Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman, David Frum,
and others play the blame game with shocking frankness.
Target No. 1: the president himself.”
David Rose recalls meeting with Perle
in London a few weeks before the start of the Iraq war
and being lectured by Perle on Iraq’s eminent
suitability for western style democracy after a quick
‘Victory’ was achieved..
Three years later – with the GOP
facing losses in the then imminent midterm elections –
Rose reports:
“As he looks into my eyes, speaking
slowly and with obvious deliberation, Perle is
unrecognizable as the confident hawk who, as chairman of
the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee,
had invited the exiled Iraqi dissident Ahmad Chalabi to
its first meeting after 9/11. "The levels of brutality
that we've seen are truly horrifying, and I have to say,
I underestimated the depravity," Perle says now, adding
that total defeat—an American withdrawal that leaves
Iraq as an anarchic "failed state"—is not yet inevitable
but is becoming more likely. "And then," says Perle,
"you'll get all the mayhem that the world is capable of
creating."
All the millions of hapless fools
like me who predicted exactly this state of affairs,
were then derided as ignoramuses, unsophisticated
trespassers into the sacred realms of Hoch Realpolitik.
Now, as the carnage and cataclysm
advance, inexorably, the Perles and the Adelmans have
turned and savaged their unsophisticated Neophyte NeoCon
– the President of the United States.
“ … this unfolding catastrophe has a
central cause: devastating dysfunction within the
administration of President George W. Bush. Perle says,
"The decisions did not get made that should have been.
They didn't get made in a timely fashion, and the
differences were argued out endlessly.… At the end of
the day, you have to hold the president responsible.… I
don't think he realized the extent of the opposition
within his own administration, and the disloyalty."
Pearle speaks of disloyalty with all the lofty authority
of a scorpion.
But an even nastier specimen is
Michael Ledeen, American Enterprise Institute freedom
scholar who slyly confides to Rose: "Ask yourself who
the most powerful people in the White House are. They
are women who are in love with the president: Laura
[Bush], Condi, Harriet Miers, and Karen Hughes."
Friends like Ledeen and Perle almost
make it possible to feel sorry for Bush.
Whether Bush reads the newspapers or
listens to the radio or television, he must be getting
some information from somewhere.
The Great “Decider” has, almost
overnight, found himself neutered, bereft of advisors he
can trust, surrounded by men vastly more clever and less
scrupulous than himself.
He has been playing a part scripted
for him although he clearly believes he is writing the
script, that he is the puppeteer and not the puppet.
Perhaps fortunately for him and for
us, his father and his father’s advisers have recently
intervened. His father’s Secretary of State and an
eminent committee of conservatives is even now trying to
draw up plans to bring some order to the chaos of the
Bush foreign policy and perhaps to domestic policy also.
The election debacle is perhaps the
best thing that could have happened to Mr Bush. The
Democrat control of Congress will mean that he has a
chance of leaving office with some credit, if his better
instincts allow him to work with them. The Democrats
have managed to overcome the elaborate system of traps
and snares which prevent the American body politic
having any real effect on the policies of their
government, except by occasional electoral revolts such
as the latest one.
The American system of re-districting
(redrawing constituency boundaries) is so corrupt that
only a small minority of seats in Congress are in any
sense competitive. Seats have been drawn to preserve
empires, electoral garrisons which rarely change hands.
In the state of New York, for instance, not one seat in
the State senate has changed parties for thirty years.
This principle, extended to the
national Congress, means that unless by some fluke there
is a ‘perfect storm’ of adverse circumstance as happened
this time, the Republicans will form a permanent
government in the United States
This entrenched ‘rotten borough’
system, abolished in Britain a century and a half ago,
allows powerful vested interests to totally dominate
American society and economy. The last piece of the plan
was Mr Bush’s systematic appointment of hardline
born-again Christian Judges to the Supreme Court,
ensuring a permanent Sanhedrin for the management of
‘democracy. rigged electronic voting machines should
have taken everybody by surprise this time, except that
everybody was on the alert, after previous unfortunate
experiences.
If the United States is to survive,
the new Congress not only must work overtime to restore
some measure of social justice to the United States and
to end the obscenely unfair tax system which subsidises
the rich and pauperises the poor. The neocons and their
allied ‘malefactors of great wealth’ can buy
autographed tins of ‘artist’s’ excrement for hundreds of
thousands of dollars and indulge in other
fantastically indecent forms of conspicuous
consumption, financed by oppression of entire nations by
war and the products of war. The whole purpose of
globalisation is to bring these blessings to the
formerly colonised of the earth, in a system which not
only pauperises the people but attacks the earth itself,
poisoning the air, deforming children, exterminating
wildlife of all kinds and substituting a regimented,
trademarked proprietary civlisation to which most of us
are slaves..
In this kind of world there will
always be the need for a war on terror, because the
oppressed are never oppressed willingly, and desperation
and hopelessness have no conscience. The natives are
always restless and some population is always in need
of pacification.
Copyright© 2006 John Maxwell
jankunnu@yahoo.com * *
* * *
posted 11 November 2006 |